Camp Allen Speakers/Panels List Here

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Big Media | Friday June 30, 2006 @ 12:02pm

I've finally got my hands on the preliminary speakers schedule for Camp Allen, the nickname given Allen & Co.'s annual summer investment conference for the macho mogul set in bucolic Sun Valley, Idaho. The dates for this sleepaway for plutocrats are July 11th-16th. Highlight (or is it lowlight?): the idea of Barry Diller, Rupert Murdoch and Sir Howard Stringer interviewed by Michael Eisner. Oh, to be a fly on the wall for that. But I'm sure everyone will be uber-polite. My prediction is that no one but Eisner will get a word in edgewise. Interesting that it's Eisner, too, since he's tried to avoid attending the conference ever since he had his heart episode there. Read my secrets of Camp Allen column which ran 6/29/99 in New York magazine for a fuller understanding of this confab occurring since 1982. The Allen & Co. invitation used to be what separated the adolescents from the boys in Hollywood, a stamp of approval from Wall Street, confirmation that making feature films and sitcoms was an enviable enterprise. For so many years Camp Allen was a secretive gathering of the privileged white men who sat atop America's entertainment conglomerates and their families, a wilderness confab replete with river-rafting, picnic-table power-lunching, and (the whole purpose of the exercise) hush-hush deal-making. Its apex came back in 1994 as a full-page Vanity Fair spread complete with pedigree-enhancing headline -- "THE NEW ESTABLISHMENT" --to describe these Leaders of the Information Age. But then NYC investment banker Herbert Allen Jr.'s retreat changed subtlely in both style (there used be dildos jokingly given out as awards) and substance (its glitzy showbiz element downsized in favor of high-tech and Internet) in 1999. As a result, it's been far less interesting ever since. Still, 50 corporate jets line the tarmac at nearby Friedman Memorial Airport year after year (see actual photo below from there during conference week 2005):

Wednesday, July 12th -- 7:30 AM: THE TEN COMMANDMENTS FOR BUSINESS FAILURE BY DON KEOUGH (ex-chairman Coca-Cola, current chairman Allen & Co); 8:45 AM: eBAY INC.

Thursday, July 13th -- 7:30 AM: AMGEN INC.; 8:45 AM: PANEL DISCUSSION/CAN WE END OUR OIL ADDICTION?; 10:25 AM: PANEL DISCUSSION/SEEKING TO UNDERSTAND LATIN AMERICA 

Friday, July 14th -- 7:30 AM: THE IED CHALLENGE AND HOW WE ARE COUNTERING IT BY GENERAL (RET) MONTGOMERY C. MEIGS; 8:45 AM: BARRY DILLER, RUPERT MURDOCH AND SIR HOWARD STRINGER INTERVIEWED BY MICHAEL ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

UPDATED: Thank You For Your Support

By Nikki Finke | Category: Media, TV | Friday June 30, 2006 @ 10:05am

UPDATE: It's True: Gawker's Jesse Oxfeld Canned

I just want to thank you for all your support re MarketWatch/Gawker. The many emails and phone calls I've received, mostly from women journalists but also from (enlightened) men, have been so gratifying. The great news is that this clearly started a dialogue about how sexism is still widespread in the profession of journalism. (And here I thought we'd moved on from the time when AP's VP in charge of personnel worried that I wasn't "tough enough" to become a Moscow correspondent -- until foreign editor Nate Polowetzky told him, "She'd run over her own mother for a story.") My main point was that there simply was no excuse for two separate standards (and by that I mean, two separate sets of questions, two separate sets of descriptions, etc.) to be applied in a profile of a female business journalist versus a male business journalist. The response I received from the author afterwards -- "Oh, I wanted this to be a fun story!" -- was also inappropriate, especially since this had been pitched to me as a serious look at my writing and reporting. You also agreed with me when I objected to shoddy journalism. You abhored that off-the-record quotes were placed on-the-record (that cemetery stuff), or that the author's statements were written as mine (about being first on Ovitz, Eisner or Diller). You saw how the author omitted any mention of my journalism background or my recent award (which was supposed to be the peg for the story) yet focused on my debutante past and even judged my marriage. You understood me when I complained that the Frances Farmer quote was taken out of context. (My historical point, which I expressed to the author but he failed to include, was that Farmer fought Hollywood -- and lost.) You disliked the author's publishing deeply personal comments about me from a blogger who is a complete stranger to me. And you said "hurrah" when I contacted that blogger and asked for -- and received -- a retraction/apology. I'm reprinting four emails here which are representative of those I received (I've edited out their IDs):

  • "Hi Nikki, you don't know me, but I write about [XXX] for the Chicago Tribune (aka the Titanic). I think you were right to be upset about that Jon Friedman piece. He almost went

... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

No Media Experience For Disney's Incoming Chairman? Wrong!

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Big Media, Eisner | Thursday June 29, 2006 @ 7:22pm

Wow, so much misinformation and omission in recent newspaper articles, including The New York Times, Los Angeles Times and Wall Street Journal, about Walt Disney Co.'s incoming chairman John Pepper Jr, the ex-CEO of Procter and Gamble. Granted, he looks like he just got cast by ABC Family for an Americanized remake of Mr. Chips, fretting over whether his brood of preppies will horribly haze the new kid. (On second thought, maybe he's planning to do just that to still new Disney prez Bob Iger.) But The New York Times quoted experts claiming he lacks media experience and doesn't bring much to Disney's party. Huh? As if hiring former Senator George Mitchell was a stroke of genius by FrankenEisner and his board of flunkies. Look how well George didn't turn out. If you ask me, this new guy has Mitchell beat by a mile. Obviously, none of the following was in any of the official press releases: 1) The most obvious, first: as one of the largest consumer product advertisers on the planet, his ex-company's brands like Bounty, Crest and Pampers live or die on the basis of the success of its TV commercials and other media outlets. 2) P&G has long owned and operated TV soap operas; in fact P&G literally helped put the soap in soap operas. P&G produced and sponsored the first radio soap operas in the 1930s and became dominant when the soaps switched onto TV. P&G's past soaps have included Another WorldThe Edge of NightSearch for TomorrowSomerset and Texas. Two veteran soaps are still distributed by Proctor and Gamble, As the World Turns and Guiding Light. P&G also produced and sponsored a prime-time show, Shirley, starring Shirley Jones, produced TBS' first original comedy series, Down to Earth (successful enough to air 110 episodes), and distributed the syndicated comedy series Throb. And, most interestingly, Procter & Gamble Productions co-produced the global hit Dawson's Creek with Columbia Pictures Television that made Katie Holmes into a big enough celebrity to qualify her to become Tom Cruise's paramour and bearer of his child. 3) Pepper's extensive consumer products experience will help Disney's extensive line of consumer products. 4) P&G's anti-counterfeiting campaigns more or less mirror those set in motion by Disney against piracy and knockoffs. 5) P&G wrestles with a product boycott because of the company's animal testing claims, not unlike Disney's battle against a product boycott because of sweatshop claims. And, finally, 6) P&G is an expert at controlling bad press. (The company had to ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

Superman Doesn't Return At Box Office: $19 Mil Opening Disappoints Biz Experts

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Movies | Thursday June 29, 2006 @ 8:43am

I'm told Warner Bros.' Superman Returns opened Wednesday with $19 million at the U.S. box office. That's only OK -- not great, not terrible, prompting box office guru analysis that the gay whisper campaign which crescendoed into newspapers and on the Internet hurt the movie's viability as did its star Brandon Routh's anonymity. (Box Office Mojo put the opening take at $21 mil, but rival studios told me that's too high.) Predictions are that Superman Returns could muster $100 million for July 4th weekend (which in many American households will continue from Friday through Tuesday). But even that barely puts the film in the 10 top opening Wednesdays. The problem stems not only from the movie's close to 2-hour 40-minute running time, its $200 mil-$250 mil budget, its mis-marketing campaign, or its emphasis on earnestness rather than simple ol'fashioned fun, but that the movie will get swamped its second weekend out by Disney's Pirates of the Caribbean 2, which continues tracking as the biggest movie opening ever. Major film critics have been split almost down the middle reviewing this film, although Bryan Singer's direction is generally lauded. Meanwhile, Warner Bros. has been desperately re-tooling its marketing campaign for the movie in light of the studio’s failure to stem the gay buzz surrounding Superman Returns. As late as this week, new TV ads transformed Routh from doe-eyed softie to macho techno-man of steel, borrowing heavily from other comic books successes like Spiderman and X-Men in its look and feel, with special effects set to pounding rap music (cue Terminator-like eyeball suck-out) and no thumpa-thumpa Gloria Gaynor within earshot. For more Hollywood summer movie madness, read my latest LA Weekly column, Super-Manly Makeovers, Slackers and Perkbusters. Meanwhile, the FBI on Wednesday broke up two movie piracy rings that were conspiring to profit from Superman Returns and other films. The mobs specialized in sneaking digital camcorders into theaters and filming newly released movies, then duplicating and distributing millions of bootlegs worldwide. The rings were based in New York City, but sent the counterfeit films using computer file-sharing networks to Pakistan, Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, and other countries. The Motion Picture Association of America says black market schemes like this robbed the film industry of an estimated $18 billion in global revenue in 2005.

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

David Geffen/LA Times Update

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, LA Times | Thursday June 29, 2006 @ 1:35am

dreamworks-skg.jpgIt was as recently as April that David Geffen attended a reception for the dean of Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism, Nick Lemann, at the Los Angeles home of Sony Pictures Entertainment chairman and CEO Michael Lynton. I'm told Geffen uninhibitedly demonstrated in front of several guests that his interest in buying the Los Angeles Times was still very much alive and well. Right now, David doesn't want to talk publicly about what he might, or might not, do, understandably. So it's been a while since there's been any substantive word connecting Geffen to a sale of the paper. Until yesterday. His name first surfaced in a September 2005 LAT story reporting the surprising news that Geffen met with parent company Tribune Chief Executive Dennis J. FitzSimons that summer to say he was interested in buying the media outlet. FitzSimons reportedly told the Dreamworks partner it was not for sale. For months, speculation ensued (mostly in the LAT's pages). Then, yesterday's Wall Street Journal wrote that the Chandler family, which owns its Tribune shares through trusts and is at loggerheads with FitzSimons and will become the company's largest shareholder in the wake of Tribune's not-very-popular $2 billion stock buyback scheme, is preparing to meet with Geffen and other potential buyers like Ron Burkle and Eli Broad, as well as private-equity and other investors. It's all an attempt by the family that once ruled the Spring Street roost to create some drama and force a breakup or sale of all or part of Tribune Co. 

Let me relate this: One time when I went to talk to Geffen in his Dreamworks office, he was sitting behind his desk and focused on the television. Specifically, he was concentrating on a CNN report about developments in the Middle East. While I took a seat and waited for him to acknowledge me, we sat there in silence listening to the CNN reporter and then anchor for about seven-to-ten minutes. After that, I could tell that he reluctantly pulled himself away from the foreign briefing to deal with the more trivial matter of Hollywood. In this day and age when foreign news holes are becoming smaller and foreign reporting budgets leaner at media outlets across this country, a wannabe owner who cares so deeply about international events bodes well for the LAT. Slate's Jack Shafer recently coined a term, the "New Vanity Press Moguls," claiming ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

Accidental Gun Discharge At CAA

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, DH update | Wednesday June 28, 2006 @ 5:30pm

So today a rumor swept Hollywood about recent gunplay in a crowded lobby of a top talent agency. Here's the reality: I've been told about an accidental gun discharge incident at Creative Artists Agency in Beverly Hills on January 28th at 1:50 p.m. You first need to know that no one was hurt: it was a Saturday and the lobby was empty, and only three people were in the entire building, not including the security guards. And the security guard was employed by Gavin de Becker & Associates, which protects CAA and William Morris and about 1,400 other companies and is widely regarded as one of the leading firms in the field of public figure protection and threat assessment. De Becker (pictured left) told me tonight: “Even though accidental discharges are frequent occurrences in law enforcement, the military, and the private sector, we are grateful to have the lowest rate of accidental discharges I know of: two incidents in 31 years. The former employee involved in this accidental discharge was trained by the U.S. Marines, passed the state training requirements, and completed our academy – and we are grateful that the incident never posed any danger to anyone.”

I've learned what happened: the guard was working the 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. shift and at his security post when he followed standard procedure and checked the "417" which is security codespeak for taking the firearm out of its locked lockbox and examining it. He looked inside the chamber and noticed there was a round of ammo. And then in attempting to clear the chamber, he reported the gun went off accidentally. The shot left a small round chip in the building's lobby floor. Sources told me the guard appeared before a board of review with de Becker's firm and was subsequently terminated. As for the incident itself, it was reported immediately to the guard's de Becker supervisor, who reported it to a de Becker partner. That next workday, January 30th, the president and co-partner of the de Becker company, Michael LaFever, personally went to CAA to inform the agency about what had happened. That same day, De Becker personally emailed a notice about the accidental discharge to the director of the California Bureau of Security and Investigative Services including the guard's own report. I have confirmed that no report was made to the Beverly Hills police ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

I Respond To MarketWatch/Gawker

By Nikki Finke | Category: Media, TV | Wednesday June 28, 2006 @ 12:05pm

UPDATE: It's True: Gawker's Jesse Oxfeld Canned 

I find it shameful that Dow Jones/Marketwatch media critic Jon Friedman has chosen to write such a misogynist piece published today (I refuse to link to it) that trivializes me and what I do. It begins with a bit-o-praise under the headline, "In-your-face Finke keeps Hollywood honest. Nobody writes tougher stuff than this LA Weekly scribe...), then proceeds to dissemble. No mention of my extensive journalism background. No mention of my recent award (which he told me was supposed to be the peg for the profile). He wouldn't have dared write an article like this about a male business journalist working for a mainstream newspaper. Several comments attributed to me were uttered by Friedman, while others were post-interview phone chatter put on the record by him contrary to our agreement. In several places, my quotes were taken out of context, and in one place his characterization of my work is not supported by the facts. He also allows someone who isn't a journalistic colleague, who has never met me and who has never spoken to me, to disparage me even though there's no basis whatsoever for such a personal judgment call. I accepted Friedman's stated purpose that he intended to write about myself and my work, and I was prepared to take any and all legitimate hits. Instead, he presented me as a carnival sideshow act. Everyone knows how hard it is to craft a serious career and reputation, and how easily it can be undone by an article like this. 
UPDATE: My own editor has emailed me "friendly advice" that I'm "tone deaf" not to realize this is an "almost overwhelmingly positive piece" and that "your journalism is given the highest praise and your quirks, what minor ones are discussed, are endearing in the piece. You look human...." To which I say, gee, my hearing was working fine. When Friedman interviewed business journalists Allan Sloan (Newsweek) and Joseph Nocera (The New York Times) recently, he never asked them "Which business tycoon do you have a crush on?" The result was a column that focused on their views about business journalism. Friedman and I talked 99% about that same subject, yet almost none of that is in there. Instead, Friedman asked me over and over and over again, ad nauseum, "Which movie star do you have a crush on?" -- then focused on that kind of nonsense.
2ND UPDATE: Re Jesse Oxfeld's posting of our email exchange, I completely ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

UPDATED: Whopping $2,995 for Nielsen's New "Modern Movie Experience" Study; Co-Author Explains Why It's Worth It

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Courts | Monday June 26, 2006 @ 11:31am

If you've got $2,995 burning a hole in your wallet, then that's the cost of Nielsen Analytics' and The Movie Advisory Board's new 100-page "Modern Movie Experience" study -- billed as "a report on moviegoer behavior today, possibilities for tomorrow, and the impact of digital technologies on the movie value chain." Quite a mouthful, that. Here's more: "Declines in movie theater attendance, coupled with an explosion in digital entertainment alternatives, has put the movie industry under particularly intense scrutiny. Moviegoing, once seen as a staple of shared mass audience entertainment, is rapidly changing. This report follows the evolving viewpoint of the uber-media consumer, one which movie studios, theater owners, television networks, agencies and advertisers need to understand in order to keep up. 'The Modern Movie Experience' analyzes consumers' movie theater attendance and consumption habits, and sheds new light on why U.S. theater attendance has declined." It's based on an analysis of over 2,600 Movie Advisdory Board members. Also explored are consumers' usage and preferences of movie technologies such as DVD, VOD, the Internet, and subscription services (i.e. NetFlix or Blockbuster). Feel free to email me a copy once you've bought it. But if you also can't afford it, I'm now going to save you some $$$. I haven't read it, but how much do you wanna bet it says: Hey, if a movie is good, consumers will go see it. Otherwise, they choose to save gas and money and stay home and watch video-on-demand, cable or satellite, or a DVD. Or maybe they'll just play a video game or listen to Ipods because most new movies suck big-time.

UPDATED: The report's co-author Adrienne Becker explains: "Actually, the new Nielsen analysis does not paint as simple a portrait as you guessed. Certainly if a movie sucks, moviegoers are not going to pay for it in any which way; no great insight there worth the price tag. What the report attempts to explain however, are some of the forces of transformative change now taking place, providing evidence to explain the change as well as the accompanying challenges and opportunities. Let me give you an example.  We're in a day and age of what I call "participatory media," that is the consumer plays a greater role than just end-game consumption...in fact, the consumer can - increasingly - play a role in writing, green-lighting, funding, developing, marketing and distributing content, and in this case, long form ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

Deadline Hollywood Daily Named Among "Top 100 Coolest Film Sites On The Net"

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Books, DH update | Sunday June 25, 2006 @ 9:10pm

The film industry magazine Fade In named Deadline Hollywood Daily as one of its Top 100 Coolest Film Sites On The Net in its latest issue with this description: "Nikki Finke’s well-reported daily blog on the business of show." Thanks!

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

Da Vinci Code Hits $700 Mil Worldwide

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Movies | Sunday June 25, 2006 @ 9:37am

I'm told Sony's Da Vinci Code passed $700 million worldwide gross today. Adding $4 mil domestically and $9 mil internationally this weekend put the total take at $701.3 million. The movie is now the 22nd best earner globally (and 12th best internationally). The breakdown of the total haul is $205.5 for U.S. and $495.8 mil overseas (which was down only 37% despite the huge World Cup weekend). Initially, Sony hoped the movie would take in $500 mil worldwide by summer's end. And here it is not even July.

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

America Loves Adam! Click Opens No. 1; 5th Sandler $40 Mil+ Opening Weekend; Da Vinci Code Hits $700 Mil Worldwide; Indian Mob Ransacks Da Vinci Multiplex

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Movies | Saturday June 24, 2006 @ 1:00am

UPDATED: *Adam Sandler is looking like American moviegoers' favorite comedian as his latest Click scored his fifth $40 million+ opening weekend today to become the nation's No. 1 film. The Sony comedy about a man whose TV remote turns into a life remote debuted with $40 mil at the box office. Right now in Hollywood there are very few actors working today that can generate that kind of audience drawing power. The studio's exit polling showed Sandler's audience was 51% female and 49% male, while 50% were under age 25. Sony and Sandler, which have been a profitable box office pairing for some time now (Big Daddy, 50 First Dates, Mr. Deeds, Anger Management), had their best ever opening in Austrailia so Click may be their broadest film with international moviegoers. (Usually, U.S.-made comedies don't translate to big box office overseas.) Click is Sony's seventh #1 film of 2006, unlike 2005 when much of the studio's fare bombed with moviegoers.

There's more good news for Sony: Da Vinci Code Hits $700 Mil Worldwide today. I’m told Sony’s Da Vinci Code passed $700 million worldwide gross today. Adding $4 mil domestically and $9 mil internationally this weekend put the total take at $701.3 million. The movie is now the 22nd best earner globally (and 12th best internationally). The breakdown of the total haul is $205.5 for U.S. and $495.8 mil overseas (which was down only 37% despite the huge World Cup weekend). Initially, Sony hoped the movie would take in $500 mil worldwide by summer’s end. And here it is way past that and not even July. Meanwhile, on Saturday, an Indian mob ransacked a multiplex playing the Da Vinci Code after a state ban on screening the film was lifted. (see below)

In other movie news this weekend, Disney/Pixar's Cars finished its third weekend out with $23 mil, and a total $156 mil gross. Paramount's Jack Black comedy Nacho Libre was third with $12 mil (total $52.4 mil), and Universal's The Fast and The Furious 3 was fourth with $9.5 mil (total $42.7 mil). But continuing as the biggest box office surprise was Focus/Rogue Pictures's Waist Deep, the other movie opening this weekend: playing in only 1,004 theaters, the urban drama pulled in $9.5 mil to tie for 4th place.*

I'm told Adam Sandler's low-concept comedy Click about a man and his TV remote, ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

The Day I Sucker-Punched Aaron Spelling

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, LA Times | Friday June 23, 2006 @ 9:59pm

aaron.JPG

It's the end of Aaron Spelling, and the end of a TV era. To understand his once-upon-a-time utter dominance in the medium, you have to put together both Jerry Bruckheimer's and Dick Wolf's TV empires on one network, and then you'll understand. So I'm sharing with you this sit-down interview I did with him in 1989 way back when I was a Calendar writer for the Los Angeles Times covering the TV biz. Let me set the scene: he had this gargantuan office on what was then the Warner's Hollywood lot, and on his payroll a black guy in a white uniform (a porter? a waiter? heck, there's no PC term for that) serving us drinks. I let Aaron do his tapdance routine for me for about half an hour. Then I asked him, "Gee, if things are going so great for you, then why is this the first time in a generation of TV viewers you won't have any shows on ABC?" He looked like I had sucker-punched him. But then he got really, really angry. Not at me, but at the TV industry and network suits. It turned into a very revealing interview, one of those rare times in Hollywood when candor actually occurs between a mogul and a journalist. (But Aaron hated this article and regretted being so truthful. He gave his PR guy Warren Cowan many Maalox moments because of it.) After this humiliating TV dry spell, Spelling recouped and reinvented himself and his production company with Beverly Hills 90210, Melrose PlaceCharmed, and so many other crappy shows that nevertheless we all craved. (Exception: Seventh Heaven, a cut above content-wise.) We won't see his ilk again, and TV is both worse and better off for it:

CAN SPELLING CAST HIS SPELL AGAIN?VETERAN PRODUCER IS SEARCHING FOR THE MAGIC TOUCH IN A NEW ERATwo years ago, Aaron Spelling had an idea for a dramatic and, he thought, different television series about a divorced family as told through the eyes of a little boy. Besides voiceovers (later used by The Wonder Years), its main innovation was its format -- two back-to-back half-hour shows, one about the boy's weekdays with his mother, the other about his weekends with his father. "I got to tell you," ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share
More Deadline | Hollywood »