'Open Season' on Ashton Kutcher/Kevin Costner for No. 1; Their 'Guardian' #2

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Box Office, Directors | Saturday September 30, 2006 @ 8:16am

SUNDAY UPDATE: Sony's animated kiddie fare Open Season kicked butt this weekend for No. 1. It was an embarrassing loss for Ashton Kutcher and Kevin Costner despite Disney's heavy promotion of their Coast Guard action/adventure The Guardian. (So what did we learn? That Costner's career is definitely toast, while Kutcher's appeal is limited.) Opening in 3,833 theaters, Sony's "when the hunted become the hunters", starring a domesticated grizzly bear and a scrawny mule deer, earned $23 million this weekend thanks to an expected rug rats' Saturday bump. It was Sony's 11th No. 1 opening this year, and Sony's 10th film of the year to open to more than $20M -- a gargantuan feat of marketing muscle. By contrast, The Guardian, in 3,241 theaters, made only $17.8 million its debut weekend. The two movies sucked the life out of the rest of this weekend's box office. The third-place movie, Jackass 2, took in $14 mil for a $51.4 cume. Meanwhile, the AP reported that a small-town Illinois theater owner shut down for two weeks rather than show Jackass 2 or other new releases that he calls "drivel." The Lorraine Theatre in downtown Hoopeston reopened Friday showing Disney's football biopic Invincible. The owner said he'll shut down again if faced with a similar batch of films, even though contractual issues with the studios -- such as guarantees on first-week receipts -- sometimes limit his options. "I just didn't think I should use my high-quality facilities to show people vomiting on screen," he noted. No. 4 was The Weinstein Co/MGM's School for Scoundrels, which opened in 3,004 theaters for an anemic $8.5 mil weekend. (Remember when star Billy Bob Thornton used to appear in important pics instead of teen drivel?) Finally, in fifth place, holdover Jet Li's Fearless from Rogue/Focus Pictures added $4.8 mil for a $17.9 mil cume.

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

Finke/LA Weekly: Baquet's Billionaire Boys Club; Geffen 'Confident' LAT Buy

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Big Media | Wednesday September 27, 2006 @ 5:16pm

My latest lalogo.gif column, Baquet's Billionaire Boys' Club, examines whether the Los Angeles Times editor, "Dean of Arc", is playing a dangerous game with the newspaper's integrity. Here's how it begins:

"Not long after Dean Baquet became editor of the Los Angeles Times, influential entertainment mogul Jeffrey Katzenberg sought a meet-and-greet. It was during this lunch that Katzenberg purposefully let slip big news: His DreamWorks partner David Geffen really wanted to buy the newspaper. Baquet was shocked. “How’s he going to feel the first time we review a movie or music produced by a friend of his?” Baquet asked. Katzenberg just laughed. That was a year ago, and, since then, Geffen’s pursuit of the Tribune Co.’s troubled outpost not only hasn’t flagged, it has fired up, and not just because the paper’s 20 percent profit margin is so much better than the 6 percent earned on bonds. I’m told he’s “very serious” and “pretty confident” about purchasing it someday soon. “He believes that he’s going to be the owner,” an insider explains. That, even though there’s a growing list of fat-cat Angelenos lining up, including Eli Broad and Ron Burkle. But anyone familiar with Hollywood knows how relentless Geffen can be: What David wants, David gets. Says another source: “He has never stopped doing anything until he’s done.” ... Baquet, meanwhile, has never met Geffen. “But if David Geffen called me up tomorrow and said, ‘I want to have lunch,’ I’d probably have lunch with him,” Baquet was overheard saying. “After all, I’m the editor of the L.A. Times.” That’s exactly why this is all such an ethical dilemma, too.

...The Times’ most pressing problem isn’t whether Geffen or someone else buys it, or Tribune sells it, or Baquet gets fired. Instead, the widespread media coverage has ignored the dangerous game being played with the paper’s integrity between this billionaire boys’ club and Baquet or his surrogates behind closed doors. I’ve even looked into accusations that the Times buried an investigation into one of the potential buyers. It’s all so unseemly: There, in August, was the Times’ own West magazine’s Power Issue giving high placement to every past and present ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

Problem With 'Studio 60' Is Scheduling: Would Beckman Have Let This Happen?

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Documentaries | Tuesday September 26, 2006 @ 11:55am

Don't get me wrong: I like this show. But the primary problem with NBC's expensive but struggling Studio 60 On The Sunset Strip isn't the Aaron Sorkin (right) inside-the-bubble flourishes, or the smarty-pants staccato scripts, or the high-priced/high-profile cast. It's the truly awful scheduling. Granted, ABC last spring threw that monkey wrench into NBC's plans to air Studio 60 on Thursday nights when Grey's Anatomy was moved there (instead of Monday nights). But Monday nights are a lousy time slot for Studio 60 when Sunday night at 10 pm would have been so right. After all, Grey's Anatomy premiered on March 27, 2005, in the same Sunday slot, and that was a winning strategy. So I don't understand why NBC didn't wait to debut Studio 60 in mid-season after football ended. As it stands now, ESPN's Monday Night Football is eating into its audience. And it can't move to Sunday until it can replace NBC Sunday Night Football. Of course, others might argue that Studio 60's woes go deeper than scheduling, since during premiere week too many Deal Or No Deal viewers turned off the new series within 30 minutes. But it's obvious that Deal and Studio 60 attract very different demos and a game show was the wrong lead-in. Its first week out, Studio 60 wasn't even in the Nielsen Top 20, and its second episode following lead-in Heroes attracted even fewer eyeballs. Now NBC is in a quandary: If Studio 60 gets moved to Sunday nights or even stays Monday nights and continues airing shows in order, then newcomers will feel lost. And if the network repeats those earlier shows, then existing fans will get bored. It's a dilemma I can't help but think 'King O' The Grids' scheduling guru Preston Beckman would never have let NBC confront. 

I've written before in LA Weekly about Beckman. There's no more controversial executive occupying a corporate network job than this guy who brought his "kill and win" style of guerrilla scheduling from NBC to Fox Broadcasting in June 2000 as executive vice president for strategic program planning and research. His so-called genius (only in the lunacy of network television does doing so little often mean so much) was to construct a midseason schedule that spread American Idol and Joe Millionaire over Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday to put some heat behind the network's scripted shows. Idol ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

NY/LA Times Re-Commit to Oscar Puffery

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Big Media, Fashions | Tuesday September 26, 2006 @ 9:25am

David Carr has confirmed to me he's reprising his Red Carpet role as "The Carpetbagger" for The New York Times this Oscar season beginning in early November. The blog will appear after the NYT's annual holiday movie issue is published. Intended to supplement the paper's news coverage of the Academy Awards, Carr, a Times culture reporter and media columnist, penned a very personal, rather informal and somewhat uninformed blog but, at the end, predicted correctly that Crash would win Best Picture. (So did I -- way back last January -- but who's keeping score, right?) Meanwhile, Tom O'Neil tells me the Los Angeles Times keeps expanding "The Envelope", its embarrassingly fanboy 24/7 awards website feature that includes lots of Oscar-related blogs and news. There will be weekly Envelope inserts into the LAT about the Oscar derby starting in early November. Plus, ads for The Envelope are running in many Los Angeles theaters right before films screen. (Some may go beyond LA, too.) I also hear The Envelope may keep a running scorecard based on various Oscar gurus' opinions. All I can say is, ENOUGH! It's a shame this stuff has to start so early -- see today's LAT article It's That Time Already? -- because by the time the actual awards broadcast rolls around, everyone is sick to death of all things Oscar. But both newspapers have found this Oscar puffery to be a potentially lucrative way to drum up more web traffic and advertising -- even though it's often at the expense of good journalism. I find it demeans both papers. And then there's that cottage industry among blogs that make Oscar predictions ad nauseum beginning in July in order to get an early jump on revenue from the movie studios. Stop the insanity, especially when the vast majority of Academy members don't even start viewing DVDs until Christmas. (Mea culpa, I myself raised the Oscar issue over the weekend in a news roundup of Mel Gibson's Apocalypto, but as usual I was pissing on Oscar voters, not praising them. The bulk of my Oscar coverage starts in January.)

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

Pellicano: Feds Lose Wiggan Perjury Case

By Nikki Finke | Category: Courts, Indie, Law | Monday September 25, 2006 @ 2:02pm

This afternoon, the jury in the Joann Wiggan perjury trial returned verdicts acquitting the former SBC phone employee of four of the five counts. The jury split 6-6 on the third count, and U.S. District Judge Dale S. Fischer declared a mistrial on that count. Assistant U.S. Attorney Daniel A. Saunders issued this statement through a spokesman: "We are disappointed by the verdict, but of course we accept the jury's decision. We will consider the evidence related to the unresolved count and will decide in the next few days whether to proceed with the case." The feds emphasized that the loss of this case has no bearing on the upcoming racketeering and wiretapping trial February 13th against celebrity P.I. thug Anthony Pellicano and others. "The charges against Ms. Wiggan are completely different from those contained in the separate indictment against Anthony Pellicano," Saunders said. "Today's verdict does not impact the prosecution or the ongoing investigation of Mr. Pellicano and his associates."

The verdict comes after Wiggan testified that she did not intentionally lie to a federal grand jury about having contact with a phone company colleague who's now under indictment for allegedly providing confidential information to Pellicano. The prosecution related to a five-count indictment of Wiggan last February stemming from her grand jury testimony about her contact with SBC field technician Rayford Turner, who's charged with helping Pellicano place wiretaps. 

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

Will Oscar Voters Judge Mel's Film Fairly? Gibson Sneaks 'Apocalypto' For Native Americans; Both Time/Newsweek Cover?

By Nikki Finke | Category: Actors, Agents, Directors | Sunday September 24, 2006 @ 11:50am

I've learned that both Time and Newsweek want to put Mel Gibson's Apocalpto on their covers timed to its Dec. 8th opening. This happened with Gibson's The Passion of the Christ: Newsweek made it the cover before the film's release, and Time after the movie was in theaters. It's quite a coup for any Hollywood pic to make the covers of both newsmagazines. "There are a lot of media offers on the table competing for this movie," an insider told me. This may happen without any actual interview of Gibson, too. Any interview would be problematic for Mel's publicity push since it would necessarily dwell on Gibson's alcoholism relapse and drunken rantings against Jews. Because of that, it's still up in the air if there'll be a big network (or even cable) TV one-on-one. But the real issue, now that the Disney movie is starting to garner raves from its sneak screenings, is whether Oscar voters can, or will, judge Mel's film fairly. Members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences are known to hold grudges for a myriad reasons, and Gibson's anti-Semitic remarks over the summer provide ample fuel. Then again, the voters are supposed to judge the merits of the film and not the man behind it. The question is: can that be possible? I certainly don't have an answer yet since it's too early in the process -- most voters won't even start seeing the film until December -- but I can look to the past. After all, they ignored Gibson's Passion for the big noms (Best Actor, Best Director, Best Picture) because of the anti-Semitic overtones some saw in its portrayal of the events surrounding the death of Jesus. And, last year, I reported that hetero Oscar voters were unwilling to screen Brokeback Mountain because of their own anti-gay prejudices. But Mel's film is becoming known as the 'Mexican Braveheart' -- and everyone knows Braveheart won a ton of Oscars. What is interesting, also, is how Gibson seems to be positioning Apocalypto: the Hollywood Reporter, which had a stringer in Austin, noted that at one weekend screening Gibson drew a parallel between the Mayan civilization on the brink of collapse and America. "What's human sacrifice," he asked, "if not sending guys off to Iraq for no reason?" (Gibson has been increasingly critical of the Bush administration ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

'Jackass 2' Knocks Out Box Office For #1; Jet Li's 'Fearless' #2; 'King's Men' Bombs

By Nikki Finke | Category: Actors, Agents, Box Office | Saturday September 23, 2006 @ 8:19am

Again, moviegoers sought mindless entertainment as Johnny Knoxville's stupid stunt pic Jackass Number Two delivered a knockout punch at the box office for No. 1. The flick took in a bruising $11.9 million Friday and $10 million Saturday at 3,059 theaters Friday for what was a huge $29.2 million opening weekend. Hit-starved Paramount brass will be thrilled, although the idea for turning the MTV series into a movie pre-dates current management of the studio. Jet Li's martial arts Fearless limped into No. 2 by comparison for Rogue/Focus Pictures, opening in 1,806 theaters Friday with only $3.6 mil Friday and $4.2 mil Saturday for what was a $10.8 mil weekend. Sony's Gridiron Gang, starring The Rock, came in #3 its second weekend out, earning $2.9 mil Friday and $4.3 mil Saturday for what was an additional $9.7 mil to its cume of $27.2 mil to date. Electric Entertainment/MGM's Flyboys seemed an exact replica of the old pic Memphis Belle -- and it failed to fly with moviegoers now as in 1990; the No. 4 James Franco starrer was grounded with a $1.8 mil opening Friday and $2.4 mil Saturday for what was only a $5.5 mil weekend. Another holdover, Universal's The Black Dahlia, finished in 5th place with only $1.3 mil Friday and $1.9 mil Saturday, so it will probably add only another $4.5 mil to its cume of $17.3 mil to date. Among other movies opening this weekend, Sony's remake of All the King's Men starring Sean Penn (who's becoming known as box office poison) and Anthony Hopkins, was a flop. It finished #6 by eking out only $1.2 million Friday and $1.5 mil in 1,514 theaters for what should be a feeble $3.8 mil total. One problem was the studio's decision not to use the film's New Orleans setting in the pic's trailers out of fear it would be seen, sources told me, as exploiting the post-Katrina news value of the city. Fortunately for Sony, it had a financial partner on the film, which limits its exposure, and received production incentives from filming in Lousiana pre-Katrina. (All weekend figures include Sunday estimates.) 

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

EXCLUSIVE: Top LA Times Editors Loyal To Baquet Said To Have A 'Suicide Pact'

By Nikki Finke | Category: Big Media, LA Times, Media | Thursday September 21, 2006 @ 12:30am

The Tribune Co., which has an all-important board meeting today where the crisis at its Los Angeles Times will be front and center, may have a bigger problem than even the corporate owners realize with the paper's top editorial management. I'm told there's even a name for it inside the LA Times newsroom -- "The Suicide Pact" -- and it involves the highest-ranking editors. I've learned from insiders that, if Dean Baquet gets fired as editor and executive vice president by his Chicago bosses, then his trusted senior lieutenants have agreed to quit on the spot: Doug Frantz, Leo Wolinsky, and John Montorio.

All three men were promoted by Baquet in October 2005, so they must feel that they owe him this rather extreme display of their loyalty. Frantz had been the paper's Istanbul bureau chief, and then was made managing editor along with Wolinsky, upped from deputy managing editor. They replaced Baquet, who had held the managing editor title before ascending to editor when John Carroll quarrelled with Tribune management and exited the paper. Wolinsky, an LAT veteran since 1977, was given more responsibility first by Carroll and then successor Baquet. Features czar Montorio was promoted from deputy managing editor to associate editor. 

At the time, Baquet was quoted as saying this about Frantz and Wolinsky sharing the No. 2 job: "I wanted an aggressive way to address the issue of declining readership, to have someone focus on it. And I wanted someone to run the newsroom day to day. For a newspaper of our scope and complexity, this would be enough work for more than one person." Here's how the LAT itself has described what the three guys do: Frantz has been overseeing the paper's major news operations, including coverage of foreign, national, California, business, sports and science news. Wolinsky continued to run the paper's front-page operation and assumes responsibility for efforts to attract more readers and gain circulation. His job description entailed working with the entire LAT organization to expand readership and oversee newsroom resources, including staffing and budgeting. As for Montorio, he was given the additional charge of a variety of special news projects, including the development of more profiles in the main news section and improved coverage of trends. All three editors report to Baquet. Frantz, 57, a two-time Pulitzer Prize finalist and author of several books, worked as a ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

Finke/LA Weekly: Blood-and-Guts Behind The Scenes Why Jim Carrey Went to CAA

By Nikki Finke | Category: Actors, Agents, DH update | Wednesday September 20, 2006 @ 11:27am

My latest lalogo.gif column, Cash and Carrey, explores the Entourage-like exploits behind-the-scenes of what was once known as Team Carrey: actor Jim Carrey, his managers Gold/Miller, and his agent, UTA's Nick Stevens, in even more detail, with more surprises, than I've previously reported here. Oy vey. But it's a fascinating look inside the frantic phone calls, fractured relationships and film fortunes of showbiz, if I say so myself. As I had anticipated, after firing Stevens, Carrey did indeed take meetings with Endeavor (because partner Ari Emanuel is tight with Jimmy Miller, and gave Sacha Baron Cohen to him) and CAA (which exclusively reps Eric Gold as a movie producer and reps most of Miller's clients). As I predicted, Carrey has gone to CAA. UPDATE: *Carrey called in to CAA's Wednesday AM motion picture staff meeting and was put on speakerphone. Naturally, all the agents went orgasmic -- uh, make that, showed as much emotion as bloodless robotic clones are capable of.* Here's an excerpt from the new column:

"Carrey once rewarded his team with spankin’ new Porsche 911 Carrera convertibles. But on September 13, Carrey phoned Stevens and said, “I’ve never met with another agency. But I’m feeling like it’s time.” The two haven’t talked since. The next day, Stevens had that Porsche towed and sold. “I could never sit in it again after that,” the agent was overheard to say. The shocking and unexpected firing of the top agent by the top actor left Hollywood agog. Naturally, none of this “he said/they said” badmouthing behind the scenes has surfaced in the trades, because that’s how Hollywood works: The media rarely know about such disputes, much less report them. And the principals won’t talk to journalists publicly about any of this. But I’ve dug deep for details, first on DeadlineHollywoodDaily.com and now in L.A. Weekly, because they’re juicier than any episode of Entourage. I found out Carrey’s managers claim that Stevens wasn’t cutting it as a rep anymore, had become distracted by a summer home in Martha’s Vineyard and golf rounds at L.A.’s Riviera Country Club, and was “rageful and resentful,” alienating not just them but the star. I also learned that Stevens accuses the managers of a cash-and-Carrey conflict of interest by “manipulating” the comic’s exit from UTA in order to further their own, now separate, producing careers at another ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

LAT's Hofmeister Now H'woodmeister

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Big Media | Wednesday September 20, 2006 @ 10:43am

UPDATE: *A day after my original posting, the Los Angeles Times internal memo making the announcement finally went out today.* It's not been announced yet, but I'm told the Los Angeles Times did select its replacement for Amy Wallace, the talented Deputy Business Editor in charge of entertainment/Big Media/technology industry coverage who jumped to Conde Nast's just started Portfolio biz magazine. Drumroll, please: It's Sallie Hofmeister, the paper's long-time business reporter who's had her share of TV, cable and satellite industry scoops over the years. Actually, I'm told she's been doing the job since mid-July. So why no announcement? She became an assistant business editor in April, and before joining the LAT, was an editor at The New York Times, "where she improved the copy of a host of reporters including some
guy named Baquet," said today's memo from Business Editor Russ Stanton. Before that, she was a staff writer at Venture magazine and a 1980 graduate of Kansas State University. (No "Toto, we're not in Kansas anymore" jokes, puh-leeze!) And since memos like this are not complete with some huh? comment, Stanton adds that her attributes "are exceeded only by her arsenal of fashionable glasses and spiffy shoes." OK, Hollywood, the sucking-up starts now! 

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

Ex-Mogul Sherry Lansing: Happy At Last

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Fashions | Wednesday September 20, 2006 @ 2:09am

OK, so now we know what ex-studio moguls do: they blog on HuffPo. If Sherry Lansing's doing it, can ousted Viacomer Tom Freston be far behind? Sherry opines about turning 60. But there are some interesting Hollywood revelations as well. "I've always had this great fear that time would run out and life would have passed me by. I realized that I didn't want to die at my desk. I wanted to do something else and began to wonder: Am I defined by my job and if so, what kind of a person am I? Is this really what I want to say with my life? Of course, I loved the movies and the movie business. I ran Fox for over three and a half years, produced movies for ten years, and then ran Paramount Pictures for over twelve years. I loved my job, but at a certain point it became repetitive. The highs weren't as high, and the lows weren't as low. So I asked myself: What is it that really gives me pleasure? The answer is giving back." She claims she "retired" from the entertainment business and committed herself to a career in philanthropy. In 2005, she formed The Sherry Lansing Foundation dedicated to cancer research and education. She serves on the board of the Jimmy Carter Center and the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, which disburses $3 billion in funds for stem cell research. She's a regent of the University of California and chair of its Health Services Committee. With a partner, Civic Ventures, she's starting a movement, Primetime, for those sixty and older to retire and give something back to the community. "The funny thing is that I'm busier than I've ever been. I honestly can tell you that this is the happiest time of my life. It doesn't take anything away from what I was before; I still love movies, I still love my old friends. But now I have so many new friends, and I'm constantly learning new things. The big difference is that I control my own days and set my own agenda; I don't do anything that I don't want to." Turns out Sherry's blogging is an excerpt from Arianna Huffington's new book, On Becoming Fearless.

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

Hannibal Is Harvey's Cannibal Now: Young French Actor Stars in Film Prequel; Dr. Lecter's Lucrative Movie/Book Tie-In

By Nikki Finke | Category: Actors, Agents, Big Media | Wednesday September 20, 2006 @ 12:55am

 

In case you didn't know: This photo shows the new Hannibal Lecter. Thomas Harris' just-delivered prequel, "Hannibal Rising", is coming to bookstores Dec. 5. The author also penned the screenplay for the hush-hush movie version, Young Hannibal: Behind the Mask, which will be released in theaters two months later. Even though very little has been written about this forthcoming flick and it's still not announced on the film company's website, this could be that big score which The Weinstein Company has been waiting for. (HollywoodWiretap.com updates TWC, What's Happened To Harvey?). For one thing, there'll be a closely timed tie-in between the book's release Dec. 5 and the film's distribution by MGM in February 2007. The book and movie look at what transformed Hannibal into a sadistic killer. Anthony Hopkins is not expected to appear in the new movie but he supposedly narrates it. The film follows Lecter's life in three phases: from early childhood in Lithuania, to his years in France, and then America before he is captured by FBI agent Will Graham (who's appeared before in the movies Red Dragon and Manhunter). The new film was shot mostly in Prague.

I love the idea, and irony, that Harvey finally met his match pairing with wheeler dealer Dino De Laurentiis, who just turned 87 and is the official film producer of the Hannibal character. Because it's said about both Harv and Dino that negotiating with them is more painful than a root canal. This was a speedy delivery of "Hannibal Rising" for author Harris, only 7 years, compared to the 10 years it took him to turn in its predecessor Hannibal. (Before that, Red Dragon and Silence of the Lambs.) And Dino produced them all. Though Universal made Hannibal, Harvey snatched up the prequel, which has great franchise value. The 21-year-old French star, Gaspard Ulliel, is best known for playing Audrey Tatou's lover in the 2004 WWI drama A Very Long Engagement. His performance was rewarded with a Cesar as Best Newcomer in 2005. Young Hannibal is directed by Peter Webber (2003's Girl with the Pearl Earring). “Usually, even the best-selling books have an eight-week excitement cycle,” Bantam publisher Irwyn Applebaum told The New York Times. “But for this book, the movie excitement will hopefully be at its height just as the book goes through that cycle, so it’s a very good opportunity for this book to have an extended hardcover life.” ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share
More Deadline | Hollywood »