Top 10 Actress Earners? On What Planet!

By Nikki Finke | Category: Actors, Agents | Thursday November 30, 2006 @ 3:41pm

So I've read The Hollywood Reporter's annual list of highest earning actresses and about some in the Top 10 all I can say is: ON WHAT PLANET? Here are my reasons:

nicole.jpg1. Nicole Kidman, makes $16 mil-$17 mil. What she should be earning: -$1 mil. That's right, I'm saying that Nicole should be paying film companies to hire her, not the other way around. That's because she's poison at the box office, the female equivalent of Sean Penn. Women dislike her, men don't think she's sexy, and those Chanel ads induce nausea. My guess is Nicole's rate dates back to Sony Pictures overpaying her for that bomb Bewitched. Since then, she's been doing smaller films, but is signing for studio projects right now. Note to majors: save your $$$ and hire Reese or Angelina.

2. Reese Witherspoon, $15 mil. What she should be earning: $25 mil. Reese can do no wrong. Women love her, men love her, the camera loves her. And she's smart: when she was looking for a new agency, she lamented not owning her Legally Blonde character because it'll be Broadway bound. Which doesn't mean all her films are great, but she's always great in them. She opens a movie. 'Nuff said.

renee.jpg3. Renee Zellweger, $15 mil. What she should be earning: $5 mil. Renee doesn't open movies, unless the material is Bridget Jones-cloned. She's fine as the wife or girlfriend, but then her price needs to be cut by a third. Worse, audiences are getting sick of her changing hair color whenever she changes parts. That's a dye job, not an acting job. Sadly, she's lost her once winning girl-next-door quality; now she's trying to be a fashion diva. Ugh.

4. Drew Barrymore, $15 mil. What she should be asking: $3 mil. Drew has never been able to open a movie, and she never will. That doesn't mean she isn't sweet onscreen, but lately her roles have been too saccharine. If only she'd bring back that Poison Ivy edginess she once had. Women like her but they don't want to be her (or even briefly married to Tom Green), whereas men don't think she's hot anymore. Drew's price should go up when she grows up.

... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

The 411 On CAA Starting To Lose Clients

By Nikki Finke | Category: Actors, Agents, DH update | Thursday November 30, 2006 @ 1:44pm

 hugh_grant.jpgkate.jpgbeyonce3.jpg 

caalogo-thumb.jpgBeyoncé, Kate Hudson, Hugh Grant -- all have left CAA within days. True, Jim Carrey recently moved from UTA to CAA, but so far his new agency not only can't keep his old projects from blowing up either, but he's still not cast in anything new. (Indeed, CAA went back to Fox to try to restart his Used Guys, just like UTA did, and the studio said no, just like it did to UTA. So much for the CAA mystique.) And don't forget that CAA recently was powerless to keep Microsoft's much-hyped Halo from being deep-sized by the studios. While this isn't yet a "CAA tripping up" trend, it's certainly an interesting development for an agency that hasn't shaken loose many clients in recent years. After all, CAA still poaches agents with tempting offers of 5-year, $5 mil contracts that aren't dependent on bringing over old clients or signing new ones. But let's face it, that kind of largesse can't go on ad infinitum, either. But I've said it before, and I'll say it again: in my opinion, CAA's philosophy of agenting runs contrary to the best interests of talent. After all, president Richard Lovett has always embraced two essential guiding principles: first, that the company is always more important than the clients; and, second, that it doesn't matter if the clients are working because it's better to have them than not have them. The result is that Lovett at times has tangled with his partners Bryan Lourd, Kevin Huvane and others who grew up inside Ovitz’s CAA thinking the agency should represent fewer clients and give them more personal attention, than try to sustain a volume business. But Lovett keeps winning every battle because his mantra is market share, market share, market share. As Lovett likes to argue, there won’t be a need for any other agency if CAA has everyone. Well, judging from recent days, not quite everyone. Stay tuned.

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

Comments On My Screenwriter Column...

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Movies | Thursday November 30, 2006 @ 12:36pm

Among the incredible reactions to my latest lalogo.gif column, Screenwriters In The Shit, come these two astute comments:

"An interesting side note is how well some of the New York based scribblers are doing. Tony Gilroy, David Koepp, John Hamburg, Richard LaGravenese, the team of Brian Koppelman and David Levien, are all among the highest paid, constantly working writers. Don't know why it is, if somehow their lack of proximity makes them more desirable."

And this: "One thing that caught my eye: of your list of the top screenwriters not one was a woman. Not a single one. Which isn't you - it's just the facts. And I got to thinking - because the list is clearly correct (we all know the names). Not really sure (I think not) that a single one is a minority either, which falls into the same category."

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

2007 Sundance Film Festival Lineup

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Box Office, Comedy | Wednesday November 29, 2006 @ 1:26pm

Here's the lineup for the 2007 Sundance Film Festival (January 18-28). Brett Morgan's docu Chicago 10 will open the fest. A total 64 films have been selected to compete for the best new work categories. A total 122 feature films were selected, representing 25 countries with nearly 60 first- or second-time feature filmmakers. These were selected from 3,287 feature submissions, up from 2006. Said SDF director Geoffrey Gilmore: "This year’s American Competition reflects a newfound awareness and self-expression that results in an engagement by the work that is both political and personal, a collective voice fueled by a steadfast optimism and hope for the future."

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

While Mr. $4 Mil Akiva Goldsman Fiddles, More Accomplished Movie Scribes Burn

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Books, DH update | Wednesday November 29, 2006 @ 12:03pm

My latest lalogo.gif column, Screenwriters In The Shit, examines today's desperate situation in Hollywood: while Akiva Goldsman fiddles, more accomplished movie scribes burn. It puts into context my exclusive last week about Goldsman ("Keevie" to his childhood pals) receiving a record $4 million for a Dan Brown book adaptation that'll be Sony/Imagine's sequel to The Da Vinci Code. Here's how it begins:

barton.jpg"Every year, one of the major Hollywood talent agencies conducts a running tally of all studio jobs snagged by screenwriters. In 2005, there were 10 percent fewer hires than the year before. So far for 2006, there are 15 percent fewer. That’s a big drop in two years. 'These jobs,' said the admittedly depressed literary agent, 'just disappeared.' A manager joins the pity party and describes a litany of givebacks by his scribbling clients: free treatments, free rewrites, free polishes and/or free script-doctoring — all done with the hollow hope that the studio will give schmucks with Underwoods a paying gig sooner rather than never. As for those sparse scribes offered real pay for projects, they’re buckling under studio demands by cutting their usual and customary by 30 percent. 'It’s the bewildering nature of the business right now that nobody has a quote. It’s a quote-free system,' an agent describes. In a word, it stinks out there for screenwriters, worse even than the fetid stench of the usual shit flung at them in previous years. These aren’t wannabes, either. These are some of the top names in the biz. 'I am fucking terrified,' a major scribe tells me about his year of not getting any work. 'I can’t believe my career is ending like this.' Laments a manager: 'I have a giant screenwriter who’s doing everything on spec. Everybody is doing this. They’ve got to get into this mindset.' This is the reality of the screenwriting trade right now, the antithesis of the ridiculously rosy picture that the Los Angeles Times paints week after week in its 'Scriptland' column... Continued

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

How To Fight Hollywood's Caste System

By Nikki Finke | Category: Actors, Agents | Wednesday November 29, 2006 @ 10:33am

The findings of this report on casting aren't a surprise, but the fact that they justify legal action against the Hollywood caste system is. A new study by the UCLA School of Law and UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center finds that Latino, black, Asian American and Native American actors have few acting opportunities available to them. But the study's law professor author challenges the legality of race-specific casting announcements and suggests that actors may have legal recourse in federal law that prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. Can you spell C-L-A-S-S  A-C-T-I-O-N  L-A-W-S-U-I-T? According to UCLA, the findings are based on a 2006 survey of casting announcements, akaphotocollage.jpg

"breakdowns". The study found that 69%of the roles were reserved for white actors and another 8.5% were open to white actors as well as non-white actors. Actors of color were limited to between .5% and about 8% of the roles, depending on racial background. "Casting directors take into account race and sex in a way that would be blatantly illegal in any other industry,” Robinson said. "Many actors accept this as normal, but depending on the facts of the case, lawsuits can be filed.” He believes that, in many instances, taking race and sex into account for acting roles violates Title VII of the U.S. Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination. According to Robinson, many casting breakdowns currently restrict, without any strong narrative justification, the sex and race of the actors who may audition. Robinson believes casting is a form of free speech that may be protected under the Constitution's First Amendment, depending on the circumstances. This extends to race- or gender-based casting when these traits are integral to the storyline. But, Robinson said, there are many exceptions that permit the government to regulate certain speech in certain ways. "I argue that Title VII's regulation of casting announcements falls into an exception,” he said. He added that he did not believe that complying with Title VII would entail using quotas but rather the consideration of actors of color and women in many more roles.

Now the better news: Robinson recommended banning the use of race/sex classification in casting breakdowns except where the casting of an actor of a specific race or sex is truly integral to the narrative. This would require the entertainment industry ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

Pam Anderson/Kid Rock 'Borat' Bust-Up: What's Ron Meyer Got To Do With It?

By Nikki Finke | Category: Actors, Agents, Hollyweird | Wednesday November 29, 2006 @ 9:57am

Here's what interests me -- well, more like confuses me -- about the Pam Anderson/Kid Rock Borat bust-up: This happened at Ron Meyer's home? Whaaaat? (By the way, Page Six says it took place at the Universal COO's house in Beverly Hills. Everyone else knows he lives in Malibu.) My question is this: Why in the world were those two losers included among the 20 VIPs on what's supposed to be a triple-A screening list? The explanation is rather ordinary: Anderson is a friend of a Meyer neighbor, who asked the studio mogul if Pam and Kid Rock could come over for the screening because new hubby hadn't seen new bride in Borat yet. The way Page Six made it sound, there was a screaming match in the middle of Meyer's screening room. Wrong. None of the guests knew anything happened -- just that the couple left before the movie ended.  

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

Pellicano: Woman Who Got Away Indicted

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Courts | Tuesday November 28, 2006 @ 2:23pm

If at first the feds do not succeed, they try, and try, again. So word from the U.S. Attorney's Office for Los Angeles today is that a federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment against former SBC phone employee Joann Wiggan last Wednesday (the day before Thanksgiving…. apparently it fell through the cracks with the holiday). Her arraignment may take place as soon as on Monday, Dec. 4. All three counts in the indictment carry a maximum possible penalty of five years in federal prison. This  is the same woman who went on trial for perjury in September, and a jury returned verdicts acquitting her of four of the five counts. The jury split 6-6 on the third count. At the time, the feds emphasized that the loss of this case had no bearing on the upcoming racketeering and wiretapping trial against celebrity P.I. thug Anthony Pellicano and others scheduled to begin August 22nd. Previous: Pellicano: Feds Lose Wiggan Perjury Case, Pellicano: Phone Employee's Perjury Trial  

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

'Casino Royale' Biggest Global Bond Ever; #1 Pic Overseas With $224+ Mil Already

By Nikki Finke | Category: Actors, Agents, Box Office | Sunday November 26, 2006 @ 7:23am

bondprepar.jpg007 so far is doing Da Vinci Code-like biz in all 50 countries where it's opened No. 1 (except the U.S. where it opened No. 2). There were 18 new international debuts for Casino Royale (in Paris theater, at left) this week - all #1, including France, Germany, Spain and Scandinavia. So far, that's an overseas total of $66.2 mil from this weekend's haul -- the 6th biggest international weekend of 2006. Last week, the spy pic was #1 in all 27 countries where it opened, earning $42.2 mil from the UK, Russia, India and small territories in the Mideast and Asia. (Last week, it scored the #9 all-time UK opening, and the biggest Bond opening ever in the UK by 46%.) Right before the debut weekend, Sony Pictures was lowering expectations for Casino Royale in the U.S. and counting more on foreign sales. The studio was right: the pic now looks like the biggest Bond ever worldwide, moving up from $82.8 mil last weekend to easily passing $224.5 mil this weekend (including the $128.2 mil foreign and $94.2 mil U.S. cume) with many major foreign territories still to go, including Japan, Korea, Italy and Australia. casinoroyale_danielcraig.jpgBox office gurus say Daniel Craig will easily blow past the biggest grosser in the Pierce Brosnan series, 2002's Die Another Day, and its $432 mil global take. Estimate is for Casino Royale to make as much as $575 mil globally. 007 is still #1 its second week out in at least 40 of the 50 territories where it's in play. The $40.4 mil it generated from new openings beat the combined openings of Die Another Day in the same territories ($28 mil) by 44%. It held in the UK with $16.6 mil, just -24% off its launch the week before. Most of the new openings were the biggest for Bond ever. pierce.jpgGermany opened to $12 mil, France $8.4 mil, Spain $4 mil, Switzerland $3 mil, Denmark $2.5 mil, Sweden $2.1 mil, Holland $1.8 mil, Austria $1.6 mil, Norway $1.5 mil, Belgium $1.5 mil.  All-time opening rankings include Switzerland #3, Denmark #7, Norway and Finland #8, Sweden #10, Holland #12, Belgium #14. But Happy Feet is about to make major inroads. I hear that in Singapore, where Warner's pengiun pic opened this weekend, holdover Bond moved down to ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

Tap Dancin' Baby Mumbles Hot Xmas Toy: 'Happy Feet' No. 1, 'Casino Royale' No. 2; It's 'Deja Vu' (#3) At The U.S. Box Office

By Nikki Finke | Category: Actors, Agents, Box Office | Thursday November 23, 2006 @ 12:28pm

babymumbles.jpgSUNDAY AM: Happy T-Bird weekend, and get out of the way for the mall stampede as shoppers try to score one of the hottest toys this holiday season: Happy Feet's Baby Mumbles, on sale for $29.99, which tap dances to any type of music playing. Ah, the commercialism of Xmas! A big moviegoing weekend it has been -- with the top 3 films estimated to do $160 million from Friday through Sunday, and $220 mil from Wednesday through Sunday. (But that's still -5% from last year because of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.) Welcome to déjà vu at the box office. On Thanksgiving Day, Bond traded places with the birds to become America's #1 movie after the penguins triumphed on the T-Bird weekend opener. It was a replay of last weekend on Friday, however: Happy Feet waddling past Casino Royale to be the No. 1 movie thanks to huge kiddie matinees. dejavu.jpg(That is, if you can even hear the movie above the din of all that whining, "I wanna Baby Mumbles!") Screening in 3,804 theaters, those Warner penguins made another $7.3 million Wed, $6 mil Thurs, $15.7 Fri, $14.3 mil Sat, for what was a $38.1 mil three-day weekend and a $51.5 mil five-day holiday and a cume over $100.7 million by Monday. Sony/MGM's 007 flick in 3,443 playdates raked in $6.5 mil Wed, $7.5 mil Thurs, $13.1 mil Fri, $11.8 mil Sat, and had a $31 mil three-day weekend and a $45.1 mil five-day holiday and a new cume of $94.2 mil. Still, the 007 pic won Week One in the U.S. and is doing Da Vinci Code-like biz in all 50 countries where it opened No. 1. There were 18 new international debuts this week - all #1 including France, Germany, Spain, and Scandinavia -- earning $66.2 mil foreign. Casino Royale looks like the biggest Bond ever worldwide, passing $224.5 mil this weekend ($128.2 overseas + $94.2 U.S. cume) with many major foreign territories still to go, including Japan, Korea, Italy and Australia. Box office gurus say Daniel Craig will easily blow past Pierce Brosnan's Die Another Day and its $432 mil previous biggest global take. casinoroyale_danielcraig.jpgAnd my guess is that the spy vs spy news coming out of Britain ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

EXCLUSIVE: New $ High for Screenwriter

By Nikki Finke | Category: Agents, Books, DH update | Wednesday November 22, 2006 @ 10:38am

akiva.jpgI'm about to give all the Hollywood moguls indigestion before they've even taken a bite of their Thanksgiving meal. That's because I'm told that Akiva Goldsman, who adapted Dan Brown's worldwide bestseller into a $755.6 mil hit pic, is receiving $4 million for the Da Vinci Code sequel in the works by both Imagine Entertainment and Sony Pictures. Not only is that major moola, but agents are telling me this represents a new $$$ high for hiring a screenwriter (not buying a spec script)  -- and not even an original screenplay, but an adaptation of a book. And, no, Goldsman isn't getting a producer credit, so this is for straight scribbling. "That would be a lot for a pure writer's credit," one agent gushed. "It puts Akiva in the absolute top of his profession." (Actually, the first rumor I heard was an astounding $6 mil, but the truth is $2 mil less than that. As for whether the deal also includes gross points, dunno.) Anyway, this is great news for Hollywood screenwriters, who continue to get screwed left and right in the moviemaking process, notwithstanding the WGA's supposedly best but also glacial efforts to prevent that. The terrible news is that it's sad these bucks are going for the sequel to a movie which the critics roundly panned. Generally, the most in-demand screenwriters these days are getting between $2 mil and $2.5 mil per project. And Sony historically has been known to open its wallets a little wider for writers than most studios. "Bob Osher talks a tough game, but when Amy Pascal really wants something, she gets it," one source told me. The reason for the big score is that the studio wants the 2008-slotted sequel, like, yesterday, not only because the first movie did so well, but also because of the expected studio-WGA confrontations next year. Fortunately for Goldsman, when DVC came out, Sony already owned the rights to the Robert Langdon character. Not only is the Harvard symbologist the protagonist in Brown's Angels and Demons, but also featured in a new book the author is penning as we speak that takes off where Da Vinci Code leaves off. In A&D, Goldsman must make sense of a plot crammed with Vatican intrigue and high-tech drama: it thrusts Langdon together with an ancient and shadowy secret ... Read More »

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share

RIP: John M Higgins, Astute B&C Editor

By Nikki Finke | Category: Media, TV | Tuesday November 21, 2006 @ 3:33pm

What a shock that Broadcasting & Cable's business editor John M. Higgins is gone at the age of 45 (Monday night, of a heart attack). Like most good journalists, he had a way of establishing an instant and easy intimacy with people, and that extended to colleagues in the scribbling biz. What brought us together, so to speak, was my LA Weekly column (November 2004) spanking the Los Angeles Times' resident brat, Joel Stein. Wrote Higgins: "Hmmm, I'm not sure I've EVER agreed with you more than this column. 'Whoring after youth???' Nah, just whoring. I don't think even youth reads Joel Stein's crap. I totally don't understand the appeal..." Like most journalists who work for trades, John knew a lot more than he ever shared with his readers. He was an astute analyst of journalism as a profession, too, as he wrote me in July: "The media beats of the NY Times, WSJ and LA Times aren't really the prestigious places they once were. They've become pretty awful places to work. Sure, they're great megaphones. But as the financial prospects of newspapers wane, the abused children on the top of the masthead in turn abuse their own children. The big papers have always been intense, competitive places where navigating internal politics was at least as important as developing tremendous sources. The difference today is that there's no promise of a glowing future if you succeed. You get thinned from the herd, even if you're a creative, clever reporter. Name the last media beat reporter at the major dailies to go off to a great job somewhere else, one that you were jealous of?" This is the 2nd journalism colleague I knew pretty well to pass away this year before his time. (Garry Abrams was felled by cancer in August.) The good die too young.

Comments Off Email This  |  Print This Article  |  Bookmark and Share
More Deadline | Hollywood »