News And Analysis: I now have all the details from all the different sides of that big argumentative powwow by TV showrunners that took place yesterday where they voted and agreed that 1) they will return to work and perform their producer duties, overseeing the non-writing production of their shows, as soon as the studios return in good faith to the bargaining table, and 2) they also agreed to stand by any fellow showrunner who is sued for breach of contract for not crossing the WGA picket line.
“But one of the greatest feelings was a passionate consensus to end the meeting,” Matthew Weiner of AMC’s Mad Men said privately afterwards. “Showrunners stood up in
support over 95% in agreement, and pledged to stay the course of our current actions. Voices were heard, arguments listed, and then unity declared. It was pretty amazing actually.”
Among the big news is that they’ve been sent “breach of contract” letters from CBS Paramount yesterday telling them that if they don’t report back to work then they’ll be sued. The news was announced at a closed door, extremely secret meeting of 115 showrunners who gathered at the Writers Guild Of America headquarters to discuss strike-related issues amongst themselves after first showing up to picket collectively at the Disney gate, then going en masse to lunch at The Smokehouse. (I broke the news of the confab yesterday afternoon.) “The CBS letters yesterday said that if the showrunners don’t report back into work for their producing duties, they’re in breach and they’ll be sued.” No other showrunners had received letters yet from their respective networks or studios, the gathering was told. The CBS letters news was received somberly by the group. “Since CBS is first, it became clear that Les [Moonves] is the most pissed,” a source at the meeting told me. “All the other showrunners now expect to get similar letters.” After a group discussion, the showrunners came to an agreement on how to deal with this threat to them. “The writers agreed that, if anybody gets sued, the showrunners will all stand together. Those who are still working will go out and join us on the picket lines, and, if we’re all back at work, then we’ll all go out,” a source told me. “That’s if we come back.”
Let me say this upfront: if the networks and studios plan on really suing the showrunners, then they’re going to smash the very underpinnings which support the entire Hollywood system. One of the main reasons that the guilds exist is to perform all the administrative functions that producers don’t want to do, like health, pension, credits, arbitration, etc. Crissakes, if the WGA didn’t decide who wrote what for both the writers and the studios, then we wouldn’t be able to count the number of lawsuits emanating from every TV show and movie or the amount of billable hours outside lawyers would chalk up.
The reality is that everyone in the entertainment industry bends over backwards not to initiate lawsuits because the powers-that-be have too much to hide. They don’t want to air their dirty laundry. They don’t want to expose their tricky accounting. They don’t want to swear to tell the truth in a deposition or on a witness stand where opposing counsel can ask them anything or everything in order to embarrass them or even shame them. Example: the Coming To America lawsuit. Another example: Katzenberg v Disney. I was in the courtroom the day when this nightmare exchange took place:
Bert Fields: “Did you say Mr. Katzenberg was the ‘tip of your pompom’?” “Did you say Mr. Katzenberg was your ‘retriever’?” “Did you tell Mr. Schwartz that you ‘hated’ Mr. Katzenberg?” Did you say, ‘I think I hate the little midget’?”
Michael Eisner (so red-faced he was positively florid): “I think you’re getting into areas that are ill-advised… If you pursue this line of questioning, it will put in the public record those things that shouldn’t be in the public record.”
But here’s the best argument: when all is said and done, when the strike is over (and it will be over someday), the showrunners and the networks/studios are going to have to work together. Every mogul to a one has complained to me over the years how there aren’t enough showrunners. So now they’re going to alienate those few they do have?
What’s ironic here is that networks/studios love showrunners because these super-talented creatives are the driving force, the inspiration, the soul, of TV shows. C’mon, the moguls all claw and fight to hire the best ones for big money. Even those showrunners that flop or behave badly are still hired year after year, series after series.
Everyone needs to remember that any breach-of-contract letters are coming from the lawyers in business affairs. Last time I looked, the moguls were their bosses. So I say, no way the network/studio CEOs are going to throw away these valuable assets. Because Hollywood is still very much a town of relationships, even during a strike. Same applies to the conventional wisdom that the studios are purposely waiting for the 2-3 0r 6-8 week period to pass so that they can force majeure many of the large overall deals they made with TV writers, many of whom have 7 figure deals yet are producing nothing right now. Then, so the theory goes, the studios/networks are going to start cutting their on-lot POD deals. Once they’ve done all that, you watch, they’ll return to the negotiating table, hoping by then the union is divided. One problem: a collaborative business will be toast.
Before I get into the rest of this news and analysis, a nugget: Paradigm talent agency owner Sam Gores, the really rich guy determined to grow the merger-frenzied tenpercentery into a powerhouse and give it a higher profile, proved incredibly savvy and picked up the check for all the showrunners’ lunches at The Smokehouse, saying “Compliments of Paradigm”. An internal email sent about it inside the agency said Paradigm picked up the tab for the entire group “to show support for their cause.”
The Disney gate show of strength by the 150 showrunners Wednesday, organized by the WGA, was a seminal event. Their post-picket confab started over lunch at The Smokehouse, but then, fearing they’d be overheard by diners in the next room, they decided they could have a more open and candid conversation at the WGA headquarters a few hours later. A few dozen showrunners fell out so in all 115 met together there.
This was, by no means, a polite conversation between colleagues. It was heated and vociferous, but it ended in hard-fought, heavily argued agreement. The WGA would have everyone believe the showrunners are 90/10 in support of everything strikewise. The AMPTP would have everyone believe it’s the other way around claiming the showrunners are fearful of really speaking their “hearts and minds”. Bullshit by both sides. Last night’s very open forum showed very clearly that the showrunners there were overwhelmingly in support of the strike, but they were 60/40 split on the best way to conduct it. The meeting broke down like this: 60% voiced absolute support for a 100% work stoppage by showrunners as a way to shut down the shows and hurt the networks and studios, and 40% wanted to stop all writing but continue their producing duties.
There was deepo disagreement over whether showrunners should do post-production or not. Some of the showrunners felt that, if they didn’t do post, the networks would ruin their shows.
This very vocal minority worried about the quality of their shows made the point to the assembled crowd that it seemed unfair to pressure themselves when film director/writers haven’t stopped directing, and the actor/writers haven’t stopped acting, but the TV producer/writers are being asked to stop editing. ”Why isn’t J.J. Abrams being given a hard time for starting to direct Star Trek tomorrow? Why isn’t Tina Fey being given a hard time for acting on 30 Rock? Why is this strike being waged on the back of the showrunners?” one hyphenate asked.
This minority gave an impassioned plea to be allowed to edit without being treated like an outcast. They stood up and told a personal story about what situation they’re in with their individual show. Greg Garcia of NBC’s My Name Is Earl spoke about how one of his actors called to say he’d helped lock the cut of an episode and how that made Garcia feel sick. “How is two episodes of my show sucking going to hurt GE?” he asked.
On the other side, Greg Daniels of NBC’s The Office spoke proudly about why and how he’d shut his show down. But Marc Cherry of ABC’s Desperate Housewives urged the majority side “not to pressure” the showrunners on the minority side.
It was agreed that the showrunners probably only have power for another month or two. Though many series have been shut down, a lot of ABC Touchstone and Warner Bros are still shooting this week, along with NBC Universal hourlongs. “Next week will be a watershed week,” the group heard a leader say. That was why the majority of showrunners felt they had to use their power to “really hurt” the networks/studios. But the minority argued that into bargaining in good faith. But the minority response was that, if the showrunners were going to “sacrifice” the quality of their shows, then they wanted to get something positive out of it, like using their producing duties as leverage to bring the networks/studios back to the good-faith bargaining. “Why are we worried about hurting them? Let’s get them to negotiate,” a minority viewholder stated.
Another summed up the minority position this way, “We want to win this thing. We just want to do it the right way. We just want to know, if we’re staying out, what we’re sacrificing for.”
Then the voting began. There was even a vote about the vote — whether it had to be unanimous or not.
To reiterate, the showrunners voted and agreed: “That we will return to work and perform our producer duties, overseeing the non-writing production of our shows, as soon as the studios return in good faith to the bargaining table,” a source there told me. “We also agreed to stand by any fellow showrunner who is sued for breach of contract for not crossing the WGA picket line.”
There was no vote about the inquity of having director/writers helming, or actor/writers acting. “They skipped over that,” one attendee told me. “But the militant faction of the guild said they’ll pressure those people next.”
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.





I’m slightly confused by the showrunners response. Does that mean that if someone is sued after the strike is over, they will all strike again? Why else would they all be back at work?
The studios may have decided to fuck with the wrong Marine. (shoutout to Aaron Sorkin).
CBS is the most vulnerable so it makes sense they launched the “first strike”. I doubt they want to kill the goose laying their golden eggs though, it may be more of a threat than anything else.
Once Lawyers get involved in this, it will become a stranglehold on negotiations for both sides.
Speaking of Lawsuits, if this thing lasts much longer I hope the WGA launches a nuclear fussilade of lawsuits aginst AMPTP for their shady Accounting practices which are designed to prevent proper residuals from being paid. This is a HUUUGE issue coming to the forefront in CA Courts. And in many cases, may be considered Criminal as Publicly traded Corporations must abide by Government guidelines.
I say, you wanna play hardball? Let’s Play! Let’s force you to open your books for all Movie Titles over the last 20 years and see just what is under that rock.
So, let me get this straight… Moonves offers a deal he can’t deliver, embarassing and shocking the WGA and he’s PISSED that the writer’s don’t want to work for him?
How old are these “moguls”… five?
A “mogul” is someone who makes deals and finds solutions not a grown man who throws hissy fits.
They will be mocked for years to come.
I hope this helps put to rest the notion that the showrunners are just talking big because they don’t have much on the line. They’ve willingly put themselves in a position where the networks have a right to sue them (and the networks would have a good chance of winning). That’s not nothing.
Very interesting… One way or another, I do think it’s about time us writers (I’m not a WGA member) stuck up for ourselves. I can’t necessarily say I’m proud of the annoying drum banging and obnoxious megaphones, but I am proud of the stand these guys are taking.
A lawsuit instead of negotiating? Wow, Les Moonves is sure a talented big shot Hollywood deal-maker. This is clearly over his head.
Good. Its time these pampered overpaid producers were threatened with being sued. The only thing they care about is themselves. Thanks for a nice Christmas Writers Greed of America
Absolutely disgusting.
It’s serious and unfortunate, but it’s also corporate protocol to issue warnings. Good to hear the showrunner’s stance is firm.
If the networks truly start filing lawsuits then the showrunners better be able to pony up BIG money to defend themselves.
The networks have billions of dollars to pay thier legal teams.
How much do the showrunners have?
This is getting uglier alot quicker than I thought it would.
Desperate times call for desperate measures. They really have nothing left in their arsenal. Stay strong WGA!
@PJ — I imagine that WOULD end things pretty quickly, considering that New Line was willing to sacrifice Peter Jackson’s involvement with The Hobbit to prevent an independent investigation into their accounting on the LOTR trilogy.
If I were Google/Yahoo/Microsoft I’d be licking my chops right now. The studios are making a huge. HUGE mistake. If a couple showrunners decided to take their business directly to the net then the networks would seriously cannibalize their own business. And Mr. Moonves is cannibalizing his own career. None of these showrunners (or future showrunners) would ever want to work for a snake like him in the future. There’s no way he could run a channel without showrunners. It’s like McDonalds firing the hamburger.
I say the showrunners should all go back to work and edit their shows into incomprehensible, postmodern messes that the networks could never air. That would be honoring the contract, right? You can’t put a gun to someone’s head and make them create.
So, the AMPTP, and now specific studios, are looking to actively lose the PR war. Perhaps their pockets are deep enough that they don’t care about making audiences alienated from shows which are profitable.
“I am Spartacus” is a refrain that would be thrilling to hear from the showrunners’ lips.
Remember, remember the 5th of November…
This proves that the studio line, that they’re happy to throw this season of TV away, is a lie. It’s goal, like the bogus claims of stockpiling which were bandied about all summer and fall, is to psych out the writers. They want to pretend this isn’t hurting them, but it is, badly, hence these letters. These guys are far more scared, and vulnerable, than they will ever show. This war – and make no mistake, it is war – is 95% psychological. They think you guys are wimps that can be easily pushed around. The more you prove them wrong, the more you’re going to start to see them sweat. These threats are the first beads on their brow. Moonves and Murdoch and Bewkes and GE may not literally be afraid of the writers, but they are afraid of the people they’re beholden to, Madison Ave. and Wall St.
Stay strong, writers!
The showrunners should be applauded and thanked for not turning their back on the writers for the sake of cold hard cash. My respect for them has grown immensely.
I am sure the other networks are really happy with CBS right now. Also a sign that the AMPTP is totally worthless as a union. They wouldn’t agree on the price for a bag of rice, let alone a complicated residual issue. That they allow one company to influence the strike so thoroughly proves it.
I don’t think it’s that cut and dried… when the Show-runners signed their contracts they agreed to perform certain duties… and were paid for their services. And now… for a very good reason mind you, they have chosen to ignore that promise. They are simply in breach of their word. I’m not saying it isn’t heart wrenching – or that it doesn’t feel like betrayal doing so – but they should perform the duties they promised to perform. If we can’t even honor the contracts we signed – if our word has no integrity – they how in the world do we dare hold anyone else to a higher standard? And no, you won’t be able to convince me by showing what bastards the producers are – and how they have broken faith.
I am responsible for my own actions – I made a promise – I signed a contract – and I can’t honor it only when it feels good – or when I feel like it. I mean I CAN – but then why should anyone believe anything else I promise to do?
I am so proud of the showrunners… except the one that fired me in 1998. That guy can go f**k himself. JUST KIDDING, I love him, too.
Don’t forget to HONK at the picketers if you support the WGA — we love to hear it!
I salute the showrunners for their stance on this. It does put them more in the shoes of the middle class writer. They could face daunting legal fees if the networks are stupid enough to push this forward.
And YES! Let’s see inside those studio accounting ledgers. If they’d report honestly on earnings for films and TV then talent (writers, actors, directors etc) could accept less up front because they would have faith their backend participation would be based on legitimate numbers.
A win / win? Studios pay less up front to make the product and profit is shared based on market performance rather than talent trying to rectify the financial screwing they took on previous projects by financially penalizing the budget of the upcoming project.
But it will never happen. Despite the studios’ claim that production costs are too high, they’d never consider honestly reporting and sharing in profits as a means to lower budgets!
Apparently they must be doing pretty well with the current set-up.
Not sure how anybody’s surprised about this. They said they’d sue anyone that didn’t honor their non-WGA contracts, that’s what they’re going to do. Did they think all of them showing up and picketing in one place was going to do anything but make Moonves and the boys more angry?
The moral high ground stuff is funny, because it’s the same for both sides. They’re going to try and put the squeeze on the writers any way they can, just like the writers are trying to shut down as many shows as they can to put the squeeze on the networks.
What’s the line from Boston Legal that I’m looking for?
Oh yeah:
“You opened the door to this line of questioning, counselor. If you’re going to ask questions you don’t already know the answers to, you’d better be prepared to deal with the results.”
Keep up the good work, Nikki.
But don’t bang the “fair and balanced drum” anymore. You are or you aren’t, but making a point of it only causes us to question the issue.
So how would that work? Obviously there’s a breach of contract issue, but can the companies actually extract damages from showrunners refusing to work? And how much are we talking about?
I expect the details are private, but vague estimates would be nice. Being sued can mean many different things.