While striking writers and Hollywood networks and studios are still negotiating a contract, Les Moonves "has a honey of a new one", according to the nation's foremost expert in CEO compensation. The agreement, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on October 19, was made public today by Bloomberg Financial News' Graef Crystal. Both Viacom boss, Sumner Redstone, and the board Redstone/Moonves control, signed off on it. Altogether, Crystal says that the CBS Inc chief exec "looks to be sitting more than 200% above the competitive pay level based on my study of 542 CEOs. That compensation doesn't seem appropriate if you consider that CBS's performance has been on a steady decline since he became CEO on January 1, 2006."
Naturally, this doesn't surprise me because I've written a lot about Hollywood corporate gluttony over the years. This case is just the arrogance of rich old Viacom chairman Sumner Redstone claiming he cuts costs at every corner while at the same time lining the pockets of himself and his execs at the expense of investors. It's all so nauseating. I recall how, in 2005, Viacom was shameless enough to reimburse Moonves, who lives in Los Angeles but also has a New York apartment, $105,000 for the period he stayed in New York at his apartment instead of at a hotel. Talk about chutzpah: This is paying the guy to live in his own home. (To learn more about the Big Media CEOs' exorbitant pay, see my 2005 column Really Big Packages that ran in LA Weekly.)
Back to Moonves' contract this time around. Crystal analyzed the most-watched network in 21 different time periods, all ended this past October 15. The first of the 21 periods began on Dec. 31, 2005, the day before Moonves became CEO, and then the start date of each succeeding period was increased by one month. Of the 21 periods, CBS delivered a total return only twice that beat that of the Standard & Poor's 500 Index. Moreover, its returns in the 17 most recent periods all fell below those of the S&P 500 Index. As the time windows narrowed toward this Oct. 15, the negative gap between CBS and the index became progressively larger. "That performance pattern makes me wonder what Redstone was thinking when he effectively gave Moonves the moon in his new pay contract," Bloomberg's Crystal wrote.
Here's what the CBS Inc chief exec gets in the agreement that runs through October 2011, according to Crystal:
--> A base salary of $3.5 million. That's down from the $5.6 million he was paid in 2006, which was the highest of 542 U.S. CEOs running companies with market caps of at least $3 billion. His new base keeps him No. 1 until 2007 pay figures come out. So much for pay risk. (General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt was No. 2, with $3.3 million. GE's 2006 sales were $161 billion; CBS's were $14 billion.)
--> A target bonus of $10.5 million, three times his salary. That's what Moonves gets essentially for showing up. There could be more if he performs, though nothing is specified.
--> An option covering 5 million shares, with a present value at grant that I calculate to be $35 million, using the Black-Scholes model. It isn't known whether that 5 million option-share grant will be repeated during Moonves's four-year agreement. If it's an annual event, then his total compensation looks to be $57 million a year, not including the income-tax equalization. If it is a one-time event, the figure drops to $30 million.
--> An annual grant of free shares worth $7.6 million on each of four grant dates during his contract. To earn them, Moonves will have to achieve a performance target for budgeted free-cash flow. Moonves can propose the target, and the board must approve it. Whatever it may be, neither Moonves nor his board are saying.
--> A make-whole provision so Moonves doesn't face the higher income tax that New York state and New York City levy compared with California. That allows Moonves to spend whatever time he wants at his company's New York headquarters and not suffer any monetary consequences compared with spending all his time at CBS in California. (In a statement, CBS said the rationale for this provision is that Moonves is a longtime California resident and that the company has major facilities in that state. Still, the vast majority of CEOs whose company headquarters are in New York are not given the option of having their shareholders foot the bill for any state and local taxes above those they owe wherever it is they choose to live.)
--> Should Moonves be shown the door, he stands to receive severance that includes as much as three years of salary and three years of his average past bonus. He also keeps all options and free shares.
--> If Moonves's agreement isn't renewed, he gets some more gold, by electing to be a senior adviser for $2 million a year for three years and a one-time grant of another 300,000 shares, worth $8.1 million as of the close on Dec. 7. For this, Moonves isn't required to work more than five days a month and eight hours a day. Assuming he works the maximum hours, his pay rate, including cash and the current stock price, would be a lovely $9,800 an hour. Compare that with Moonves's pay as CEO. If we take the lower estimate of his annual compensation package -- $30 million -- and assume he works 60 hours a week for 48 weeks a year, his hourly rate would be $10,500.
"Does that small gap suggest a substantial degree of indifference on the part of CBS's board as to whether Moonves works or loafs?" Crystal asks.
really? really? really?! How is the AMPTP even allowed to exist with the claims they give. it defies logic.
Well, CBS is about to become TBS if Les’ Bosses don’t settle this strike soon. They will literally have no new scripted product to sell, their share price will plummet and their ad sales will dry up in a matter of months.
How– what–
How is this even possible? How can you make that much money, deliver a mediocre product, and face yourself in the mirror?
I don’t hate the rich. I’m a dirty little capitalist girl, and I aspire to join their ranks.
But this isn’t fair market value for a rare, valuable set of skills. This is rich white men inexplicably protecting the huge compensation packages of other rich white men, for no good reason that I can see. Les Moonves does NOT have a package of skills that’s so rare that it needs to be compensated at this level.
This is the media version of Cheney hiring his cronies at ridiculous prices to do shoddy work in Iraq.
Disgusting.
A friend of mine who works at CBS was just told they will be losing all of their overtime and that people may be getting laid off… but nice to see Les will keep on trucking.
No wonder they “can’t afford” to make a deal with us.
Well, at least now the AMPTP’s claims that they can’t afford internet residuals makes some sense — Moonves is already being paid all the money there is.
Criminy. I sure hope he remembers to sock some of that away for a rainy day.
B
indicative of the larger problem with the strike, the ‘have’s’ have become completely divorced from the reality of the ‘have nots’ and even the ‘have some’s’….
it speaks to how capitalism “gone wild” can significantly harm a democratic society.
And their argument is that WRITERS are trying to destroy the industry with their piddly demands?
I think I get it now. They actually believe that they are worth every dime of what they earn. They think writers are terribly overpaid.
And they honestly do not understand why anyone else would think otherwise.
The stockholders of CBS should offer Moonves $250 for a year’s work– no overtime and no bonus. After a year, they should pay him nothing, and just make him wear a promotional CBS T-Shirt and walk around CBS Studios.
I think both Sumner Redstone and Les Moonves are smart, smart people. Moonves is one of the most gifted TV schedulers there’s ever been. But this package is gonna like pretty stinky in February when CBS has three strains of CSI in reruns (it does horribly in reruns) and Fox has American Idol plastered over the schedule.
ROTFLMAO Anonymous at 5:32pm. That was GREAT! And remember they should be allowed to deem anything that Les does as “promotional” work and not pay him anything at all.
Anoynymous —
I wish I knew who ya were — I’d buy ya a beer for putting it so beautifully. C’mon out of the shadows, dude (or dudette). To parapharase Butch Cassidy (William Goldman actually of course) You see it all with twenty-twenty vision while the rest of the world wears bi-focals…
Nice timing on this news Les. Yet again the studios and moguls show us what lousy PR skills and timing they have. Can’t someone bring them news of the real world to their Ivory Towers? I just had a thought, is this why the marketing of so many movies is so bad? Same teams writing up the press releases right? Maybe with better studio PR and marketing every movie would be successful.
Follow the money! Moonves is being paid for something that doesn’t show up on the P&L Statement.
Follow the money!
What’s he make for doing his “More With Les” segments on Letterman? Probably not enough. I hope this makes up for it!
What I would really love to see is Leslie’s prenup.
Everyone is being so harsh about this so-called excessive compensation, but has anyone considered what kind (legitmate and yet probably not deductable) expenses Les is incuring in terms of tanning bed rental and/or spray tan applications?
How is he expected to be “the face” of CBS if that face isn’t tanned like a desert iguana?
Perhaps the excessive tanning is an attempt to level the facial playing field between himself and Sumner “Crypt Keeper” Redstone.
Just one more reason why the WGA should spend every minute the AMPTP spends stonewalling negotiating directly with new media giants like Google, Apple, Yahoo, etc. Let’s cut out these overstuffed, 20th century robber barons and claim the future for ourselves. In an era when any college kid with talent and a digital camera can make make a pretty damn good webisode, we really don’t need these greedy thugs.
Failing up. Way up.
Most of the shareholders’ lawsuits I’ve read about are baseless, and designed more to put money in the pockets of class action lawyers’ pockets than protect the interests of shareholders. But in this case, if I were a CBS shareholder, I think I’d be looking up names of shareholders’ lawsuit specialists right about now.
Occasionally, bosses of under-performing companies might have a case to argue, “If not for my brilliant leadership, this company would be in a lot worse shape than it is.” But I think Moonves would have a hard time selling that, given this contract.
If shareholders’ lawyers went after his contract, Moonves would likely win in court, or lose at no cost because his contract probably puts the company on the hook for any legal expenses charged against him as part of his boss job. But he’d look bad in public, which might make him think about playing nice with the WGA to grab a little good press. Or so one can wish.
Y’know, somebody should be putting together the latest list of all the CEO’s current pay, along with Nick Counter’s salary, plus the last recorded earnings of the AMPTP’s PR guys.
And then *that* should be at the top of the page on United Hollywood.com
BlesstheAMPTP wrote:
Y’know, somebody should be putting together the latest list of all the CEO’s current pay, along with Nick Counter’s salary, plus the last recorded earnings of the AMPTP’s PR guys.
And then *that* should be at the top of the page on United Hollywood.com
Comment by BlesstheAMPTP — December 13, 2007 @ 3:27 am
OK. And then lets put together a list of all the showrunners and their salaries, and all the hypenate producer/writers on those shows and their salaries and then let’s see if suddenly middle america sees your fight as a worthy cause.
The money in Hollywood just flows from one member of the tribe to the next, doesn’t it?
A production assistant makes just a little more than minimum wage without benefits. They can never organize and if they tried, they would easily lose their jobs. Everyone abuses them and no one cares about them until lunch isn’t on time, then there is all hell to pay. If you want to talk about pay inequality, let’s start here.
Do any of you remember when Les took over the sinking ship back in the mid 90s? I believe “Touched by an Angel” was the highest rated show on the schedule he inherited.
I started working at CBS at that time, and I usually rode the elevator with Les at 5:30 every morning, and he did not leave until well after most of the staff did. He also worked weekends. I know because I was part of his support staff.
Back then he was not being paid what his rivals were. It’s sad that now that he is getting some of what he deserves for his years of loyal service, he is getting reamed. I don’t see many of megastar actors taking paycuts either, and they aren’t responsible for an entire studio and its future.