I’m running Washington Post Style columnist Tom Shales’ review of the 80th Academy Award broadcast. Because he agreed with me about last night’s show. (And even if you dislike what I wrote, remember that he has won a Pulitzer for his TV criticism…)
Oscar Viewers Got Clipped, In More Ways Than One
By Tom Shales
The Washington Post
Monday, February 25, 2008; Page C01
The 80th Annual Academy Awards ceremony, televised live on ABC last night from Los Angeles, went clip-clip-clipping along. This is not a good thing; the show was so overstocked with clips from movies — from this year’s nominees and from Oscar winners going back to 1929 — that it was like a TV show with the hiccups.There were hardly any emotional moments from winners on the stage and there was little in the way of drama for viewers who watched, especially those who stayed with the tedious drag all the way past 11:45, when it finally drew to a close. Javier Bardem, who won for Best Supporting Actor in the Best Picture winner, “No Country for Old Men,” did move the crowd when he concluded his speech with a message to his mother in his native Spanish. She was sitting in the audience, surrounded by the usual suspects and celebrities.
No acting prizes were given out until the second half-hour of the show, a poor piece of showmanship — as was hiding kids’ favorite Miley Cyrus, star of TV’s “Hannah Montana,” backstage until 9:50 p.m., when many of her biggest and youngest fans had gone to bed and didn’t get to see her.
Jon Stewart, the cable TV comic brought in to host, did only a fair-to-middling job, mostly middling, and in fact threatened to ruin the poignancy of Bardem’s speech by later informing the audience, “That was a moment,” in case we were all too dumb to have figured that out for ourselves. Stewart made only a few political jokes, at one point observing that usually when an African American and a woman are both seeking the presidency, it means “an asteroid is about to hit the Statue of Liberty” — i.e., it’s part of a disaster film set in the future.
The highly praised “Michael Clayton,” starring George Clooney, won just one major award (Best Supporting Actress for Tilda Swinton), while Marion Cotillard’s victory as Best Actress for playing legendary singer Edith Piaf in “La Vie en Rose” was an upset over newcomer Ellen Page as a pregnant teenager in “Juno.” The closest any movie came to a sweep was “No Country for Old Men,” which won for Best Adapted Screenplay from another medium as well as Best Director (Joel and Ethan Coen) and Best Picture.
It happens that the Coen Brothers got their start in the movie business with help and support from Jim and Ted Pedas, Washington real estate investors who owned the beloved Circle Theater on Pennsylvania Avenue in the ’50s, ’60s and ’70s. It has since been torn down and an ugly office building erected in its space. The Coens generally make cynical, gloomy movies, with the exception of the breakneck comedy “Raising Arizona.”
There were several references to the recent strike by the Writers Guild of America, which, if it had continued, might have meant canceling the 80th Oscars altogether or putting on a much reduced and postponed show later in the year. Actually, that might have been a pleasant change and a blessed relief from the bloated show and the effusive windbags making speeches that Americans endure annually, even as the number of other awards shows on television has grown exponentially.
Accepting the Oscar for Best Original Screenplay (“Juno”), Diablo Cody held up the statuette and said, “This is for the writers.” The sentiment didn’t exactly bring the house down, however. As for Cody, one admirer hailed her as having written “the best book ever about strippers” — no relation to the movie for which she won the Oscar, of course.
Influential Hollywood blogger Nikki Finke, writing in advance of the Oscar show, noted that “few in America or the world have seen the nominated pictures and performances” and predicted that “all in all, everybody should expect The Worst Oscars Ever in the History of Hollywood.”
Was she far from wrong?
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Honestly, I fell asleep within the first 60 minutes of the show. I usually stay awake for the whole thing. It was drab, boring and lacking any entertainment value.
The only redeeming quality the the Oscars had was when E! Channel red carpet show host, Ryan Seacrest asked Jessica Alba if she was going to breastfeed her baby. The star looked totally shocked by the question and the host scrambled to smooth it over. I missed those impromptu moments.
The Coens’ movies are cynical and gloomy with the exception of Raising Arizona? How about O Brother, Ladykillers, Big Lebowski?
Hating the Oscars seems like some kind of industry game the past several years. I don’t get it. Doesn’t there come a point where the schadenfreude loses its appeal? Please tell me when there was EVER a really good Oscar telecast. Was it Billy Crystal doing buckets of Catskills jokes and singing cringe-inducing spoof songs? Or Whoopi Goldberg making the same “edgy” racial jokes year after year? “Oprah, Uma”? Tell me, please. I’ve never known any real enjoyment from the Oscars other than fast-forwarding to each announcement, listening to the few acceptance speeches I’m interested in hearing, and going to bed.
No emotional moments from the winners?
Did he have some other year’s Oscars on?
That’s beyond ridiculous – it was an above average emotional reaction show (other than the Coens).
…and Hudsucker Proxy and Intolerable Cruelty.
Nikki…you should win an Oscar for Most Amazing Insight Into Most Inconsequential Reported Fare. Congratulations on stating the obvious.
What a grump!
And after writing a piece like that he has the gall to call the people getting the awards windbags?
Nikki – Why is no one but you speaking about moving the “best actress” away from the other major awards. Also explain the exclusion of four time host Whoopie Goldberg from clips of highlights of Oscar hosts. If female members of the Acadamy don’t find any of this offensive, shame on them.
For more about Whoopie, please read http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/02/25/the-view-voices-displea_n_88308.html
Nikki, With all due respect, just because he has a Pulitzer doesn’t mean his opinion is Gospel. I throughly enjoyed Jon Stewart. I think hosting the Oscars has got to be the most thankless job in Hollywood because inevitably someone will hate the job you did. I also think that because of the Writers Strike there was less prep time than normal and thus less produced pieces, more clips. I also don’t understand the theory that because the most critically acclaimed films weren’t box office hits it hurts the show. I don’t think they should nominate “Transformers” just so more people will watch the Oscars.
I agree with you; fewer and fewer people every year see the nominated films before the Oscars. I can only speak for myself as to why; I love films but the only nominated movie I saw this year was “Juno” because I hate going to the theater these days. The seats are filthy, the crowds are often rude and it’s expensive; I generally wait until films hit DVD or HBO and watch them at home. So does almost everyone I know; gradually over the years we’ve stopped going “To the Movies” unless it’s a blockbuster, over-the-top, special effects flick that cannot be duplicated on your widescreen at home.
And I think they blew it by moving the Oscars from April to February, too. That cuts back even more on how many people get to see the films before the Academy Awards airs. I wish they would either release them on DVD before the show or push it back out to April again so at least we know what the films are about.
Plus the show itself gets more boring every year. I thought maybe it was just me because I’m getting older but even my kids and their friends in their 20′s don’t want to watch the Oscars today, although they love movies. They say they don’t even know who most of the actors are anyway these days. What a difference from years ago! It’s rather sad.
TOLJA! Nikke’s losing her mind! Publishing TOLDJA’S and ARTICLES to substantiate her own opinions — YAWN… Your site is growing more tired than last night’s ceremony. TOLJA! TOLJA! TOLJA!
Props to ONCE and the lovely winner who was allowed to give what was an inspired acceptance speech.
Everyone’s entitled to their opinion equally.
Makes sense that Shales would agree, seeing as how you both have an irrational dislike of Jon Stewart.
And, geez, Pulitzer or not, Shales is one of the most consistently wrong-headed critics around. His Oscar piece is embarrassing. Attacking Stewart for supposedly undermining the audience’s intelligence, and then explaining Stewart’s easy-to-understand Deep Impact joke in the very same paragraph? The beautiful irony and cluelessness are hilarious.
I think both Nikki and Tom Shales have selective memories.
For all this talk about how the show was “clip heavy,” nobody seems to have noted that, for the first time in forever, they did not run clips of the 5 Best Picture nominees, which cut down on the show’s running time by at least 10 minutes (given about 2 minutes each for the clip’s presenter to walk up, introduce the film, and then play the film clip – which is usually followed by a lengthy commercial break).
And actually, this year’s broadcast was a full half hour shorter than last year’s. So why the hate?
I do agree with Nikki that the winners shouldn’t be cut off. For all the kneejerk talk about how the speeches are what pad the show out (and not the huge commercial breaks), I always feel bad when someone gets cut off. Except, of course, when Harvey Weinstein got cut off during his acceptance speech for “Shakespeare in Love.” Now that was an Oscar moment to treasure.
I think they should now limit the number of nominated songs to 3 (if they must keep the category at all – we’re a long way from those “Que Sera Sera” and “Shadow of your Smile” days). It’ll shave off another 10 minutes from the show.
So how would you fix it?
It’s a tough show to do. What else can you add? Bring back Debbie Allen’s interpretive dance? Anything you add will just lengthen an already too-lengthy show.
I would have skipped the randomly thrown together montages of past winners and added back the packages of the best picture nominees throughout the evening. I’d also have told the orchestra to ease up. They went overboard with the playing people off. Maybe they could show clips throughout the show of the Honorary Oscar winner to build that up but in this case, would people have really wanted to see more pieces about art direction?
You just need to have a great opening number and a host that can really own the show (self-deprecating humor doesn’t work as well when hosting an awards show IMO). After that, it is what it is and there’s only so much you can do to improve it.
Jon Stewart commenting on Bardim’s speech being a “moment” was what we call a “joke,” in which the “humor” is derived from “stating” the blatantly “obvious.”
There’s nothing wrong with being a cynic in Hollywood when talking about awards shows, But I can’t disagree more with Nikki & Tom’s review of the awards show.
Watching Jon’s opening monologue, I must have laughed out loud at least a half dozen times. More than I can remember since Billy Crystal.
I work in “The Biz” so maybe I “get it” more than the majority of the national and International audience, but you and Tom sound like you got a serious case of the Post-Oscar Mondays.
I thnk they need to rethink the presentation. the show is a fossil. it’s old-fashioned and appeals to no one. the culture has changed, the film choices have changed and the presentation should change to fit our world as it is today. Fast, casual, intimate with the stars. And cut all of those damn clips, enough is enough……
it’s just a creepy shw at this point.
The Oscars are always going to be at least a little bit on the boring side, no matter what films are nominated or how many clip segments they show.
Instead of putting all the pressure on the major categories to carry the show, how about a year when they try to show people how much respect the technical awards deserve? Even if it just means explaining to middle America the difference between sound editing and sound mixing instead of introducing them with two pudgy guys arguing over which of them is more Halle Berry.
Maybe next year instead of wasting time listing all 80 best picture winners they could do a featurette about the pre- and post-production processes. Worst case scenario, we get a segment that tries to engage the audience instead of a glorified Powerpoint. The bit explaining the voting process was much better than years past when the Academy president just stood there and brought the accountants on stage to wave at everyone. We need more segments like that.
Don’t cut the songs, cut those short film awards from the telecast. Sure, still give out Oscars for best short animated, documentary and live action film if you must, but PLEASE don’t televise it. NOBODY has seen these films unless they are critics on the film circuit and it adds an extra 20 minutes to the show.
I’d much rather leave time for each winner to have a full minute to speak rather than 30 seconds. Seems crazy after all the work they’ve put in to get to that moment, to cut them short so we can give out more awards to films nobody has seen (and that take up much less effort than the work put into a full length film.)
We miss Joan Rivers
These people working the red carpet are bland, insipid, unfunny, tacky
And, we’re young!
Tom Shales disliked Jon Stewart last night? No way! Stop the presses!
Seriously, Shales hates on Stewart every chance he gets. Why should last night be an exception? He has just as much unfounded dislike for Stewart as you obviously do.
Hilarious that these misogynistic AMPAS fossils scramble for an Oscars host, yet leave out 50% of the pool.
How about a female host, boys? Other than a token Ellen or Whoopi every 10 years.
And don’t say women aren’t funny because that’s crap, and the feeble battle cry of the hater. The men certainly are proving not to be funny.
And women certainly are funny to other women, and women are the main demographic watching the Oscars.
What are men so afraid of? Sheesh.
LOL
How on earth is Marion winning an “upset” over Ellen Page?
“Jon Stewart, the cable TV comic brought in to host, did only a fair-to-middling job, mostly middling, and in fact threatened to ruin the poignancy of Bardem’s speech by later informing the audience, “That was a moment,” in case we were all too dumb to have figured that out for ourselves.”
That might be today’s single most dunderheaded take on last night’s show. I would resort to name calling, but there is no word in the English language that implies that level of cluelessness. Wait, yes there is — Shales. Tom Shales, my God… you are so, so Shales.