I’ve written here again and again how much David Geffen wants to own the Los Angeles Times and put it back under local control as well as make it a real must-read.
But the Hollywood mogul was rebuffed first by the Tribune Co’s CEO Dennis Fitzimmons and then by current owner Sam Zell. Now Geffen may be looking for a third chance to buy the paper. I’m told by a source that Geffen and Zell are “in serious discussions” regarding a sale. It’s all very hush-hush, but my source tells me: “Cash flow is not being met for the bankers, revenue is in freefall, and the potential liability on the Combs story is huge. Sam feels he bought a bill of goods. Geffen is back in the mix and he’s going to get it for a deep discount. They’re in serious discussions.”
UPDATE: However, Geffen has been on his yacht vacationing in the South Pacific for weeks. And a Geffen insider insists that the DreamWorks partner and Zell haven’t spoken in months.
Some background is needed. I’ve reported previously that, not long before Dean Baquet became the LA Times editor in July 2005, Jeffrey Katzenberg sought a meet-and-greet to announce that Geffen really wanted to buy the newspaper. Baquet was shocked. “How’s he going to feel the first time we review a movie or music produced by a friend of his?” Baquet asked. Katzenberg just laughed. After that, Geffen’s pursuit of Tribune’s troubled outpost didn’t flag — if anything, it got fired up – until Zell became involved. I’d been told he was “very serious” and “pretty confident” about purchasing the paper someday soon. “He believes that he’s going to be the owner,” an insider explained back in 2006 even though a growing list of fat-cat Los Angelenos were lining up as potential purchases, including Eli Broad and Ron Burkle. But anyone familiar with Hollywood knows how relentless Geffen can be: What David wants, David gets. As a source explained: “He has never stopped doing anything until he’s done.”
So, in September 2005, Geffen invited Baquet’s inside man Leo Wolinsky [now the paper's recently named features and entertainment czar] to his Beverly Hills estate, and together they discussed the possibility of Geffen buying the paper with Baquet’s blessing. Ultimately, Geffen made a formal all-cash offer of $2 bil for the LA Times in November 2006, but parent company Tribune CEO Fitzimmons rejected the bid.
When Zell came into the mix, Tribune Co made clear it was selling the whole company to the Chicago real estate titan in a complicated financial arrangement that threatens employee pensions.
Nevertheless, Geffen still hoped to land the LA Times. He and Zell know each other in Malibu, where both billionaires have their de rigeur beach houses. Geffen heaped praise on Zell in conversations with his insiders: How Sam is a straight-shooter and an honest guy. How Sam wants to win more than any other person Geffen has met in his life. Geffen even proposed running the paper as some kind of joint venture with Zell to circumvent all the tax consequences and corporate regulation. The two men met, but Zell rebuffed Geffen’s overture. After that, it looked like Geffen’s quest was quixotic.
Remember all the changes which Geffen planned to make on Spring Street? They sound like Nirvana now especially as Zell seems intent on running the place into the ground prestige-wise. I’ve previously reported that Geffen would pour money into more hires. He wants to staff — more like stuff — the paper with name writers and journalism stars. (Of course, he’ll raid The New York Times, where Frank Rich and his wife, Alex Witchel, are his good friends and occasional overnight guests. So is Maureen Dowd. So are a lot of literati like Nora Ephron and Nick Pileggi. And don’t forget Arianna Huffington.) He’ll demand quality. He’ll ratchet up the Web site. He’ll figure out a way to bring in Latinos as readers. He’ll overhaul what he thinks are the boring, badly written, inconsequential and pedestrian editorial and opinion sections. He wants the paper to be read and talked about. He’ll put the newsroom ahead of the ludicrous profit margins demanded by Wall Street. That’s not to say he wants to lose money, just that he thinks it could be a good investment.
What not to expect from Geffen is that he’ll devote every waking minute of his life to the venture. I know that, last time around, he sought advice from press lord Rupert Murdoch who tried to talk him out of it. Murdoch advised Geffen this about owning a newspaper: “Every day is going to be a headache for you. I’m used to these headaches. You’re not.” But it’s well-known that Geffen is looking for a new challenge. The movie biz hasn’t excited him for years. His Dreamgirls pic was his last hurrah. And all that’s left is for him to move DreamWorks out of Paramount and into a friendlier partnership with NBC Universal and be done with showbiz altogether.
Stay tuned…
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


‘Bored’ Hollywood mogul has yet another epiphany about limits of his/her current power and influence in the world. So what else is new?
I think it would be fun to run a newspaper. I’ll be able to influence national politics I might even run for public office myself. Rosebud! Rosebud!
No one fucks with David Geffen, I have personally seen what that man can do to a Presidential candidate. My candidate, Hillary Rodham Clinton, for whom I worked on her Advance Team here in Los Angeles is getting her clocks cleaned by Geffen all over the country.
Geffen fought back against the Clintons and backed Obama for them not supporting his causes and broken promises made to him.
Then Geffen somehow gets the Los Angeles Times to endorse Obama over Hillary which put Ron Burkle on notice to not bid against him for the Los Angeles Times. Ron Burkle is the Clintons diehard supporter. (15 million and counting)
Geffen even broke rank with Steven Spielberg, also a diehard Bill Clinton supporter and a fan of Hillary to support Obama.
No one says no to Geffen.
Geffen stalks his prey like a Gladiator in the Roman Colosseum. On second though, he’s Nero Claudius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, the fifth and last Roman Emperor. Nero burned down Rome as he watched the city go up in flames he played on his fiddle.
I had the pleasure of meeting Geffen on a video tape shoot we did for Terry Semel and Joel Silver back in the 90s. We were all given specific instructions to never mention Michael Ovitz’s name to Geffen, if we wanted to have him in the project. We didn’t peep a word and both Michael Ovitz and David Geffen appeared in the legendary video together. Though, Michael Ovitz did upstaged everyone playing Batman, with Ron Meyer playing Ronnie. Ovitz stole the show! (I still got that tape)
Geffen was a cool hang on the day of the shoot. He was warm and sincere person. In fact, I found him to be a natural born charmer and almost a Divine being.
I briefly met Geffen again while doing Advance work for Vice President Al Gore during the 2000 Democratic Convention. Geffen marched into the Centruy Plaza Hotel like he was a 5-Star General leading a charge up a hill.
I could just imagine who gave that order to the Vice President… to kiss Tipper, dipped her down like she’s the Prom Queen during the Convention on live television.
I had a feeling Geffen directed that love story.
Sam Zell, you might as well hand over the front door keys to the Los Angeles Times because Geffen is GOD. And no one in their right mind says no to GOD.
And Geffen said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. Geffen saw that the light was good, and He separated the light from the darkness. Geffen called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.
Be it ever so crumbly, there’s no place like Rome.
I’m trusting they didn’t hire you on your writing skills, Chris. Geffen is equal parts indulged and indulgent. He’s right about the Clintons but, truly, is Obama really all-things-to-all-people? Suffice to say, it suits Geffen’s purposes to say that he is. On the LAT, that rag is dying a slow, painful death. I actually cancelled my subscription a few weeks ago. I can’t believe I did it but I just don’t read it anymore and all that paper was clogging up my blue bin. Geffen would run it like a (not so) benevolent dictator but at least money wouldn’t be an issue. That is until he starts drowning in the red ink. But at least the old tart would have a few good years left, before the Spanish Dancer gets her.
It really doesn’t matter who owns the paper. Look around. Nero has already fiddled and Rome has already burned. Game over!
I don’t suppose the owner of LA’s
biggest newpaper would have any
conflicts with the film industry coverage,
would he?
Owning The LA Times and profitably running The LA Times are two distinct activities. I am a subscriber and I enjoy getting my (ever-shrinking) LA Times in the morning. However, the quality has declined somewhat and I have to wonder why the hell anyone would want to buy a newspaper company now, whether it’s Sam “buy your own newspaper, David” Zell or David “nobody says no to me, Sam…Nobody!” Geffen.