UPDATE: Clooney’s ‘Leatherheads’ Fumbles Friday Box Office
I dive into this weekend’s box office forecast below. But first I need to deal with another matter. We all learned from today’s Variety that WGA member George Clooney went fi-core last fall after a 2-1 credit arbitration decision that only Duncan Brantley and Rick Reilly deserved screen credit on Leatherheads even though Clooney claimed he did a major overhaul on the script which he also directed and starred in. Well, this certainly explains why Clooney never walked the picket line alongside the striking writers.
Clooney told the trade ”he would have quit the WGA altogether, but that would have prevented him from working on all WGA-covered productions. He says he wanted nothing more to do with the WGA but didn’t want to be hampered in his ability in writing scripts.” Variety takes Clooney’s side. Not me. Forget the merits of his case: he was churlish and childish to go fi-core.
Earth to George: such disappointments happen every day of the week to real screenwriters — but they don’t pick up their toys and go home.
I’m not going to diss him for bigfooting the script because that is his right. Nor should anyone hold against him that he starred in it, he directed it, he produced it and he’s already got a villa on Lake Como. But, by going fi-core, he deservedly earns the enmity of 12,000 members of the Writers Guild for refusing to play by their rules.
The veteran writers who do the WGA arbitrations take them very seriously. They spend dozens of hours reading all the drafts, comparing all the changes, and then submitting a document justifying their decision. That’s then read by yet another member who confirms that it’s in line with all the Guild regulations concerning screenwriting credit. So this decision that went against Clooney wasn’t somebody’s whim or envy. Each arbitrator knows what’s at stake. (In order just to be an arbitrator, you have to have a screen credits…)
True, the deck is definitely more stacked against an actor-writer-director-producer, or any combination thereof, on a project. In order for a producer or director (also known as a production entity) to receive credit, each must have made substantative changes in over 60% of the script. The bar is higher for them specifically because of the old days when producers and directors self-administered credits, and everybody and his brother-in-law got a screenwriting credit.
The questions facing the arbitrators was this: did Clooney fundamentally change the story or the characters or the plot? It is a misconception that dialogue doesn’t count: if it fundamentally changed the tone and intent of the movie, dialogue does count. But it is the sum total of all the changes that determines who gets credit and in what order.
Now for the supreme irony: Clooney claimed his major overhaul transformed Leatherheads into a screwball comedy. And that seems to be the weakest part of the picture to top critics who gave it only 36% positive reviews. According to Rotten Tomatoes, their concensus is, “Despite a good premise and strong cast, this pro football romcom is half screwball and half fumble.”
All of Hollywood is especially watching Leatherheads‘ release to see if Clooney can open the movie. It’s not as if Clooney’s career is on the line. Only his paycheck. As one studio mogul said to me this morning, “He’s no Will Smith.” And if his non-ensemble big studio movies keep opening wide under $16 million domestic (Michael Clayton, Intolerable Cruelty, Solaris, Three Kings, Out Of Sight, The Peacemaker, One Fine Day…), then Clooney may have to cut his price accordingly. For all of his media darling coverage, he seems unable to attract moviegoers on his own. I’ve written repeatedly and negatively about Clooney’s box office performances. I think it’s not enough for him to be considered a big a movie star. He has to perform like a big movie star, too.
With a budget of $60 million, the Universal pic was nurtured by a smart marketing campaign that combined football, romance, comedy and nostalgia. Even better, Clooney hyped the hell out of the movie, eking out every ounce of PR possible. The comedy has been tracking well with older men and older women, who’ve been equally enthusiastic for weeks. And there is also a surprising amount of strength with young males and teens.
Even so, my box office gurus don’t expect the movie to be big. Universal is hopeful for high teens. Says a source, “if we can hit $20M, it would be an absolutely exceptional result”. My analysts think $15M-$16M. Bad news for George.
As for other pics, Nim’s Island starring Abigail Breslin and Jodie Foster for Fox/Walden is traditional family fare aimed at girls. Thanks to Saturday kiddie matinees, it should bring in $14M. The Ruins, that horror thriller from DreamWorks/Paramount, is predicted to make single digits.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.






I won’t go see it.
No, his movie career is over. He knows it. He’s too old. And people are sick of seeing the same overpaid, over-hyped actors over and over.
let me save you the trouble nikki: NO! clooney’s a cool dude, but he’s got to quit it with these throwback vanity projects. does anyone remember intolerable cruelty? me neither. this may be a fine film, but it’s not commercially viable. it’s being marketed way more aggressively (and being released way wider) than it should be. this is a niche picture. is ANYONE but clooney was attached, the budget/p&a for this pic would have been half of what it is (actually, this would never have gotten made to begin with w/o george). clooney’s a star, but he’s no miracle worker. due it’s mega-wide release and massive marketing push, this flick MIGHT generate an “acceptable” box office take this weekend but i’m not holding my breath. if nothing else, i predict a mammoth drop-off come next weekend. a month from now, no one will even remember leatherheads. FLOP!
I hope it does far better than people seem to expect. Frankly, it looks like a lot of fun and there’s nothing wrong with that! I’d be going myself tonight if I hadn’t already made other plans a few weeks ago; as it is, I’ll be going soon.
After seeing the trailer for this piece of shit (which includes Clooney’s smug attempt at being “cute”) and considering he’s never had a hit movie on his own, I’ll say that Leatherheads will bomb. Sure, Zellweger is in this too but she’s had very few hits herself. In fact, the only time she’s had a hit with her name in first place is with the first Bridget Jones movie and that was only because it was based on a huge best seller. Alone, Zellweger can’t pull in a crowd. And neither can Clooney. Add the fact that there were reshoots, a movie poster that has Clooney’s head WAY too big for his body to the point he looks like a bobble head, a less than impressive trailer, and now talk that Clooney is pissed off that he’s not getting a writing credit, well it’s got “bomb” written all over it.
Of course, Warner Bros will continue to pay Clooney top dollar to star in more flops. Hail, Hollywood!
I’m not a George Clooney fan (sometimes I wish actors would just shut the eff up)but my family is actually going to go see this this weekend (family consists of myself, wife, and 14 and 11 year old boys, for you audience tracking people). I’ll admit I’m not expecting anything great but it at least looks reasonably entertaining plus my boys and I like sports comedies.
My prediction from here in flyover country: Solid base hit for Clooney (to mix sports metaphors; maybe I should call it a field goal?).
I would also add that, given the ad budget and “awareness” of this movie, if Clooney can’t open this, he needs to go back to television. Putting aside the fact that Hollywood insiders love his stuff, I would argue that his celebrity is more like Tom Selleck– much bigger and more successful on television than on the big screen. Then again, unlike Selleck, Clooney never actually carried a television show on his own so maybe he doesn’t even get the edge over Selleck.
Clooney keeps squeaking along, with disproportionate power and money than earned, because the studio heads have man-crushes on him. He’s old enough for them to relate to, but still has some looks and hair, and deliberately cultivates a glamorous carefree persona.
Based on what I saw in the commercials, John Kransiki is going to be cast as Jim-type characters from now on. I felt like he was trying to woo Renne Zellwegger’s character ala Pam.
Clooney’s people don’t respond to letters so screw Clooney and his work. Hey Clooney check your toilet, that’s where you career is headed!
A.O.Scott in the NY Times. “Tackled it”. Kicked it while it was down and said awful things about this movies “Mama” (Clooney).
It’s going to hurt for a while.
http://movies.nytimes.com/2008/04/04/movies/04leat.html
I don’t think Leatherheads will do very well. I have no idea what Clooney had in mind as the target group. It’s got football and rom-com elements and I think that uneven mix is eventually going to hurt the movie. Plus the script that he’s taking sole responsibility for, is mediocre at best.
He has alienated his core fan base in recent months by taking his private life public. His ancient frat boy jokes, the re-telling of the same old unfunny pranks on talk shows and his whining about being slighted by the WGA won’t help him either.
Uhm dudebro22… “Throwback vanity projects? Yes he has to quit making bad vanity films – like “O’ Brother Where Art Thou?” dot dot dot.
George Clooney unfortunately sees himself as a throwback kind of actor, remember his idiotic oscar speech about ‘being happy about not being in touch?’ Anyhow I digress, he’s sees himself as a Cary Grant even a Gary Cooper type. He wants roles that show him to be loveable yet flawed, handsome yet always has to battle to win the girl. The thing is his ERA has passed decades ago. He has talent and if he has wisom he will see he was born a few decades too late and hopefully, eventually he’ll be happy with the only role he was meant to play..the role of being the man behind the camera.
All of you Clooney bashers are f’ing delusional. Clooney can’t open a movie huh? Really? What planets are you on?
The Oceans films have made close to half a billion dollar world wide.
The Perfect Storm was a massive blockbuster.
His artistically ambitious projects like Michael Clayton. Three Kings, Syriana, Intolerable Cruelty, Good Night and Good Luck, and Out of Sight made more money than any other actor could have pulled in with the same material. Almost all of those films grossed $100 million worldwide just in ticket sales. Not to mention the dvd sales based on this man’s resume. His films have all together grossed over $1 billion, the average film he stars in grosses $55 million, and the average opening for his wide releases is around $22 million.
So….enough about how Clooney “doesn’t open.” Leatherheads isn’t going to make $100 million domestic but nobody in their right f’ing mind would think it’d have that chance in the first place. It’s a throwback, screwball comedy with Football set in the 1920′s. Yeah…that’s gonna get repeated viewing from teenagers. There’s NOBODY else in Hollywood that could get a movie like Leatherheads made in today’s movie climate. Nobody.
So…before we all start discussing the death of Clooney at the box office, just remember what I have stated. The man is a star, and like it or not, he’ll be around for a long, long time.
Personally, I am a huge fan of his work as both actor and director. Leatherheads looks like decent fun and I am sure I will see it but it’s not my first choice this weekend; that belongs to Marty Scorsese’s Shine a Light. But I’d guess that Leatherheads opens to about $16 million and grosses close to $50 million domestic, which combined with overseas grosses and dvd sales/rentals, will make for YET ANOTHER PROFITABLE FILM STARRING GEORGE CLOONEY.
He’s old-school classy and extremely talented as a leading Hollywood man; if only we hade more actors with the kind of screen presence that he has.
“is ANYONE but clooney was attached, the budget/p&a for this pic would have been half of what it is”
So what IS the budget for this? I have no idea, but I’d guess it’s probably fairly low. I think this will do OK, it won’t be huge but I doubt it cost much either.
I don’t get all the hate (envy) for clooney – do people really want him to do some big budget tentpole thing just to make money for the sake of making money? He does films because he thinks they will be good films instead of just trying to pander. Why do other filmmakers get respect for that but he gets bashed for it?
Ugh! Clooney has is so annoying and self absorbed. He will never be a successful producer because all of his projects are vanity one’s for himself. He should be grateful that he wasn’t given a writing credit for this piece o’crap. This script has been kicking around Hollywood for at least a decade. Clooney has aged tremendously over the past year. Lay off the booze George it isn’t doing you any favors. And get some new material will ya? Oh and big YA to the French and Russians for kicking him off the floor at the UN. GMAB
look up ‘vanity project’ owen. clooney didn’t write or direct o’ brother, the coen bros. did. and that film was entirely different in tone and content than this one. apples and oranges. i’m not hating on george. in fact, i like him quite a bit. i just question his decision in making this film. he’s a rly talented filmmaker (not on the level of the coen bros. though), one need look no further than good night and good luck to realize that. i wonder why he squanders his talents and superstar megawattage on projects like this that are destined to fail in the marketplace. and in response to milo, i can promise you the all inclusive budget for this film (prod., p&a, distro, etc.) exceeds $100 mil. the studio will not see a return on this one anytime soon….
I say it won’t break 20 million for the weekend.
clearly “actionman” works for CAA
No way that movie makes $15 million this weekend. It looks retarded. GC looks like a movie star, but he’s not one.
I’m hardly a gigantic Clooney fan, and most star actors simply annoy me and take me out of movies. But I find it hard to completely trash a guy who’s at least attempted to make some decent films, rather than purely cashing in with a series of bad action films interspersed with worse romantic comedies. Three Kings, O Brother, Solaris, Confessions of a Dangerous Mind, Intolerable Cruelty, Good Night & Good Luck, Syriana, The Good German, Michael Clayton… some of these are awful, some are actually pretty great. But the point is, none of them are lazy. At least it’s an attempt at something, which is more most A-List stars even bother for.
Also… this “vanity project” talk is ridiculous. He’s a gigantic star. You could just say every movie he’s in is a vanity project. It’s pretty bloody vain to star in a motion picture. Who cares?
Nikki Finke always publishes these really weird boxoffice-based articles.
Leatherheads will totally bomb. Nobody wants to see it, a money loser all the way.
But before it comes out, we get words about the intelligent marketing campaign.
But when 300 comes out, it’s not praised for being innovative, ground-breaking or interesting. And yet, it opened to 70 million with a niche source material, a burgeoning director and no bankable star.
Leatherheads: Under 12M. Under 36M Domestic. Under 60M Worldwide.
The problem with George Clooney is that he tries too hard. And that we see him trying…to be the new, new Rat Pack… the “hilarious” practical jokes…the “look at me not settling down” bit. George Clooney may have been real at some point, but now he’s just a poor man’s Joey Bishop.
This is for Jimbo: If you do not have the critical and analytical skills to say something more incisive than “It looks retarded,” and are too insensitive to realize why many people do not want to see the term “retarded” used as a pejorative, then maybe you shouldn’t post comments.
I don’t have anything against George Clooney, but I have no desire to see this movie because
1. 1920′s football? No thanks.
2. Weird leather bathing caps. Ugh.