I’ve just received this statement from Harvey Weinstein’s people about today’s CNN report that the ardent Hillary Clinton supporter tried to strongarm House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to embrace his effort to finance a re-vote of the Democratic presidential primaries in Florida and Michigan. “While Harvey has the greatest respect for Nancy Pelosi, the Speaker’s work on behalf of the country and her success in taking the House back for Democrats in 2006, he did convey that it is in the best interest of Senator Clinton, Senator Obama and the historic values of the Democratic Party to find a way to re-vote Florida and Michigan and not disenfranchise millions of voters. Harvey believes the only way Democrats can lose the presidency in 2008 is by repeating what happened in 2000 – and not count all the votes. Harvey assumes that all Democrats stand united behind the principle that everyone should have the opportunity to vote.”
It’s rare that I agree with Harv on anything Hollywood, and certainly I continually disapprove of his bullyboy tactics, but on this issue I think Weinstein is right. Florida and Michigan Democrats should be allowed to vote for Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama no matter if it’s too late to affect the ultimate winner. What’s more is that lost in this CNN story is a very promising idea: Weinstein’s offer to raise money so that both states can hold proper primary elections since the Democratic party keeps saying there’s no money to fund them. “Harvey is very passionate about this issue. He was knee-deep in it in 2000,” a Weinstein insider reminds me. “He now feels it’s important for Democrats to count everyone’s vote. The real story is Harvey looking to get a group together to finance it in Michigan and Florida. This is not about Hillary and Obama but about the party and consistency.”
CNN’s White House correspondent Ed Henry broke a story about how our moviemaking pal tried to bully House Speaker Nancy Pelosi late last month. (Seriously, does she really think she’s deserves better treatment from Weinstein than, say, Hollywood directors and actors?) The CNN report says Weinstein had a heated phone call with Pelosi late last month during which Harv threatened to cut off campaign money to congressional Democrats unless Pelosi embraced a new plan by the movie mogul to finance a revote of the Democratic presidential primaries in Florida and Michigan. CNN cites three officials who were briefed on the contents of the conversation as the sources for its report:
“The three officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk publicly about the private phone conversation, said Weinstein appeared determined to buy Clinton more time in her battle against Barack Obama by pushing for the revote and pressing Pelosi to back off her previous comments that superdelegates should support the candidate who’s leading in pledged delegates in early June.”
After the report aired, Weinstein called CNN today to “vehemently” deny that he issued any threats. “Never, ever was the thought about denying funding to Democrats,” he told the cable news network. That denial was repeated to me today as well.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.







This one’s easy — I learned the answer growing up in the Midwest, playing kickball with the neighborhood kids every night until the street lights came on.
You can’t change the rules in the middle of the game.
Period.
A word to Lifelong Democrat (and others)…
Most elections are a choice between the lesser of 2 evils. I know there are Obama supporters who say they will vote McCain or not at all over Clinton, and of course Clinton supporters who will vote McCain or not at all over Obama. If you are truly a Democrat (or even an Independent), you may want to take some time to think twice about this. After you get over your spite for Obama, would you really rather have McCain as President? Really?
There are plenty of Democrats who weren’t happy with the choice of Al Gore 8 years ago, so they voted for Nader or didn’t vote at all. In hindsight, not such a great idea, was it?
“the Democratic party’s Psycho Ex-Girlfriend”
I like that!
Yes, FL broke the rules. And yes FL did get punished for it. That royally stinks. I live in FL and I voted anyway. So my vote didn’t count. That royally stinks too. But nonetheless, I live in a great country, in a beautiful state and I have the right to vote.
Pelosi has bigger issues on her plate. Namely, moving HR 111 out of the Rules Committee. I’d rather she do that than grant my state a revote.
Gee, a fat balding, self loathing producer with money threatening Nancy Pelosi and the election process by financial intimidation. Harvey Weinstein, the George Soros of the West coast, can actually be so arrogant as to think he and the entertainment industry, can manipulate the house speaker of the United States of America! Man you liberal haven’t even mentioned that aspect in this thread, and you wonder why the Democratic Party is so dysfunctional, unorganized and just plain Looney by encouraging this blatant disregard for the Democratic party process. Stand up against desperation, and do the right thing, after all the Democratic Party stands for love, compassion and understanding…Right?
To Jack Burton:
Do you have a link to a site that quotes Clinton saying that or can you tell me where you saw it? I’m not being confrontational with you nor do I disbelieve you, I just want the story.
Thanks!
What a double standard. He is the Democrats’ Jeb Bush.
What if the NRA had offered to pay for the Florida recount?
And if Weinstein is truly so concerned with fairness shouldn’t he also be all over the Super Delegates possibly trying to usurp the popular vote? Nothing will be more destructive to the Democratic party or cause more dissension. THAT would even more closely mimic 2000 – People in a higher political seat of power trying to sway the vote despite the wishes of the actual voters. Only this time, it’s even worse – it won’t just be the popular vote, it will be the popular vote AND the delegates’ votes thrown aside for the ridiculous “Super Delegates.”
Help,
Here you go (2nd paragraph):
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-05-07-clintoninterview_N.htm
It’s a bummer– I was a John Edwards man and have issues with both Clinton and Obama. But the scorched-earth approach the Clintons have taken in the last six weeks has really turned me off. And co-opting goons like Harvey Weinstein and suddenly pressing the Florida and Michigan issues, which she’d dismissed when she was in the lead, ain’t helping.
Thanks, Jack Burton. Agree with your commentary. I’m a Republican that’s going Democrat this time around. Even McCain scares me. So I’m being extra cautious about which Democrat I support. It’s tricky.
So Harvey and Hillary are so concerned about everyone’s democratic right to vote? And yet Hilary’s only chance now is to convince the superdelegates to OVERTURN the will of the voters.
So let’s stop talking about people’s rights and start talking tuchas here: Harvey is going to lose — big — and he don’t like to lose.
Ha ha, boo-hoo Harvey. You big baby.
This is kind of a random post, but I just wanted to compliment Nikki on posting negative comments about herself and her own posts. I feel like the site used to be much more censored and posts were chosen with an agenda. Lately, I feel like the comments are not scissored out to achieve an ulterior motive and allows more discussion. I guess that’s somewhat of a back handed compliment, but nonetheless…
I really don’t know if this is post-worthy.
What happened here is that both states broke the rules, but the Florida legislature, which is Republican, moved up the primary date to late January for both parties. This forced a decision to where the Democrats were forced to choose the January date against their will. In contrast, Michigan Democrats freely chose their January primary date.
The decision here would be to seat only the Michigan superdelegates because they should be counted no matter what happens, and because superdelegates can make their decision at anytime. As for Florida, allow for a revote, but it has to be done in a caucus setting on or before July 1st.
For the record, this is disenfranchisement, but it is the Republicans in the state house, senate, and governor that are being disenfranchised.
Weinstein sounds so disingenuous. Where was his proposal early in the process. Only when Ms. Clinton is about to lose, his ‘investment’ in her campaign is at risk and will get no returns.
We may be seeing Hillary’s campaign calm now. But hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. The Clintons have their sights set. They are a powerhouse in their own right.
Sen. Obama is a force unto himself and can survive, but he and the democratic party, and all his supporters, will be tested.
Obama’s campaign is now also looking past the nomination to the general election, and more of my critique and comments will go in that direction too.
Apparently Democrats seem to think it’s okay to change rules (laws, whatever) that are inconvenient. Is it any wonder that this country is going to hell and that kids have absolutely no respect for rules, laws, adults… or anything else? Clearly adults, at least the Democrats in this matter (much like illegals, coincidentally) don’t have any respect for inconvenient rules (or truths), so why should kids?
It *is* just one big coincidence, isn’t it?
Well, isn’t it?
No, wait! Somebody mananged to make this whole farce within the Democratic party the Republicans’ fault! Amazing, but true. You just can’t make this crap up, folks. Nobody would believe it.
Comment by Mel — “if barack gets the nomination, the dems can kiss the presidency buh-bye yet again.”
You might be right, Mel. My question is, why do the Democrats continually do such incredibly stupid stuff that manages to lose elections for them that they should have won easily! I refer, of course, to the 2004 Presidential election. If anybody was ripe for defeat, it was george W. Bush. Yet once again, the Democratas snatched defeat from the jaws of almost certain victory.
Here they go again? Oh well. At least they’ll have yet another excuse to whine about how they got done wrong… again, and again, and again….
Most of these Hollywood types were Dean supporters in 2004. Dean has shown his capacity for executive leadership at the DNC hasn’t he? Good lord he’s awful.
All this money Harvey wants to raise should be donated to the party for THE GENERAL ELECTION.
Democrats don’t lose elections because of imperfect candidates. They lose because of their inability to unite the party around the nominee.
No candidate is perfect.
Hillary is the past, Obama is the future. Get on board or its 4 more years of Republican rule in Washington.
Earth to BS Detector, Primaries are set up by the state legislators and signed into law by the Governor. In Florida both the state legislative body and Governorship are ruled by the Republicans and they voted for the Democrats to hold their primary in late January in order to disenfranchise them. This is after the Republicans in Florida stole the 2004 election by erasing every other democratic vote in both Florida and Ohio while Florida destroyed the rolls of over 100,000 democrats back in 2000. Meanwhile a caucus is set up by the party, they pay for all the locations, and for everything else regarding the caucus.
As for Michigan, they have nobody to blame but themselves and don’t get a vote outside the superdelegates.
Finally, as for Democrats doing stuff wrong, the only thing is this, Democrats will win in this election unless a third party can provide a better deal. If you are a republican reading this, prepare for a bloodbath in November.
At this point, it looks like seating delegates from Florida and Michigan isn’t going to rescue Clinton anyway. Her margin wasn’t huge in Florida. In Michigan, she only barely beat “uncommitted”; a lot of people were either voting for Obama and Edwards or voting against her.
Every time Clinton mentioned “experience”, she made a much stronger case for “I’m not as qualified as McCain” than she ever did for “I’m more qualified than Obama.” Once she made that the centerpiece of her campaign, she deserved to lose the nomination, because it ruined her for the general election.
The proposal is much too late. Weinstein should be raising money for Obama’s general election campaign. If he really wants to do Clinton a favor, he should try to sell her on the idea that she can accomplish more as a Senator-for-life than as a presidential candidate who isn’t going to win the primary, and wouldn’t win the general if the primary were handed to her.
Nikki, support Hilary, fair enough, but to support Harve’s attempt to reactivate his Lincoln Bedroom club membership is so outta character… I mean, self-serving states trying to rewrite party law?… c’mon, woman!
Harvey Weinstein and the Hollywood elite present with manifestations of malignant narcissistic traits. Weinstein bankrolled the political campaign of Hillary Clinton. Give, Harvey Weinstein his dues, he knows where the bacon is at; Between the pig’s togas….. Alas, Porky Weinstein is a mishugener.