I’m told CW picked up How To Teach Filthy Rich Girls (WBTV/Alloy), which was expected. And I, too, think the title should be changed to ”Surviving The Filthy Rich” as rumored. (Or, even better, “This Is Our Money-Grubbing Attempt to Clone Gossip Girls But Not Call It A Spin-Off”.)
Primetime Pilot Panic: ‘Filthy Rich’ OKed
By NIKKI FINKE | Sunday May 11, 2008 @ 9:20pm PDTTags: CW Pilots, How To Teach Filthy Rich Girls, Networks, Reality, Studios, TV
This article was printed from http://www.deadline.com/2008/05/primetime-pilot-panic-filthy-rich-oked/
COMMENTS (7)
-
SUBSCRIBE TO DEADLINE NEWS
-
Marketplace
-
Two Weeks of Posts Comments 1 Paula Abdul Won’t Return To ‘X Factor’ In 273 2 RECORD-BREAKING WEEKEND! 4 Films Open $20+M: ‘The 190 3 Why Actors Hate Agents At Pilot Season… 161 4 ‘Chronicle’ Tackles ‘Woman In Black’ For 121 5 SAG-AFTRA: Exclusive Post-Merger Details 120 ‘New Girl’ Music Video
News/Opinion Poll
Loading ...By The Numbers
Title Studio Gross 1 Chronicle FOX $22.0M 2 The Woman In Black CBS $20.9M 3 The Grey OPRD $9.3M 4 Big Miracle UNI $7.8M 5 Underworld: Awake... SNY $5.5M 6 One For The Money LGF $5.2M 7 Red Tails FOX $4.7M 8 The Descendants FSL $4.6M 9 Man On A Ledge SMT $4.4M 10 Extremely Loud & WB $3.8M 11 Contraband UNI $3.4M 12 The Artist TWC $2.6M 13 Beauty And The Beast DIS $2.6M 14 Hugo PAR $2.3M 15 The Iron Lady TWC $1.9M 16 Mission: Impossible - PAR $1.7M 17 Joyful Noise WB $1.5M 18 Haywire REL $1.2M 19 Alvin And The FOX $1.0M 20 Sherlock Holmes: A WB $1.0M SOURCE: RENTRAKBox Office Poll
Loading ...Archives
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006

- Whitney Houston Interview: Talks 'Sparkle,' Aaliyah's Death And More In One Of Her Final Interviews
- BAFTA Awards 2012 Red Carpet: Michelle Williams, Viola Davis Meryl Streep And More (PHOTOS)
- BAFTA Rising Star Award: Hayley Atwell On Lack Of Female Nominees
- 'The Vow' Wins Box Office: Beats Out 'Safe House' And 'Star Wars' With $41.7 Million
- Whitney Houston Dies: Remembering Her Finest Onscreen Moment In 'The Bodyguard'


- Artist, Meryl Streep Win Big at BAFTA Awards
- Berlinale Dispatch: The Taviani Brothers — Who? — Return with a Great Shakespeare-in-Prison Movie
- Berlinale Dispatch: Greetings from the Baked Potato of Film Festivals, 62nd Edition!
- Summit and Lionsgate Hoping for Sixth Twilight Movie, Of Course
- REVIEW: Star Wars: Ep. I - The Phantom Menace Adds Stunning Third Dimension of Meh



Love it. I’ve been a Rina Mimoun fan since the old dawson days. Way to go!!!!!
really ,The CW now trying to clone ratings challenged shows…. the network will be gone in a year!
why can’t they fashion the CW network after the WB in its heyday
WB was great when it had Felicity, Dawson’s Creek, 7th Heaven, Buffy, on all at the same time, had good music in shows which it lightly promoted at the end.
What the CW needs (needed) to do is go back to the guys who made the WB relevant…it wasn’t the pretty people. It was Joss Whedon, JJ Abrams, Kevin Williamson (ok, KW only lasted about a good year or so and his second show was terrible). Whedon and Abrams had new pilots and they went to FOX. The CW/WB is where these guys got their TV start, and the CW should have welcomed them back with open arms, no matter what the price…
Seriously, I’m starting to wonder whos dumber…tv executives with no clue or the movie executives who can only green light:
1. Films based on tv shows from any time period
2. “Reimaginings”
3. Sequels, even 30 years later (hi indy, how’s the alzheimers)
4. Bad english versions of great japanese film (don’t you ever EVER consider that bastardized american version of Battle Royal)
I still go with tv executives being worse as they tend to whine and moan a lot more.
#
why can’t they fashion the CW network after the WB in its heyday
WB was great when it had Felicity, Dawson’s Creek, 7th Heaven, Buffy, on all at the same time, had good music in shows which it lightly promoted at the end.
Comment by j. — May 12, 2008 @ 6:42 am
because the wb took on upn’s shit. i had a bad feeling about the merger to begin with. i never liked 90% of upn’s programming and when the suits decided to meld both networks together, i knew that the cw would have a stain on it that will never wash off. the problem is that the cbs side is taking more control while warners is taking a passive role in everything.
But didn’t the merger result in the WB people being let go and the UPN people taking over? Either way The CW seems to be getting smarter about it’s network branding. Remaking 90210 brings buzz to a channel no one is watching.
If I were running that network I would have also fast tracked a remake of “21 Jump Street”. That way 2 fan faves of yesteryear would bring eyes to a network that no one is paying attention to, and maybe they will stick around to see other network offerings.
This show is based of the book by zoey dean. Which I thought was great. So hopefully the show will be good to. As far as being a spin off of Gossip Girls . i dont think so.