With Comic-Con fast approaching (July 24-27) and all the Hollywood studios getting ready, I understand that Warner Bros has been nervously monitoring the deteriorating situation at its subsidiary DC Comics. There could be a major shake-up – especially if Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes keeps cleaning house inside the Big Media corp. There’s a lot of chatter, from comic book circles like io9.com to trade media like Publishers Weekly, that DC Comics Senior VP and Executive Editor Dan DiDio, who oversees the DC Universe line of superheroes, is in major trouble. I don’t pretend to know all the ins and outs of the comic book culture. But my own reporting, and others’ coverage, show the following:
The problem isn’t just that, under DiDio’s leadership, fanboys are disappointed with the directions of Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman and other characters. (How dopey of DiDio to come out with a new series Decisions this September where the superheroes take political stands timed to the election.) Little wonder that fanboys are selling “Dan DiDio Must Die” t-shirts. But also average sales of the DCU line are down more than 20% from a year ago, and DiDio has lost a big chunk of existing readers in a year while deliberately failing to reach out to new ones.
But the biggest bad news is that DC’s much hyped Summer 2008 release Final Crisis, the 7-issue miniseries, isn’t the huge hit it was supposed to be. Comic Book Resources reviewed, ”This isn’t a disaster just yet, but six more issues of this caliber and this could spell the end of the sales power for a company event at DC Comics. Final Crisis, indeed.” Not to mention those misleading full-page DC Comics ads promoting Final Crisis by referring to an upcoming ”Batman R.I.P.” storyline. That could have unleashed a box office backlash against Warner Bros’ all-important The Dark Knight release next month. (“We can’t kill him during a big movie year,” DiDio finally made clear.)
With DC Universe so much a part of Warner Bros’ bottom line, getting DC Comics back on track has to be a top priority. For one thing, the movie studio’s biggest DC characters remain in development limbo – Superman, Wonder Woman, the Justice League. Only Batman has an ongoing live action franchise. But whose fault is that? Warner Bros Pictures Group prez Jeff Robinov and Warner Bros prez/COO Alan Horn (who still retains greenlight authority and therefore has to share the blame for this) remain paralyzed by indecision, chaotically starting and stopping work on scripts for the biggest DC characters.
Meanwhile, Marvel is about to exploit the hell out of its characters, primo or not. Right after Iron Man‘s success, Marvel Studios announced an ultra-ambitious film development slate through 2011, culminating in an “Avengers-Themed Summer”, introducing a Captain America film and then uniting heroes Iron Man, Hulk, Captain America and Thor in a single film. Heck, if I were Bewkes, I’d shake up Warner Bros as well as DC Comics.
To add insult to injury, Marvel’s Secret Invasion comic book was #1 in May, while DC’s Final Crisis was only #2. Worst of all, DC had only three comics in that month’s top 10 best-sellers. As one Internet commenter opined on io9.com: “DC needs to make this move just to show that they do in fact care about their product, and appease fan boy rage. Even if the higher-ups at TW really like Mr. DiDio’s work, the sales numbers and overall editorial inconsistancies under his recent tenure has caused public perception to view him as being incompetent.” DiDio, who took over in 2004, can’t be happy his current contract expires soon. Or that Jimmy Palmiotti is being handicapped as his replacement. (Palmiotta is currently an exclusive writer for DC Comics and formerly the co-founder of Event Comics and co-head of Marvel’s Marvel Knights imprint with friend and current Marvel Editor-in-Chief Joe Quesada. Fanboys also suggest Joey Cavalieri, a veteran of both comics companies, should be considered.) Now the question is whether DiDio will exit before Comic-Con, or after, or at all — and how much of a distraction this will be at the confab.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Long time reader, first time commenter.
Surprised you are talking about this, Nikki but at the same time, I’m not. This summer, DC has the potential to do something that Marvel have been doing for months now and that is milk off a franchise with it’s books.
Everything with the words ‘Iron’ and ‘Man’ has flown off the shelves in comic stores across the States and I’m sure the Hulk titles will do the same thing considering the numbers the movie is getting.
Time Warner are probably seeing what’s going on right now in the comics (a storyline that could potentially be replacing Bruce Wayne as Batman) and they’re really concerned about how this will appeal to not just the fanboys but the casual comic fan. What was the point of seeing Bruce Wayne in the film if he’s a blivering wreck in the comics?
As someone who has only heard interviews and panels with Dan, he could be judged as a really nice guy. He listens and understands what people say but at the same time…the decisions that have been taken recently have really dragged down his reputation as the head editor. Having your ass kicked by Marvel especially during a big event written by one of your most famous writers doesn’t help things at all.
Of course, he shouldn’t be the guy talking all the crap..but at the same time, the buck stops at the guy in charge and the shake up might not just effect DiDio’s job.
This has been a rough two weeks with DC, also adding their “no comment” lack-of-responses to their firing of veteran Batman/Robin writer Chuck Dixon, and the resigning of Senior Vice President of business development John Nee.
Rumors speculate that Dixon was let go from the company in relation to the upcoming “Batman RIP” storyline in which Bruce Wayne will retire and the current Robin could be his replacement. Dixon was writing Robin at the time of his letting go.
No reasons as to why Nee left just yet..
OK, as a fanboy and a Sundance-goer, let me jump in here with my two cents:
1. Marvel’s been eating DC’s lunch for years at the comic book shops with its monthly titles (and Marvel’s EIC, Joe Quesada, is as widely loved/hated as DiDio–his recent reboot of Spider-Man, wiping out about three decades of continuity–a big fanboy thing–by pretending that Peter Parker never married Mary Jane in the comics).
2. Marvel’s numbers are down, too. Comics are too f*cking expensive. There’s a glut of titles, and many of them are just shit. Secret Invasion, Marvel’s big summer title with a Skrull invasion of Earth, was set up far better than DC’s thus-far-ponderous Final Crisis–which so far has killed one veteran DC character, Martian Manhunter, with the promise of bringing the Silver-Age Flash, dead since 1985, back to life.
3. DiDio, like Quesada, seems to have an outsized view of his own talents. He’s got some big-name comics guys in his stable–writers and artists jump between DC and Marvel with great frequency, so there’s a pretty good balance between the two–but he has shepherded too many deaths (a dime a dozen in comics) and too many reboots to keep the long-term fan happy.
4. Its Warners’ fault, not DiDio’s, that more of its movies haven’t gotten the greenlight. I wish Josh Whedon had not walked from Wonder Woman, but are we really any worse off for not having seen Bryan Singer’s sequel to Superman (the first one was ponderous and redundant–no more Luthor or land-grabbing schemes, please) or George Miller’s Justice League (which sounds SO iffy). I have great hopes for The Dark Knight, but no desire to see Christian Bale’s Batman in a team movie.
5. Marvel Studios exceeded expectations with Iron Man, but The Incredible Hulk was still just a B-movie with A-level talent. And among the recent pool of movies from other studios Spider-Man 3 was awful; both Fantastic Four movies reeked; X-Men 3 disappointed; and Daredevil was a waste of good characters and storylines. Captain America (great potential) and Thor (which will be REALLY difficult to get right) will prove whether Iron Man was just an anomaly of getting the right director and actor together.
So what am I trying to say here? For the good of the comics, not Hollywood, a change at the top of DC would not be a bad thing. But the nature of comic-book publishing has changed–and anyone who follows DiDio is going to face the same set of problems, with no quick fixes in sight.
Wonder Woman has had so many starts and stops because Jeff Robinov is still trying to figure out how to make it with a male actor as its lead.
The sad thing is, there are so many great properties at DC – “Preacher,” “100 Bullets,” “Fables,” etc. – but the DC/Warner Brothers deal has become known to comic creators as “golden handcuffs.” While doing a book at Oni or IDW or Dark Horse can mean after-market bucks selling the thing as a property to Hollywood, if you do something with DC, it means that unless HBO is interested or Warners Feature Development is interested, you’ll never get it done at another studio.
And, beyond “Constantine,” Warners hasn’t really shown an interest in mining their comics library beyond the capes.
You want to make DC compete? Warners should take chances on the ACTUAL best shit in the DC canon. While yes, there’s a “Y: The Last Man” movie coming, what happened to “The Losers?” “Transmetropolitan” is probably too expensive, but “Preacher” is one of the greatest comics of all time.
People are regarding Marvel comics with fresh eyes because of the reinvention. There hasn’t been an “Iron Man” movie before – it’s all new. Yeah, the comic book has existed for a lot longer than “Preacher” or “Fables,” but where DC Comics has Marvel absolutely destroyed is with the creative talent on the DC/Vertigo side – some of the best fiction writing being done today.
If Warners started looking into the books that sell 15,000 to 20,000 copies a month rather than relying on stale, old warhorses like Bats and Supes that – admittedly – can move 200,000 to 300,000 copies a month just because they’re familiar (but for how much longer?) – then the WB could potentially show why they’re lightyears ahead of Marvel in the intellectual property department. Seriously – where’s Marvel going to go after Avengers? Nowhere (well, “Ant Man,” hopefully) as they’re tapped out.
For DC, if Warners would only start seriously considering material based on “story” rather than how many toys it sold last year and how many more it would sell with a new movie, THEN they wouldn’t be in this position.
I understand the estate of Wonder Woman creator Dr. William Moulton Marston has somehow managed to retain a lot of control over the character and have differences of opinion with the studio and the revolving door full of filmmakers working on it as to any movie version. At least that’s what I’ve heard, and I’m about as far out of the loop as anyone these days.
Now I have to say that I don’t think DC is helping itself with the never ending series of “Crisis”-style events that went from being seen as a serious attempt to make sense out of 70 years of DC continuity, into a marketing gimmick, and then into a source of apathy.
That 70 years of continuity is also turning off new readers, and old readers who would like to get back into comics, but can’t get by with the relatively simple back-story they knew when they were kids. If you haven’t been deep in it your entire life, without a break, you are so out of it.
Marvel’s trying to win over new fans with their Ultimate Marvel line of comics designed for younger and more casual readers, and that’s helping them reach new markets and fans.
Another problem is comics distribution. I haven’t seen a comic book at any local convenience stores or drugstores since the 1980s. Most people don’t have a comic shop in their immediate community, and casual readers don’t want the hassle of shopping for them online, when a catchy cover on a rack in their local Kwik-E-Mart could have caught their eye and made the sale.
Comics went from being a mass market, to a niche market. The movies have the potential to reopen the mass market, but it would require a new business model, distribution system, and possibly even a complete reboot of their whole superhero mythology.
The DC movie division is completely separate from the DC comics division. That is why there is paralysis there. Can’t blame the comics people for that.
That DC is being beaten in sales by Marvel is nothing new. That’s been happening regularly since the 70s. In the past 5 years, DC has only beaten Marvel in sales in about 4 months. Sales are mostly down at Marvel, too. It’s the nature of the business to have downturns, and with the economy in the dumps, pleasure reading is one of the places where people cut back.
Replace Didio, then give DC more autonomy over film productions…no more Superman Returns/Catwoman debacles, please. Or better yet, spin-off DC, entirely. Split-adjusted, don’t Marvel shares trade around 3x a share of TWX?
One thing that isn’t mentioned is that in terms of independent (non superhero) properties, DC is WAY ahead of the game. Y The Last Man, Sandman, ExMachina, Preacher, Scalped all originate under the DC umbrella and have long lives at bookstores and on Amazon, where their editions go into sixth, seventh, eighth printings. These are projects that often garner development deals and other tie-ins and licensing opportunities. Marvel just has their superheroes, and that’s it, really.
DC’s “creator-owned” (but usually Time Warner CONTROLLED) backlist is the most impressive in American comics. Period. And the upcoming WATCHMEN movie should underline that point.
And the monthly periodical sales (which are definitely in decline) are only the tip of the financial iceberg for comics, which is increasingly becoming a backlist-driven business.
None of this has to do with Didio, though, who has just not done that good a job with his responsibilities. One big problem at DC is the amount of heavy lifting accorded to their star fanwank writer Geoff Johns. Johns’ books are unreadable mazes of continuity that pay endless, pointless homage to decades-old and obscure stories and themes.
DC doesn’t publish a single book that would be attractive to someone who liked the Nolan Batman films and wants a similar experience.
DC could have a huge film franchise in the “Sandman” series, if they’d only realize what a huge goldmine it is. I can’t believe no one has done anything good with that yet.
As a former long-time DC reader it is really disheartening to see how far their comics have fallen. As for seeing more DC characters on screen, Warners need to take a hard look at how Marvel is rebooting their film franchises. There needs stronger, consistent creative control from the comic side and less corporate intrigue. Besides Batman, I am looking forward to Watchmen, that should be a portal of what JLA could have been.
Regarding the DC vs. Marvel numbers. It’s a seesaw. Think of television ratings. One network dominates for a time, then another. Same is true of the two big comics publishers.
And movies into comics? That’s an animal unto itself, one that can easily be tamed.
While every fanboy and fangirl knew of Iron Man long before the movie, how many theater goers were aware of the character before they saw the television commercials? Not many I would guess.
DC has an amazing stable of titles beyond Superman and Batman. Lesser titles that have a dedicated following because they have GOOD STORYLINES! and those good stories can translate easily to box office.
They just need someone on the Coast who understands film AND comics.
I think there are lots of misconceptions in this post, simply from Nikki’s obvious (and admitted) lack of familiarity with the comic book industry.
First of all, any money to be made is in the licensing; goodness knows that’s the only reason DC Comics still exists. And DC Comics has nothing to do with any of that stuff — i.e., movies — other than being the source material. Whether DiDio’s contract gets renewed in October or not has nothing to do with, well, anything other than floppies that aren’t going to sell very many copies anyway, regardless of who’s in charge.
Marvel has been kicking DC’s ass for years and years and more years now. This is nothing new. Saying, “Worst of all, DC had only three comics in that month’s top 10 best-sellers,” is just silly when that’s been how the sales figures generally break down and have for years. DC generally has a handful of titles in the Top 10, with the rest being Marvel fare.
The fact that FINAL CRISIS was the second-best-selling comic last month actually means it *is* a huge hit. A DC book that beat everything but one book by Marvel? Definitely not a failure. Especially seen as it was coming after the trash that was COUNTDOWN.
So it doesn’t match continuity, as that CBR review was complaining about. Pretty much every complaint in that review can probably be said of every super-huge-it-will-change-everything-you-know summer crossover event. They’re like TV sweeps — promising huge-you-can’t-miss-it-change but really just serve up the same boring drek there was last February/May/November that didn’t actually change anything.
Comic book fans are never satisfied. To be honest, even if FINAL CRISIS was the absolute very best damn thing ever written and selling 250,000 copies a month and going to reprints, the fanboys would STILL find things to rail against and use as evidence to call for DiDio’s head.
That’s not to say that DC doesn’t have some creative problems. The line could definitely be better; there’s a lot of bad stuff there. They had something of a little renaissance several years back when they had lots of top-quality talent turning out really good stuff (which, interestingly, didn’t sell anywhere near what the superhero-by-numbers crap being published by Marvel at the time were pulling). But I do wonder if, as I saw Steven Grant suggest somewhere, if DC wouldn’t just go with another outsider to replace DiDio instead of turning to a freelance writer.
But when it comes right down to it, no one will be affected but the small niche audience who still reads comics. I mean, the top-selling book (SECRET INVASION) is only selling 200,000 copies and the only books that sell more than 100,000 copies are all in the Top 10. That means twice as many people watched ALIENS IN AMERICA as read all of the books in the Top 10 last month — assuming the readers are all different, when all 10 books probably share a huge chunk of readers.
Forget creative issues. A couple years ago a stock analyst for a big wall street firm stated that DC’s library of IP was the most underutilized (and hence undervalued)corporate asset currently being traded. Since then TW has done almost nothing to extract the value from their library. It’s not Dan’s fault but rather Alan and Jeff’s complete failure to get it in gear.
For what is actually going on with DC and Dan DiDio, make sure you read Lying In The Gutters on Monday NOON PST, 3PM EST, 8PM BST…
The big problem with DC, and no one seems to be mentioning it, is that people like me (and apparently 25% of their readership) quit when they suddenly had all their titles become part of a massive and convoluted cross over storyline. They create a situation wherein you can only follow their series if you know the ins and outs and history of every character, and you’re required to buy several more titles that you have no interest in just to fill in the current gaps. Whatever Crisis. 52. Fuck you. I realize there’s a simple reason for this. If Joe Reader has to buy ten books a month to keep up, then Joe Reader is buying more books than usual.
But what if I, and the anyone with a brain, doesn’t like being forced to read all that shit? What if I just want to buy the character’s I like? I buy my books based on the writing, not some insane desire to keep up with crazy continuity and these huge complicated stories. That’s why I love how you can read something like Runaways or Punisher and whatever the big stupid crossover is at the moment is out in the periphrary. No one gives a fuck about that stuff.
Besides their Vertigo titles, Ex Machina, and Blue Beetle, I’m done with DC. I don’t have the time, patience, or desire to throw my cash at all that bullshit. And it’s clearly not just me. The decisions DC has made in the last two years have almost made me quit reading comics altogether. How boneheaded can they be?
I have had major problems with DC Comics recently. They have become to insular, to attached to random continuity. They also have a bad habit of adding scenes that relate to some grander story into stories that have no relation to it, or starting a story one place and ending it somplace else (see the recent Titans #1, which somehow was part 2 even though it was the debut issue, and nowhere does it explain where part 1 is). The comics don’t seem to enjoy a very tight consistent continuity, seeing as how during the Final Crisis story, no regular titles will be affected. I know they will say so fans don’t have to pick up every book to get a full story, but really thats a load of BS. Seeing as how they are releasing a steady stream of mini-series and one-shots that you have to pick up to complete the story. It also makes it hard to get a single interpretation of characters, seeing them in so many differing situations and not exactly acting in a consistent tone. It’s also pretty bad when the writer of your big event has to defend his work, because those in charge neglected to follow his initial outline, and didn’t properly set anything up to flow smoothly into Final Crisis #1, it’s bad when you have to all of a sudden come up with a new comic (DC Universe #0), to try and explain stuff that should have been explained in your weekly series (Countdown) leading up to your big event. It makes Final Crisis feel like it doesn’t matter, and that it’s happening in some small section of the comic universe apart from the regular titles. Doesn’t that kind of defeat the purpose of a company wide storyline. Marvel at least has maintained a constant tone throughout their titles. Although someone may bring up the recent Spider-Man storyline, which did not in fact do as much damage as people seem to think it did, at least we ended up with a much more enjoyable spider-man comic. Not some quasi-cosmic spider-totem BS, and depressingly dark stories. Spider-Man has always been its best when it is a lighter toned book, so that when something dark happens it has a weight to it. DC as it is now, seems to cater to much to the past, well not explaining the present very well. It uses the past as a crutch and forcing things to fit way to often. I am really hoping that Final Crisis is indeed the final one for quite awhile, as it has just become a reason to constantly restart too much and has really distorted the DC continuity.
Wait?
I don’t get this…
Where is the research Nikki and others?
The single biggest problem at DC Movies is the one guy running it- a bumbling maroon named Gregory Noveck who spent two years acting like he was Avi Arad and actually owned the place before DC Head Paul Levitz smacked him down. I personally know at least 15 filmmakers and 30 DC creators who wish him gone. He is a self absorbed idiot who acts like he has power and knowledge and he is the main reason. If an on lot producer says they want to do Fables, well Noveck says “NO I have other plans” Plans that lead no where.
Robinov and Horn don’t know all the characters and it is not their job.
Noveck was supposed to cross pollinate and instead he has just acted like a know nothing jerk.
I think DiDio’s worst decision was letting Grant Morrison become DC’s unofficial creative director (in addition to writing FINAL CRISIS and BATMAN R.I.P.). Morrison’s a genius, but his ideas are too esoteric to rebuild the whole DC universe around them. And his work requires so much knowledge of past continuity that it’s hard for new readers to jump on. I’m reading FINAL CRISIS and have no fricking idea what’s going on.
Wow, comic book fans come out in force. I gotta love it, I learned something new every day
Thanks for all the informative information guys.
Honestly, like Nikki, I know nada about Comic Books, the only thing I know of is some of the movies are based off the comic books. Batman, Superman, Spiderman, IronMan and so forth, but as for the detail part of it, I am inexperienced.
But what I wanted to ask, is I hear a lot of complaints on different blogs about how DC/Warner messed up Smallville. How they made Clark into this pussy whipped of a man pining after Lana.. That Clark and Lex were never really friends to begin with (according to the comics) Again I know nothing really about the foundation of comics.
But how messed up is Smallville? Did they really screw the series up?
Too bad this guy at Warner can’t clean the house of the CW executives lol
Rich Johnston, you are such a whore and that’s why I love you mate!
As to the article at hand, I think its just a matter of TPTB in charge of TW don’t know what to do with DC. It would be completely different if DC were independent of TW in regards to their film opportunities. But being owned by a big corporate monster that deals not only with DC but also mainstream movies and television. Time Warner needs to take a page from Marvel’s playbook and split off the DC film franchises into its own development unit. Jeff can still get final say and Warner Bros. can still be the distributor but they need a specialized division to nurse these grossly neglected properties through development. One thing Marvel did with Iron Man is bring some of their top writers to Hollywood to meet with producers and help with the story. Guys that live and breathe in the comics world and know their shit. Warner Bros. and DC by extension is too much of a top dog run company. For the comics properties they need to let the folks that know the material contribute to the films. Obviously Dan Didio isn’t doing something right. For as much shit as Joey Q gets over at Marvel you don’t see “Joe Quesada Must Die” T-shirts at the Marvel convention panels. So something is obviously wrong in River City. I don’t agree that Joe Palmiotti is the right choice though. He’s a great writer (alongside writing partner Justin Gray) but I don’t think he’s the right guy for the job.
As for San Diego Comic-con… well I’m having some “Dan Didio Is Dead” T-shirts printed up just in case.
(Nikki, sorry for the double post, browser was acting up!)
TV Fan, DC Comics really has nothing to with the Smallville series… or any tv show or movie, that’s WB and whatever production company the property is at (ie. Batman with Chris Nolan, Superman with Bryan Singer/Jon Peters, etc.)
For those who aren’t aware, Smallville is a mess for many reasons, probably the finest expert at explaining this is novelist Neal Bailey, who has critiqued and analyzed every episode.
Smallville also remains on the air because behind Americas Next Top Model and WWE Smackdown, it is the CW’s top show averaging near a 3.0 rating each week. Most of its fans are teenage girls, not comic fans.
DC is also to blame because unlike Marvel that can have books starring 40+ year-old characters easily accessible to new readers, DC does not.
In 1986, DC had a “reboot” of their superhero universe (Crisis), erasing their previous 50 year history and restarting from scratch. However, in 2006 there was a comics event that undid just that (Infinite Crisis) and now the past 20 years of “revised history” created with new readers in mind is now gone, replaced with the old past.
“Marvel at least has maintained a constant tone throughout their titles. Although someone may bring up the recent Spider-Man storyline, which did not in fact do as much damage as people seem to think it did, at least we ended up with a much more enjoyable spider-man comic.”
Who are you trying to kid? Spider man is much worse off than it even been thanks to Joey Q personal problems with Marriage and integrity. The sales is a good indication considering that they’re falling down the chart every month. Spider man used to be a top ten book and now its almost out of the top 20. Spider man is in the shape DC is now, so don’t give me Spider man is more enjoyable now bit because that’s BS and the sales say otherwise.
“DC could have a huge film franchise in the ‘Sandman’ series, if they’d only realize what a huge goldmine it is. I can’t believe no one has done anything good with that yet.”
I’m not a comic book fanboy, but I think the statement above is illustrative of the problem with them.
Sandman? Never heard of it/him.
My recognition of DC Comic characters more or less begins and ends with the Justice League of America as it was depicted in the cartoon “Super Friends.”
DC Comics has Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Flash, and the Green Lantern. Toss in Captain Marvel/Shazam and that’s about the limit of their marketable characters for film.
Marvel has Spider-Man, Iron Man, Blade, X-Men, Fantastic Four, Hulk, Ghost Rider, Daredevil, and the Punisher. That’s just what’s been made, and it hasn’t been an unanimous hit parade.
Hopefully, I’m wrong, but Thor doesn’t sound like a box office winner to me. Captain America? Maybe. “[U]niting heroes Iron Man, Hulk, Captain America and Thor in a single film?” That sounds cluttered as hell – like “Batman & Robin,” but hopefully without the camp.
I know Comic-Con is considered an important part of marketing, but the impact of fanboys, at best, is made on weekend one and is done at that point.
Harold – those may be the characters you know, but DC has actually managed to introduce more characters to younger generations via animated and live action shows produced more recently than the Superfriends. I’d say, at the very least, you’d have to add Green Arrow, Supergirl/Batgirl, the Teen Titans and Martian Manhunter to your list.
To actually gage the most popular comics titles/publisher, someone would need to persuade Rapidshare to open up their server logs…