EXCLUSIVE: I’ve confirmed what I first heard on Monday: that Universal Classics has sent out an email to about 35 art house exhibitors and other film bookers of classic films alerting that the Universal Studios fire destroyed nearly 100% of archived 35mm prints
kept in the so-called “video” vault on the lot. So, in the short term, Universal has canceled bookings of anything archival coming directly from Universal City and can’t honor any film bookings of prints that were set to ship from there. Let me be clear: I am assured by insiders that the negatives are not affected, thankfully — only the actual 35mm prints used for repertory circulation of classic films. Prints from that very rich vault which also includes pre-1950 Paramount include such classics as Frankenstein, Son of Frankenstein, Duck Soup, Hell’s Angels, Brides of Dracula, Incredible Shrinking Man, Buck Privates, Hold That Ghost, and so many, many more. Some Industry types are emailing me that, with these prints gone, and the expense of making new prints, they fear that art houses and cultural organizations and film societies and festivals may never see these films theatrically again. But I’m told that Universal has already committed itself to making new prints. Of course, there will be delay and disappointment in the immediate future. But that’s only a timing issue. I’m told it’s possible that some of these prints may have duplicates in storage at other locations. So, over the next few weeks and months, Universal will be piecing together what extra prints, if any, it does have elsewhere. I still can’t get a straight answer to all your questions about why the video vault wasn’t fireproof. In part because the Uni people just sound completely frazzled still about the fire’s aftermath. But Universal does have an extraordinary history as a leader in film preservation. Still, Hollywood must, repeat must, do everything to preserve its history. So everyone try harder, spend more, and just do it.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Ooh, that could hurt a lot of groups, who rely on Universal’s archives to fill their schedule.
Hopefully, Universal will follow its own tradition and make new prints for these outlets. Not only because it would be a “nice” thing to do, but it can also make good business sense.
Art house theaters screening classic movies are a great way to promote DVDs of classic movies. Art house patrons usually collect movies too. Also there’s the issue of audience goodwill. People are more likely to spend their money on the products of a company they view in a positive light, and this is an extremely important, but often overlooked factor in the movie biz.
I’m curious as to what will happen to the workers who allegedly started the fire.
gr8 job Nikki on keeping up with this story. Quite a list of films.
Yes, hollywood should definitely get on the ball. In the end, they will always make this money back because many of us would continue promoting these movies, as we already have over the years.
in terms of what happens to the workers who started it. I believe it was reported that it was an accident by construction workers, so i think the construction company is insured/bonded to cover accidents such as this. However, the workers “maybe” fired, depending on the circumstances surrounding the insident.
In any event, Uni needs to have better facilities for their archives. I have known of other archives in libraries that caught fire, and the entire bldg didnt go up like what happened here. And they also involved fires caused because of welding. Better precautions to pevent future damage simply have to be planned from the get go.
Unfortunately, before they can even look at what kind of new facitlity they need., Uni will have alot of repair/restoration/copy work to do, for any film that might be damaged or destroyed.
someone has their work cut out for them. especially since someone else didnt do it in the first place.
I don’t see what the problem is. Isn’t all this stuff already on YouTube?
Maybe someday one will forget for a nanosecond the F… word (Franchise, I mean) and recall what was all this about: movies.
Don’t they have fire insurance to cover the replacement value of the prints that were burned?.
Yes, it’s pretty obvious you don’t see what the problem is Mark.
The negatives are fine as Nikki said, which means the film’s aren’t lost. So the matter of posterity is somewhat secure. But most theatrical screenings depend on the 35mm prints that are painstakingly restored and cleaned up, with single films sometimes being worked on for months. What the PROBLEM is, is that cinephiles and film societies can now only rely on the limitations of DVDs and smaller prints to screen for audiences. Audiences who actually want to and need to see films of yore on a large screen with an auditorium full of friends.
Maybe GE and NBC can pull together some of their bean counters and black belts to figure out how they will be able to replace everything lost at half the cost.
Universal will take this unfortunate event and make the most of it. All cinema exhibition is going digital in a big way. The next four years will see the elimination of 35mm prints altogether. This is a golden opportunity for Universal to make DCI compliant prints of these classics and distribute them to all the theatres that want to screen them. DCI compliant prints will offer a pristine image, they don’t scratch and they are a lot less expensive to distribute than 35mm prints.
While an unfortunate event, the film community will benefit from the end result. Digital files can reside in many locations at the same time making the old concept of the “film vaults” irrelevant.
Good question Brian. Does insurance pay for fires started by non union workers, brought in in the dead of weekend night?
While I’m sure Universal will begin to make new 35mm prints of films lost, I fear they’ll concentrate on restoring well-known titles at the expense of less familiar fare — and the latter is what guides the best repertory houses, such as Film Forum in New York. (In other words, the cinematic equivalent of oldies stations that play “Respect,” “Satisfaction,” and the same 500 or so songs.) Universal owns a rich heritage of film, including plenty of classic Paramount such as Ernst Lubitsch. But I wonder how many of these Ivy League bean counters are really concerned; after all, these are black-and-white films that don’t have a “franchise” or likely merchandise tie-ins.
“This is a golden opportunity for Universal to make DCI compliant prints of these classics and distribute them to all the theatres that want to screen them.”
The problem with that is that film societies, nonprofit houses and the like are going to be the LAST venues to invest in digital projection. And costs will have to be brought way down if that’s going to happen.
Great Thanks, Nikki Finke, for engaging this question of concern to those of us struggling to preserve our cinematic history. Toward that end, I and a team of determined film lovers are knocking on sponsorship doors in an effort to bring back a popular 1980s PBS classic movie series called Matinee at the Bijou, with sequel host Debbie Reynolds. Adam Gronski at PBS affiliate WETA represents the series to public television stations. For Our Bijou Blog is a vital part of the Web 2.0 components demanded of today’s advertisers, and serves as a journal of our efforts. We also provide free weekly Bijou Mini-Matinees on YouTube, accessible from the Bijou Blog ~~ http://matineeatthebijou.blogspot.com/
Thanks for your informative posts, especially those on retro movies and television.