

UPDATE: Ugh. The retooled Ebert & Roeper show premiering September 6th will be co-hosted by Ben & Ben — a Generation Why duo who only got the gig due to nepotism. Ben Lyons is the nobody son of Jeffrey Lyons, the film critic world’s biggest hack and quote whore with zero credibility, while Ben Mankiewicz is the slacker host on Turner Classic Movies, whose only claim to fame is that he’s a watered-down member of the famous film family. Now, there’s a working definition of the death of film criticism for you.
It’s not really a surprise that Disney-ABC Domestic Television finally decided to take At The Movies “in a new direction”. Except for the old Siskel & Ebert show, there’s never been a successful talk show about film on TV.
Because people would rather watch movies than hear others yakking about them. Plus, the Internet provides so much more resource material to moviegoers that TV soundbites just don’t cut it anymore. And now even amateur bloggers consider themselves qualified film critics, while the quality film reviewers find their print forums disappearing. It’s also been a while since a “Thumbs Up” meant anything to the movie biz when studios can buy Web raves with a bribe or two. Ebert has fought various health challenges, Roeper plans to co-host another review show, and At The Movies as we knew it is kaput in mid-August. Sadly, I expect the next incarnation will involve more hairspray and toadying than criticism.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.







Not bestowing sainthood on him but disparaging Ebert is a telling indicator of ignorance about film. The gulf between Ebert and a dwindling number of his colleagues and the rest of what passes for film discussion, criticism and advocacy in the media is stupefying.
Nothing wrong with a changing of the guard but that’s not what this is.
I thought Roeper did a fantastic job since he took over on the on air reponsibilities after Ebert took ill. He also had good chemistry with Michael Phillips and I really enjoyed watching them together. How do you market a 33 yr old Television institution to the Access Hollywood audience? The show that I loved watching every week will not be the same!
Ben Lyons? A new chapter in the history of the joke has just been written.
I’m not so worried about Ben Mankiewicz. I figure that he must have picked up something hanging around with his assorted uncles and cousins who are all pretty big in the industry. And while I don’t entirely agree with his smarter than thou style on TCM on the weekends I realise that everything can’t be hosted by Robert Osborne. Where I have a real problem is with MTV boy Ben Lyons. It’s not just his links with MTV – which is what gives him some supposed degree of credibility. It is that his father Jeffrey was one of those who replaced Siskel and Ebert on the old Sneak Previews. The other: Michael Medved (hack spit). Yet again, a Lyons replaces an Ebert and the result is worse than mediocrity.
White men being replaced by more white men.
The real value of a TV movie review show is the exposure it can give to films that would otherwise be overlooked: sleepers, indies, experimental, international, and other releases that don’t have $30M P+A behind them. Other than that, the pithy sound bite format of a TV review show is pretty worthless for generating anything other than quotes and thumbs. There was no comparison between what Siskel & Ebert were allowed to do on TV versus the thoughtful, consistently well-crafted, insightful pieces they devoted to their first love, print. As a former major city newspaper and TV film critic myself, I can attest to the difficulty of getting anything of value (read: non mainstream) past editors and producers. What most people don’t realize is that movie criticism is just about the most dangerous beat in journalism (other than war correspondent). Forget sports, editorials, political, investigative, or crime reporting. A movie critic is the ONLY journalist who regularly criticizes advertisers. So I wish Mankiewicz and Lyons best of luck dealing with The Mouse. Their power may pale before any 12-year-old texting his friends as the end credits roll on opening day, but if they truly love film they will find a way to celebrate the breadth of it.
Hey,
I could care less about the two of them. Let’s face it. Who listens to critics anymore or ever? I never did and anyone who does is a blow hard who can’t make decisions for themselves. I like going to a film, watching it for myself and then making my own mind on it. And with the fast paced world of the net, we have that at our fingertips, we dont need to wait for a dman show.
Mr.L
Santayana said:
“The real value of a TV movie review show is the exposure it can give to films that would otherwise be overlooked: sleepers, indies, experimental, international, and other releases that don’t have $30M P+A behind them.”
But those reviews are not being done on TV. Online blogger critics are the ones spreading the word about those films and that’s the future of how to connect audiences to smaller films. And bigger films too.
It’s a very sad day for movie reviews, with the final ‘nail’ in the coffin (so to speak, no pun intended) and the other shoe dropping…so many years after Siskel’s untimely passing. The Two Bens will most likely, review ONLY the big studio films and ‘Sundance approved’ indies. Otherwise, the rest of film will be ignored.
Which is why I LOVED LOVED LOVED Siskel and Ebert (and then Ebert/Roeper and Phillips). All of them not only appreciated the big studio film, and the darling indy, but as a few have indicated, they also reviewed films that fell into neither category. Which is what made the program so invaluable to anyone who really cares about films (and great for those who might occasionally want to see something totally left field). I myself used the show not so much to validate or change my own opinions of films, unlike Mr. Armand who must think so HIGHLY of himself and his tastes that he doesn’t need ANYONE to SUGGEST ANYTHING least it upset his sensibilities, but to simply ‘know’ about what is being made and put out into the marketplace.
Sure, it’s easy to be aware of The Dark Knights and Harry Potters of the world. Ditto for the Little Miss Sunshines and No Country For Old Men; but what Gene/Roger/Richard & Michael did week in and week out…was tirelessly explore the wide range of films out there. From the very big to the very small and all points inbetween.
Dimwits like The Two Bens probably don’t even know that there are movies made that fall outside of the Big Studio Blockbuster and the Indie Darling (the latter they probably have to have the ‘adults’ tell them about so whatever ‘criticism’ they’ll be doing on those films won’t be worth the price of a postage stamp).
Only speaking for myself, I will NOT be watching the new version of a tried and tested classic — so I’m sure others who love film and love knowing about film (beyond the usual marketing tricks) will also use the power of their remotes to ensure that the new show doesn’t last a season. Sure, it’s all good and fine that there’s Netflix and online bloggers to help draw attention to smaller movies, but again, just because you know how to type, does not make you Hemingway.
Sadly, I suppose that finally, and unjustly I might add, the balcony is officially closed!