
Despite the AMPTP’s prickly statement tonight, and SAG’s terse one (see both below), I can tell you what really went on in today’s very crucial negotiating session… Today, SAG made a full counter-proposal to the Big Media cartel negotiating group’s supposed “last best final” offer put on the table June 30th.
I’m told SAG and the AMPTP “got closer together today” because the union worked hard to “remove some of the differences” and ”made a number of moves” in the AMPTP’s direction. “SAG is now engaging the AMPTP in the process of doing the same thing,” I’m told. Specifically, SAG moved closer on some economic issues, New Media issues, and some other bargaining issues not previously addressed.
In turn, SAG told the AMPTP that it had to move closer on these issues, too. The AMPTP “starts every negotiation saying they’re here to bargain for ‘your’ recommendation. And we say, ‘If you want our board to recommend an offer to our membership, then you’re going to have to do better than this. Because what you’ve given us won’t make it beyond our board.’ “
SAG’s national board meets on July 26th and the guild made it clear to the AMPTP that SAG “would like to have something ready between now and then that our board would be interested in unilaterally recommending to the membership.”
In all, both sides spent about 3 hours on discussion, first in a big committee group for an hour and a half, then in a smaller sidebar. Right now, the AMPTP hasn’t said yes or no or even maybe to SAG’s counter-offer.
But there won’t be any negotiations tomorrow, although both sides agreed to touch base. What’s cause for concern, however, is that no future meeting is now scheduled: instead both sides will get together, a source tells me, ”when there’s a reason to get together so we might have a productive meeting in future”.
What’s next? Here are my thoughts: Now that the Screen Actors Guild wasted its political capital by losing its campaign against ratification of the AFTRA-AMPTP primetime TV contract, the AMPTP will predictably be taking every advantage of what it sees as its upper hand with the big actors union. (Funny enough, I’m told that the subject of the AFTRA vote wasn’t discussed more than a couple of times today. And one insider suggested to me far too optimistically about the AMPTP, “I certainly think they understand that was no slam dunk for them.”)
But a loss is still a loss. And I believe that the AMPTP’s latest statement sounds as if it’s ready any moment now to walk away from the negotiations, blame SAG for the stall, and issue an ultimatum — just like the AMPTP did to the WGA. However, I can’t believe the Hollywood CEOs are about to let their negotiating panel make a bad situation worse with a de facto lockout. The moguls would take a lot of heat for that, much more even than SAG, because they control the production spigot.
UPDATE: *Which is why it’s nonsensical to think there’s been a de facto strike when it’s been the Hollywood CEOs who’ve made the decision not to put films into production even though SAG has said publicly it has no plans to even ask its membership for a strike authorization vote, Step One before a strike is even contemplated. Meanwhile, let me make it clear here and now that the moguls have told me the de facto lockout has nothing to do with completion bonds and insurance. As one mogul clarified in response to my question about this: ”Most studio movies are not bonded — those are indie films. And no insurance, unless separately bought for huge money, insures against strikes.” Another mogul emailed me when I asked if completion bonds/insurance were the studios’ reasons for the stoppage, “…That has not been the focus of our internal discussions.” So what has been? ”Firstly, our productions are coming to an end, as planned. Secondly, it’s only prudent to know there is an agreement before committing millions of dollars of production which you may not be able to get back.” Meanwhile, SAG has signed more than 500 guaranteed completion contracts with independent producers of films, the top of which boast budgets between $14 million and $40 million dollars and represent in total hundreds of millions of dollars. But pro-AMPTP factions are out and about in Hollywood claiming that SAG has shut down the town. *
As for TV production, it ramps up around July 25th.
That’s why I’m hoping that both sides stay put and negotiate with an eye to that July 26th SAG national board meeting. The goal now is to put a deal together that the panel can recommend to its members. That way SAG can save face. And the AMPTP, too, since it would meet the August 15th ratification vote deadline imposed by their “last best final” offer. As I’ve reported previously, the AMPTP offered the WGA a total 10 last best final offers, and one ultimatum (with 2 items to take off the table that the AMPTP negotiated back on the table for the DGA). So there’s no loss of face if the AMPTP tweaks the terms of its offer, and the two sides come closer. Then all of Hollywood can get back to work by the end of the month.
But, if the AMPTP walks away… well, SAG at this point doesn’t even want to consider that possibility. “We’ll cross that bridge when we come to it,” my source told me. “We’ll keep taking it day at a time.”
SAG’s statement tonight:
“Screen Actors Guild negotiating committee members presented the AMPTP with their response to the producers’ proposal made June 30. SAG committee members will meet Friday to discuss the AMPTP’s response. We will provide further guidance following that meeting.”
The AMPTP representing the Big Media cartel issued the following statement after today’s negotiations:
“Today’s meeting demonstrated that SAG’s Membership First contingent unreasonably expects to obtain more in these negotiations than directors, writers and other actors obtained during their negotiations. AMPTP has already achieved four major labor agreements this year with the DGA, WGA, AFTRA Network Code, and AFTRA Prime-Time. Our final offer to SAG members includes more than $250 million in additional compensation, important new media rights and protection for pension and health benefits. The refusal of SAG’s Hollywood leadership to accept this offer is the latest in a series of actions by SAG leaders that, in our opinion, puts labor peace at risk. SAG’s Hollywood leaders have already pursued a time-consuming, divisive, costly, and unsuccessful anti-AFTRA campaign. Any further delay in reaching a reasonable and comprehensive agreement does a disservice to the thousands of working people of our industry who are already being seriously harmed by the ever worsening de facto strike. We call upon SAG’s Hollywood leaders to put the AMPTP’s final offer to SAG members for ratification. The last thing we need is a long, hot summer of labor strife that puts even more pressure on a badly struggling economy and deprives audiences of the entertainment they clearly desire in such difficult times.”
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.







The AMPTP doesn’t have to do anything.
They’re the fat-cat with a big parent company to keep them in kibble, so why even bother opening the mail from SAG.
SAG will have to take this deal, then get some new leadership who realize that they’re in a business, not a social revolution, ditch the stands based on “ideological purity” and start preparing now for 2011′s negotiations. Negotiations are a form of warfare, and to win you need to prepare, prepare, prepare.
Because if you don’t AFTRA will be the last union standing.
Ok good for Allen, he went in and asked for a better contract and the AMPTP said no again. What did it prove? It proves that he keeps doing the same thing and expecting different results. The very definition of stupidity. He has no new leverage, no new strategy, no new negotiators but he keeps charging at windmills. A tragedy in Quixotic terms. If this were a movie, by the end of the 2nd act he would have come up with a new plan, reinvented himself, struggled to overcome his antagonist and proven himself victorious in the 3rd act. Allen this is not a movie!!! You are not an actor playing a role-this is real!
July 24th, at the meeting, lets get a quorum together to impeach the Me Firsters. It takes 3 people at the meeting to make the motion. One to propose it and 2 to second and third the motion. Then the room votes. All that is needed in the room is a simple majority. 50.1% Once that is done ballots go out.
Are there enough people that are fed up with the Me Firsters? Are you sick of the money wasted on diversionary tactics? The late and expensive hiring of a PR Firm? The ineptitude of a leader who clearly knows he’s in over his head, but rather than say, “he lets get some professionals in here!”, he says,”I don’t want to give away any of my lines, I’ll do it myself”. That’s the kind of ego that sacrifices logic at the expense the membership. Don’t we need leadership that can be honest and self aware? We need a president that can be insightful and say, “I am a good president at running the day to day, but as far as negotiating, I recognize that for the good of the members we should get a professional.” It’s done in every single business in the world, yet for some reason that kind of logic and precedence doesn’t make a dent in the thick wall of Alan’s huge ego.
Make July 24th a referendum for the membership, not for the Me Firsters. Who has the balls to make democracy work for the members and not for the failed leadership?
Lets organize the recall.
Chris-Performers United- Are you in? You’ve already got a website and email headed in that direction. Can you lead this? Will you stand up and present the motion? Who will second and third Chris?
How many of you SAG-bashers have actually studied the offered terms? Did you know they want to pay actors $25 for a YEAR’S use of an episode on the Internet?
Is anyone actually saying that SAG should take that “deal”??
Are you insane?
Of course, that’s only if the episode plays after the 17-day FREE window that the AMPTP wants.
SAG, hang tough. You’re the only union with balls left.
Rosenberg and SAG seem a lot like Hillary Clinton vs. Obama right now. They (SAG) miscalculated their strategy like Hillary did and ultimately did not succeed. But like Hillary, they stubbornly refuse to just accept defeat gracefully and move on, costing other actors and 100,000+ below-the-liners their livelihoods in what is possibly the worst economy since the great depression. The parallels are eerily similar. I agree that SAG should eventually get the deal they are seeking, but it just didn’t work out this time. Now it’s time to move on and let everyone get back to work.
Just a thought,
There are many, many, many more TV writers in the WGA than there are feature writers. And they couldn’t care a whole lot about directors getting the “film by” credit, and certainly would never strike over it. Not as long as writers still get to call the shots in TV, which they do.
THAT is the truth of the matter. Ask any writer.
SAG, you fought the good fight and lost. take the not entirely shitty deal and live to negotiate another day.
The poster above who talked about how a SAG strike will affect comic-con is correct, pissin’ off fanboys on their yearly pilgrimage will have MASSIVE p.r. repercussions, and I’m not being sarcastic. You will do serious DAMAGE to your cause and the industry as a whole. You think ratings slipped after the writer’s strike….
Next, many below the line people who were economically affected by the writers’ strike will again be shit-hammered, all this with $5/gallon gas and a fucked up economy. you go on strike, it will take years before they look kindly upon you
take your lumps now and play cesar chavez a couple years from now when it’s time to negotiate a new deal and the economic picture isn’t as dire.
but go ahead…keep blaming dga, wga, and aftra….nothing really new when actors whine and complain about everyone else but themselves
So, the strategy seems to be akin to the senate leader not allowing a vote, because he or she knows it will pass or lose. In other words, stall. Interesting. Think of the AMPTP as Bush and Rosenberg as Harry Reid, full of piss and vinegar, but short on options, and not in control of his own membership. He holds the right to “put it to a vote” and he can choose not to, and, as I understand it, cannot be forced to. So, smoke the suits out for a few weeks and wait until they thrown in the towel, or enough of the towel to, as Nikki says “save face” on both sides and make a deal. If it comes down to a minor increase in DVD, that would be a hollow victory. “Wow! NOBODY got them to budge on DVD!” But, when you run the numbers, it would need to be a substantial increase to make any real difference in the lives of 99% of “working actors.” Historic? Sure. Money in the pocket? Not so much. The real long term substance here is cracking the code on new media, tying the suits to a percentage of ALL revenue, that’s the mother lode. And, of course, it’s entirely fair. Is it gonna happen? “$25 bucks a YEAR – AFTER a ‘free window’” under the AFTRA deal? That’s just silly. No free window and a percentage is where the money is, and if SAG is going to go to war, that’s the hill they gotta take. Seems to me SAG better start focusing on their membership, informing them, educating them, explaining, via, say, various known actors on the SAG site, and in mailers (for the web-un-savy), real world projections that are carefully researched, as to how this AFTRA deal will fuck the working actor both now, and down the road. You gotta give SAG members the chance, away from the fireworks, to check the info out in the privacy of their own space, and give them the chance to mull it over, and go “oh. Shit. I get it. We don’t get this, we’re done. Not now, but 5, 10 years from now when a much larger percentage of content is web originated.” It has to be explained in a way they can wrap their heads around, out of the firework blogs, or the sound bite radio debates (which Rosenberg blew). The facts are on SAG’s side: AFTRA DID fuck them for purely self-serving reasons, and the AMPTP IS looking to fuck actors on new media, and IS portraying SAG as the stumbling block, whereas if the suits offered a fair and reasonable deal, this would be over tomorrow. The actor DOES need better protections than we’re being offered in this deal, or we will go from bad to worse in terms of ability to make a decent living. Make no mistake – the AMPTP DOES want to fuck the actor. The question is – are we ready to say “Uh, I’d rather not be fucked, thank you very much,” or, are we going to take it? Ise ready to go back to work massa!! Let’s get back in dem cotton fields!! I loves my massa!!!
coup De Tet!-
“doing the same thing and expecting different results. The very definition of stupidity. ”
Actually that’s the text book definition of insanity. No matter. This pattern of ignoring what’s actually happening and stating what you want to be true is a tactic that’s been used by the AMPTP since… well as long as anyone can remember. It’s “Counter”-rarian. And it’s worked very well for them. So I think it’s refreshing to see the AMPTP having to deal with their very own operating tactic being thrown in their face.
And I think Mr Rosenberg is a little LESS stupid than you give him credit for. Patience and time will tell the tale.
‘the Screen Actors Guild wasted its political capital by losing its campaign against ratification of the AFTRA-AMPTP primetime TV contract, the AMPTP will predictably be taking every advantage of what it sees as its upper hand with the big actors union. (Funny enough, I’m told that the subject of the AFTRA vote wasn’t discussed more than a couple of times today. And one insider suggested to me far too optimistically about the AMPTP, “I certainly think they understand that was no slam dunk for them.”)’
You’re being kind, Nikki. This person is delusional. AFTRA could have spotted its detractors three touchdowns and a field goal and still won comfortably. Now that the whistle has blown and the goal posts have been torn down, the Hollywood S.A.G. elitists are still floundering about in search of a winning game plan.
That would exclude, of course, any strategy that includes putting the contract or strike authorization to a democratic vote before the entire membership.
There have been many good points made in these pages about the weaknesses of the proposed contract. Actors deserve more. There’s no doubt about it. But the leadership didn’t have a workable Plan A, much less a well considered Plan B. Once the writers went back to work, achieving so little (with S.A.G. members watching their backs, no less), it was a whole new ball game. The leadership failed to adjust to the new paradigm and have paid the price.
MANNY:
I actually agree with “I SEE YOU” about the high probability that there are a lot of AMPTP shills here, but for a very specific reason. I have posted a couple of times here now on two different articles an effort to organize a movement to work over the next 3 years to merge AFTRA and SAG under ONE guild with ONE newly elected board. For all the “UNION SHILLS” you claim this site is “RIFE” with, I got….count em…. ONE response from this board. If there were actually SAG or AFTRA performers posting here, I am quite certain they’d be on board, as I am not proposing anything that ANY performer could possibly be against. I don’t know any well reasoned, sound minded performer who doesn’t find it absurd that we have TWO performers unions, actually COMPETING AGAINST EACH OTHER for jurisdiction over work performed by the same class of laborer – the PERFORMER. I’ve not found a single voice of dissent for this idea in the performer community here or anywhere else – yet there was literally only ONE response to my posts from this board – which tells me the performer population on this board is nill. I don’t think this site is as “RIFE” with UNION SHILLS as you contend. In fact, I am starting to think I am the only GUILD member here that is a performer.
coup De Tet!:
I agree with some of your assertions, and certianly share your frustration, and there are many out there who do. However, the main reservation I have with your suggestion has to do with timing. The process you mention is completely viable and within our rights, but from a timing perspective, given the fact that negotiations are currently on-going and in process, pulling a move such as this now would likely only serve to further weaken our position in the eyes of the AMPTP, and would be almost as bad – not quite – but almost as bad as AFTRA’s decision to pull out of joint negotiations JUST before they were to begin. As bad as things seem, I don’t think that ousting the current board in the middle of heated negotiations would advance our position, and to the contrary, it might leave us ***really*** powerless, screwed up, and completely disoriented.
The growing list of performers that are coming on board with the “PERFORMERS UNITED” movement over the past few days (only one of which is from this forum) has it’s sights set on reorganization over the next few years prior to the 2011 contract negotiations, with a demand and direct mandate by the majority of both unions to merge the two, remove both current boards, and hold a fresh elections process to put in place an entirely new board for ONE performers guild, the only rational and common sense thing to do.
Best,
Chris
Oh, and, by the way – IF SAG can pull off this 30 foot bank shot by delaying and then building consensus to strike, and then, perhaps, striking if necessary to get a percentage of ALL new media with no free window, a substantial increase in DVD and some of the other ridiculously reasonable, fair, and overdue bumps? Step 2? All dual cardholders tear up their AFTRA cards, refuse to work AFTRA contracts, and let’s de facto merge into ONE powerful union of actors for actors, already called THE SCREEN ACTORS GUILD and shut down the actor part of AFTRA and their pandering, weasely, bullshit for good. AFTRA needs to die for SAG to live. Enough is enough.
I wish SAG could negotiate a better deal than AFTRA, but its over.
While SAG is in the right, I blame part of the failure of what’s happened on the SAG actors, mostly in Hollywood, who voted against the merger with AFTRA out of pride reasons, and economically screwed everyone in the process by enabling the producers to use a “divide and conquer” strategy.
Get over your pride issues or your feelings of superiority. We need ONE unified union for actors, merge SAG, AFTRA and Equity. One union can negotiate diversified contracts as other unions in other industries have shown us. There is room enough for film, television, and stage actors, new media and voice over artists, stage managers, radio and television hosts and presenters under the same umbrella, with one union negotiating all these contract under a unified front.
Then, in three years, the writers, directors, and unified actors union need to cooperate together.
This nonsense has to stop. This round is unfortunately lost. Three years from now begins today. I will vote for any pro-merger slate in the next SAG, AFTRA and Equity elections.
Thank you, Chris, for mentioning Performers United. I hadn’t heard of it until you mentioned it.
The first step in getting a better deal for every actor in every union is merging.
Dan W.,
This round is only “lost” if you vote in favor of a bad contract.
Your other points are well taken.
Dan:
EXACTLY.
So the writer’s are the only talent in town with BALLS, who’da thought? Pretty sad when a gorilla forgets he’s a gorilla.
Bye-bye residuals, I’m not suggesting that the course of 2008 labor negotiations doesn’t have an effect on SAG’s current situation. However, SAG’s inability to look in the mirror: the fact that they misjudged their leverage, the fact that they started the process late, the fact that they wasted time with a misguided war with AFTRA, all of these childish actions along with their finger pointing at others indicate their absolution of responsibility for their current predicament. Of course outside forces framed the conditions for the contract negotiation, but poor leadership has gotten you where you are right now. Which is fucked.
Anonymous at 12:06 on 7/11 wrote:
“Ask yourself: what would have happened had the WGA worked on their expired contract, shown some patience, and then went on strike simultaneously with SAG at the end of June?”
The same thing that happened leading up to the actual strike, only worse. If the WGA worked without a contract during that period, everyone in town would know it to be a move towards a combined union strike in summer ’08. And the studios and networks would do exactly the same thing — put the whip to every writer under contract to generate a stockpile of material. Except they’d have have had 9 more months to do it. How many episodes of LOST and HEROES do you figure that would have been? How many features greenlit? For the writers to delay while basically announcing “a strike is coming” would have resulted in months of them plaiting a rope for the AMPTP to hang them with.
“And if they’d gotten together with the DGA as well? And AFTRA?”
Interesting point, but you’re assuming that all of these guilds have the same agenda and needs. Sure, nobody wants to get screwed by the AMPTP, but there are all sorts of methods and degrees of screwing. And not every guild has a dog in every fight.
The DGA did have a chance to show solidarity and chose not to take it. They decided to act “like adults” as the party line has become. But this assumes that the DGA is only made up of directors, and that all directors have the same industry concerns as all writers. That’s not the case. There are many positions represented by the DGA for whom residuals are not and never have been an issue. “Screwed on residuals? Who cares? I don’t get ‘em anyway — let’s ratify.” I don’t mean to vilify them. They’re a union negotiating on behalf of their members, not the industry as a whole.
The WGA has a similar internal schism. The profit models and relative power of TV and feature writers are vastly different. And then there are the disenfranchised animation, reality, and game show writers standing on the doorstep and getting kicked around like a political football.
As for the AMPTP, they haven’t even shown solidarity with their fellow performers’ union, SAG. They’re already the red-headed stepchild of acting unions with little to lose and much to gain by rolling over for the AMPTP. One would think that SAG and AFTRA would have many more common goals than AFTRA and the WGA (or DGA), so what would the WGA or the industry as a whole hope to have gained by waiting for AFTRA? Are you assuming that AFTRA would have stood shoulder to shoulder with the other unions against the AMPTP? I think that’s doubtful. Because they had the opportunity to do so with SAG and chose instead to take the low route.
Of course, they’re just looking out for their members, as well, one might argue. Unless those members happen to be dual card holders, it seems. And in my opinion, the actions of AFTRA seem more clearly the actions of a union at war with a rival union and willing to “win” at any cost.
But to answer the basic question of “What would have happened if the WGA had waited?” I don’t believe things now would be any better, and would likely be much worse.
Scott, the Screen Actors Guild had no other choice but to try to persuade AFTRA members to defeat the contract because the contract is bad for screen actors. In that sense it’s hard to view the “war” with AFTRA as misguided (and the question of who fired the first shot is open to debate, to say the least).
And I don’t think SAG leaders misjudged their leverage so much as had it cut out from under them by the defection of AFTRA from Phase 1. But not all their leverage is gone in any event. SAG can still strike, and in my view, should.
I believe the best course of action is be a selective strike targeting features only, while letting TV production continue. That would shut down the big money pipeline while keeping the town working for the most part and minimizing the risk of losing jurisdiction over new TV shows to AFTRA.
SAG is only fucked if it accepts the AFTRA deal.
RandomSig,
There is a serious flaw in your response to why the WGA didn’t continue working under the terms of its epired ocntract and strike in unison with SAG. You said that the studios would have had time to stockpile scripts in anticipation. Well, they might have but so what? If the WGA went on strike with SAG, THERE WOULD BE NO ACTORS TO READ THE SCRIPTS!!!
Quoth the AMPTP
“The last thing we need is a long, hot summer of labor strife that puts even more pressure on a badly struggling economy and deprives audiences of the entertainment they clearly desire in such difficult times.”
It’s time to take up a collection for carbon credits to pay for all the carbon dioxide and hot air emissions wasted by the AMPTP spokesbots and their cowering craven mogul bosses and contributing hugely to not only global warming with all of their hot air but the ‘long, hot summer of labor strife’. And no, reality TV or these pronouncements from on high you call press releases do not constitute ‘entertainment we clearly desire’.
Listen geniuses, I’m out here in the audience with millions of other people around the world and I 1000% get that what’s holding up the flow of production of entertainment content FOR A SECOND TIME is you and not the actors. Just like during the 100 day writers you forced on everyone (remember the ‘freeze’ in scripted TV production back in the fall and winter of our ‘dissed content’?) and not just the writers. We fans and viewers are not that dumb…see your declining TV ratings for evidence of how we’re on to you.
These moguls act like Tom & Daisy Buchanan in ‘The Great Gatsby’, like they think rich greedy media moguls are magically different from the rest of us and immune from negative consequences and can make messes anywhere they want out of everyone else’s lives and then hide from reality by playing around at rich people camps (like Camp Allen) during the ‘long, hot summer of labor strife’. They are about to be woken up from their delusional state and it will not be pretty. Get ready to clean up after yourselves, boys.
Advertisers and shareholders and oh yeah a bunch of federal legislators and bureaucrats are watching you mini moguls (who save Rupert Murdoch are frankly poor relations when compared to the other mogul campers at Summer Camp for Spoiled Rich Guys and amusingly enough many of whom run the new media style companies where the future lies, a future that does not have to include old media moguls). And we’re going to make sure they rub your noses in this. Because it’s you who are leaving us to our own devices and to entertain ourselves. And this is definitely an option open to us.
We’re not ‘playing’ at this for just the next quarter…we’re in this for the long haul. And we don’t watch TV & movies to see you, we only want to see the talent. Which means you have to pay them. Fairly. If you can’t or don’t want to do that then be prepared to be cut out from the pipeline. We can now pay them more directly ourselves (hallelujah technology!) without meddling middlemen. Like you.
That $200,000 a day sweetner for SAG to take your alleged ‘final offer’ before August 15th? Well that’s all of a whopping $1.67 per SAG member per day.
$200,000 is also only *half* a day’s pay for CBS President Les ‘Moonbat’ Moonves. So it might cost an out of work actor an ‘insult of a tip’ to stay out for a day and not take a bigger financial screwing. But keep this up and we’ll be glad to make sure you all lose more than what Les’s daily salary leeches from shareholders. Every. Single. Day. This. Impasse. Lasts.
So if you want to get in the game you need to STFU already (ask one of the $8.00 an hour kid interns you toss abuse and an insulting pay at to watch the sites online to explain that abbreviation to you) get in the room yourselves and make a damned deal with SAG already. One that’s not insulting to everyone else watching this process. Or prepare to (for once) suffer the consequences personally.
We’re so very done with you moguls and your AMPTP flaks.
The Audience
bye-bye residuals-
“I believe the best course of action is be a selective strike targeting features only, while letting TV production continue.”
hahahahhaha
What features? There are none….When you find one starting up you let us all know.
This is a very crappy time for a strike. The economy sucks bad enough as it is and it’s hard enough to get a decent job let alone a job in your industry. The Unite for Strength’s campaign against SAG’s leadership is no surprise to me. The sad thing is, for most people who needed the work, the damage has already been done.