SAG’s National Board met today and issued as statement.
(The AMPTP’s reaction is below it):
Los Angeles, July 26, 2008 — The National Board of Directors of Screen Actors Guild passed the following resolution at its meeting today:
It is a core principle of Screen Actors Guild –That no non-union work shall be authorized to be done under any Screen Actors Guild agreement and;
That all work under a Screen Actors Guild contract, regardless of budget level, shall receive fair compensation when reused.
Passed unanimously 68-0.This resolution represents guidance from the National Board of Directors to the National Negotiating Committee. It reaffirmed the importance of these issues in these negotiations.“For some time, we have been telling the industry how important it is for all new media productions under our contract to be done union and how important residuals for made-for new media programming are when programs are re-run on new media,” said SAG National Executive Director and Chief Negotiator Doug Allen.
“I am very pleased that our National Board today unanimously confirmed these essential principles in support of our National Negotiating Committee,” Allen added.
And the AMPTP responded:
“The continued refusal of SAG’s negotiators to accept AMPTP’s final offer means that actors will continue to work indefinitely under the expired contract – an old contract that contains none of the $250 million in additional compensation provided by AMPTP’s final offer, and an old contract that provides none of the new media rights and residuals that other Hollywood Guild members have now been enjoying for months. SAG has permitted non-union Internet production under its contract since 2001. AMPTP has offered to extend SAG jurisdiction to original new media production, including low-budget programs that employ a single “covered actor.” The AMPTP’s final offer also guarantees residuals when original new media productions are reused and terms to increase pay and residuals if the program is eventually exhibited in traditional media. None of these rights and residuals exists under the contract that expired on June 30th.”
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.







.
Just Hope when all is said and done that the Sag BackGround Actor’s don’t get stiffed. We are being dealt peanuts through all this and even taking 1 away would be an insult and a slap in the face.
Think it’s time we have our own Representation on the National Board.
Peter M.
Boston
salamander
I work with extras everyday. They feel that they will get thrown under the bus yet again. Most sag extras are hard working and are professional. The cattle call that comes after them is the real problem. It use to be a 100 union extras now it’s 50 with stand-ins. I guess the advances that the “middle class actors” made over the years have been at their expense. No I’m an IA guy that works with stand-ins everyday. They feel betrayed by your leadership.
mheister
I am tired of your reverse logic. Very catholic school of you. The thing that made me dismiss you totally was you post on your site about Cromwell.
In typical Jesuit style, first praising prose, then the hammer of the wrong. Sniping at it’s best. His response was classic, a total dismissal of you and your position. I do too. You know what they say if a Jesuit gets you by 6 your one for life. BTW it was arm twisting not an ephinpy.
just a thought
thanks for your slant on things. i will make it my business to find out as much as i can about the plight of backround. i’m learning everyday. but us “middle-class” actors can’t help anybody if we get beaten down. we all work on the same movies and shows.
everybody counts.
Guess the bottom line for most of the Sag BackGround workers is MORE WORK during production for the ones who want it and are available. A day here and a couple of days there just wont cut it. An increase in pay cant do any good if your not working. In my early days of construction, a Union Job was just that, A UNION JOB. ALL UNION, thats why we pay dues.
Peter M.