It’s very hard in the public spotlight to have second acts. Much less third acts, fourth acts, or infinite acts like Tina Brown. (Remember when her Talk mag died from lack of interest, and then her short-lived CNBC talk show received a zero rating?) Now Brown appears to have made a big blunder by falling back on that tired trick of a “Hollywood Power List” to help launch her new blog. Because moguls, agents, mouthpieces, and the like are telling me they’re refusing to cooperate with Tina. ”The idea is so 1980s. Both Premiere and EW have abandoned their lists, thank god, and Vanity Fair‘s is totally different,” one Hollywood source contacted by Brown’s people explained to me. “I think she wanted to stir up a frenzy. But a lot of us are saying, ‘Thanks but no thanks. We’re not going to participate. We don’t care if you list us or not.’ ”
I feel sorry for Brown’s likeable L.A. rep Tom Tapp who’s now starting to flopsweat. First he sent around a blizzard of emails asking for meet-and-greets for what he described as ”a Hollywood Power List, circa 2010. The idea here is that as the Industry changes rapidly, it’s more important to know who you should be in business with in 2-3 years than it is to know who’s on top right now. We’re speaking with all the agencies, the studios and players around town as well as Silicon Valley. We’d love to come in sometime soon and talk to your best and brightest about [insert name of person or company here] and the future of the Industry.” The result was that a lot of people and places have politely put him off or turned him down flat.
Now Tapp is sending out increasingly desperate-sounding emails to flacks working for studios, tenpercenteries, big producers and PR firms begging for help. (“Hey Man, We need to get moving on this. Any chance we can set something up in the two weeks?”) I doubt it’ll be forthcoming. Much of the problem, I’m hearing, is that 1) Hollywood feels Brown is played out because of the failure of her recent ventures except book-writing, and 2) thinks the website is just another of her self-promotional stunts to raise her own profile, and 3) still resents her cozy relationships with loathed former power players Mike Ovitz (whose agenda she slavishly followed at Vanity Fair) and Harvey Weinstein (whose agenda she slavishly followed at Talk) and most recently Barry Diller (whose agenda she’s surely following now since he’s funding her new little venture).
But Tina, I wish you all the best!
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.





Stick a fork in Tina. Her days are long gone. This web site of hers is so late 90′s. And while we’re at it, pull out that fork and stick it in Ms. Waxman, too. Maybe they can keep each other company in: Personanongrataville.
Um, but why is Tina Brown famous and why does she feel compelled to force herself down people’s throats? Maybe I’m just testy because I’m dealing with a “producer” just like this at the moment who also has something of a God complex but we all know the only reason she got a magazine in the first place is because Harvey Weinsten was a pal. I tried to read one issue of that dreadful “magazine” (if that’s what she wants to call it) and I had to throw it aside. It was that idiotic and sloppy. Of course, even after numerous failures, she for some reason expects “her people” to roll out the red carpet and hand over even more cash. Not bloody likely! Get a real job, Tina.
Tina can’t even make it onto her own list and keep it valid.
Tina dahling, Mike Ovitz has a seat at his table reserved for you.
Share a cocktail and relive the glory days.
Dear Tina- You are SO YESTERDAY— please do all of us in Hollywood a favor and transition yourself into
retirement. Your day is done. Your perceived power has
flickered out– Please stay out of our town. RETIRE !
Tina Brown brings back memories of Spy Magazine, as in how they regularly pilloried her and the likes of Trump, Katzenberg and more. Gotta hand it to the plucky, middle-aged Brit with the ease with which she fails upwards.
I like how CNBC is the public access channel for bored formerly important CEOs and the like.
Anyway, these people just don’t get it. They get so used to having people listen to them that they think it’s THEM and not the jobs they once had they attracted the attention.
It’s just sad that none of them can bow out gracefully from the public eye. I mean, how desperate is Mike Eisner to have people still listen to him talk about himself while supposedly interviewing someone?
Sad.
Tina Brown’s still around?
I so hate this woman. She’s the worst excuse for a human being and good riddance.
I liked Tina’s show on CNBC. At the end each guest would mention a new book, movie, tv show or something that was new and interesting. I will admit week after week some of her stories in between fell a bit flat. I always thought it should have been either 30 minutes or a monthly special.
If ‘Wired Magazine’ was writing about Tina, she would make the “Expired” list.
Nikki, all I can say is “Rrrrooowwrrr!” Down kitty.
I know somebody who worked for her and I’m loving this – suffice it to say this couldn’t be happening to a nicer woman.
>>>But Tina, I wish you all the best!
Ouch. Translation: Write if you get work!
Tina brown is so has been. Has anyone ever heard Hannah Montana?
i believe it’s another generational thing…out with the old, in with the new…..regardless…….it’s kind of getting predictable and slightly sad…that trashing those that came before seems to be manditory. Maybe what’s worse, on the other side, is the older generation trying to stay hip. Tina should move on, she’s one smart lady. She could make getting older very, very hip…..
I worked for Tina Brown. I don’t believe in karma, but it seems to have happened to her. You treat people like expendable crap who are only there to service you; you don’t acknowledge the hard work of people (let alone their very presence); you steal the best ideas coming out and remake them into something less interesting…the list goes on and on. Well, the point is that it all comes back to bite you. It shouldn’t be that surprising that no one is interested in you anymore, Tina Brown, since you were never interested in anyone else when you were on the top of the world.
The first clue should have been the hiring of Tom Tapp. What has he done but suck up to losers like Brett Rattner?
You’ll find these if you Google them where the Industry, just like you, are looking to learn all about The idea. A pal thought that they are exactly the same. When you have extra money to trade, you have more leverage in the jobs and can make a bigger profit for yourself.
Tina has had too many failures to be taken seriously in a town that has failure-phobia. And Tom might be a charming guy, but he’s never accomplished anything that would make insiders listen to what he has to say. It’s a bad combo for Hollywood, a serious miscalcaluation on what it would take to have an impact here. No one wants to do business with a loser and a lightweight.