I just heard that Universal has declined to exercise an option to co-finance DreamWorks’ Tintin with Steven Spielberg and Peter Jackson set to begin filming in October. The decision was quietly made a few weeks ago.
So now DreamWorks will look only to owner Paramount for the rest of the moolah in the same way the two shared financing on Dreamgirls and Transformers. Unfortunately, Paramount is presently without an overall financing deal to mitigate risk, but is arranging it on a film-by-film basis. I say Tintin — to be played by Love Actually‘s Thomas Sangster — sounds like an expensive but safe bet, considering that the beloved Belgian boy is a worldwide phenomenon, and that the two great filmmakers are directing and producing even though also participating as huge first-dollar-gross players. This latest wrinkle would be more interesting if, say, Uni’s decision hurt its about-to-become-closer relationship with DreamWorks. But it didn’t. As I already reported, GE’s Jeff Immelt and Uni’s Ron Meyer dined with Spielberg and Stacey Snider Thursday night while NBC Uni’s Jeff Zucker spent the better part of that afternoon with Steven planning out the rebuild of the fire-ravaged backlot.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.








How many American kids do you think are going to see some antiquated European cartoon (sorry, Chromey — “mo-cap”) about a young Belgian investigative reporter? Yeah, that’s gonna go over real well in the heartland.
Well, a nine-hour, three part adaptation of a sixty year old fantasy written by a Catholic British academic didn’t do too badly. Jus’ saying.
And what do you have against Belgians — all those books Dame Agatha Christie wrote about Hercule Poirot are still tidy little earners for the copyright owners.
It’s NOT Tin-Tin it’s Tintin!! There is no hyphen; there are not two words!! Why do people always spell it like that? It’s one word, one capital letter at the beginning!
(Yeah, I’d pay to see a Tintin film …)
They better pull some amazing stuff out of the bag to make this movie appealing to me and the rest of the young entertainment-hungry population out there. I can’t see this movie making a considerable amount of money…
Tintin has never been popular in America, nor do I suspect it will resonate with Latin American or Asian markets. It’s resolutely old-fashioned and hokey, even if it did have brand recognition. This has to be the first time a big-budget tentpole was pitched at being huge with francophone pensioners.
And as for motion capture, that has never really caught on: “Monster House” and “The Polar Express” hardly caught the box office on fire, and “Beowulf” was pretty disappointing. I don’t know why Spielberg and Zemeckis and these guys insist on shoving this technology down the audience’s throats when they clearly don’t want it.
First off, I’d like to see a Tintin film, preferably either live-action or animated. And preferably with everybody involved keeping their minds focused on the actual creation of a great film.
I’m sure some independent film-makers with a VERY limited budget could make a decent – i.e. enjoyable – Tintin film. Jackson and Spielberg? Weren’t they indy film-makers at one point? I wonder what their mindsets / philosophies on making good films were back in the day?
“Name” mentioned Monster House in pointing out that motion-capture films have yet to catch on. While this is true, it’s unfortunate for Monster House which, IMO, was one of the most enjoyable and original animated film in a long-time. It should have done much better. I recommend it to everyone, young and old!
Oh, and as for Tintin being the most popular cartoon character in the world… Unfortunately, Mickey Mouse wins that title hands down; in both the number of people who know him and how widespread his fame is globally. I highly doubt their isn’t a country where Mickey face isn’t known to most people.
However, I would love to see Tintin hunt Mickey down and skin him. Then, wear Mickey’s skin to get close to the rest of the Disney gang to finish them off. Yes, somewhere in the past, the Tintin and Lecter family lines crossed paths.
>:-D
Anyhoo…
Tintin has never been popular in America, nor do I suspect it will resonate with Latin American or Asian markets.
With all due respect, Name, if you’d told me Martin Scorsese’s biggest commercial hit – and the film that finally (and IMNSHO opinion undeservedly) scored him a long overdue Oscar – was an inferior remake of a Hong Kong thriller that hardly set the world box office on fire, I’d have suggested you pee in the cup and go home until the results of the drug test came back.
Isn’t it funny what does “resonate”, and how often the pundits are just wrong? Keeps life interesting, though it plays merry hell with the blood pressure of studio executives.
I’m a huge fan of the Tintin series. And no, I’m not 50 plus! :~) I’m a college student in India. Tintin [and Asterix] are extremely popular in India among people of all age groups [atleast, the english speaking ones].. I would love to watch a Tintin movie, but i think its relative unpopularity in the USA will be affect its chances adversely.