TOLDJA! I broke the news last Monday that Steven Spielberg and Peter Jackson were dialing for dollars now that Universal had declined to exercise an option to co-finance the family movie Tintin set to begin filming in October with Spielberg directing. (Weirdly, both the Los Angeles Times and Radar waited five days to weigh in, and then ridiculously claimed how this was such a setback for Steven and Peter.)
Back to my own reporting. I’m told Spielberg and Jackson began looking other places for the money, and had just talked to Walden Media. But the pair were still waiting to hear back from Paramount (which hadn’t yet passed, contrary to what Radar wrote). Now my sources say parent company Viacom just offered the bigtime directors 100% Tintin financing. So it’s Spielberg/Jackson’s turn to get back to Paramount with a yea or nay.
So those other media were both out-of-date and dead wrong.
Steven Spielberg/Peter Jackson ‘Tintin’ Movie Now Looking For More Cash Cash
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.



Kilner:
I stand corrected, but my understanding is that Moffat is also unavailable to do any re-writes (which seem to be obligatory in Hollywood) so let’s just hope some hack doesn’t make a mess of it.
And I have seen ‘Blink’ — in fact, I’ve all the new Who on DVD. I don’t think you win three Hugos in three years (off three nominations) if you don’t know your a** from your elbow. Still, I wish the man all the best – because while Doctor Who might be a cult item in the US, Moffat’s first series in 2010 (after next year’s “gap year” of four one off specials) is going be under a surreal amount of media and audience scrutiny.
I can’t believe some of the comments here about Tintin being obscure, Francophone, and not read by young people and so on.
Tintin has sold over 200 million copies in 70 languages. ’nuff said.