

The Screen Actors Guild’s National TV/Theatrical Negotiating Committee today passed the following advisory motion to the national governing board by an 11-to-2 vote. The employers’ AMPTP statement is below. I will have an analysis containing a lot of new information as soon as possible:
“Whereas, Screen Actors Guild has been and remains willing and able to continue formal and continuous negotiations with the AMPTP and the employers, with the intention of reaching a mutually-acceptable deal; and
Whereas, the National Board has unanimously identified the core principles of new media jurisdiction and new media residuals as essential elements of any agreement in the Television/Theatrical contract negotiations; and
Whereas, preservation of longstanding force majeure protections for actors is of self-evident importance; and
Whereas, the President and Chief Negotiator have communicated this view to the AMPTP and the employers, and have requested that they return to the bargaining table to negotiate a fair deal; and
Whereas, the AMPTP and the employers have refused to change their position and have continued to refuse to meet to attempt to advance the negotiations; and
Whereas, in the opinion of the National Negotiating Committee, the AMPTP and the employers will only seriously engage in further negotiations after the members of the Guild express their confidence in their leadership by authorizing them to take all actions necessary to protect the interests of the membership, including a strike; and
Whereas, although the National Board has already unanimously delegated the authority to take a strike authorization vote to the National Negotiating Committee, in the opinion of the Committee, the strong and public support of the National Board for the necessity of a strike authorization at this time is a necessary prerequisite for its success;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the National Negotiating Committee that:
A strike authorization vote of the membership is necessary to overcome the employers’ intransigence, and the Committee therefore recommends that the National Board authorize such a vote be taken; and further recommends:
That the National Board adopt a resolution strongly supporting such an action, and recommending that the membership vote in favor of a strike authorization; and
That the National Board endorse an educational campaign advocating a “yes” membership vote, to give the authority to the National Board to call a strike only if the National Board deems it necessary and unavoidable to do so. “
Adopted: October 1, 2008
—
Big Media’s Association of Motion Picture And Television Producers immediately issued this statement:
Is this really the time for anyone associated with the entertainment business to be talking about going on strike? Not only is the business suffering from recent economic conditions, but if ever there was a time when Americans wanted the diversions of movies and television, it is now. The DGA, WGA and AFTRA reached agreement on comparable terms months ago, during far better economic times, and it is unrealistic for SAG negotiators now to expect even better terms during this grim financial climate. This is the harsh economic reality, and no strike will change that reality.
- SAG National Negotiating Committee To Discuss AMPTP’s Rejection This Week
- AMPTP Rejects Today’s SAG Overture
- SAG Sends Letter To Chernin/Iger/Counter To Restart Formal Negotiations
- So What Do SAG Election Results Mean?
- SAG Election Results
- SAG Members Overwhelmingly Support Guild Leadership’s Negotiation Strategy
- SAG Issues Special Bulletin & Polls Members About AMPTP Negotiations
- Finke/LA Weekly: Calm Down. SAG Will Not Be a WGA Strike Sequel
- Finke/LA Weekly: The Details the Moguls Don’t Want You to Know






Now SAG is negotiating.
That’s how you have to do it.
With both balls.
Good good good good. Good.
You’re kidding, right Nikki? The AMPTP is making more money now than it did prior to the WGA strike (and we got royally fucked in that deal).
I hated that strike, but it was necessary (even if it turned out all fucked up), and this one, should it actually happen, is also warranted.
For once, in this town, somebody is taking a stand for the right reasons, and, more importantly, they’re not backing down. Gotta love their moxie. I know I do.
Great. The economy is already in the tank and unemployment is going nowhere but up so SAG is going to strike and put a ton of Below the Line Crew and Behind the Camera stiffs out of work … possibly right before Christmas. For only a marginally better deal than one they would’ve got before.
I appreciate all of SAG’s support during the WGA strike, but you have to be smart about picking your battles. And this industry simply cannot afford another strike now. It doesn’t matter if they’re right on the issues. They have to make a deal and live to fight another day.
SAG has had every opportunity to accept a fair deal. The Writer’s got nowhere with a strike, no matter what they claim, and SAG now wants to sideline an entire industry because it think it deserves better than other people who create entertainment? “Taking a stand” will lead to pain for people who cannot afford it
No.
I love how the AMPTP keeps pointing to the other deals it concluded knowing full well that the DGA and AFTRA prostrated themselves before the glory of their idol, and the WGA was strong-armed into capitulation.
I also love how the AMPTP keeps singing a swan song about
New Media being too newthe economic downturn tying their hands. I suppose it doesn’t matter how ridiculous the narrative is so long as it provides some sort of excuse for avoiding a negotiating table, eh?What?! Who would authorize a strike right now?
AMEN! There is a WHOLE LOT of support for this move among SAG members, regardless of the current state of the economy. The state of the economy does not change what is “fair”….never has, and never will. We’ve had residuals as a central part of our income throughout many an economic downturn during many previous decades, and economic downturn or not – residuals will STAY as a part of our compensation going forward too.
I stand in support – along with what I believe will turn out to be a large majority of SAG members, of negotiating a fair and equitable contract.
There was a time where I could see both sides of this but the information SAG has made available regarding the importance of further negotiation and the record dollars the studios are currently earning and will continue to earn under the deals made with the DGA and WGA, points me in the direction of standing by the SAG leadership. And the other thing to consider as a member of any union is how much power you take away from your union leaders if you elect them to look after you and then undermine them at critical times like this. If you’re on the fence, you have to stand tall with your leaders – you have to support your union and stick by the leaders you’ve elected or else management in all industries will be more willing to try to weaken and embarass and destroy other unions just this way. If you are against what SAG is trying to get, you would still be doing your guild a disservice by voting against your leaders. Negotiations will continue if you authorize a strike. The Companies will just say they are taking a bullet on behalf of working Americans or some bs like that and say that for the sake of the economy, blah, blah, blah, they have come back to the table to make a deal. And don’t believe them when they say America needs entertainment and SAG members will be depriving Americans of entertainment if SAG strikes. What a load. Remember when the WGA was striking and the studios said it didn’t matter and they had plenty of movies and reality shows and whatnot in the can and ready? I think it’s time folks got realistic and thought about what it means to stick by your union leaders and stand for what is right and fair. Otherwise, the damage done will be felt for a long, long time.
- Once was neutral
The studios can afford what SAG is asking for, don’t let them fool you, their job is to make money. Whatever they have to giveaway they will find a new way to generate revenue to replace. That’s what they do. Working in Hollywood is inherently risky. Deal with it. I’ve been working in production for 15 years and I’ve got plenty of fallbacks and don’t live a lifestyle that can’t withstand 18 months of unemployment. Those are the terms of working in the business. These jobs are optional not mandatory. If you want job security go work in a funeral home or for the IRS.
Why do people always use the “marginally better” argument on one side? Why don’t they ever say that these corporations are willing to jeopardize everything for only “marginally better” terms? The “marginally better” argument, if followed, just leads to marginally worse terms and a little more marginally worse after that and even more marginally worse the time after that and so on and so on. I’m sorry you’re in the middle of it, and that’s why there are charity funds set up. The other side just lays you off and could give a flying f—.
Screw that crap, the economy is already in a bloody mess and SAG wants to strike to save EGO?
So you want to strike to mess up TV? You already lost viewers once, strike again NO ONE WILL COME BACK.
Who are the morons in charge? They want to strike when the economy is in a recession? WTH YES let’s strike because we can and we want to show the big bad tv executives what were made of.
*headdesk*
No one cares about SAG. Think of others not yourselves.
Selfish a-holes.
Selfish, selfish actions. The town’s patience will be very limited this time around.
Other people on this town have bills to pay. And we’ve already gone to bat for others once this year…
what a joke!
i hope they go on strike. they’ll merely paint themselves as further idiots.
Why are some on this thread calling the actors selfish? No one wants to see any BTL crew members put out of work, but the actors need to do what’s right for them. They’re getting screwed and they’re considering drawing a line in the sand. Good for them. Everyone supports a labor movement until it’s someone ELSE’s union going on strike. Bullshit.
And Ted, if you don’t think the writers made significant gains in the strike, compare the AMPTP’s initial offer to what the writers came away with: HUGE gains. Check the facts, amigo.
GOODFORSAG,
You are completely correct! This is an inherently risky business prone to labor strife. Deal with it or get out. The AMPTP is a massive anti-trust violation and it still blows my mind that no one seems to be challenging them on this. The car makers do not negotiate together with their unions cause it is massively illegal. Why is no one beating this drum?? So bizarre- it’s a no brainer.
FlyBy
Hey ‘enough’, you can argue that the studios should negotiate to save the people and economy impacted by a strike. I once questioned what was happening just like you but then I read up about it and saw that SAG has a legit concern here that can be addressed and then all this can be avoided. And regarding your anger at the issue, there are two forces at odds here. It’s not just SAG insisting on going down this road. Look at the deal points and what’s being offered – it’s really ugly. So, have a look and consider calling the corporations out on this rather than pointing your anger and the little guy.
- Once was Neutral.
So I guess, logically, the studios are saying that if the economy were good they would be more than happy to open the coffers and make a fair deal.
Anybody believe that?
All the puppets cry when anyone speaks out against Big Business or asks for a decent deal. “Take what you’re given and be happy for that much.”
You who speak that way are cowards. Luckily you benefit from those who are not cowards and have worked for years in UNIONS to get you the 40 hour work week, Overtime Pay, Health Benefits, a Living Wage and everything else you take for granted while kissing Big Business’s ass thanking them for their generosity–Even as Bush hands over $700 billion to Big Business while your house is in foreclosure.
It’s a rigged game people! And it’s rigged against you. Remember that when you choose sides.
THINK people. THINK! THINK! THINK! THINK! THINK!
STEEEEEEERIKE!!!!
It’s not for fun it’s for survival.
For Chrissake! THINK!!!!!!
what good is having a union if you don’t us it to stick it to the big corporations. I’ve lost work because of the negotiations and I never blamed SAG. It’s the pig headed suits who have gotten away with so much this year.
Let’s bloody their nose!
Already, I’m having to move, can barely afford gas and food, savings is gone… but this is what having a union is about- hard negotiations, in harder times, so we can all prosper down the road.
Stand up, stand together, and stand strong!
Hey Flyby…
Check it out…
Car manufacturers do negotiate together… It’s called a multiple employer unit. just like this industry.
Which isn’t that risky, if you play it right.
Once was Neutral- Look the point I am trying to make here, Now is not the time to strike. This is not the year to strike. The economy is already suffering, did anyone not see Monday’s stocks fall?
To put people out of work before Christmas again isn’t right either. Especially with the already suffering economy, that doesn’t look like it will get better. Hollywood can not afford another strike. SAG is the only one to stop this.
What SAG needs to do is suck it up and take the deal for now, and try again later. SAG will be more respected, because they avoided the strike. JMO