Faithful readers of DHD know I don’t do geek. Nor does this site review movies. Instead, it does the biz of the Biz. So, with that in mind, I asked my Comic-Con correspondent Luke Y Thompson to attend today’s unveiling by J.J. Abrams of 25 minutes of Star Trek XI footage. (New trailer here.) Here are his thoughts on whether the stale franchise can be freshened to add to Paramount’s bottom line. SPOILER ALERT. SPOILER ALERT. SPOILER ALERT. SPOILER ALERT:
I have, like many fans, been very skeptical about the idea of this new TREK. It’s one thing to do a straight up remake, like BATTLESTAR GALACTICA, where you take the basic idea and character names, then do your own thing — but to do that and then claim that it’s actually still within existing continuity, by having Leonard Nimoy appear as a time-traveling elder Spock, just made me wonder, why? STAR TREK’s future chronology is so convoluted and mapped out already that anything you do is bound to contradict something pre-established, and if there are any fans in the world who absolutely defined the concept of the nit-picking continuity geek, it’s Trekkers.
So upon seeing the trailer, which was shown again to kick off Paramount’s presentation today, my geek brain kicks in and says, “Wait a minute, Shatner’s Kirk didn’t know how to drive a vintage car, so how come he knew as a kid? Nobody in Kirk’s time ever saw a Romulan face to face, so what are they doing here? Why doesn’t the Enterprise interior look anything like it did on TV? Etc.”
But by the end of the presentation, I can say this: I was enjoying what I was seeing so much that the nitpicker in me shut the hell up, at least momentarily. Besides, even if J.J. Abrams utterly screws this up, he can’t do worse than the last couple of STAR TREK movies. And I don’t think he’s going to screw it up. Though he did say that when he started the project he didn’t care much for Kirk and Spock as characters, but now he does — that worried me, because Sam Raimi said the same about Venom, the villain he completely ruined in SPIDER-MAN 3.
Abrams came out to introduce four clips — the same clips that I gather have been shown in England and New York already, but he said it was special for him to do it on the Paramount lot, as his dad, who used to work there, had taken him to the first studio screening of Robert Wise’s original movie.
Abrams, on casting Chris Pine: “To play a character like Kirk, he couldn’t fall back on the pointy ears like the other guy!” Abrams’ speaking manner reminds me of Woody Allen, which isn’t what I expected.
Please note — these clips contained significant spoilers, and I’m not holding back.
SCENE 1: Our first glimpse of Kirk as a young man
A vast Iowa cornfield, the same one Kirk is driving through in the trailer on his motorbike, but at night. There’s a bar, and we follow Uhura (Zoe Saldana) into it, as she orders drinks — a “Cardassian Sunrise (geek alert — the Cardassians never appeared till the Next Generation), a Budweiser Classic, and a Slusho (Abrams in-joke — the fictional Japanese drink featured in CLOVERFIELD). There’s an alien at the bar with a really long face, looking like a cross between a human and baboon.Then there’s Kirk, one of the few civilians in a bar full of Starfleet cadets. He hits on Uhura, upon hearing that she’s a linguist he says “You’ve got a talented tongue.” Her fellow cadets get defensive, and start a fight; Kirk gets pushed into Uhura in such a way that his hands hit her chest just right. She kicks him hard, and he starts to get whupped until Captain Pike (Bruce Greenwood) shows up and sends his cadets out.
Cut to later in the evening. The bar’s empty, and it’s just Kirk and Pike. Kirk ahs a bloody nose; Pike is trying to get him to join Starfleet. Says “Your dad didn’t believe in no-win scenarios.” Tells Kirk he could be an officer in four years, captain in 8. “Your father was captain of a ship for 12 minutes — Saved 800 lives, including your mother’s, and yours. I dare you to do better.”
Cut to the next day. Kirk drives his motorbike to the shipyard where Enterprise is being built, and approaches Pike’s shuttle.
Worker on the lot goes “Nice ride, man!” Kirk tosses him the keys. “It’s yours.” Walks up into Pike’s shuttle, tells him he’ll be a captain in three years.
SCENE 2: An emergency space lightning storm is occurring on Vulcan. All cadets are assigned to rescue ships except Kirk, but there’s a technicality — a cadet who is sick can come onboard a ship if his assigned doctor is on its crew. So Dr. McCoy (Karl Urban) has injected Kirk with a mild virus to get him on the Enterprise.
On the bridge of the Enterprise, which is a lot whiter and more digital-display heavy than any prior iteration, we meet ensign Chekov (Anton Yelchin). I’m a bit nervous about this portrayal, because he does the Russian accent so broadly — and also because he doesn’t have Chekov’s trademark Davy Jones wig, which in the original series was supposed to make him appeal to girls. Instead, he has curly hair, that might be inspired by the young Justin Timberlake, I suppose. Anyway, we get a joke at the expense of his accent, when he has trouble saying “Victor” so the computer doesn’t recognize his voice code.
Meanwhile, Kirk is having an allergic reaction to McCoy’s vaccine, making his hands swell up like a Garbage Pail Kid. When he hears that the emergency is a lightning storm he runs to the bridge — it seems that when he was a kid, a similar storm masked a Romulan attack that killed his father (this jibes with what we’ve heard that the plot involves Romulans time-traveling to kill young Kirk).
Kirk makes it to the bridge, and Uhura backs him up, but Spock and Pike are skeptical. Still, Uhura speaks “all three dialects” of Romulan, so she’s assigned to communications. There’s no response from ships near Vulcan, so they warp over there and land in the middle of a big debris field of smashed ships.
Now, everyone’s been saying Zachary Quinto is the perfect Spock, but I remain a little skeptical — his voice is too high, for one thing, and his sideburns look fake. Kirk, however, is the challenging role, and Pine really brings it. It’s not like Kirk is just some character any actor can play — his mannerisms and character are defined by those of William Shatner in real life. And while Pine, in what we saw, doesn’t go quite to the level of sudden hand gestures and dramatic pauses, he gets the headstrong essence of the original captain.
SCENE 3: Abrams tells us that at a certain point, Spock becomes captain, and his first order of business is “get Kirk the fuck off his ship.” Kirk is left on a snowy planet, where he encounters Future Spock (Leonard Nimoy).
We see them led into a Federation outpost by a gnome-like critter that looks like a cross between an Ugnaught and one of the fish-dudes in PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN. Kirk and Old Spock enter and are greeted by Scotty (Simon Pegg, nailing it way better than I thought he would), who has been there for 6 months, punishment for testing out his transporter theories on “Admiral Archer’s dog.” Yes, Scott Bakula’s cute beagle from ENTERPRISE…so what happened to him? “I’ll let you know when it reappears,” Scotty says.
Spock show shim what he’s been doing wrong with his theories — a nod to the fourth movie, where Scotty did the same for another inventor. Then he tells Kirk how to take command of Enterprise, via “regulation 619.” If an officer is emotionally compromised, he can be removed. Spock says he is compromised, and Kirk must get him to show it, but must not mention he talked to future Spock.
Kirk: “Changing history — it’s cheating.”
Spock: “A trick I learned from an old friend.”Then he does that hand gesture. “Live long and prosper.”
SCENE 4: The Romulan ship is a giant, spiny, tentacled Matrixy looking thing, running a power line all the way down from space into the Vulcan atmosphere, where it culminates in an air platform that shoots down a beam of fire, drilling into the planet core.
Enterprise’s transporters are disabled, so a small team must do a parachute jump from the upper atmosphere, in space suits. The team are Kirk, Sulu (John Cho), and “Engineer Olson,” who’s wearing red. I suspect even the casual fans know what that means as far as his imminent fate goes.
Onboard the shuttle to the upper atmosphere, Kirk asks Sulu what kind of combat training he has.
“Fencing” replies Sulu.
They make the jump. As expected, Olson opens his chute too late and meets a nasty death. Kirk lands on the platform first, and pushes a button that sucks his chute back up into his backpack. He is then accosted by Romulans, who aren’t exactly the classic or Next Gen kind. These Romulans are burly, bald, have facial tattoos, dress dirtily, and their leader Nero (Eric Bana) also has scarification bumps. Kirk brawls with a Romulan whose gun emits stray far, shooting holes in the chute of the still-falling Sulu. When Sulu finally lands, he draws a sword, and goes into swashbuckling mode, which is less cheesy than it may sound. He saves Kirk by stabbing Kirk’s assailant through the heart, and I hope that somewhere, George Takei is happy that Sulu finally got to save the day for the captain he never liked much.
Without explosive charges (Olson had them), Kirk and Sulu simply grab the Romulan guns and start shooting the platform to bits. But the damage is done; the drill already got to the center, and the Romulans drop a depth charge that will create a black hole inside the planet and destroy it. Meanwhile, Sulu falls off the platform, and Kirk pulls a Keanu-in-POINT-BREAK move, jumping off in freefall. He grabs Sulu, but then the chute doesn’t open.
Up on the bridge, Spock prepares to evacuate Vulcan and save his parents. Meanwhile, nobody can get a transporter lock on Kirk and Sulu, because they’re moving too fast. Except Chekov, who has a radical new theory of some sort. He runs to the transporter room, takes control, and right as Kirk and Sulu are about to hit ground and die, they beam into the transporter room and hit the floor. The action pacing of this sequence was excellent.
That was it for the clips, but I should add that in the lobby, there were a few production designs, and I caught a glimpse of the classic Klingon cruiser…
Overall, I suspect this movie will play very well if the rest of it is up to these scenes. Casual fans will have no problems whatsoever; continuity geeks will probably do like me and find themselves turning off their internal critic during stuff like the freefall sequence. Whether they turn it back on after remains to be seen. One thing I do like quite a bit is the sense of scale and size — this is easily the biggest budget TREK yet, and it finally has an epic feel to it.
So far, anyway. (By Luke Y Thompson)
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.







All Fanboy gayness.
Star Trek has been in need of a reboot since the Next Generation took over the Movies. All, thats right, all of the Next Gen movies were god aweful. That includes the laughable first contact.
I welcome the change and hope it is good.
Remember, that is what a reboot is!!! Screw continuity.
And the people who are complaining the loudest will be the ones first in line for tickets…
I just found a teaser trailer showing the construction of the Enterprise while historical space travel voiceovers play in the background. That trailer may be a little too reverent, but it’s fine. The sound design is especially good.
If the teaser trailer turns out to be a lot better than the finished film: why not give whoever made the teaser trailer a shot at producing Star Trek XII?
Hmm based on most of these comments it seems this Star Trek film is sure to prove at least one thing: Star Trek doesn’t need its whiny fans to survive. I love Star Trek, always have, but jeezy creezy, people! Do you realize how silly you sound when you say things like “all the SF fans are laughing at the idea of the Enterprise being built on Earth”? It’s ludicrous.
I want them to get it somewhere close to continuity, but frankly, I don’t care that much when we met Cardassians or where the Enterprise was built. These things are ret-conned every five years anyway. As long as they get the spirit and the universe right, I’m on board. Plus, it looks like fun.
Like many of you, I’m a fan from way back. Watched TOS on NBC, etc. Loved TNG, didn’t like DS9 or VOY that much. I really enjoyed Enterprise.
I’ve seen the trailer, heard the blurbs about continuity, etc. Look – it’s a movie, intended to be fun and – not coincidentally! – make money. I’m not going to blast Abrams for “messing up” Star Trek. Let’s see what it is, if it’s worth it.
BTW – I frankly don’t think Nemesis sucked that much; again, a rowdy action flick – I liked it. Finally, my wife & I are HUGE ‘Lost’ fans – Abrams can’t be ALL bad!
I am old enough to have seen a few of the original series episodes and everything else trek since. I am a huge fan but not a fanatic like alot of the whiners who have already posted comments. This is a movie not Moses delivering the 10 commandments from God..though by some of the comments you’d certainly think it was. It reminds me of the SNL skit WS did almost 30 years ago lampooning all those ‘geek’ fans. Unless all you people who are whining about this are 12 years old then I suggest you act your age. Instead of the endless complaining, be happy there is something new in the Trek world to look forward to. Everything gets done again eventually. It is one reason why Shakespear, Sherlock Holmes, and Dracula are so popular. Everyone’s take is a little different but no less relevant than the first interpretation. Whew…lol. I feel alot better now…beam me up Scotty!
I have been a Trek fan just as much as I have been a Star Wars fan and a James Bond fan…
Star Trek has been in a DIRE need of a re-boot for quite some time. I loved TNG and loved the first 2 films of that era, “Generations” and “First Contact.” after that they lost me. Last 2 films were lousy and boring and that is being nice.
Going back and looking at this a whole different way is just what is needed. The writers themselves claim to be huge Trek fans and that is enough for me! The trailer looks fantastic and the so called fanboys can sit and sulk and delve into their DVD collections for all I care. I am looking forward to a GREAT Star Trek movie… first time in a long time I might add!
“I love Star Trek, always have, but jeezy creezy, people! Do you realize how silly you sound when you say things like “all the SF fans are laughing at the idea of the Enterprise being built on Earth”? It’s ludicrous.”
Sad to say, but when I first saw the welder in the teaser and realized he was working on the Enterprise my first thought was “Where’s his spacesuit?” Then I thought that, perhaps, they’re using force fields to keep a bubble of air around the ship, because obviously they HAVE to be building the thing in space. Then I realized that, no, it’s being built on Earth, and I could not stop laughing. Hey, and while we’re at it, why not build the International Space Station on the ground and use the power of transcendental meditation to raise it up into orbit.
And as for “Who cares about someone ordering a drink made by people we haven’t met yet?”, does that mean you wouldn’t brick in your pants if a movie about Napoleon showed him ordering his chef to whip up some burritos and taco salad, washed down with a Mai Tai or two?
Dang, almost forgot about James Bond. As for Casino Royale…the one without Woody Allen…didn’t anyone else notice that Bond was a young guy, just starting out–James Bond Year One, more or less–thus explaining why he was such a dim athletic hothead who still had yet to realize that his actions have consequences? In other words, the James Bond we have seen in all the other movies was a MIDDLE-AGED guy who had learned from the mistakes being made by this agent who frequently proves that young and stupid go together like bangers and mash.
So say what you like about Casino Royale, but it isn’t a reboot or a reinterpretation or a hashish dream, it’s the same guy but merely younger….
…although…
The M we see in the movie is the same M who was the last Bond’s boss. When you combine that with the remarkably prescient observation in the first Casino Royale that “There must always be a James Bond,” perhaps this young Craig Bond is the replacement for the aging Brosnan Bond who may have retired, or was killed in the line of duty.
Hmm.
When I saw the teaser trailer I wasn’t excited. Now, I am. I have my favorites from Original Trek, but really, not all of those episodes were pure gold. The first of the films almost killed hopes of future films and then ST2: Wrath of Khan brought new life to the trek civilization…I enjoyed NextGen, DS9, Voyager, and sometines Enterprise. I can’t say I’m the type of fan that knows every episode name, but I do love Trek and been to several Cons. Sometimes, one must just have “suspension of disbelief” in order to watch a film. I didn’t see Cloverfield, so am a bit apprehensive about what JJ Abrams has done to to Trek. That said, I do plan to see this one even with the major tweaks to the Kirk and Spock stories. The non-Trek theatre goer won’t notice those tweaks and it may make this more fun for them. For the rest of us Trekkers, the whining needs to stop. The one NextGen film that did well appealed to non-Trekkers. Then there was Nemesis, the dark film. I liked it because I like “dark”. It didn’t have broad appeal and that was the end of the films until this new one. It’s time to let new actors play the characters from the Original Series so I hope this film launches this franchise again. Third star to the right, and straight on ’til morning….
Luke pointed out the thing about driving the car. It caught me as being out of place at first too since that scene in the episode “Piece of the Action” is one of the funniest and iconic in the original series. But after watching the trailer again, I think it just goes to prove that Kirk never learned to drive a stick shift. He either sends them off a cliff or shreds the tranny.
I grew up with the original series, but I always keep my mind open with these reimagined remakes. I was never a real Doctor Who fan until the relaunch. Now, David Tennant announcing that he was leaving Who soured Obama winning the White House for me since both things happened in the same week.
Trekkers and trekkies need to take a breath and enjoy this new film for what it is, another chance for Trek to live after Berman killed it.
I’m a fan who is more than willing to let a lot of the nit-picky stuff go and understand that a prequel presents many challenges for writers and directors. However …
I can’t forgive anyone who ignores the big gaffs and I need a story that basically makes sense. This isn’t a complete reboot and having a ‘future’ Spock come back supports that, so why have the Romulans involved when they never appeared before the orginal series? Why IS Chekov an ensign before Kirk is even a cadet? I’ll tell you why …
Because people like JJA love to get their hands on the toybox and pull out bits here and there because it interests them. But that doesn’t mean you’re going to get a good story and it takes fans out of the moment and less able to enjoy the film.
You say you want to weave an exciting adventure while taking advantage of the Trek universe’s rich history? If so, then you’re obligated to work within that history (within reason). Go ahead and reboot it … start all over if you want … I’ll be happy with that. But once you say it’s a prequel and bring back ‘future’ characters then you’ve set the bar high and lazy writing isn’t acceptable!
I mean … take the first few seconds of the trailer. The kid says he’s James SIBERIUS Kirk … Siberius!?! JJA cares so little that he either doesn’t care if the writer and actor got it wrong or his people have been so careless that it slipped through. That’s like calling Bruce Wayne … Bryce Wayne. Of course it doesn’t make any difference to the story but it irritates like a thumbtack on your theatre chair for the rest of the movie.
This project screams of failure and unfortunately this is going to kill off another Trek attempt for at least a decade (much like Doctor Who).
Remember JJA was the guy who wanted to reboot the Superman franchise and keep Krypton from blowing up so he could have a three-picture epic about a Krypton Civil War. He’s just a kid wanting to pick through the toybox and it sucks for the rest of us.
Whining? I don’t hear any whining. I hear something far worse.
Laughter.
We are laughing at the know-nothingness of this production, at the gross superficiality of a director who thinks that if you have a Kirk, a Spock, and an Enterprise then you’ve got the bases covered and everything else you can pull out of your ass. It’s like showing Lincoln riding a Harley to Gettysburg decked out in a bomber jacket and Wayfarers. Sure, it’s a cool image, but people will laugh their asses off nonetheless.
I like Star Trek but I’m not a Trekke.
I enjoyed the original movies most of all, before TNG took over. Seeing the new trailer, has sparked my interest in star trek again and I hope that it will be a great movie.
I believe that stories have to be restarted or they will fade away, new generations will move on to stories that have a more current theme and style. If you want Star Trek to live on, you have to let and be open minded to a reworking of the old story.
Having said that you have to have the right man for the job, and thats not the actors, its the writers and director that have to have a want to do it right, a want to make a Star Trek movie. Like the new Bond movies, it just doesn’t feel like Bond, a great action movie just not a Bond movie, you have to leave the movie and know you watched a Star Trek movie not a SF movie and JJA dose not give me the idea he wants to make a Star Trek movie, he wants to make a movie that happens to be Star Trek.
I hope next year I will see a Star Trek movie and not a movie that happen in space.
i was never a star trek fan but i never had a problem with it. i used to watch the original on tv but i was never crazy about it. seems like the 2nd and 3rd movies were pretty good and everything else sucked. when the tv show progressed from kirk and spock the next dudes, it was dead to me.
about jj. everyone goes on and on about lost. there is nothing about that show that is remotely interesting enough to make me want to watch it. i watched the beginning of the 2nd episode to the first commercial and was too bored to keep going. a little while later i think i saw about half an episode at someone else place and left ’cause they wouldn’t turn it off.
didn’t they already make a show about a bunch of people stranded on a desert island – oh yeah, i was called gilligans island.
and then there’s cloverfield. i could tell from the trailer that it would suck and never saw it. everyone i’ve ever heard talk about it says it sucked.
jj did direct MI3 which was the only good MI of the lot.
the trailer for the new star trek looks bad ass. i’m glad it’s dissing all the geeks. it looks like it will the best serving of trek ever. i will see it the first weekend.
and now onto Bond. daniel craig kicks ass as JB. but the new casino royale sucked. half the movie was an f-ing card game. and was i the only one who noticed that after bond made the deal with the american CIA dude to buy back in for him that would turn over the bad guy, that the bad guy, who was just handed over to the CIA by bond, appeared in the next scene torturing bond. impossible.
and just for everyone who believes all the stupid critics out there, quantum of solace is probably the best bond ever. it totally rocks. and it’s got a nice homage to goldfinger.
when you’re dealing with something that’s been around since the 50′s or half a century, a reinventing is exactly what’s needed.
and hey, i heard they’re planning a bond vs the crew of star trek where they realize they have to team up just to survive the siege from spidey iron man and the hulk who have all learned how to fly through space using the force.
and as far as batman goes, i’d just be happy for someone to come along and make a bat man flick based on the old tv show. now that would be great. POW!
being a big fan of sci-fi and a casual fan of ST (i’ll get the dvd’s if they’re cheap)i really don’t see the point of all this bickering i hear. i dont know why people are complaining about it having action, the original show had tonnes of it! my only real reservation is J.J. i thought Alias was great, so was Lost for the 1st season, then it slipped into mediocrity (though it piched up in season 4, and i felt that Cloverfield thought it was better than it actually was. MI3 was crap. what i find funny is that all these ppl blasting it will no doubt be the first ones queing weeks in advance.
Ok, well, while you’re at home “laughing your ass off”, I will be at the theatre enjoying what looks like a thoroughly worthy addition to the Star Trek universe.
I have been a casual Trek fan through the years with an emphasis on TOS. When TNG first came out in the late 80′s, I was severely disappointed, but it got better in the later seasons. I despised DS9 because there was nothing to anchor to in the storyline. Voyager got lost in the Tech-speak, and Enterprise didn’t get interesting until they started tying in with TOS (right before it, too, got canceled). The best movies were ST2: TWOK and ST8: FC, by far. Then the rest of the TNG movies were an embarrasment because of the fanboy pandering (Data singing about scanning for lifeforms).
I think it’s definitely time for some new blood in the franchise after the absolutely poor job Berman did in his post-Roddenberry stewardship. The choice of Abrams is inspired as he is an outsider coming in to reform the broken franchise. In addition, he brings with him Michael Giacchino, who is possibly the best young composer in film music right now (potentially an heir-apparent to the likes of John Williams and Jerry Goldsmith). This will be GREAT!
On another note, to the poster that said Abrams changed Kirk’s name – he didn’t. Go back and watch the trailer again. The kid says “James Tiberius Kirk”, he just has a slight speech impediment, but if you watch his lips and listen carefully, he does say “Tiberius”.
Time for Star Trek to grow up…
For Christ’s sake…will you people stop referring to the “whiny, nit-picky” fans of ‘Star Trek’ as “Trekkers!” Those guys (the hard-core fanatics) are known as “Trekkies…” Big, big difference!!!
Trekkers (such as myself) simply enjoy the show for what it is…but Trekkies live, eat and breathe it! They’re the ones whom you see roaming the Comicons, dressed as Klingons and Borg…lol
Alrighty then.
There were people complaining about each and every Star Trek series when they came out. There were people complaining about each and every Star Trek movie when they came out. Why would I expect to see otherwise for this movie? Some people will never be satisfied. I’m planning to see it this weekend!