UPDATED: This weekend’s big box office news was overseas: MGM/Sony’s Quantum Of Solace, the 22nd James Bond motion picture, had record-setting launches in the UK, France and Sweden this weekend. Total Fri-Sat-Sun take was $38.6 million on 2,123 prints, generating more than $18,000 per print. The pic expands into 57 additional markets next weekend. But Bond made box office history on its opening day in the UK, taking a staggering £4.9 million and making it the biggest Friday opening of all time.
This shattered the previous record held by Harry Potter And The Goblet of Fire, which took £4.0m. The latest 007 installment, which claims to be the longest running franchise in film history (if you don’t count Godzilla or Tarzan), also beat the opening day figure of £2.9m for Casino Royale, the first to star Daniel Craig. Quantum Of Solace did £15.4 million for its UK weekend launch and the biggest standard 3-day opening of all time there, passing Harry Potter And The Goblet Of Fire‘s £14.934 million. This is 35% bigger than the £11.4 million launch of Casino Royale and a massive 70% of the UK box office this weekend. France’s weekend estimate of €8.2 million beat Casino Royale‘s 5-day €7.0 by 16% for the biggest Bond launch ever there, and in just 3 days. MGM/Sony expect Quantum to have three great days ahead in France, with the All Saint’s holiday school break running through November 5th. And Sweden’s 18.1 million SEK 3-day weekend is that country’s 4th biggest FSS ever, behind only Lord of the Rings 3 (20.4), and 31% more than Casino Royale‘s 13.821 million SEK launch. The 22nd Bond will release in the U.S. on November 14th and its first choice tracking was almost double what it was for Daniel Craig’s debut as Bond in Casino Royale. But this is 007 without the established Bond cliches and stereotypes. Reviewers said the current Bond movie looked more like Bond-as-Bourne since it dropped Moneypenny, dropped Q, dropped the wit, dropped the gadgets, and dropped the line “The name is Bond, James Bond”.
That said, rival studio chatter says this may be the costliest film ever made minute by minute: $261 million for a 105-minute movie, which comes out to almost $2.5 million per minute. (As opposed to, say, the $300M pricetag for 165-minute-long Pirates Of The Caribbean 3.) But Sony sources say that number is “off base by more than $60M. Plus we have tax credits from filming.” Produced for EON Productions by Michael G. Wilson and Barbara Broccoli, the 22nd Bond was directed by Marc Forster with screenplay by Neal Purvis & Robert Wade and Oscar-winner Paul Haggis. The film picks up the storyline just one hour after the end of Casino Royale, marking the first direct sequel produced by EON Productions/Danjaq, LLC, which is owned by the Broccoli family and has produced 21 Bond films since 1962.







Wait wait wait, if there’s no Q and no gadgets, there were only 3 FX companies working on it, meaning minimal effects, why the F@#% did the movie cost so much?!?
‘Only 3 FX companies?’ What are you talking about, Enrique? That’s a lot. Iron Man had 3 houses working on it — just for the digital stuff alone.
expecting to be disgusted by product placements…the Omega plug in the first one was wince-inducing, a serious howler
and he’s so unattractive and rather wimpy…
Trash a few Aston Martins and romp around the globe in exotic locales and the price gets up there pretty fast..
The best statement the film makes that he is a new breed of Bond is his angry rejection of expressing a preference for either a shaken or stirred martini.
However, Bond does say his name in the only way he could at the very end of the movie when the Bond theme is also heard for the first time. This shows the link between old Bond and new Bond. I believe we will see Moneypenny and Q in following films. Why not remake an early Flemming book based Bond film or two while Craig is still young enough to pull it off?
It will probably happen.
Double Oh! Three and a half returns.
No Q, Moneypenny, Wit, or real Bond; that is not Bond, that’s Blonde.
Barbarra Broccolli is typical of people who live in the shadow of someone succesful. She, like they, want to prove they are equal. So far, she has failed. This is not Bond, neither was the first.
Cubby, and Sir Ian are rolling in their graves.
Way too serious….what happened to coolness..? Sean invented cool under stress, heartless retribution… ( You’ve had your six.. ), and suave masculinity…007 is Bond, James Bond…Guess I’ll go back to watching Goldfinger again for the 223rd time…” You expect me to talk “.. ” No Mr. Bond, I expect you to die..” Well, Bond has died…
So this is the first non-”Bond” Bond movie since the series started. Dropping Q & the gadgets is putting a lot on Daniel Craig’s ability to act and capture the audience. From the reviews, perhaps he came through.
I was not impressed with the last Bond film….got to see it last week on a FREE-Weekin on showtime….So glad I didn`t go pay for it.
THIS James Bond was lucky to even survie the script…
He had to be saved by his Grilfriend TWICE…he was late to discover the back-stapping plot, He fell head over heel in love with the traitor almost coming to tears ….This has turned Bond into just another “Chick Flick”
WHO? pray tell can save the Queen now???????????????
Oh, so it has haggis. No wonder they’re eating it up over there.
How many more times do we have to hear the lie that this is first direct sequel in the history of the Bond franchise? “On Her Majesty’s Secret Service” ended with Blofeld killing Bond’s wife. The next film “Diamonds Are Forever” begins with Bond searching for Blofeld in order to avenge her death. Got it?
Well let’s hope that’s the end of it: the end of the droppings, because that’s what made Bond “Bond”. Otherwise the franchise will become just another bloody slugfest and fade into the hazy sunset of forgotten dreams.
Do it once, fine. I haven’t seen the movie yet, but I will. However, when I pay my hard-earned money to get James Bond, I don’t want a Bourne Supremacy look-alike (don’t get me wrong, I love the Bourne series). If I want Bourne, I will see Bourne, unless Bourne introduces a new line in return: “The name’s Bourne, Jason Bourne.”
On the next one I say bring back the droppings, please, or the movie studios may find die-hard Bond fans dropping their money on other things.
@Enrique:
Don’t you know that computer special effects cost just as much as the real thing?
Or maybe $150 Million-per-picture Tom Cruise did a cameo?
No Q, no gadgets, no “Bond, James Bond…”??
These were/are part of the 007 legacy and what makes James Bond movies James Bond movies….
Those movies were actually fun and entertaining to watch, now these new Bond flicks are just like all the other super serious spy movies (Bourne, etc..) trying to be all realistic and shit… It was cool to have Bond be so unrealistic yet still be believable…
What has the Broccoli Bitch done to this cherished character? Or CHARACTERS more like it!! Ian Fleming must be turning in his grave…
I’ll take a gadgetless Bond over one that travels on a transforming gondola hovercraft any day.
The movie cost so much because they went through so many damn Aston Martins!!!
Um, not to be terribly nitpicky.
The Godzilla franchise has 29 films to its credit. Bond at 22 is not the longest running film franchise.
Enrique- those suits don’t come cheap.
Theyll never be another Sean Connery but Daniel Craig is without a doubt the best James Bond since. He and the producers bring back a serious Bond with a mean streak much like the original Bond. The charm is still there but a dark side exists only found in those who can murder at the drop of a hat. Great job in bringing THE REAL BOND BACK!!!
If they could only come up with another Connery.
If they could just stick to the proven formula.
Bond…James Bond.
No Q, No gadgets, No Fun…
DUMB…………JUST DUMB………
Ed K
I hope that Bond girl looks better in a bikini
Just go see it and quit complaining about the cost or I’ll have to report you to the authorities.
“why the F@#% did the movie cost so much?”
Location. Location. Location…. and real action. Visual effects are cheap compared to these.
exotic locations + re-shoots.
And i think Craig got a bigger paycheck than we think for it.