Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has just called for a special session of the California legislature to figure out how to “stop the bleeding” because of the state’s miserable economic condition. And he reached out to keep Hollywood at home by ”providing tax incentives to new film and television production locating in California and production that has left the state, to return to the state.” How will this be received by the legislature? My bet is badly and perhaps unfairly. Especially since Schwarzenegger also proposed $4.4 billion in tax increases, including a temporary 1.5% sales tax increase, and a slew of budget cuts that slashes assistance to the needy while raising taxes on those least able to afford it. So legislators may see providing services for the poor as more important than providing tax incentives to moguls. But what else is there to do?
True, Hollywood players like Iron Man director Jon Favreau have been lobbying Schwarzenegger for incentives to stop runaway production. I first reported back on July 22nd that Marvel Studios intended to keep $600 million in productions in the Los Angeles area, especially if the state of California made it worth their while. Then Marvel announced that its next 4 movies as well as its corporate office space are moving to Raleigh Studios Manhattan Beach. Schwarzenegger pledged to Favreau and Marvel to reach across the aisle and push for tax break legislation in Sacramento.
But the heat really was on the Guvernator before that in the wake of Ugly Betty leaving Los Angeles for New York to take advantage of an Albany-passed package of fat rebates. That impacted hundreds of local crew members who lost their jobs plus thousands working for L.A.-based vendors that depended on Ugly Betty. That production bought lumber, paint, wallpaper, cabinets, other building materials, office products, fabric, art supplies, computer equipment, food, beverages, flowers, film, makeup & hair products, wigs, insurance, jewelry, clothing. It rented lighting equipment, sound equipment, video playback equipment, heavy machinery, office equipment, backdrops, costumes, furniture, scenery, props, soundstages, offices, parking facilities, cars, trucks, storage facilities, computers, camera equipment, grip equipment, editing equipment, drafting equipment, cell phones, computers, toilets, dumpsters, live plants, production trailers, tools, hardware, artwork, walkie talkies. It used the services of dry cleaners, printers, location companies, special effects companies, utilities, caterers, payroll services, restaurants, security, post production services, clearance houses, etc. When it shot on locations around Los Angeles, it paid for permits and use of property, police and fire department personnel, facility engineers, etc.
New York recently boosted the showbiz tax credits on below the line expenses for qualified productions to 30% (up from 10%), and Mayor Michael Bloomberg added an extra 5% if a project is made within New York City limits. But, unlike about 40 other states, California does not offer a tax credit program to keep Hollywood at home. So the number of film production days shot on location in Los Angeles has plummetted nearly 40% since 1997, according to FilmL.A. Inc, a non-profit group that handles film permits. What’s at stake? Well, a major production can pump tens of thousands of dollars a day into local economy what with hotel room stays, catering, services and permits. One figure cited is that 3 weeks of filming of Memoirs Of A Geisha generated more than $4 million for Sacramento and El Dorado counties.
Though his showbiz proposal contained no details, Schwarzenegger is known to favor tax credits of $100+ million to keep film and TV productions in California as part of an overall stimulus package. But Schwarzenegger’s plan also carried a possible bummer for Hollywood labor. To “reduce barriers to job creation and rendition”, it called for ”providing flexiblity to employers regarding flex time schedules, meal and rest periods and overtime rules, to reduce the amount of costly litigation and encourage employers to keep jobs in-state.”
- ‘Iron Man’ Director Lobbies Guvernator To Try Yet Again For Hollywood Tax Breaks
- Unemployed ‘Ugly Betty’ Crew Blame Schwarzenegger For Show’s NY Move
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


UGH on Ugly Betty!!!
Enough already with the Ugly Betty sob story about them leaving LA for NYC. We (LA) “stole” that show from NYC in the first place. The pilot was shot in New York. All through the first 2 seasons, the producers wanted to shoot in New York. The amount of greenscreen work, just to fake New York, was ridiculous.
I am, of course, completely for stopping runaway production. But how many shows that take place in LA are shot in New York? Compare that to the number of New York-based shows that are shot here and stop complaining about ONE show that went back.
In 2002 California used to have an incentive program called Film California First. Had the program not been in existence I would have had to take my film, The Rules of Attraction, to Canada. It was one of the first programs cut by Schwartzenegger when he came into office. At minimum I’d like to see a similar program reinstated, so that I can continue to argue to shoot my films in California, where the best crews in the world live and work.
“Anonymous,” be sure to get back to me the second those tax cuts for the film industry pass.
But while you’re holding your breath, you might want to get out of L.A. once in a while. When you stop in Berkeley, Sacramento, or hell. Go to Riverside. Ask a few peops how much they want to cut “*Hollywood*” a break right now — at the same time the Governator is also now asking for an increase in sales Tax — as opposed to other industries.
Be sure to attack them personally when they give you that “you gotta be kidding me” stare, then follow up by trying to tell them that helping Hollywood by cutting it a break will “trickle sideways” to them … and how helping us will more effectively help them than it would to do the same for other industries that actually have work somewhere around their town. Then when that doesn’t work, convince their rep in Sacramento to throw his/her career down the drain by being “smarter” than them and catering to Hollywood.
Timing is a key component to political pragmatism, and Arnold seems to have lost it (e.g., proposing that increase in Sales Tax right *after* Los Angelians just agreed to raise their sales tax to improve the transit infrastructure is jaw-droppingly poor timing).
So sure. Write Santa some notes, and hope Santa brings you a new mansion and a Lexus.
But if you think that Sacramento thinks that its constituents are going to support stimulus for the film industry at any time, let alone *now* — and that’s where the Governor should be spending what political pull he may have … be sure to get back to me when that happens. My breath will not be held.
Give major film producers a 100% tax rebate right now, and without a break in the SAG/AMPTP negotiations or some light at the end of the tunnel, and the grand total of new major film production and monies to the L.A. and State economy is going to buy a six dollar burger at C.J.’s, without fries.
We have an 800 pound Gorilla in the room when it comes to what’s stopping major film production and realistically, with work and creativity, he can disappear. Ignoring that best to focus on dream wish lists, on some conviction that the constituent of a majority of reps in Sacremento is inclined to favor us over some other industry was the hardest of sells when the State Budget was rockin’: Choosing -now- to finally get off his formerly muscled ass and gun for something that he couldn’t be bothered to do for years is the essence of bad timing, and the antithesis of smart politics.
Actually Sterling, I was the “anonymous” poster – I forgot to add my name to the post. Yes go and ask those in other areas about a stimulus, but ask on behalf of our state’s largest export gnp and then see if they support it. Give them the facts that film production will actually help state revenue and the financial health of the state. Your “trickle sideways” analogy is truly bizzarre! Your message seems to be that all is lost so why try? Stand aside pup and let the big dogs handle this one.
399
Is this Sterling Wolfe’s website or what? He feels obliged to post multiple times on every single thread and all he does is spout gibberish that a five year old would roll their eyes about. Much like Crystal Diane Stevens. The same person perhaps?
As an above poster said, those in Hollywood don’t give a crap about all those shows set in New York that are filmed in Hollywood do they? Such as CSI: New York. Where are the tears and histrionics in those cases? Oh that’s right. They don’t give a shit about anyone but themselves.
Thanks for the clarification Furious D. Yet I pretty much believe that the Squaw Man was filmed in California, and only location considered because it was a western. Today, the bulk of the industry still films in New York when you consider the fact that most news productions are based there while plenty of TV Productions are also filmed there.
A sales tax increase for the rest of us while the studios get tax breaks to pay the likes of Jolie, Pitt, et al. tens of millions per movie? An odd sort of similarity with Main Street taking it on the chin while Wall Street is given a bailout. How many of those talking about “job creation” by giving special breaks to Hollywood are the same that are up in arms over general corporate tax breaks? There is a word for such and it is called hypocrisy. “Spreading the wealth” starts at home and as soon as the A-listers and the rest of their ilk start “spreading the wealth” with PAs, background players and the 95% of the union that does not make enough to not have to take second or third jobs then perhaps they can actually have a platform to stand upon regarding “social justice.”
I agree with the previous poster about how many tv shows are really produced in New York. There aren’t that many in comparison to Los Angeles. I do find myself gravitating to shows based in New York because I find the city as almost a third character with a personality all it’s own. It’s fun to watch
You’ve got to look at the big picture. For the last 20 years businesses have been fleeing California because of high taxes, high property values, massive traffic jams, crime, illegal immigrants, and low quality of life in the urban areas. The whole argument about giving Hollywood some tax breaks is to try to stem the flow of even more money leaving the state. There’s no overnight fix for California. This is just an attempt to try to preserve what’s left of a major business in the state.
The problem Schwarzenegger has is where to cut? Everyone says cut the waste. But where’s the waste? 41% of the budget is for education! Should the state start closing schools? 10% of the money is for jails. Should the state release its criminals? 25% is for welfare. Who do we kick off? Another 10% is for transportation and housing. What do we shut down? Only 5.5% of the budget is the actual expense of running state government and Schwarzenegger has frozen hiring new employees.
Trying to hold on to movie production is probably the quickest and easiest way to stem the loss of a major business. Plus it keeps people employed, which means they’re paying taxes and are off the unemployment roles. That alone is worth it, even if the state collects less than it would of from the movie business.
As for California’s other problems, raising taxes will probably cause more people and businesses to flee, but the state can’t print money like the federal government, and unless the feds decide to bail out the state, there’s not much else it can do to balance the budget right now.
FYI the entertainment law community in Texas is looking at lobbying Austin to improve Texas’s incentives for attracting film & TV production…the tone of this Texas Bar Journal arrticle is concern that Louisiana and Michigan have stolen the Lone Star State’s thunder in attracting production because of better state tax rebates (BTW Texas has no state income tax so there is one place Texas can’t offer any discounts unless it starts collecting state income tax from everyone in Texas including long time permanent residents and then refunds something to the film and TV production companies that are likely to be transient businesses, a move that resident Texans are unlikely to permit to happen)
http://www.texasbar.com/Template.cfm?Section=Past_Issues&Template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=22398
If you ask me this is a race to the bottom amongst all the states and it’s going to prove unpopular among the broader community of taxpayers no matter what state they live in. I think Americans can get behind the idea of keeping entertainment production jobs in the USA (so called ‘runaway production’) but if you start pitting California vs. New York vs. Michigan vs. Louisiana vs. Texas ad nauseum this won’t end well, especially given the fact that unlike attracting say an manufacturing plant, those in ‘the biz’ could bail on a moment’s notice, frustrating the long time resident taxpayers of the state/jurisdiction.
I don’t know what the answer is here to keep all the states from duking it out amongst each other but there will be consequences to that and not all of them will be hugely positive.