Former entertainment superlawyer and now convicted felon Terry Christensen is being sentenced at 8:30 AM Monday morning. But get this: he still thinks he’s a bigshot. Because he’s requesting to be put on probation for 10 months under home confinement. That’s right, he doesn’t want to go to jail with all the peons after he was convicted this summer for hiring then Hollywood P.I. Anthony Pellicano to wiretap Kirk Kerkorian’s ex-wife in a high profile 2002 child support case. According to details provided by the Los Angeles Daily Journal newspaper (subscription only so I can’t link),
Christensen is now explaining away his crime as an “aberrational, isolated exercise of bad judgment” on his part. His sentencing request was outlined in his recently filed sentencing memorandum. To be fair, the U.S. Probation Office is also asked for the same sentence for him, plus a fine of $30,000. But prosecutors, in their sentencing memo, called the Probation Office’s recommendation “reckless, uninformed, and completely inappropriate”. Their memo states that Christensen had managed the scheme with Pellicano to wiretap Bonder Kerkorian’s phones and, as an attorney, held a higher level position of trust that warranted prison time. So the feds demand that Christensen serve three years in federal prison and pay a $500,000 fine due to his “brazen efforts to corrupt and subvert the legal system… This is not a case of a defendant who committed a crime and who coincidentally happened to be an attorney. To the contrary, this case involves a defendant whose criminal activities were directly intertwined with and inextricable from his work as an attorney.”
Pellicano’s sentencing has been put off until December 15th.
According to the Los Angeles Daily Journal legal newspaper (which is subscription-only), Christensen wrote a letter to U.S. District Judge Dale Fischer, of the Central District of California, saying he regretted his decision to hire Pellicano. “Looking back, when I was approached by Mr. Pellicano, I should never have agreed to hire him. No matter how I look at this, from whatever angle, I cannot escape this lapse of judgment on my part.” Christensen said his recent resignation as managing partner of the prominent entertainment law firm that he started in 1988 and bore his name until he was found guilty, and is now called only Glaser, Weil, Fink, Jacobs & Shapiro, was intended to help its lawyers and staff move past the criminal case. Christensen said he is on interim suspension by the State Bar of California. “He will likely never again practice law and his ability to earn an income has been vastly reduced, if not eliminated altogether,” the memo states.
Still, more than 70 letters from his law colleagues and clients and friends and family were filed on his behalf. Several of the letters come from current and former board members and senior executives of Kerkorian’s present and former investment holdings like MGM Mirage, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. and Tracinda Corp. One was from Matthew Spitzer, the former dean of the USC School of Law, Christensen’s alma mater, who wrote, ”The legal and business community has paid close attention to this case, and the fall of Terry Christensen has become a terrifying cautionary tale for others.”
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Thanks for keeping them honest, Nikki. Let the Son of a Bitch rot in hell. Bad judgement the fool must do his time. I hope he really learns his lesson. Enjoy the showers!
Thank you.
Christensen deserves jail, not just for the Pellicano thing, but also for assisting in the bilking of millions from the late Brooke Astor. Read all about it in last month’s issue of Vanity Fair.
Agreed, HonestAnswer, and apparently he won’t learn unless he goes to jail.
Terry Christensen’s response to the court is typical of the little monster.
The reality is that as a lawyer and human being, he was utterly ruthless, devoid of any conscience, and unethical (don’t forget – you can act within the parameters of the law and STILL be unethical. As a litigator said to me years ago, “Don’t be ridiculous. Ethics has nothing to do with the law, except for dropping in commencement speeches and speaking on CNN.”)
Terry bragged that he was so good he was able to convince a jury of anything, literally, and he derived a sheer enjoyment in knowing that he had helped the studios to get away with a fair amount of dark behavior. Strange, he got a kick out of helping them when they plagiarized scripts, beating the original writers in court. What was it about beating ‘the little guy’ with him?
It’s like Terry to call what he did an “…aberrational, isolated exercise of bad judgment” on his part.” Are you kidding? It wasn’t bad judgment; it was getting caught.
And then ask for probation and home confinement? You have to admire the chutzpah of this sociopath.
You know, I’m going have to go with him on this one. I mean, if you had received a sentence to serve time, would you not prefer to spend it in the comforts of your own home rather than an icky crowded jail?
Now we’ll see if there’s a “Fisher” or an “Ito” under that robe. But, given the history of “LA justice” – in particular this trial – it may be a forgone conclusion…
Terry Christensen doesn’t seem to understand the extent of his problems or what it will take to reduce it. He faces sentencing in a few days by a judge who is widely said to detest him. He’s been convicted for not only hiring Pellicano to wiretap Bonder-Kerkorian’s phone, but to have done so with the express purpose of both violating her attorney-client privilege and using the information he so obtained to undermine and pervert an ongoing judicial proceeding. Yet he shows no remorse whatsoever other than “regret” for hiring Pellicano in the first place. Apparently Christensen wants Judge Fischer to believe that he regrets not hiring a more professional spook to tap that phone, a spook who didn’t leave tapes of his own hours-long conversations with Christensen lying around his office for raiding cops to find. Message to Terry: This statement does not evidence acceptance of guilt or responsibility or any remorse of the kind Judge Fischer wants to see: “Looking back, when I was approached by Mr. Pellicano, I should never have agreed to hire him. No matter how I look at this, from whatever angle, I cannot escape this lapse of judgment on my part.”
It seems as though Mr. Christensen is pinning his hopes on overturning his conviction on appeal. Could anything else explain his not providing Judge Fischer with a single word she needs to hear to even consider not making an example of him? An appeal based on removal of an obviously prejudiced juror who refused to even deliberate? Good luck on that one! The way things are going, including this absurd “non-remorse” letter to the judge, she’s probably going to throw the book at Christensen and make him start serving his prison term right away, while his case is still on appeal.
Arrogance and narcissism seperate Terry Christensen from reality….Prison will reduce the distance…
The results of the first “Pellicano Trial” were less than fair. Seeing that several high profile witnesses were never indicted themselves and, more importantly, the ones who were not called to the stand at all, leads to the belief that the results in this trial will turn out to be much the same. The sorry state of the compromised justice system in Los Angeles, is an unfortunate joke worldwide.