It also looks as if the now disgraced uber-entertainment lawyer and convicted felon in the Pellicano scandal won't be doing his time under house detention, either. This morning, federal judge Dale Fischer granted prosecutors' recommendation and sentenced Terry Christensen to 36 months, plus a $250,000 fine to be paid within 30 days. She is allowing him to stay out on bond pending his appeal, and authorities have confiscated his passport. But Fischer poured cold water on Christensen's request for house detention instead of prison, which the U.S. Probation Office had recommended for a total 10 month sentence. "The probation officers' recommendation was ludicrous," she said. "Home detention in an 8,000-square-foot house is not punishment." Fischer also ordered Christensen to three years on supervised release after his prison term ends. That means until he is 73 years old. No doubt about it: she threw the book at him. Speaking about Christensen's own letter to the court expressing his regret for his actions in the wiretapping case, Fisher declared, "His regret seems of recent vintage."
So goes Christensen's once flourishing career after he was found guilty in August for hiring then Hollywood P.I. Anthony Pellicano to wiretap Kirk Kerkorian's ex-wife in a high profile 2002 child support case. Christensen wrote a letter to Fischer explaining away his crime as an "aberrational, isolated exercise of bad judgment", but the judge didn't buy it. "Looking back, when I was approached by Mr. Pellicano, I should never have agreed to hire him. No matter how I look at this, from whatever angle, I cannot escape this lapse of judgment on my part," he told her. Christensen resigned as managing partner of the prominent entertainment law firm that he started in 1988 and bore his name -- now called only Glaser, Weil, Fink, Jacobs & Shapiro --- and is on interim suspension by the State Bar of California. He will likely never again practice law.
Besides his own, more than 70 letters from his law colleagues and clients and friends and family were filed with the court. Several of the letters come from current and former board members and senior executives of Kerkorian's present and former investment holdings like MGM Mirage, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. and Tracinda Corp. If the point of this prosecution was to scare lawyers into realizing that winning at all costs doesn't mean breaking the law , then the feds were successful. During this morning’s sentencing hearing, Fischer summed up: “In a real sense, the legal community and the justice system are the victims of this crime.” In explaining the sentence rejecting Christensen’s request for no prison time, Judge Fischer noted that Christenen’s actions ‘”marred the legal profession in the eyes of the public” and demonstrated a “disrespect for the justice system on a grand scale.” But it's still a crock that all the big fish in the Pellicano scandal have been let off without so much as a slap on the wrist. Which further underscores the sad fact that America has the best judicial system that money can buy.
Pellicano's sentencing has been put off until December 15th.
Carl Icahn Now Wants ALL Of Lionsgate
I’m starting a new fund-raising drive to buy him a carton of smokes to use as currency in prison. Because rich convicted felons need friends too.
When is this judge up for reelection or appointment? I’ll vote for her or send letters to support her re-appointment to the bench. I like a no-nonsense girl with balls.
I don’t know why I am commenting on this but with all of the injustice floating around right now I gotta cheer Judge Fischer
“The probation officers’ recommendation was ludicrous,” she said. “Home detention in an 8,000-square-foot house is not punishment.” Speaking about Christensen’s own letter to the court expressing his regret for his actions in the wiretapping case, Fisher declared, “His regret seems of recent vintage.”
how the hell did Ovitz, who is mentioned every third sentence in this whole charade, get away scott free? the FBI pointed all kinds of fingers at him and he just walks…scumbag
How can we get Harvey to have a trial in front of this judge?! Somebody, Help!!
It’s odd why Christensen carries the moniker of “top entertainment” lawyer. A review of reported cases in which he’s listed as counsel has him in several class actions involving Kerkorian interests, and a sizeable group of decisions on disqualifying attorneys based on conflicts. [Some call these 'conflicts' others know these as 'ambiguous opportunities'].
This ‘crime of the Century City’ occurred in a domestic relations case. Duh! Perhaps the ‘lapse of judgment’ for which Terry grieved was a class action, securities, etc., lawyers taking a domestic relations case – never, not even for one’s uber-client. The second lapse was not hiring a true, criminal defense lawyer to defend him, and instead hiring his partner. Again, it’s odd that an attorney, whose name comes up so often in cases involving efforts to disqualify his firm (and so share the work with others), ends up losing a trial for his freedom by hiring his own firm to represent him.
and also brad grey got away guilty as hell
Brad Grey and Michael Ovitz and even Bert Fields may all have been more involved with Pellicano than Christensen was, and each of them may have commissioned Pellicano to commit more and greater crimes than Christensen did. But Pellicano didn’t leave tapes of 6 hours of his phone calls with them cackling about those crimes. That is to say, there is a little matter of a lack of ACTUAL HARD EVIDENCE showing the criminal guilt of Grey and Ovitz and Fields beyond a reasonable doubt.
Apparently, some consider the American justice system to be unfair in not rooting out all similar crimes. Perhaps that’s true, although I cannot imagine how it could be fixed without divine intervention. But I do know that American CRIMINAL TRIALS are fair in demanding actual evidence to convict beyond a reasonable doubt – and not just the accused being “mentioned [in] every third sentence in this whole charade” with the “FBI point[ing] all kinds of fingers.” “Mentioning” and “finger pointing” are not evidence. And American PROSECUTORS are certainly fair in not bringing charges against people who cannot be convicted for want of such evidence.
The Prosecutors AND Judge Fisher not only let Ovitz and Grey walk, they purposely did not call Meyer, Fields and several others and, in that sense, they were allowed to “walk” as well… Questions that linger on…
“they purposely did not call Meyer, Fields and several others and, in that sense, they were allowed to ‘walk’ as well”
Look, this is America. That means the Fifth Amendment guaranties people whose testimony might be used against them the right NOT TO TESTIFY about such things. It’s just bizarre to argue that people like “Meyer, Fields and several others” were likely criminally involved with Pellicano, but should have been put on the stand. For what reason? Just to intone: “I refuse to testify on the grounds that it may incriminate me?” Such a turn would be wholly unproductive, risk confusing the jury and border on abusing the witness.
It’s anyone’s right to think that the Fifth Amendment and its consequences are “unfair.” The Constitution guaranties everyone that right, too.