SUNDAY AM UPDATE: Huge pre-sales added up to a franchise record shattering opening in North American for the new Bond film. That’s phenomenal, considering 007′s 46-year history. It made $27M on Friday and another $26.1M Saturday from 3,451 theaters. So MGM/Sony were thrilled that their costly Quantum Of Solace‘s weekend grosses totaled $70.4M in North America (including Sunday’s estimate of $17.3M). That far exceeds the $60M which Hollywood expected. It’s also blows away by 73% the $40.8M North American weekend debut of Daniel Craig’s James Bond in MGM/Sony’s Casino Royale (November 2006), and easily beats the $47.1M bow of Die Another Day (November 2002) that used to be the best ever. Quantum‘s success must be due to either pent-up demand for Hollywood’s holiday season product or Daniel Craig’s new-found popularity or both. Because the new Bond-as-Bourne’s reviews were dismal (only 35% positive from top critics on Rotten Tomatoes as opposed to 95% for its predecessor). But it appears this 22nd Bond’s delayed U.S. debut — three weeks after its October 31st bow in the UK and two weeks after most of the world — proved to be a savvy distribution and marketing move for the new pic. Even though U.S. Bond fans have been bitching and moaning all over the Internet that they didn’t want to wait so long to see the film, which so far has made a staggering $251M internationally from 73 territories, or $322M worldwide. The pic is over halfway towards Casino Royale‘s global $599.2M after coming off a $126.5M weekend overseas.
And it has yet to open in Japan, Australia and Spain.
Last weekend’s big No. 1 film Madascagar: Escape 2 Africa, produced by DreamWorks Animation and distributed by Paramount, was #2 with $8.1M Friday and $16.9M Saturday from 4,065 venues. That’s an impressive $36.1M weekend, down only 43% from a week ago because of crowded Saturday kiddie matinees, for a fresh new cume of $118M. The family fare soared over the $100M mark in just 10 days time. Universal’s surprisingly robust R-rated comedy Role Models held for No. 3 with only a 39% drop for an $11.7M weekend and a new $38.1M cume. At No. 4, Disney’s tween/teen hit among females High School Musical 3: Senior Year added another $5.8M weekend for a solid new cume of $84.3M. And Changeling, Universal’s Oscar-touted drama directed by Clint Eastwood and starring Angelina Jolie, came in No. 5. It earned an additional $4.2M for a fresh $27.6M cume.
No. 6 was The Weinstein Co’s Zack And Miri Make A Porno from Kevin Smith with a $3.2M weekend and new $26.5M cume. The Weinstein Co’s other pic, distributed by MGM, was #7, the late Bernie Mac’s Soul Men, which had a $2.4M weekend and now a $9.4M cume. At No. 8, Fox Searchlight’s The Secret Life of Bees, based on the best-selling novel, earned another $2.4M this weekend for a fresh $33.6M cume. In No. 9, Lionsgate’s horrific R-rated Saw V made $1.7M this weekend for a new cume of $55.4. And, ounding out the Top 10, Freestyle Releasing’s The Haunting Of Mollie Hartley squeezed out $1.6M this weekend for a $12.6M cume.
The only other new film of note is Fox Searchlight’s Oscar-heralded and Danny Boyle-directed Slumdog Millionaire, which platformed in 10 theaters for a $350K weekend and a $418.1K new cume. It managed a huge per screen average of $35,043.
Overall, the weekend box office totaled a hefty $155M, up 49% from last year’s $103.7M.
Back to 007… Here’s why Quantum Of Solace opened late. It started when The Dark Knight made so much money that Warner Bros. decided to give other studios early Xmas cheer by moving Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince to 2009, thus freeing up its original release date of November 21th (which about-to-be-blockbuster Twilight grabbed). That allowed Quantum of Solace to move from November 7th to November 14th. However, that also meant the new Bond pic’s U.S. bow would really lag behind its UK/France/Sweden record-breaking opening October 31st to November 2nd. That date was considered optimum for Europe because of a conveniently placed bank holiday. So why didn’t the studios pull the trigger on 007 at the same time in North America? Because when Halloween falls on a Friday, Saturday or even Sunday, it’s considered the worst weekend to open a movie here. Plus, Sony has had tremendous success with its pre-Thanksgiving plays. (You think these people aren’t superstitious?) So Quantum Of Solace wound up with this weekend all to itself in North America.
The new Bond film opened #1 in every territory where it debuted and exceeded the opening of Casino Royale in almost every market. A true sequel since its storyline picks up just one hour later, 007 had been tracking strongest among males, with hard-body Craig bringing interest from older women. In North America, the opening weekend exit polling showed the audience was 54% male and 46% female, with 58% over age 25 and 42% under 25. But filmgoers may not have realized this is 007 without the beloved Bond clichés and stereotypes. In fact, pic 22 is more like Bond-as-Bourne since it dropped Moneypenny, dropped Q, dropped the wit, dropped the gadgets and dropped the line “The name is Bond, James Bond.”
Meanwhile, rival studios tell me this may be the costliest film ever made minute-by-minute: $261 million for a 105-minute movie, which comes out to almost $2.5 million per minute. (Highest is the $300-million price-tag for 165-minute Pirates of The Caribbean 3.) But Sony sources say that number is off base by more than $60 million. Plus they claim tax credits from filming. Which is why one veteran film financing source warned me, “The film cost a fortune, and they spent a fortune to release it, so it better do well. Everything is relative.”






Now that Quantum is a hit (was there ever any doubt?), can MGM get rid of the Bourne-style editing of the action sequences? It is WAY too fast; you can’t understand what the hell is going on.
…and as fan I thought it was definately a winner. Daniel Craig makes it not only watchable but captivating; he does more to reveal the professional isolation of a man like Bond than anyone before him. too much ‘Bourne’ maybe? But what’s wrong with that? So it’s not a comedy?…I grew up with Roger Moore and I loved those campy send-ups but these grown up versions are the movies I wanted to see then…I just didn’t know any better. Opening sequence is great.
I agree, the action shots were shot terribly. Blah.
I agree.
Smash it! Love it!
Yeah folks, this Bourne-rapid cut style is getting really annoying. I can see why filmmakers are tempted to use it in thinking by chopping it up into billions of pieces they’re evoking high tension, but it really just gives you a headache in the end.
This is what a great script will get you and if you can’t tell what is going on in the action scenes I suggest you get off the Zoloft.
The movie was boring even at 1 hour 40. I would expect word of mouth to quickly kill this pic after the first weekend. Critics have really gone for backhanded praise and they’re right: this lackluster effort feels like filler until someone comes up with a story as good as CR’s. And Craig has zero chemistry with either Bond girl, and there’s more self-pity than rage in his performance. It truly is Bourne, James Bourne now.
This bond movie was the worst ever. What ever happened to the Bond with the cool gadgets and eclectic taste for his gals. Both gone MIA! He seemed like a hybrid of Jason Bourne and Jackie Chan. What’s wrong with people wasting $$ on this dumb flick!
I’m really excited to go see it tonight!!
dear god bring martin campbell back for the next one – and i heard bond is going black after craig?!? give me a break! never thought the aclu would infiltrate mi6! if thats true, bond is going to go the route batman took when schumacher cut the nuts off the bat
Yeah, I’m SURE they’re gonna make BIG changes to a movie that opens with $70m. Ooooooooh they’ve learned their lesson……..
The best marketing for “Quantum of Solace” was “Casino Royale” much like the best marketing for “The Dark Knight” was “Batman Begins.”
Off-topic I: I’ve seen the new trailer for “Watchmen.” The first trailer was a laughable disaster. Talk about a 180 degree turnaround. The new trailer actually makes some sense. The visuals actually promote a story and establish some character relationships rather than just representing a collection of confusing random images that few understood (and none recognized) except for the existing fans. The new trailer is such a turnaround from the earlier one that it’ll be interesting to see whether this helps expand interest in the film.
Off-topic II: Despite me writing earlier that much of the hype about “Twilight” is vapor, interest has clearly been expanding this week. We’ll see how solid that interest is (and whether it continues to rapidly build) next week.
The movie was amazing and the box office is showing that. To all you who feel it is too “bourne”-ish… I am thinking the majority of you are older. This is a new / different generation bond. The times have changed, get used to it. Did you ever read the books?
I didn’t mind some of the earlier movies but I love the passion Craig brings. When he kills someone, he is really killing them. Think back to Pierce Brosnan and pretty much all the other bonds… when they were in love, or a tough spot or had to kill someone there was nothing you could relate to in their character. No passion. Bond was not human.
The new bond is AMAZING!!
just saw it and it was really good! I don’t know what people are talking about when they say it wasn’t good. Man this is raw and fun!
Not up to Casino Royale (or many other previous Bond films, imo). I expected much more and was disappointed. MIA were the Bond theme and clever opening sequence found in previous films. Aside from the annoying Bourne style filming sequences, the film lacked a true “villain”. The villain in this film was no more menacing or interesting than an average dentist. Craig, though, did fine and carried the film.
Who cares… Go see it, things that defy physics
and broads who wouldn’t give you the time of day in real life. When you get out, Obamoron will have your mortgage payment check ready for you.
… but so what? It was great entertainment. Something even non-Bond fans can enjoy.
And, Neo, you paid to see the film, too – so you tell us, what is “wrong with people wasting $$ on this dumb flick!”
Um, haven’t seen it in the theater yet, watched most of it on one of “those” websites…I just got laid off, don’t have 20 bucks to spend at the movies, but, yeah, the action editing and some of the scenes were direct ripoffs of The Bourne series, especially the foot chase across the roofs. Bourne, I mean, Bond, just seems a souless killer at this point. Judi Dench is fabulous. I want to see more of her. She scares me more than Bond. She’s badass. More strong, mature women please. Jeffrey Wright having nothing to do in movie after movie is fucking embarrassing. (In case you haven’t noticed, Hollywood, the next President will be black, can we get Jeffrey more than 2 lines in a movie for fuck’s sake?) I only liked Casino Royale because of Craig’s muscles. More muscles, please.
great movie- the old campy Bonds were a travesy, the Roger Moore’s were classic but a bore by today’s standards, yes the beginnign action sequences were ala Bourne chop, Only place I agree, but overall the movie is a winner. Casino was horrible. Now if they, can platform off and amp up the story. To hell with the original books!
If u think Bond is too fast paced for u then u need to prepare for a life at the postal service or something.
The Bond series is for teenage boys or old men who do not know better. If u find yourself liking Bond movies you have some profound questions to answer to yourself. The Bourne series, as much as i dislike Damon as a human, is a plausible and properly done sequence of film. Really excellent. This bond horse shit is not appropriate to the 21st century. End of goddamnd story
People flocked to this movie because of their absolute LOVE of Casino Royale and Daniel Craig — which stands as the best bond film ever made. I wish they kept the same director over Marc Forster. Those expecting casino royale 2 might be slightly disappointed — but hey it’s got chases galore, the great daniel Craig. Not to be missed. And I’m so glad that a Bond film finally got a chance to open on a weekend on its own — instead of always opening second to another blockbuster like what would have happened (originally opening Nov 7th againgst madagascar)if not for Harry Potter == thanks harry!
I hate that headache Bourne cut and splice.
It is a screw you to the audiance.
I have to close my eyes.
Definite letdown following the high expectations of following Casino Royale. As though scenic locations introduced with diverse fonts, Minority Report computer technology and Bourne action scenes could carry the movie. Perhaps if they added a plot it might have stretched to 2 hours.
Hi,
I’m Mr. Smith. I’ve yet to see the new James Bond movie, but internet folk have so I thought I’d pass along their opinion as my own. This film was ‘too fast’, and had far too many ‘quick cuts’ and ‘fast editing’ tricks.
Also, this is clearly not ‘James Bond’ but rather ‘Jason Bourne’. Despite the hundreds of millions of dollars the 22nd film in this ’40 year’ franchise has made, I’m going to declare it ‘dead’ and no longer relevant.
I hope to see this ‘James Bond’ movie this weekend and see if my prejudiced assumptions match other realities. I just wonder how many of these internet people who offer their opinion are getting theirs first hand, or second like my own.