I’ve been hearing a rumor for the past few days that DreamWorks 2.0 supposedly can’t get a bank loan. Here’s what my reporting turned up: the heads of the start-up independent film company, Stacey Snider and Steven Spielberg, were advised to slow down the bank syndication process in order to let the capital markets stabilize in these volatile financal times. J.P. Morgan pursued this strategy right after the Lehman Bros/AIG collapse. So everyone has extended the time period within which the deal can/will close until the end of First Quarter 2009 (which is March 31st) instead of the beginning of First Quarter 2009 (as originally planned).
“It’s a ridiculously tough market, but all the indications are positive,” an insider tells me. “We should be fully funded and operational no later than April 1 and maybe earlier.” 
The deal is for Mumbai-based Reliance ADA Group to invest $500 million equity and for J.P. Morgan Chase to arrange another $700 million in debt toward the new film company. The DreamWorks 2.0 team saw no reason to make the delay public, so of course the rumor mill began working overtime. “It wasn’t a ‘big decision’ because the how and when to syndicate the loan had never been set in stone,” the source tells me. “We had barely closed the Reliance deal when the market took its turn. When it did, it was an easy and informal and obvious decision that we made to take a few extra weeks to let the the markets stabilize. But other than losing a few weeks during the initial market turmoil, nothing else is different. I have to say the guys at Reliance have so far been spectacular partners: the economy has gone crazy, and they have not wavered.”
- DreamWorks Picks Universal (Like, Duh)
- DreamWorks Will Be Downsizing 15%
- Paramount And Dreamworks Finalize Separation; David Geffen Ends DW Relationship
- DreamWorks Tells Owner Paramount Friday AM That Reliance Deal Signed
- CAA Put DreamWorks With Reliance: Hollywood Agency To Pocket Millions
- GE’s Immelt Takes Spielberg To Dinner; Zucker & Director Plot Universal Backlot
- Greenlight For DreamWorks-Reliance Deal
- DreamWorks Finds Indian Big Bucks To Form New Film Biz
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Can somebody please explain to me why a man worth 3 billion needs “outside financing”?
$500 million from Reliance? Spielberg can generate that in 2 years from residuals alone.
Are these the only movie entrepreneurs left in the world? If all is humming, they make the remaining studio moguls look like recent, third-rate B-School grads with a bad plan, no creative spark, and no gut map to move forward. Al Martino, whining to Don Corleone that he just couldn’t get work in Hollywood was a Profile in Courage compared to these poseur moguls, protecting their jobs at any cost.
It’s a major industry. There’s more equipment and talent and financing and venues to present movies outside the studios than inside. Imagine a sports mogul trying to hijack, then stop the entertainment in all the stadiums in the country until it felt like the right time. How long before a real entrepreneur, with experience and vision in the new media, forces these hidey boys to their logical plot line- selling the studios for scrap to pay their credit card mistakes.
Every high-quote actor has plenty to lose in a more competitive environment at first, but talent and box office go hand-in-hand in a better system. Audiences will continue their loyalties to their favorite actors. Good actor management, talent, and sometimes, just the luck of being in a great film, will expand the current crop of actors that moguls believe are necessary for financial success.
Then the supporting movie arts, trades and associated industries can help lead our economy, rather than echo it faintly. They’ve suffered enough, waiting for permission to create again. It’s a big world. Take something and make it better.
First rule of business…NEVER USE YOUR OWN MONEY, E.V.E.R.!!!
“It’s a major industry. There’s more equipment and talent and financing and venues to present movies outside the studios than inside.”
Is this really a ‘major industry’? If you consolidated all the revenue from worldwide ticket sales, DVDs, TV rights, etc. into one company, that company would barely crack the Fortune Top 50.
Don’t forget, as well, that all things Indian aren’t exactly on the best footing right now with all things American, considering the muted response from the MSM to India’s own 9/11. They’re ticked-off that they only heard, “play nice with Pakistan,” instead of, “we support you hundred percent against Muslim terrorists.”
I wonder if they could sham Paul Allen into giving them money this time around. Reliance is just star****ing — let’s see how long they remain “spectacular partners” after a few flops.
Hate to break it to these guys, but things aren’t going to be better come March 31st. They’re going to be a whole lot worse.
Can somebody please explain to me why a man worth 3 billion needs “outside financing”? Comment by WTF?
Hollywood moguls live buy one rule: take Other People’s Money to make your product. They never put their own money into a film. It’s too risky an investment.
I’d love to see a researched article about where all of these financing deals stand at this point. why do i think that many, even the best ones, are going to be postponed, if not abandoned soon, even the ones supporting the major studios. I’m also not banking on the TriBeca Quatar Film Fest, that just made me laugh…..Gee, what happens if the studios have to look to themselves for financing like in the old days?
How many billions of dollars is Spielberg worth? Why isn’t he showing confidence in his own company and its future by putting his own money where his mouth is? I find it bizarre that a billionaire is out there begging for money to make movies like a homeless person begs for coins in the subway. Actually, it’s not bizarre. It’s disgusting.
Oddly enough, I watch the richest people are also strapped for cash. I see it with rich oil people — disposing of assets just as this crisis hit. Do they need the cash or is it a strategy to claim some of the banking bail out money?
Is the prior posting accurate in saying that this industry if combined would not be equivalent to one company in the Fortune Top 50? I would like that info.