UPDATE: Summit Entertainment Co-Chairman/CEO Rob Friedman just phoned me to add: “Catherine and Summit have agreed to part ways on the sequel because our visions are different.” The start-up studio’s hastily prepared statement (below) notes: “Summit’s targeted end of 2009 or early 2010 release of the film, New Moon, does not work with Ms. Hardwicke’s required prep time to bring her vision of the film to the big screen.”
EXCLUSIVE: So the rumors are true. I’ve confirmed that Summit Entertainment has rejected Twilight director Catherine Hardwicke from heming the sequel in this big new franchise. No doubt my news will speed up the studio’s announcement, and Summit will surely spin this as all going down amicably along the lines that “she couldn’t fit the film into her time frame”. (Summit does want a ridiculously speeded-up sked for the next installment.) But this terrible news for Hardwicke comes just as she and the Twilight cast are on their European press tour. Tomorrow’s interviews in France will now focus entirely on what, if anything, Catherine did to deserve this treatment.
This also could blow up into a scandal for Summit if it chooses a male director over Hardwicke, whose Twilight easily beat Mimi Leder’s 1998 Deep Impact box office gross as the biggest opener for a female director. That was a record embraced by Hollywood feminists as a sign of growing gal power. ["To think that the people at Summit are sexist is insulting," an insider there replies to me.] This wasn’t a good weekend for female film directors because Lexi Alexander’s Punisher: War Zone bombed, earning less than half what Hollywood thought it would. As to whether Hardwicke’s career will be damaged by this very public firing is up for grabs because, even though the pic was skewered by critics, it is already a $160M low-cost blockbuster. Summit has started preparing the sequel New Moon, based on Meyer’s second book in the series, and, to contain costs, the studio is considering making third book Eclipse back to back.
The word from inside Summit is that Hardwicke, the acclaimed Thirteen and Lords of Dogtown and The Nativity Story director, “was ‘difficult’ and ‘irrational’ during the making of Twilight,” one insider explains to me. “That doesn’t mean anything when you’re talking about a filmmaker because they all are, but still…” (Joe Roth and Sony kept saying that about Julie Taymor on Across The Universe. Yet she made a cult classic and is now directing Marvel/Sony’s Spider-Man for Broadway.) But an outside source also informs me, “Summit didn’t like her. They’re saying the DP [director of photography] Elliot Davis is the one responsible for the film’s sumptuous visual look, that the editor Nancy Richardson had to save the film in post-production, and Summit thought Hardwicke’s [CAA] agent Beth Swofford was alternately ineffectual and hysterical. It certainly demonstrates, while CAA agents boast of their vast influence, how little clout and muscle they actually have, or are willing to use, to protect their artists.”
I’m told that the studio has even had quiet talks with other CAA directors for the last week. “And Swofford never told Hardwicke about that and that she was about to get kicked to the gutter,” an insider tells me. “To add insult to injury, Hardwicke can now look forward to being grilled by the press for days on end, in front of the cast, about why she’s getting shit-canned.” Adds another source: “Catherine is the consummate professional so she’s continuing the press tour.”
Here’s Summit’s news release tonight:
Los Angeles, CA, December 7, 2008 – Summit Entertainment and director Catherine Hardwicke jointly announced today that the filmmaker will not be directing the next installment in the newly minted TWILIGHT film franchise. Summit’s targeted end of 2009 or early 2010 release of the film, NEW MOON, does not work with Ms. Hardwicke’s required prep time to bring her vision of the film to the big screen. Thus as has been done before with many successful film franchises, the studio will employ a new director for NEW MOON.
“I am sorry that due to timing I will not have the opportunity to direct NEW MOON,” said Hardwicke. “Directing TWILIGHT has been one of the great experiences of my life, and I am grateful to the fans for their passionate support of the film. I wish everyone at Summit the best with the sequel– it is a great story.”
“Catherine did an incredible job in helping us to launch the TWILIGHT franchise and we thank her for all of her efforts and we very much hope to work with her on future Summit projects,” said Erik Feig, Summit’s President of Production. “We as a studio have a mandate to bring the next installment in the franchise to the big screen in a timely fashion so that fans can get more of Edward, Bella and all of the characters that Stephenie Meyer has created. We are able to pursue an aggressive time frame as we have the luxury of only adapting the novels into screenplays as opposed to having to create a storyline from scratch.”
- Summit Announces ‘Twilight’ Sequel “New Moon’: May Make #2 And #3 Back-To-Back
- Twilight’ Midnight Showings $7M; Fastest Online Ticket Sales Since Batman
- Latest News On ‘Twilight’ Zone Phenom
- Wkd Prediction: Twilight $60M
- Fans Camp Out Day Before Premiere
- ‘Twilight’ Selling Out First Show Times
- Females Flocking To Buy Twilight Tickets
- ‘Twilight’ Tops Online Movie Ticket Sales
- Summit Readying ‘Twilight’ Sequel
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.






As a Twilight fan I am some what excited that she was Taken off the sequel, I was overly disappointed with the movie and i think that most of the problems from the Twilight Movie fall at her feet as director…But i hate that she had to find out like this during her tour, She is a huge Twilight fan herself and its so horrible that this happened but what can we do..the movie will be better with a different directer sadly..Im excited for New moon and i wish Catherine all the best and cant wait to see more of her movies!
She was a nightmare on Nativity–unprofessional, prone to crying outbursts, and seemingly lacking even the most basic understanding of filmmaking. This has nothing to do with gender, and everything to do with her lack of talent.
To quote Robert Evans, “There are three sides to every story: my side, your side, and the truth.” I’m sure that’s the case with letting her go, BUT how many male directors are assholes or crazy? How many are dragged through the press like this after a HUGE HIT??? When men are crazy or abrasive they are celebrated…and a woman is shrill I guess.
She should fire CAA for this, especially if they go with a CAA client.
honestly, i think they should have kept her.
She got a good idea of what twilight was about and made it into a movie on a low budget, and i was honestly looking forward to seeing the same idea with a bigger budget because then the movie (new moon) would be much better but now whose to say that with a new director the same idea will be put back into the movie. what if it changes ALOT, if that happens and it turns out bad then the ENTIRE series is screwed, i hope the people understand the risky decision they have just made
I liked Thirteen as much as the next film fan but Hardwicke is not a great director. None of her films were that great. Lords Of Dog Town was weak, Nativity Story was boring and Twilight (while not entirely her fault—screenplay) was just plain Bad.
Twilight had the benefit of a HUGE following. Let’s be honest, if there was no book to base the movie on, how would any of you feel about the film? I promise you it wouldn’t have made the kind of money it did.
Bring on a seasoned genre director or someone who understands pacing. This isn’t about Men VS Women… back in the day Kathryn Bigelow gave us a wonderful little Vampire film called Near Dark…maybe someone should give her a call.
WHOA! I can’t believe this! is this official?!?!?!
catherine did nothing wrong, and she made an amazing movie. if this is true… which i doubt it is, im not watching new moon.
this is a rude, and barbaric thing to post.
I don’t think this is sexist at all.
The film was shredded by critics and non-fans of the series. Even fans of the series (including my nieces) kept saying “you should read the book” when i talked about the film.
She f*cked up a movie about the birth of Jesus. Do you know how hard that is to do?
This movie was like a very bad CW pilot. I might accompany the girlfriend to see the next one if they find a better director.
You guys bashing Nikki don’t get it. She is a journalist, a real one. Not the ass-kissing liars that now dominate our media. This column is the most honest information in this town and all of you know it. I’m sure she’d defend any competent woman but this is NEWS!
That said, everyone knows the Twilight set was a mess and Summit execs were overworked and busted their asses to save this film. There are a lot of unsung heroes over there and they should all be proud of themselves.
Because of the state of our business, whenever a woman or a black person gets fired, there will be charges of some kind of “ism.” The truth is male directors act like asses and get rewarded. Catherine’s movie made money and so all things being equal, she should stay. That’s how it works.
However as I said, the Summit team is smart and they should be given the benefit of the doubt if they want a new visionary for the franchise. There are great women in that firm and I doubt if they were against Hardwicke because she’s a woman.
Wow, some people had to save the most post-production? I’d hate to have seen what it was like before because as far as directing goes it was pretty terrible (the camera angles were ridiculous, some of the acting seemed really forced -and the actors weren’t like that in their other movies so that could be down to bad directing- and the whole thing had too much of an indie feel that just screamed Catherine Hardwhick. Indie is fine, for indie films… but not a movie about vampires).
I HATE how people are saying that this is such a big deal for female directors that the movie did well, because honestly, the movie could’ve been just Rob and Kristen prancing around to Michael Jacksons Thriller and the movie would’ve still done well because it’s based on a best selling book series (think about it, all the fans of the book would go to see it with their friends, or their family – some fangirls go see it multiple times simply because it’s Twilight, not because it’s any good)… so the success of the movie had nothing whatsoever to do with Catherine, it was all down to the books.
If this movie was just some script that Melissa Rosenberg had come up with and there wasn’t already a built in fan base for the story then the movie would’ve probably flopped.
I seriously hope you’re right about Catherine being fired – three things that made the movie terrible were Catherine, Melissa and Kristen.
I know the chances of them firing Kristen are unlikely, seeing as she’s the lead but maybe with better direction and a better script she’ll do better in the sequel (or maybe she’ll do better in the sequel because it’s more depressing than Twilight meaning she can be dull, monotonous and mope till her little hearts content).
I worked with Catherine when she was a production designer and found her to be one of the nicest and most talented people I’ve met in this industry. The film we were working on was an intense and grueling shoot, yet Catherine never once lost her incredible sense of humor. She has a unique and imaginative vision. Sounds like Summit is looking for a paint-by-numbers director. That ain’t Catherine.
I love Catherine but my biggest issue with them firing her is the fact that she has such a distinctive style and anyone else they pick will be so different. It’s just going to be so strange after Twilight!
Ok. I am not sure how to feel about this, Twilight was amazing, its sad to hear this only because Catherine stayed true to the book, yes her style was different, but the movie was amazing.Somethings could’ve been different, but it stayed true…I don’t know, just a bunch of drama, I guess. I wonder who they’ll get next.
Thank goodness. Summit: Go after Brett Ratner for NEW MOON. He’ll pump up this lame material, Give it some pizazz. this series does not need MORE women involved – it’s already girlier than an oven-mitt
On “Lords of Dogtown”, Catherine Hardwicke was always on the side of the actors and crew…it was the studio heads that were a pain in the ass. I’ve never met any director who put their heart into a project like Catherine does. Elliot Davis and Nancy Richardson are her people, her clan…they would be the first to say they didn’t “save” Twilight. I think of Nikki Reed as Catherine’s muse. Nikki is the sweetest kid, crew people love her and are protective of her. “Twilight” is making tons of money for Summit Entertainment, but it’s just goes to show, money doesn’t buy good manners, grace or class.
Would be honored to work with the lovely Catherine again!
I hope this is true. She totally butchered one of the best stories I’ve ever read.
I agree with OT^^ all the way. I feel bad for Catherine, but Twilight was kinda bad and that falls on the director’s shoulders.
I just hope that they get New Moon right.
if this is true, i hope that Summit hires a better director because Twilight could have been better. WAY better. especially with Melissa Rosenberg. She is an excellent writer, and i think that Twilight wouldve been better with Rosenberg but it wasnt because someone was restricting her ideas for the script. A lot of the Twilight scenes were messed up; a lot of important info was missing. The meadow scene was ridiculous. The movie didnt have any of the cool conversations between Edward and Bella and it seemed as if they fell in love with each other so quickly and like they didnt even know each other that well. The scene in Carlisle’s office where Edward tells Bella about Carlisle’s history wasn’t even in the movie. And did you notice that instead of Alice telling Bella the process of transformation into a vampire, Edward told Bella, and in the book he didnt even want to tell her anything about the vampire transformation. And Jasper’s special ability was barely used
It’s bad form to fire her NOW in the middle of a press junket, but, given the box office of Twilight, the only rational reason for firing her would be that indeed she was impossible to deal with. She isn’t an expensive director and her lower fee would be in line with keeping budgets low. It’s a fair wager that her inept direction here ( face it, the movie is stillborn – no matter what one thinks of the source material, the movie needed a steady hand who could handle action and romance…she could do neither) and whatever behavior issues ARE to blame. And please…drop the sexist talk and the “only a woman can direct this, a man wouldn’t understand” – that’s really inane.
Hire Katherine Bigelow. She directed “Near Dark”, which is one of the best vampire movies ever made, and she’s a woman so no cries of sexism.
Executive 1: Hey, Twilight made a shitload of money, what next?
Executive 2: I know, let’s fire the director and hire a man for the next one.
Executive 1: Ooo, how about Brett Ratner. He knows what 12-year-old girls want.
Executive 2: I just came.
This is a blessing. Seriously.
Twilight was enjoyable despite Hardwicke. The camera work, soundtrack, dialogue, and pacing were absolutely horrific. If I didn’t like the story going in, I’d have hated this movie. The actors were generally okay (despite Stewart’s st-st-stuttering), but not enough to carry a pile of shit for an hour and a half. Also, the sparkling effect was pathetic. That’s on you, Catherine.
Good riddance.
Gee, all this “sexist” talk is getting anoying. As a 21 year old guy, “Twilight” really isn’t my kind of movie, so I have not watched it. With that being said, much of the hype that I read was that “Twilight” had a female director. Me thinks, the hype over her getting fired is because the “female director” stories were part of the hype and lure of the film. That’s why this is important.
As far as female vs. male directors, big deal. If the movie is good, I’ll enjoy it, no matter what the gender of the director is. With that being said, films that are made to appeal to young women would probably do better with a female director. In this case, the moveis will probably sell themselves based on the books, even if the movie is botched.
my opinion,,,,,
If this is true I may consider boycotting New Moon.
Wow, ok Catherin could have done better, but this hate is so uncalled for. She did a good job and you guys arn’t being fair to her.
idiots!
haters!
Catherine is the best!! Sheeeeeeeeee gave us Robert Pattinson and she is a GREAT AMAZING Director!!!
losers!!!!!!