3RD UPDATE: Hugh Jackman just emailed me this statement via his production company: “Thirty years ago when I was in Sydney watching Johnny Carson host the Oscars with my family, I never imagined that I’d one day have the chance to be up on that stage myself! I am very grateful to the Academy for giving me this opportunity. And, excited to be working with Larry and Bill on what I know will be a fun and memorable celebration.”
2ND UPDATE: Hugh Jackman will host the 81st Academy Awards® telecast, the show’s producer Laurence Mark and executive producer Bill Condon announced today in Beverly Hills. ”We kept saying how we were looking for Cary Grant or Clark Gable. And then we realized that Hugh Jackman had hosted the Tony’s so successfully,” Mark told me exclusively today. This will be Jackman’s first time center stage at the Oscar show, although he has previously been a presenter. “Hugh Jackman is a consummate entertainer and an internationally renowned movie star,” said Mark and Condon in an earlier joint statement. “He also has style, elegance and a sense of occasion. Hugh is the ideal choice to host a celebration of the year’s movies – and to have fun doing it.”
EXCLUSIVE: TOLDJA! I reported yesterday that the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences had chosen someone “way outside the box” to host the 81st Oscars on February 22nd. Today, I’ve learned that the person is not just outside the box but outside this country. The Academy Awards is going international with its emcee choice — Australian actor Hugh Jackman, star of X-Men and its two sequels, Australia, and the upcoming Wolverine, as well as People Magazine’s 2008 “Sexiest Man Alive”. But, and it’s a BIG but, while the 40-year-old Sydney-born thesp of English parentage has received the AMPAS offer and is very interested, I’m told that he’s not yet fully committed. Because there’s still a lot of negotiating ahead between his showbiz representatives and AMPAS. I’ve learned that the people around Jackman want to know exactly what would be expected of him, especially when it comes to opening the Oscar broadcast. One segment of the show which reps for Jackman are objecting to specifically is the joke-telling monologue. “I don’t want that for him,” an insider told me. “He is an actor with big movies behind him and one coming this summer. He didn’t work the last 20 years to suddenly be a stand-up comedian.”
In recent years of Oscar telecasts, even going back decades, the ceremony has been emceed by mostly TV or movie comedians — whether Will Rogers and George Jessel in the 1930s, Bob Hope off and on for the next three decades, Johnny Carson in the 1980s, even David Letterman in 1995. In the 1990s and 2000s, there’s been a mix of film funnypeople like Billy Crystal, Whoopi Goldberg, and Steve Martin as well as stand-up comedians and TV personalities like Chris Rock, Ellen DeGeneres and Jon Stewart. But now that producers Larry Mark and Bill Condon plan to get rid of the joke-telling portion of the show this year (as I reported Thursday and thought a smart move: these one-liners are usually understood only by the movie industry and so inside that TV viewers are left bewildered), it opened up the possibility of an actor hosting. “If this is a different version of the Oscars than in previous years, then Hugh would be great. But I have no interest in him being Billy Crystal.” a Jackman insider told me.
Only a few thesps have hosted the show by themselves, including first AMPAS president and one of the founders Douglas Fairbanks, then Jimmy Stewart, Robert Montgomery, and Jack Lemmon, when the Oscars consisted of an awards banquet, then a radio show, and ultimately a globally broadcast TV spectacle. As far as I can tell, all of the lone emcees have been Americans. Jackman’s selection is the motion picture industry’s recognition that, more now than ever before, the success of a movie depends equally if not more so on its international box office than its North American grosses.
As to why Jackman might have been selected over other actors, he’s a proven commodity at hosting awards shows. He brilliantly emceed the televised ceremony for the Tony Awards in 2003, 2004 and 2005, and won an Emmy for the latter. As to whether Jackman would be asked to show off his musical talent at the Academy Awards isn’t clear. But he did win Broadway’s 2004 Tony Award as Best Actor In A Musical for his portrayal of Australian singer/songwriter Peter Allen in The Boy From Oz. The hiring of Mark and Condon, respectively Dreamgirls‘ producer and director, to co-produce this 81st Academy Awards would seem to indicate the pair might choose to make the most of Jackman’s multi-talents. As for the actor, he’d probably love the exposure because his own movie production company, Seed Productions, is behind not only for the recent X-Man: The Last Stand (2006) but also the upcoming X-Men Origins: Wolverine spin-off for 2009. It also could conceivably help the worldwide box office and DVD sales of his current pic Australia, whose domestic grosses have been disappointing, as well as his other film credits The Prestige, Flushed Away, The Fountain, Happy Feet, Van Helsing, Kate & Leopold and Swordfish.
News of Jackman’s selection as the next Oscar host — no matter if he turns it down, which I do believe is doubtful – is sure to be cheered in his home country of Australia, where moviegoing is a widespread passion. The choice is also a repudiation of recent hosts like Jon Stewart (twice) who though a household name in this country was barely known to anyone outside the United States. Last year, his emceeing resulted in the worst-rated Oscars since Nielsen started tracking them in 1974. Only 32 million people watched the writers strike-threatened 80th Academy Awards. And the 56 metered markets averaged a 10.7 rating among adults aged 18-49 – smaller than the 39.9 million drawn by 2007′s Ellen DeGeneres, or the 55 million who tuned in for Billy Crystal back in 1998.
But, really, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences only has itself to blame. AMPAS was trying to pander to young audiences. But after last year’s kudosfest, several Hollywood power players lobbied AMPAS to do everything it could to change the awards show from top to bottom. What can’t be helped is that recent nominations have been dominated by the small independent movies at the expense of the popular studio movies. As a result, last year’s crowd-pleasers like 2007′s Transformers, The Simpsons Movie, Knocked Up, Harry Potter, The Bourne Supremacy, Spider-Man 3 and Pirates of the Caribbean 3 were barely given much air time.
I’m told the Jackman announcement could come as soon as Tuesday but more likely after the holidays if all the i’s are dotted and t’s get crossed in time. Jackman was one of the presenters at the 2002 Academy Awards, but said he’d think twice about doing it again because “getting up there in a suit and talking for a little bit is kind of bizarre.” Also, he’s supposed to be very near-sighted with extremely blurry vision when he isn’t wearing contacts, so, reportedly, when he hosted the Tonys and even Saturday Night Live, Jackman memorized almost everything he had to say so he wouldn’t have to struggle to read. And then there’s just the terror of appearing live before Hollywood and the world. But Jackman once said about his own courage, “I’ve always felt that if you back down from a fear, the ghost of that fear never goes away. It diminishes people. So I’ve always said ‘yes’ to the thing I’m most scared about.”






I always wondered why the Oscars host HAD to be a comedian (Whoopi Goldberg, Chris Rock, Steve Martin, David Letterman) and not a actor. I’d love to see Samuel L. Jackson take a shot at it.
EXCELLENT choice! I love Jackman, not only as an actor, but he is always a fun, interesting personality as well. His Tony awards stints were huge successes, and I believe he’ll do well here as well.
While I wasn’t thrilled to hear them getting rid of the jokes, which made me believe it would be bland and dreary, this has renewed my hope.
p.s. Transformers, Spidey 3, etc, get few nominations for a REASON! They weren’t very good.
Are you kidding me? THIS is the change they want? If any portion of the AA needs changing…it’s anything BUT the opening monologue. Maybe a few of the lesser awards on-air. Maybe shorter acceptance speeches? If they thought the ratings were lower last year…just wait until this year.
Hugh is a doll and I would watch him in ANYTHING. I might even watch more than the last fifteen minutes of the Academy Awards if he were host. Much better choice than recent hosts. What a novel idea to have someone host who actually is talented. Have a long and prolific career, Hugh.
So the Academy is just going to give up and admit right up front that they’re not even going to attempt to have an entertaining awards show?
Mister Jackman seems like a nice enough bloke and I am well aware that most comedians’ jokes fall flat on this show, but to just admit up front that it’s going to suck? What up wit dat?
There’s a vast difference between hosting and acting, which is why stand-up comedians so often get the gig; they know how to work a room. Hosting demands a personality, where acting demands suppressing ones personality into the character. Rare actors, such as Tom Hanks, can do both. It has to do with concentration, presence, and stagecraft, which is why the Tony Awards soar and the Oscarcast thuds. And it’s why Jackman, Mark and Condon have a shot at making a real difference, ’cause they have style and daring. And, hey, what’s wrong with being a stand-up comic? It’s one of the toughest jobs in showbiz do do well (like writing an industry blog).
Santayana makes some very good points.
Hosting the Oscars has more to do with good old fashioned showmanship than anything else. That goes beyond just playing to the audience in the Kodak Theatre, but to making an emotional connection with the people watching at home as well. Something many recent hosts seem to have forgotten.
During the Golden Age of Hollywood actors had a lot more ability to do that because many of them started out working the raucous and occasionally riotous vaudeville, burlesque, and nightclub circuits. They had to be able to think on their feet, keep the show moving, keep the audience happy, and most of all, acknowledge that it’s not about them, but about the awards and the people who win them.
I wish Jackman good luck if he takes the deal, the whole telecast will have to be revamped from the ground up to make it more than a snooze fest.
He is a great actor, and is actually pretty funny, but is this going to bring ratings? I mean really???? Outside the box thinking would have been a guy like Justin Timberlake. He would bring in an entire new viewership, is funny as hell on SNL, looks good in a tux, and can show a serious side…PLUS he knows how to play to the crowd and could open with a KICK ASS music number. This show will be booooorrrring.
Question: How do you get lower ratings than the year when you had a cable star hosting and independent films as the top 2 contenders?
Answer: Hugh Jackman hosting
I think that having gorgeous Hugh as MC of the Oscars is a wonderful idea. I haven’t watched the televised Oscars for years because they are usually overlong and boring. But Mr. Jackman could breath new life in the tired old show. By all means, get Hugh. He is a proven showman, and marvelously talented–plus drop dead handsome.
Question: How do you get me (and people like me) to watch the Oscars again after I quit watching them several years back?
Answer: Produce them like a stage show instead of an in-bred love-in and have Hugh Jackman host. Then again, I’d pay money to watch Hugh Jackman read the phone book.
Sounds like the Academy has decided to officially scrap any attempt to encourage younger, straight males to watch the Oscars. (Much like television in general these days.) They might as well go all the way and hire the women from The View to host the show. They could present the Thalberg award to Oprah. I think I’ll just wait for the highlights on YouTube.
They just can’t come out and say it that half of this country won’t watch a show that bashes Republicans and the president. It’s getting old and it isn’t funny. It’s hard to believe that a Non-American has never hosted this event, although Bob Hope was born and raised in England. Lastly, the writers for the Academy have sucked for years and getting host who are revered by a select few is the recipe for crap ratings.
Nikki
I don’t remember what year it was (probably in the 70s) David Niven (English) was a very able host of the Academy Awards when a streaker ran across the stage (naked of course) and Niven wryly commented (I paraphrase) “How fascinating that he must strip off and show his shortcomings to get a laugh.” While not a comedian, Niven had a wonderful sense of humor which was far more entertaining than a bunch of one-liners. Perhaps Hugh Jackman is the new Niven.
Real World Person,
What’s more disturbing, your choice of name based on a degrading mtv reality show or your brainwashed love for a Disney performing child puppet-turned personality free, well managed, fake ebonic expert Michael Jackson impersonator from Florida?
Justin Timbertwit isn’t funny, looks like a mall rat with syphillis, would be DOA without Timbaland (who stopped being relevant with Missy) and has died, over and over again, in any appearance that asks him to speak the English language.
Raise those standards, watch what happens…
I’m not in the industry (though I guess I follow it somewhat closely since I read this blog) but I have never thought that there was anything particularly “inside” about any of the jokes in the opening monologue. In fact, most people I know consider it to be the highlight of the show. If there’s anything that needs to be cut it’s the number of awards given out on air, the musical numbers (just have the winner perform), and many of the retrospectives.
No matter how you slice it, and Jackman is a wonderfully talented man, the Oscars this year are putting lipstick on a pig. There have been some good films but very few great ones so far this year.
There are still a few interesting films yet to be released this month, let’s hope they saved the best for last but if the trailers are any indication it doesn’t bode well.
Director Frank Capra was a lone emcee in both ’36 & ’39, and he was not born in America.
I resisted saying Frank Capra was not ‘American’, because even though he may have been an immigrant, Frank Capra has become synonymous of ‘America.’
Just floating this boat… Jackman/Chenoweth.
I think he’d be great. We definitely need some class brought to the Oscars. Look at what happened to the 4 “hosts” at the Emmys.
i have also never understood why people equate the ratings with the host. I would be willing to bet less than 10% of viewers base their viewing on the host. It has FAR more to do with the movies nominated. Look at the years of Titanic and Lord of the Rings. This year is all but guaranteed to be big if The Dark Knight gets nominations, so if it does, don’t go giving TOO much credit to the host or other changes in the program.
Nothing negative to say about this choice.
A proven host (TONYs).
An international audience base.
Leading man.
Ditching the industry jokes.
Can sing and dance.
if Hugh Jackman does host the Oscars, then his first order of business should be NOT to have Bruce Vilanch be the head writer of the show. how can any comedian, actor, or animated figure be expected to be funny when the words Bruce and his team write are not funny?
Choosing Hugh would bring back the old Hollywood feel to the awards. And he was great when he hosted the Tonys.
And back to Bruce, I say Bruce stick to being the center square on the Hollywood Squares.
What happened to Ricky Gervais hosting the Snore-scars? That was a much better choice. As long as Hugh Jackman hosts shirtless, then I’m in agreement.
I’m with you 100%, Nikki. Let’s eliminate the opening monologue to concentrate on the really interesting part of the evening: head-scratching monologues, awkward award presentations, and winners thanking their agents and lawyers. Gonna be GREAT! You’re right, most people outside of Hollywood don’t understand humor at ALL. They’re just so stupid!
And I’m sure the legions of Hugh Jackman fans who only know him from his uber-masculine Wolverine role will love to see his range as a song-and-dance man. Brilliant career move. In the immortal words of Estelle Evert: “I think that having gorgeous Hugh as MC of the Oscars is a wonderful idea.” Can’t argue with that logic!