3RD UPDATE: Hugh Jackman just emailed me this statement via his production company: “Thirty years ago when I was in Sydney watching Johnny Carson host the Oscars with my family, I never imagined that I’d one day have the chance to be up on that stage myself! I am very grateful to the Academy for giving me this opportunity. And, excited to be working with Larry and Bill on what I know will be a fun and memorable celebration.”
2ND UPDATE: Hugh Jackman will host the 81st Academy Awards® telecast, the show’s producer Laurence Mark and executive producer Bill Condon announced today in Beverly Hills. ”We kept saying how we were looking for Cary Grant or Clark Gable. And then we realized that Hugh Jackman had hosted the Tony’s so successfully,” Mark told me exclusively today. This will be Jackman’s first time center stage at the Oscar show, although he has previously been a presenter. “Hugh Jackman is a consummate entertainer and an internationally renowned movie star,” said Mark and Condon in an earlier joint statement. “He also has style, elegance and a sense of occasion. Hugh is the ideal choice to host a celebration of the year’s movies – and to have fun doing it.”
EXCLUSIVE: TOLDJA! I reported yesterday that the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences had chosen someone “way outside the box” to host the 81st Oscars on February 22nd. Today, I’ve learned that the person is not just outside the box but outside this country. The Academy Awards is going international with its emcee choice — Australian actor Hugh Jackman, star of X-Men and its two sequels, Australia, and the upcoming Wolverine, as well as People Magazine’s 2008 “Sexiest Man Alive”. But, and it’s a BIG but, while the 40-year-old Sydney-born thesp of English parentage has received the AMPAS offer and is very interested, I’m told that he’s not yet fully committed. Because there’s still a lot of negotiating ahead between his showbiz representatives and AMPAS. I’ve learned that the people around Jackman want to know exactly what would be expected of him, especially when it comes to opening the Oscar broadcast. One segment of the show which reps for Jackman are objecting to specifically is the joke-telling monologue. “I don’t want that for him,” an insider told me. “He is an actor with big movies behind him and one coming this summer. He didn’t work the last 20 years to suddenly be a stand-up comedian.”
In recent years of Oscar telecasts, even going back decades, the ceremony has been emceed by mostly TV or movie comedians — whether Will Rogers and George Jessel in the 1930s, Bob Hope off and on for the next three decades, Johnny Carson in the 1980s, even David Letterman in 1995. In the 1990s and 2000s, there’s been a mix of film funnypeople like Billy Crystal, Whoopi Goldberg, and Steve Martin as well as stand-up comedians and TV personalities like Chris Rock, Ellen DeGeneres and Jon Stewart. But now that producers Larry Mark and Bill Condon plan to get rid of the joke-telling portion of the show this year (as I reported Thursday and thought a smart move: these one-liners are usually understood only by the movie industry and so inside that TV viewers are left bewildered), it opened up the possibility of an actor hosting. “If this is a different version of the Oscars than in previous years, then Hugh would be great. But I have no interest in him being Billy Crystal.” a Jackman insider told me.
Only a few thesps have hosted the show by themselves, including first AMPAS president and one of the founders Douglas Fairbanks, then Jimmy Stewart, Robert Montgomery, and Jack Lemmon, when the Oscars consisted of an awards banquet, then a radio show, and ultimately a globally broadcast TV spectacle. As far as I can tell, all of the lone emcees have been Americans. Jackman’s selection is the motion picture industry’s recognition that, more now than ever before, the success of a movie depends equally if not more so on its international box office than its North American grosses.
As to why Jackman might have been selected over other actors, he’s a proven commodity at hosting awards shows. He brilliantly emceed the televised ceremony for the Tony Awards in 2003, 2004 and 2005, and won an Emmy for the latter. As to whether Jackman would be asked to show off his musical talent at the Academy Awards isn’t clear. But he did win Broadway’s 2004 Tony Award as Best Actor In A Musical for his portrayal of Australian singer/songwriter Peter Allen in The Boy From Oz. The hiring of Mark and Condon, respectively Dreamgirls‘ producer and director, to co-produce this 81st Academy Awards would seem to indicate the pair might choose to make the most of Jackman’s multi-talents. As for the actor, he’d probably love the exposure because his own movie production company, Seed Productions, is behind not only for the recent X-Man: The Last Stand (2006) but also the upcoming X-Men Origins: Wolverine spin-off for 2009. It also could conceivably help the worldwide box office and DVD sales of his current pic Australia, whose domestic grosses have been disappointing, as well as his other film credits The Prestige, Flushed Away, The Fountain, Happy Feet, Van Helsing, Kate & Leopold and Swordfish.
News of Jackman’s selection as the next Oscar host — no matter if he turns it down, which I do believe is doubtful – is sure to be cheered in his home country of Australia, where moviegoing is a widespread passion. The choice is also a repudiation of recent hosts like Jon Stewart (twice) who though a household name in this country was barely known to anyone outside the United States. Last year, his emceeing resulted in the worst-rated Oscars since Nielsen started tracking them in 1974. Only 32 million people watched the writers strike-threatened 80th Academy Awards. And the 56 metered markets averaged a 10.7 rating among adults aged 18-49 – smaller than the 39.9 million drawn by 2007′s Ellen DeGeneres, or the 55 million who tuned in for Billy Crystal back in 1998.
But, really, the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences only has itself to blame. AMPAS was trying to pander to young audiences. But after last year’s kudosfest, several Hollywood power players lobbied AMPAS to do everything it could to change the awards show from top to bottom. What can’t be helped is that recent nominations have been dominated by the small independent movies at the expense of the popular studio movies. As a result, last year’s crowd-pleasers like 2007′s Transformers, The Simpsons Movie, Knocked Up, Harry Potter, The Bourne Supremacy, Spider-Man 3 and Pirates of the Caribbean 3 were barely given much air time.
I’m told the Jackman announcement could come as soon as Tuesday but more likely after the holidays if all the i’s are dotted and t’s get crossed in time. Jackman was one of the presenters at the 2002 Academy Awards, but said he’d think twice about doing it again because “getting up there in a suit and talking for a little bit is kind of bizarre.” Also, he’s supposed to be very near-sighted with extremely blurry vision when he isn’t wearing contacts, so, reportedly, when he hosted the Tonys and even Saturday Night Live, Jackman memorized almost everything he had to say so he wouldn’t have to struggle to read. And then there’s just the terror of appearing live before Hollywood and the world. But Jackman once said about his own courage, “I’ve always felt that if you back down from a fear, the ghost of that fear never goes away. It diminishes people. So I’ve always said ‘yes’ to the thing I’m most scared about.”
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Hugh Jackman? Bizarre.
The reason the Academy Awards have gone downhill in viewership is that they have become a elitist show. Only the pretentious movies get nominated and the popular movies get snubbed. I haven’t seen any of the films that have won in the last few years and have no intention of ever watching them. IF the AA want better ratings then nominate Dark Knight for Best Picture and Heath Ledger as well. Otherwise it will be the same thing all over again with the pretentious independent movies winning and nobody watching the awards.
The Tonys just aren’t the same without Jackman. He made those shows really, really fun to watch and was an incredibly impressive host. If this proves accurate, this is truly great news. Anyone who thinks a stand-up would do better should watch how he works the audience and the room in those Tony telecasts. He’s an inspired choice.
Maybe he’ll even make up for the lack of inspired films (with a few exceptions)!
How is he “outside the box”? So he’s not a stand-up comic… He hosted the Tony Awards 4 years ago and was absolutely fabulous! I think he’ll be a lot of fun.
Actors are boring, self centered, bloviated hams. Comedians make the award show bearable, fun and have the ability to keep the show moving. Watching Jackman is like watching a soap opera actor trying to be funny. The problem is that these award shows are like watching a graduation commencement. Bring on Jack Black and shake it up a bit. Actors need to brought down to earth and reminded that their over inflated opinions of themselves, need to be deflated. Jack Warner had it right, “Actors are over paid Bums”
Even though it may have been nothing more than a false-slash-wishful (post Emmys) rumor, the foreigner AMPAS should have gone with is Ricky Gervais, not Hugh Jackman. You want the Cheekiest Man Alive, not the Sexiest.
Hugh Jackman? Really? What, was Wall-E not available?
Wolverine: The AA’s Final Cut…
Why would his people have an issue with him doing comedy? Many A-list celebrities do SNL, as I believe he has done in the past. As his only major successes have been actioners, letting him do some comedy may help prevent him from being type-cast. He’s a multi-talented performer who can handle humor; here’s an opportunity to let the public see what else he’s good at.
“Jackman’s selection is the motion picture industry’s recognition that, more now than ever before, the success of a movie depends equally if not more so on its international box office than its North American grosses.”
Or they could just think he’s the right guy for the job. As to the link of host to ratings? I don’t think so. The ratings are low because of the films that have been nominated. If the Academy overlooks The Dark Knight in the major categories and goes the same old route this year, the ratings will stink again, no matter who is hosting.
Young men know him as Wolverine. Older people know him as suave and a good stage performer. He was just on the cover of People mag as Sexiest Man Alive. International star. That sounds like broad appeal to me. He is smart, funny, can think on his feet, and really was terrific as Tony host. And to top it off, he’s good looking.
Am I the only one who thinks this choice will bound out with audiences? I mean, I like Hugh Jackman. He’s a splendid actor. But what will happen with the TV audience? Will they stay-tuned if the Oscars takes itself too seriously?
I think the success of Dancing with the Stars might have had something to do with this. The comedians failed to pack in the audiences so now the producers look to be going back to the old song and dances routines.
I could see Hugh opening with a Billy Crystal-esque number. Singing about the year, a few jokes peppered in, maybe with the more elaborate dance number.
After that, he’s got charm and charisma to pull off even the corniest one liner so he should be able to handle that as well.
If there’s one concern, it’s having Jackman singing and dancing and then giving Jerry Lewis a live microphone.
I’m sick of people suggesting there should be fewer awards given at the event. The Academy Awards is there first and foremost to recognise acheivements in the motion picture industry. It is not just a TV show for easily bored idiots to see clips of their favorite movies and watch their favorite actors on stage and the red carpet. It is in danger of becoming the TV equivalent of US Weekly.
I think Hugh Jackman is a great idea. He’s international, talented and charming.
Great choice. A classy, talented, fun guy, and easy on the eyes.
I just saw “AUSTRALIA”. AMPAS would be better off with HJ’s horse as host. Or better yet, if they want someone with personality from “down under” how about Heath Ledger?
To Santayana and all the people with the Monday Morning Quarterbacking in depth analysis of what it takes to host a show…
Do you understand that Jackman is one the world’s premier entertainers? Did you see a live performance of The Boy From Oz? I don’t think any of you have an idea of the range of Hugh Jackman’s talents. Anyone who can inhabit Peter Allen and Wolverine (both convincingly) is the ultimate showman.
I can’t wait for him to make you all eat your words. On the contrary. I think this years will be the first of an example of what’s been missing.
Aussie! Aussie! Aussie!
Oh yeah…he’s hosted the Tony’s several times now and received rave reviews for his hosting abilities. Is a proven track record in successfully hosting a big awards ceremony not enough for all you malcontents?
He can sing so can’t he do the opening type thing that Billy Crystal would do? Where he sang while he showed up in the different nominated movies? That bit was funny. And doesn’t require telling jokes.
His broad appeal must be the reason Australia did so well… oh wait…
@ Baldwin
As if the only reason a movie doesn’t do well is because one of the actor’s appeal wasn’t broad enough. Yes…it’s all Hugh’s fault. What industry do you work in? If you are going to weigh in…get a clue.
@ Mike Baldwin
Don’t think that movie would have done well with anybody in the lead. It’s just not a movie people wanted to see.
Oh, puh-lease, Hugh Jackman? Give me a break. On the back of a movie flop, it’s a bad move by Condon.
To Joseph: re-read what I wrote.
Each time he has hosted the Tonies, the ratings reached a new low. He may be talented and charming on screen, but he has a milquetoast personality live. Chris Rock and Jon Stewart might have had their “uncomfortable” moments, but they added an edge to the show. With Jackman, it’s like a throw-back to the Bob Hope days, but without the sharp comedic timing. Does the Academy want a Yawn Fest for 2009? Apparently so.