Los Angeles β The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) on behalf of the major Hollywood movie studios filed lawsuits in federal court in Los Angeles today against campusist.com, movies-on-demand.tv, and sswarez.com - websites that facilitate copyright infringement on the Internet. These sites contribute to and profit from massive copyright infringement by identifying, posting, organizing, and indexing links to infringing content found on the Internet that consumers can then view or download on-demand.
βThe people who are operating these sites are profiting from the theft of protected content. We have filed several other similar lawsuits and will continue to do so in order to hold operators accountable for their illegal activities. We have every intention of continuing to shut down these sites, and sites like them, for good,β said John Malcolm, Executive Vice President and Director of Worldwide Anti-Piracy Operations for the MPAA.
Sites like campusist.com, movies-on-demand.tv, and sswarez.com rely on advertisers to maintain their operations and profit handsomely from third-party advertising pitches. All three sites combined attract over 54,000 unique visitors per day who view nearly 208,000 pages of content.
The worldwide motion picture industry, including foreign and domestic producers, distributors, theaters, video stores and pay-per-view operators loses approximately $18 billion annually as a result of piracy -- over $7 billion of which is attributed to Internet piracy.
MPAA Sues To Shut Down 3 Film Websites
Comments (8)
|
Post a Comment
Comments On Deadline Hollywood are monitored. So don't go off topic, don't impersonate anyone, don't get your facts wrong, and don't bore me.
I’ve always been confused about the legality of sites like this. Can a person be sued for viewing copyrighted material on STREAMING video without actually DOWNLOADING it? To me, it’s akin to going on Youtube and stumbling across a full movie that has been uploaded in ten parts. I’m not pro-piracy, and I suppose providing an avenue to viewing stuff illegally should result in lawsuits for the sites, but can they realistically and legally go after people for watching streaming video?
@ Kristina, the issue here isn’t the end-user watching movies for free, it’s the site maintainers making said movies available.
What I find interesting is that it’s been common knowledge that these sites are “legal” because they don’t actually store the movies themselves, they just link to them (much like Google links to content). I guess the question now is whether that common knowledge was inaccurate all along, or if the MPAA has found a loophole.
…and actors won’t get a penny.
Neither will anybody else connected to the movie streamed, including the financiers
You want a comment on the REAL movie piracy? Check out the YouTube link (if it’s okay with Nikki). Note strong language: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?
It will be interesting to see where the case goes,
you see the sites listed, dont actually load the content- they just tell people where to find it.
In many cases the actual data is in China or some other nation that doesnt follow international copyright rules and regs-
it could be a freespeech case in the end- kinda like the anarchist cook book- “we are not responsible for the actions of others”
but the studios will win with sheer bank account power…
Good. Get the thieves.
Movie piracy is a multi-faceted issue, as offered in an earlier link to “Steal This Disc” on YouTube that went awry. If it’s okay with Nikki, here’a re-posting: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9KcVFN7qlc