He’s accepted Summit Entertainment’s offer to direct the movie adaptation of the second book in Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight series of vampire novels, New Moon. (I first broke the news that Weitz had received the offer here, and the news that Twilight director Catherine Hardwicke was off the sequel here.) The offer went out to director Chris Weitz in part because he’s a longtime pal of Summit’s president of production. Now comes a letter that the director will be sending to Twilight fans (below) with his selection endorsed by Stephenie Meyer (below that). Fan approval is very important to Weitz, who initially resigned from directing The Golden Compass, also based on a popular book, because he feared getting dissed by devotees. Despite that, Summit has put its first valuable franchise in his hands. Weitz has successfully worked with tweens and teens in About A Boy as director and writer, and in American Pie as producer and uncredited director. I’m told Summit wanted Weitz because the studio liked the look of The Golden Compass (he was writer and director) even if it didn’t heat up the domestic box office. Here’s the Weitz letter to fans:
Twilight book series author Stephenie Meyer endorsed Weitz today and published his letter on her website:
December 13, 2008
Hey guys,There’s been a lot of worry and speculation on the boards lately, and I want to let you know what’s going on.
First of all, like you, I’m sad that Catherine is not continuing on with us for New Moon. I’m going to miss her, not just as a brilliant director, but also as a friend. She has such a distinct, authentic voice that did amazing things for Twilight. I’m looking forward to every movie she does in the future.
And she didn’t leave us empty handed. We still get the benefits of her amazing casting and the beautiful visual world she created. This foundation puts us in a good place for New Moon.
Summit Films is moving forward with a new director for New Moon. They’ve asked Chris Weitz, director of American Pie, About a Boy, and The Golden Compass, to join us, and I am very pleased to announce that he’s agreed to be a part of our Twilight world. I’ve had the chance to talk to Chris, and I can tell you that he is excited by the story and eager to keep the movie as close to the book as possible. He is also very aware of you, the fans, and wants to keep you all extremely happy. (Torches and pitchforks are not going to be necessary.)
I’m excited to work with Chris and I think he brings a lot to the table, not the least of which for me is that he wrote the screenplay for and directed one of my favorite movies of all time, About a Boy. I’m really looking forward to seeing his vision for New Moon.
Below is a letter from Chris to you. I think you’ll get a glimpse in this note of how cool it’s going to be having Chris as part of our community.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.








I want to wish Chris a good job doing New Moon as a director. I still feel very optimistic about this choice.
Thank you for the letter.
Mister Hollywood, that was hilarious.
Chris Weitz will only have fan backing when he assures us that he is going to keep Taylor Lautner in New Moon as Jacob Black!! No more changes (other than FX) please!!!!
According to one studio exec: “You’d have to have a very high standard for art, hate the movie business, and hate money to walk off this sequel.” So with Weitz, they get the hack they wanted! The movie is doomed, indeed, to not satisfy any “standard for art.” Mabye it’s a good thing Taylor Lautner might be able to skip out on this dud. (Although the obvious move would be to have Taylor play Jacob pre-werewolf and Steven Strait play Jacob post-werewolf. But I don’t want either of those stellar actors sullied by Weitz. They should play brothers in a Catherine Hardwicke movie.)
Twilight is the gift that keeps on giving for women in Hollywood. Wow! Ya mean if they actually make a decent movie for girls/women they might show up? One step forward! But there’s no misogyny in Hollywood. Nope. Doesn’t exist. Wait. So a woman directs a no-star, low budget movie for teenage girls and it opens with $70 million and she’s replaced – by a man? Two steps back!
As to New Moon:
Script: Rob Pattinson is the big draw and needs to show up in as many frames as possible – but that doesn’t happen in the source material which, by all counts, well, sucks, for a number of reasons. Can they get enough Pattinson screen time (probably 98%?) while hovering around the general reality of the book?
Director: looking past the glare of Hollywood’s anti-women bias – Weitz may be a mensch, but sincere love stories are thus far not his forte. More about young (male) jerks or (male) jerks-gone-good (American Pie 1 & 2, About a Boy, In Good Company, American Dreamz, etc). Chris Weitz certainly has the intelligence – but where’s his heart? So far re romance, it seems he’s done what men love & women are largely desensitized to: romanticizing male assholes.
Golden Compass had no love story and wasn’t good story-telling. Not encouraging that serious script errors were not spotted on that very expensive movie, when New Moon already has script challenges to meet. Geez, even the most macho films know sincere love stories (vs. the hot chick needed for steamy sex & the director’s libido) need to rate at least the B-story (see Braveheart, Bourne Identity, Casino Royale).
Good news: Pattinson, Pattinson, Pattinson, and his chemistry with the talented Kristen Stewart – use it or lose it.
Spot on, WTF! I’ve been reading some of the blogs in the industry media and most people agree with you that without Rob Pattinson in 98% of the movie, New Moon will not be a blockbuster. He is IT. As witnessed by the Beatlemania-type frenzy that is happening around the world when he shows up. He can’t get out of a plane now without being photographed. Harness that talent, Mr. Weitz, and you’ll have yourself a megahit!
Good comments by Mister . Hollywood… funny, even insightful
as much as folks here would like to deny.
In anycase, we hear the budget for New Moon has gone from something like 35M to approx. 50M.
Sources have noted that the extra $$ will not be going to talent (Mr. Pattison or his partner), which may be a good thing for the movie since it does need better sFX, production, writing etc. for this particular sequel (New Moon).
My question to you all has to do with the fall out regarding the director. What are the women director’s in Hollywood and elsewhere thinking about the firing of Ms. Hardwicke?
Is this being looked at as a female vs. male director schmism?
Will the Union have any comment about this? or get involved?
Will there be any action against Summit (whether passive or agressive), etc.
Will this be the preverbal straw that breaks the camel’s back regarding sexism in Hollywood?
Will there be some action taken? (whether passive or agressive?)
Your thoughts please? (Nikki please comment as well if you can?)
I stopped reading Chris’ letter one he spelled Stephenie Meyer’s name wrong. Her last name is Meyer. Not Meyers. Good credibility also comes from knowing your facts — like how to spell the author’s last name and using proper punctuation.
What’s with the reverse sexism going on here? So all of a sudden a guy can’t make a film that related to women? So “Titanic” was what exactly? And maybe if some of you actually sought out real flicks you would see “Slumdog Millionaire”. Jamal and Latika’s love story is better than anything Edward and Bella have done.
Hollywood hates women because American hates women.
And they get away with it because women hate themselves.
No one has the courage to stick with a woman who demand fair treatment. As soon as she asserts herself as an equal, her passion becomes arrogance, her individualism becomes irritation and her requests become demands.
This business will not change until it comes apart at the seams– just like American did. Just like NBC is.
We must embrace the diversity that makes us unique and stop the blind white male worship.
Weitz is tall handsome and has a full head of hair. This means he must be successful at all costs. Newline had to force him to take The Golden Compass and he fumbled it. Why oh why would anyone give him another fantasy franchise? Because he’s white and male and if you fail with him you just lose your job. If you fail with a woman or a black person, they take you out and shoot you.
If Weitz fails again he will be exiled to TV where he will get even more money to be white and male and suck.
If he succeeds and makes a half decent film, he will be hailed as a savior and the stereotype will be reinforced.
Companies have put up with more from male directors less talented than Catherine Hardwicke. And yes, I am fighting for her equal right to be an asshole.
Sexism, racism, nepotism and cronyism is killing this business. The populace wants to see itself reflected in the product but we continue to promote images that are at least half a century old in front and behind the camera.
Meanwhile, rating decline, boxoffice declines and ticket prices go up.
The bubble will burst soon.
I for one cannot wait.
Wait, so Summit is not making New Moon and Eclipse back-to-back? That seemed like a likely possibility given the nickel-and-dime approach they are taking overall…
How sad we’ve digressed to the return of thinking that a successful film must be helmed by a person with a penis. Hollywood, you gravely are missing out on the underlying passion behind this.
Now these wonderful books will go the route of schloky American Pie fare. Not a great decision in my eyes Summit Ent!
Purity, I totally agree with your comment.
“Well as long as he trims that boring flat repetitive mid section of New Moon I’ll be happy. I hope he also fleshes out Edward’s time away from Bella as his emotional journey is just as important.”
Comment by rebecca
Rebecca – how can they trim out the “boring flat repetitive” section, whilst fleshing out Edward’s time away from Bella? It’s happening at the same time! The mid section that a lot of people seem to dislike here is a vital part of the story! If there was no time away from Edward, how could his and Bella’s reunion be as moving?
By saying that the mid section sucks, you’re basically dissing Stephenie Meyers storytelling prowess! Without the downs, you can’t have the ups, and i like the story just the way it is.
The book doesn’t have much Edward, so I don’t think the movie should either. Whats Robert Pattinson got to do with it? This is a chance for the audience to see Bellas anguish-and Kristen Stewart is talented enough to pull it off.
Why would you try to change the story? It’ll just become some generic and predictable romance flick, when the book is so much more!
So, let me get this straight: THE GOLDEN COMPASS presented much the same basic challenges as the TWILIGHT series, but Summit hired the guy who messed _that_ up?! I like Weitz’ work, but TGC proved that fantasy is not his long suit.
Wanted to add that the irony of all this is that while we are looking to issues around this movie to promote empowerment for women in Hollywood & the movies they make for girls/women – the source material for the films is not empowering for women – with the teen heroine saying she’ll kill herself if she loses her boyfriend who wants to kill her, by the second book apparently forgoing said boyfriend for another boy who says he’ll kill himself if she doesn’t make out with him (so she does), and by the last book, apparently they have her barefoot, pregnant and married at 18, dropping college, career, family & friends for the boyfriend she’d kill herself over.
Extreme dysfunction there, and scary to think millions of girls have swallowed it hook, line and sinker. Also scary to think the heroines of Jane Austen were much more empowered over 200 years ago.
So yes, I hope Hollywood tinkers with the source material, or they skip the last books entirely.
What I’d be preparing a script for is the unpublished book that is from Pattinson’s point of view.
To clarify my last sentence above re Pattinson’s pov: while Stewart’s character is a trainwreck in the making for female empowerment, Pattinson’s character seems to relatively – relatively – support more empowering decisions for her, on account of he’s 100 years old, so he’s a gentlemen, and things were better for women in the Victorian era… **bangs head against the wall**
ok new moon was not boring i loved how close jacob and bella got so shut up all you mean people and i dont mind him as long as he keeps taylor
TEAM TAYLOR FOREVER
Re: WTF Comments
Dead on sister and Amen!
Funny how they are talkin about (in this particular blog) about women directors, equal rights and then the story /movie that this is all suppose to support..makes no bloody sense whatsoever.. its just bizzare.
No wonder Kristen Stewart/Bella seems like she’s in such a bad mood when she gives these “interviews” its almost like she can’t stomach playing this character, and who can blame her!
Yeah, Pattinson’s character is pretty liberal for a guy who was born around the turn of the centuary.
Maybe the author forgot about that bit.
These books are rather disturbing on so many levels, but no one seems to comment on that, with the exception of WTF.
Hey Team Taylor.. we know that’s really his mom!
Anyway.. heard the guy playing Jacob is going to be canned. They are going to replace him with another older, bigger, taller actor. Hey, sFX can only go so far you know.
In anycase, the role calls for an older looking guy (like 25 ish or so). So goodbye “team taylor”..
We are big fans of the twilight saga and new moon is surely going to be a sucessful continuation.
However we were surprised and disappointed to find out that the vampires’ eyes were changed from golden brown to orangeish color.
The change doesn’t make sense and is hard to adjust to .
How do they explain the sudden and not quite reasonale change from the so successful first movie ? If at all?
We tried to find a way to contact the production and ask but with no luck!
It is a strange remark/question but we find it hard to ignore since they look so inhuman and strange unlike their fabilous look in twilight.
Thank You!!!
I thought the first movie, Twilight, was so phenomenal due to the director’s ability to capture the feelings/emotions between Bella and Edward. One could feel the love that I believe most women long for and that is why I think the movie was so successful and left us wanting for more. I just saw New Moon and found it totally lacking in emotion, especially between Bella and Edward (I do not recall one moment where he was truly soft towards her), and the relationship between Bella and Jacob was dry and cold, no feelings again. Now I just read here that the director was replaced and I have my answer why the love/emotions were missing. In my opinion, New Moon is just riding on the tail of the truly excellent work that Catherine did on the first film. She brought so much emotions out of the two main characters and kept the violence less dark, just like Stephanie’s books do, that it left us women wanting for more and more. Such a shame, that the management of Summit could not see that. I am surprised that Stephenie Myer agreed to the change of director, since in my opinion Cathrine captured the essence and total feel of her book. I have now read all four books in the series and none of them have the negative, aggressive, dark and lacking love that the director portrayed in New Moon. Such a shame. It was so refreshing to read and watch a story that did not centre in constant and very dark violence, and balanced all conflict and challenges with the kind of love that we all strive/wish for.