Tomorrow's edition of The Wall Street Journal reports that Hollywood financial adviser Jerry Breslauer steered his two top clients, Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg, into investments with New York money manager Bernard Madoff, and now the pair have been hurt in the widening $50B fraud scandal. The newspaper says Katzenberg has suffered millions in Madoff-connected losses, while one of Spielberg charities, the Wunderkinder Foundation, has sustained losses on investments with the Madoff firm. According to the WSJ, Breslauer was known to be a Madoff investor and has "likely sustained heavy losses" himself in the Madoff fraud.
Breslauer, now age 80, was for decades the financial adviser to many of Hollywood's top stars and moguls. (I know it was seen as having "arrived" at the top rung of showbiz if the publicity shy Breslauer accepted you as a client.) But in recent years, Breslauer began to shed clients until he worked in semi-retirement handling only Spielberg's and Katzenberg's financial affairs. According to the newspaper, Breslauer's financial relationship with Madoff (photo below)dates back to at least 2004, based on public tax records filed by the Mr. Spielberg's Wunderkinder Foundation. "The foundation shows annual income from Madoff-related investments steadily increasing to the point that those investments accounted for at least 70% of the foundation's reported earnings for 2006, the most recent year for which filings are available," the WSJ reported.
Spielberg was one of Breslauer's first Hollywood clients in the 1970s back when the director was still relatively unknown. "The relationship with Mr. Spielberg helped open other doors to the elite of Hollywood -- including Mr. Katzenberg," the paper said. Clearly, a lot of very savvy financial people were takenin my Madoff's Ponzi scheme, and Breslauer is "routinely described as an honorable businessman and a relatively conservative investor by people who know him," the WSJ noted. But "Breslauer is also someone who becomes deeply entwined in the lives of his clients," the WSJ noted, reporting about several personal real estate holdings of Katzenberg's and Spielberg's on which Breslauer was listed as a trustee. Before this scandal, Katzenberg's personal fortune had been estimated at around $860M and Spielberg's at $2.7B.
Breslauer – No fool like an old fool.
A fool and his money are soon parted….
Honestly, this Madoff situation is terrible. Here, we’ve been lectured about the necessity to save the financial system while jobs die like flies in a DDT sauna.
Now this… And tricks that would not do in a Gordon Gekko sequel. Just in an average episode of Hu$tle or Leverage.
“in three years when all the unions are united we’ll be able to make up what we’ve lost”
Is there anybody who seriously believes that, because if that is the linchpin of the “No” vote’s argument, then it isn’t worth jack sh*t.
I would really like to know why they think this is likely, maybe some commenters could give me their view on why this would happen.
If Breslauer didn’t do adequate due diligence of Madoff, Breslauer could be on the hook for the losses of his clients.
Where the hell was the SEC? People reported this guy years ago? I know a friend that had the SEC crawl up her butt because she purchased 300 shares in her company after the stock took a massive nosedive (driven by shortsellers) but rebounded and the SEC later, after subpeonas, depositions, etc., issued a notice of no wrongdoing. A lot of people, rich and not so rich, got hurt by Madoff. The SEC needs to provide a better explanation of how it prioritizes it’s work.
The SEC can’t make any more rules for this area than it already has. This guy played on people’s psychology, on the exclusivity and insularity of his arrangement, to make the con work. Ultimately, it’s caveat emptor all the way.
It is easy to make comments when its not you suffering losses. As a music industry manager, I myself lost 7 figures in this mess. Madoff was VERY trusted. You could not have gone very much higher on the flag pole then him. I met him on a golf fundraiser surrounded by 15 legitimate people with a billion dollars more than I who all had an investment ties with Madoff. When stocks lose, everyone blames. When banks now lose everyone blames. Now this. Maybe I will give my clients my money to hold in their pockets. If I ever get fired at least I can kick their @ss and get my money back.
Duh! If it looks too good to be true, it isn’t.
Dan -
It’s my understanding that when the SEC decides to investigate a matter based on a staff’s recommendation, the issuance of a formal order is entirely within its discretion. It doesn’t need a court order (See “SEC Investigations” by Frank Razzano of Dickstein Shapiro for an explanation of the tools in the SEC’s arsenal). Informal inquiries are even more easy to initiate. I heard news reports of Madoff whistleblowers years ago. Why wasn’t this picked up?
So who’s the first victim to get a lien on Madoff’s story for their losses.
And who plays Madoff?
Every pension in the US has been wiped out and wall street is covering it up!
I am also a victim of this attack by Madoff. Let’s call it what it is: a terrorist attack. I want all of us to get together in some strong way, and say loud and clear:WE’RE NOT GOING TO TAKE THIS ANYMORE!!!
WhenI a guy I never even knew steals 2 million dollars from me, I’m not going to roll over, oh no no no.
For anyone who cares, I knew Jerry Breslauer for 20 years, and he has as much intergrity as anyone I have met in my 49 years on this planet.
This guy stole from the rich who were giving to the poor. Could there be anything worse? These returns must have been unbelievable for people to put so much money in one basket. I guess I could only dream of losing $10 Million if I was worth $2.7 Billion like Spielberg. However, like always the biggest losers are the people who really need the money that was lost from the charities. The first rule of investing is diverification, why this rule was ignored? I guess there just aren’t a lot of people who can advise Billionaires, so when you find one you trust, you start ignoring the rules. After all I’m sure they thought, if this guy only invests money for Billionaires, he must know more than all those jerks who only have Millionaires for clients. This proves you don’t have to be brilliant to be rich. When you make more money on interest each year than you can spend, I guess you only invest in higher yields for the thrill. Does another 2% gets these people high?
I’ve watched interviews with several people Madoff fleeced…and each one seems to remember a moment when something struck them as off. The SEC used this man as a consultant—but never once checked to see if he was registered with them.
That’s criminal…but I would remind folks that when old Bernie was asked if they needed to tighten regulation of the market, his reply was “NO! Regulation is destroying this country.”
And they listened to him.