My LA Weekly colleague, film editor Scott Foundas, is foaming at the mouth that nowhere to be found on the Academy’s latest Foreign Language Film shortlist is Italian director Matteo Garrone’s Gomorrah, which has been credited with single-handedly returning Italian cinema to the world film spotlight. Here’s his argument:
How Do You Say “Oscar Scandal” in Italian?
by Scott Foundas/LA Weekly
One year ago this week, I wrote with astonishment and anger about the omission of Romanian director Cristian Mungiu’s Cannes-winning abortion drama 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences’ 9-film “shortlist” for the 2007 Foreign Language Film Oscar. That article was among the first of many similarly outraged essays that held the feet of the Academy’s Foreign Language nominating committee to the fire for what was widely seen as an unconscionable oversight by an organization that prides itself on its dedication to the art of cinema. Missing this year is Italy’s Gomorrah.
Of course, the history of the Oscars in general — and the Foreign Language Oscar in particular — is written in such blunders, which is why it becomes increasingly difficult with each passing year to afford the awards any serious consideration. Many of the best movies produced around the world never even stand a chance of being recognized by the Academy, either because they don’t receive commercial distribution in the U.S., or because they fail to play the political shell game that often determines which films are submitted by their respective countries for the Foreign Language Oscar in the first place. Still, because the Foreign Language Oscar is one of the few Academy awards that can actually have a tangible impact in terms of distribution and box-office (even a Foreign Language nomination is usually enough to guarantee a film’s U.S. release), it deserves particularly close scrutiny, and, when necessary, to be called out as a sham. As it happens, producer and Foreign Language nominating committee chairman Mark Johnson would seem to agree. During his tenure, he has helped to champion several significant rule changes regarding how foreign films are screened and nominated, including a 2006 reform that split the nominating process into two phases — one in which the entire Foreign Language committee (comprised of several hundred Academy members from all branches) determines the aforementioned “shortlist” of nine Foreign Language finalists, and another in which a blue-ribbon panel featuring ten members from the original committee plus 10 more Academy members hand-picked by Johnson vote to determine the five nominees.
Following last year’s affair Roumain, the Academy announced that the Foreign Language nominating process was to be further modified for 2008 so that the “Phase 1″ nominating committee would now be responsible for determining only six of the nine shortlisted titles, while the 20-member “Phase 2″ committee would select the three additional titles, after first learning the choices of the Phase 1 committee. This, it sounded all but certain, would prevent any such grievous omissions in the future.
And yet, and yet, and yet…here we are after the announcement of the Academy’s 2008 Foreign Language Film shortlist, and the news is far from joyous. While one can take consolation in the fact that French director Laurent Cantet’s widely admired, Palme d’Or-winning The Class and Israeil director Ari Folman’s extraordinary animated documentary Waltz with Bashir are safe for now (along with Austrian director Gotz Spielman’s superb revenge drama Revanche), nowhere to be found is Italian director Matteo Garrone’s Gomorrah, a blisteringly intense, multi-faceted portrait of the Neapolitan mafia that is not only one of the year’s most widely acclaimed films from any country, but has been credited with single-handedly returning Italian cinema to the world cinema spotlight. In many ways, the path taken by Gomorrah is uncannily similar to that of 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days. Like the Romanian film, it too premiered in Cannes to a torrent of instant acclaim and, ultimately, a major prize (the Grand Jury Prize) — making it the first Italian film to do so since Nanni Moretti’s The Son’s Room in 2001. By last fall, Garrone’s film (based on author Roberto Saviano’s international bestseller) was an official selection of the Telluride, Toronto and New York film festivals and, by early December, had repeated 4 Months‘ triumph at the European Film Awards, where in addition to being named the best European film of 2008, it took prizes for direction, screenplay, cinematography and actor Tony Servillo. More recently, Gomorrah was nominated for Best Foreign Film at the Golden Globes (where it lost to Waltz with Bashir) and the upcoming Independent Spirit Awards (where Waltz isn’t in the running), and received glowing notices upon its one-week, awards-qualifying run in a single Los Angeles theater back in December.Gomorrah isn’t the only notable omission from this year’s Foreign Language shortlist; it’s merely the most galling. Also MIA are Chilean director Pablo Larrain’s singularly disturbing Tony Manero, about a sociopath obsessed with John Travolta’s character from Saturday Night Fever, and Kazakh director Sergei Dvortsevoy’s magnificent Tulpan, a simple tale of a young sailor who dreams of becoming a shepherd, filmed with no special effects on Kazakhstan’s imposing Hunger Steppe. But those movies’ Oscar fates were far from foregone conclusions, whereas Gomorrah seemed a veritable shoo-in, particularly given that Italy is second only to France in terms of total nominations and wins in the history of the Academy’s Foreign Language category. Perhaps, in the end, Garrone’s vision of mob life was simply too violently realistic and lacking in Hollywood romanticism for a group of voters who have time and again showered nominations on the glossiest of Hollywood gangster fare.
Reached for comment on Tuesday afternoon, Foreign Language committee chair Johnson said that he considers this year’s roster of finalists “by and large a very strong list,” singling out both Revanche and Turkish director Nuri Bilge Ceylan’s 3 Monkeys as “difficult, challenging movies [of the sort] that our committee hasn’t necessarily embraced in the past.” Johnson also points out, rightly so, that while a case can be made for Gomorrah, the real scandal of last year’s shortlist wasn’t just the omission of a single, high-profile film, but rather of several such films, including France’s Persepolis and Germany’s The Edge of Heaven. In order for 2008 to rival that particular clusterfuck, The Class or Waltz with Bashir – or both of them — would have had to join Gomorrah on the reject list. Whether or not those titles benefited from the Academy’s revised rules is a matter on which Johnson understandably declined to comment.
I suspect that’s all little comfort for Garrone, though perhaps the fact that he’s recently been signed by a major Hollywood agency (ICM) will soften the blow. That, and the decision of none other than Martin Scorsese to lend his name as “presenter” for Gomorrah‘s U.S. release. Thus, from one Oscar bridesmaid to another.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.
One year ago this week, I wrote with astonishment and anger about the omission of Romanian director Cristian Mungiu’s Cannes-winning abortion drama 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences’ 9-film “shortlist” for the 2007 Foreign Language Film Oscar. That article was among the first of many similarly outraged essays that held the feet of the Academy’s Foreign Language nominating committee to the fire for what was widely seen as an unconscionable oversight by an organization that prides itself on its dedication to the art of cinema. Missing this year is Italy’s Gomorrah.

The best foreign film I saw this year was Let The Right One In, but because the country of origin (Sweden) didn’t submit it as their country’s best movie then it is not eligible. Isn’t it time the academy looked at the ridiculous way the foreign films are deemed qualified? LTROI was released in US theaters and so should be considered with every other foreign movie released in US theaters. Ridiculous.
maybe if they’d called it “Sodom” they could have piggybacked (so to speak) on the whole Prop 8 controversy.
Beyond disbelief is what I was feeling when I saw the omission. My gut instinct tells me that “Waltz with Bashir” will probably walk away with the Oscar but “Gomorrah” should have been recognized (Scott Foundas’ article is the reason why). I know there are many films to be considered but how could the Academy overlook a film that brings its respective country back into the world cinema stage after such a long absence. Italy is like Mickey Rourke – once a promising cinematic star but then out of the game only to have a resurgence with brilliant work. Mickey Rourke will probably be recognized with an Oscar nom; too bad Italy won’t.
terry d – That’s insane. Countries (e.g., politicians) decide which films from their individual country are eligible? If that’s the case, why not have the meatheads in Congress decide which US films should be eligible?
I agree the Academy should rethink that one.
Looking forward to seeing Gomorrah, it opens here in NYC soon.
I thought the same thing about 4 Months, 3 Weeks and 2 Days, easily one of the best of the year yet no nomination.
The other thing is that each country should be able to submit more than one film, there have been years when Spain or France etc. has had more than one of the year’s best films.
Where is Gomorrah playing around LA? It looks incredible.
I think Gomorrah is overrated. It is interesting for its realist style and its window into the Camorra mafia. It’s like a Italian Neorealist film that got stuck in time and didn’t get finished until now. But it is long, and it is very episodic. It should garner attention, but to assert its exclusion as some kind of tragedy is really just one blogger’s opinion.
I am a member of the Academy and it is outrageous that these films are not included for consideration. “Four Months, three weeks and two days” is everything an independent film should be. Beautiful done by real filmmakers who love their craft. Likewise “Gomorrah” was one of my favorite films this year. Very intense and, again, executed with great skill.
This is ridiculous. Why bother making such great cinema if people can’t find out about it????? And may I add, most of the films under consideration for Academy nomination can’t even tell a story properly.
P.S. Readers should know that Academy members like myself, who are in the actor category, cannot nominate for foreign film simply by watching screeners. I saw Gomorrah on a screener.
Oh please give it a rest Scott, the picture ain’t that great. Enough bagging on the committee..at least they ACTUALLY see the pictures versus the membership at large which get ballots and can vote on pictures, actors, costumes, etc without ever having to see them.
Saw Gomorrah.
It’s boring and rambling.
No big loss.
Let the right one in wasn’t eligible, it was released after September 31st in the US. Next year.
Saw Gomorrah. It’s boring and rambling. No big loss.
That’s not the point. The point is it should be eligible for Academy consideration, but because of some ridiculous Academy red tape, it isn’t and that is unfair. For example, the Paris Hilton opus “The Hottie and the Nottie” was released in US theaters and so according to the Academy rules is just as eligible as say, Benjamin Button or Milk for a Best Picture nomination. But not Gomorrah. Wtf?
Jesus, does Foundas do anything but bitch? It’s as if he really believes that the Academy’s omission speaks to the quality of this film. He should focus his attention on the films themselves, not the inherently political annual grind of the awards season.
4 Months, 3 Weeks, and 2 Days is one of the most boring, overrated films I’ve ever seen.
4 Months, 3 Weeks, and 2 Days is one of the most boring, overrated films I’ve ever seen.
Bill, you might like The Hottie and the Nottie.
It’s not a scandal Gomorrah isn’t in because it’s really great (or not, or whatever you think) it’s the process and rules at the Academy that are a scandal. I was outraged at The Band’s Visit being left out last year because of the use of English in the film. Which is ridiculous — English is in the film not for commercial reasons but because it’s accurate to the film’s situation and characters. The movie is about two different cultures with different languages coming together. What’s spoken in those situations? English! I’ve helped put together rules and guidelines for film awards before and I can tell you these from the Academy are more political than sensible or applicable to modern international filmmaking. There are some old timers at the Academy that need to make way for new ways of thinking. Clearly.
hey guys i know how to say thank you in italian u say grazie. in italian goodbye we say is arrivederci . bye