This signed statement from “the majority of SAG’s Hollywood Division Board” just came out in support of SAG National Executive Director and Chief Negotiator Doug Allen. (I have more to post tonight):
We, the majority of the Screen Actors Guild Hollywood Division Board, representing over 70,000 SAG members, responsible for over 65% of the work covered by the TV/Theatrical contract, support our National Executive Director/Chief Negotiator Doug Allen in his tireless efforts. With direction from the TV/Theatrical Negotiating Committee and the National Board, Allen has tried to secure the best contract he can for the benefit of our over 120,000 SAG members nationally.
We, the majority of the Hollywood Board, in a vote taken at our January 15th, 2009 Board meeting, also support the Compromise presented by Doug Allen to the National Board to suspend the Strike Authorization and to send the AMPTP’s final offer out to the membership.
It is unfortunate and puzzling that some members of SAG’s National Board, many of whom had no involvement with the months long process of wages and working conditions meetings or the months of actual negotiations, have, for the past several months, fought against Doug Allen’s efforts. They’ve pursued a campaign to confuse and frighten the general membership with regard to the negotiations, the contract, our president and our NED/Negotiator, as well as a concerted effort to pre-empt the members’ right to vote. Some past and present Board members have stated that the ultimate goal is to weaken the Screen Actors Guild in order to hasten a merger with AFTRA. Any discussions of merger should be deferred to a later time. The immediate issue now facing the members of the Screen Actors Guild is securing a contract that will ultimately be the template for all SAG contracts that will follow in relation to New Media production, distribution and exhibition. We are committed to the core principle passed UNANIMOUSLY by the National Board in October 2008 that states:
“It is the core principle of the Screen Actors Guild-
That no non-union work shall be authorized to be done under any SAG agreement and;
That all work done under a Screen Actors Guild contract, regardless of budget level, shall receive fair compensation when reused.”Although many believe in sending out the Strike Authorization, we have come to the realization that through questionable tactics used by the AMPTP, AMPTP operatives, industry CEO’s, industry dependent media, high profile producer/actors and certain members of the board, reaching the obligatory 75% of the SAG membership would be hard to achieve. We believe the compromise suggested by Doug Allen, supported by President Alan Rosenberg, Secretary/Treasurer Connie Stevens, 1st Vice President Anne-Marie Johnson and the overwhelming majority of the Hollywood Board, is the right path to take considering the circumstances. Neither SAG’s National Board nor its’ negotiating committee has ever accepted the AMPTP’s final offer. It is time for the membership to decide the future of this union. We, the majority of the Hollywood Division Board, believe that the membership of this union will find the final offer, which does not contain, at a minimum: complete jurisdiction in new media, residuals for all original product made for new media, and the protection of Force Majeure– UNACCEPTABLE.
We, the majority of the Hollywood Board and Eric Bogosian of the New York board, support Doug Allen. He is a true unionist and the strongest and most dedicated National Executive Director/Chief Negotiator the Screen Actors Guild has seen in decades.
In Solidarity;
President Alan Rosenberg
Secretary/Treasurer Connie Stevens
1st Vice President Anne-Marie Johnson
Angeltompkins
Jane Austin
Scott Bakula
Bonnie Bartlett
Justine Bateman
Eugene Boggs
Eric Bogosian (New York Board)
Joe Bologna
Clancy Brown
Keith Carradine
George Coe
Joe d’Angerio
Anne DeSalvo
Anthony DeSantis
Frances Fisher
Joely Fisher
Elliott Gould
Valerie Harper
Sumi Haru
Robert Hays
Lainie Kazan
Diane Ladd
William Mapother
Kent McCord
Esai Morales
France Nuyen
Alan Ruck
Nancy Sinatra
Charles Shaughnessy
Renee Taylor
Jenny Worman
—
And this unsigned statement from “the majority of Unite For Strength, and Board Members from Hollywood, New York and the Regional Branches”, came out earlier in the week:
A MESSAGE TO SAG MEMBERS FROM THE NATIONAL BOARD MAJORITY
Unite for Strength and Board Members from Hollywood, New York and the Regional BranchesAs you’re undoubtedly aware, Screen Actors Guild is currently beset by a crippling leadership crisis. With the TV/Theatrical contract having expired nearly 7 months ago, negotiations at a standstill, and our negotiators’ strategy hinging on a strike authorization vote for which there is clearly insufficient support, we called for a special National Board meeting to consider a new approach.
At that meeting, held Jan. 12-13, we attempted to postpone the strike authorization vote, replace Executive Director and Chief Negotiator Doug Allen and the negotiating committee, and direct a newly appointed negotiator to restart talks immediately.
Despite strong support for these steps from a clear majority of the National Board, President Alan Rosenberg and Mr. Allen’s other board supporters stood squarely in the way of our implementing them. For 28 hours straight, they used filibusters and other parliamentary games to run out the clock on the meeting and prevent a vote from ever taking place.
The next day Mr. Allen proposed a new plan to shelve the strike authorization, go back to the table to see if “producers would improve their offer” and then send out that offer for ratification with no board recommendation to members, only pro and con statements. It is noteworthy that when faced with a call for his removal, Mr. Allen suddenly saw fit to suspend the strike authorization that has been the cornerstone of his strategy, and indeed the topic of a 12-page promotional newsletter delivered to Hollywood members just days ago.
But unlike the plan we were obstructed from putting into place at the meeting, his is not a serious effort to get a better deal. SAG has never sent members a contract that our National Board didn’t recommend ratifying. We shouldn’t start now.
We firmly believe that SAG needs a change of course and a new captain. Mr. Allen has held fast to a failed strategy for over half a year, even as members have lost nearly $50 million from working under an expired contract. In addition, under Mr. Allen’s tenure, numerous other expired agreements have languished without renegotiation, SAG’s strategic relations with its sister union AFTRA have been badly undermined, and partisan tensions within the Guild have grown steadily worse.With new direction, we can turn this around and put Screen Actors Guild back on the right track.
We will work to quickly send members a TV/Theatrical contract that carries a positive recommendation from the National Board. We will also focus on successfully negotiating the Commercial agreement and other remaining contracts. We will rebuild vital relationships throughout the entertainment industry, and bring much needed stability back to the Guild.
We are now planning concrete steps to achieve this and will keep you updated as events warrant.*
In the interest of compliance with the AFTRA-SAG non-disparagement agreement under the AFL-CIO, Members of SAG’s National Board majority who are also AFTRA officers or board members wish to officially record themselves as abstaining from this statement.





Would some just shit or get off the pot? These updates are great but I need a job.
It’s a ironic they call themselves “Unite for Strength” yet continuously refuse to defer to the majority. Pushing their own unpopular agenda may succeed in undermining the UNION.
Certainly they do and should have a voice. But to use it to try and overthrow the majority is deplorable, selfish, cowardly, and ultimately self-destructive.
We get it UniteForStrength, you like the AMPTP, you really, really like them.
But the time has come to set aside childish things.
Go with the majority.
That’s the way it works.
To continue to undermine your fellow actors will destroy our UNION which you seem to forget brings with it many benefits from which you prosper.
I have no opinion on whether Screen Actors Guild members should vote to strike or accept the offer on the table or reject it, but I will say this: Unite for Strength is made up of quislings and traitors. You do not replace your negotiating team in the middle of a contract negotiation.
This says it all…
“It is time for the membership to decide the future of this union.”
Why would I have expected a statement talking about how they were going to try and end this impasse? Silly, silly me.
Its been 6+ months already!
So what I am seeing here is that the “the majority of SAG’s Hollywood Division Board” thinks that they are the deciders in which direction SAG should go as they consider themselves and their opinions somehow more important to all of the rest of the National members of SAG? SAG stands for SCREEN ACTORS GUILD not “HOLLYWOOD SCREEN ACTORS GUILD”! This kind of behaviour is even more divisive and shows the AMPTP just how divided, indecisive, ineffective SAG has become. Nice job MF…..
And one more thing: their (the U4S’) statement, “We will rebuild vital relationships throughout the entertainment industry, and bring much needed stability back to the Guild” is ludicrous! They not only have no plan nor experience to accomplish this, but they’re creating and perpetuating the friggin’ instability in the first place!
Regarding – “The immediate issue now facing the members of the Screen Actors Guild is securing a contract that will ultimately be the template for all SAG contracts that will follow in relation to New Media production, distribution and exhibition.”, in normal times it would make a lot of sense to take a really hard position since could impact future contracts. These are not normal times. However, a tough position could still make sense if the membership soundly rejects AMPTPs last offer (we don’t really know if its their “final”) indicating they are willing to weather this economic storm.
Thanks to Nikki (I think) for suggesting sending the lastest K offer to the membership for a vote. Time to kick this can down the street.
why is “Unite For Strength” obstructing a vote on the AMPTP contract?
Why are they afraid of letting the membership vote, up or down?
It seems that their goal is not a contract but the vilification and eventual dismissal of Doug Allen.
It seems that they are holding a 120,000 member union hostage to their bruised egos and petty personal problems with Doug and Alan.
It seems this is all about their own ambition and hunger for power.
And why would a board that finds the AMPTP’s offer unacceptable recommend it to the membership anyway? Doug and Alan are being eminently if not overly fair by agreeing to offer pro and con statements. UFS is crazy if they think that SAG will recommend a contract with such draconian anti-actor terms.
At the end of the day, it’s up to the members to fight for fair terms in New Media (soon to be “All Media”).
UFS isn’t concerned about you, just about petulantly holding a union hostage in the name of its own bald-faced political ambitions, wounded feelings and vengeance.
So they don’t want you to vote.
They don’t want to hear your voices.
They only want power.
Doug and Alan have been tirelessly working for a fair contract against all-powerful conglomerates, withstanding ugly attacks from within and without.
Ask yourself who has your best interests at heart? Doug and Alan or the so-called moderates whose stated mission is to weaken SAG and accept a deal that has been universally derided.
Does anyone (least of all the studio honchos) take this nonesense serious anymore. Our once proud union has become a complete joke both inside and outside the industry.
I guess the good (and the sad) news is that SAG has now become irrelevant. No one takes them seriously and any concern over a possible strike is gone. As that reality settles in hopefully business will pick up. No new TV series will be SAG, all will be AFTRA because no one in their right mind would work with these people if they don’t have to. Apparently Allen’s goal is to drag this on for as long as he can so he can keep his job even as the members work under the old contract and loose money everyday.
I fear for the upcoming negotiations on the Commercial contract as SAG could not be in a weaker position. You simply can not underestimate the ability of Membership First and the current leadership to find new ways to undermine the membership.
The Allen’s can blame who they want but the fact is that they have failed to unify the membership and continue to lead the way down this self destructive path.
Tom
Tom
Let’s get this vote to the membership and done. If the AMPTP has a new final offer, then let’s have it and get a vote out to members. Time to resolve this.
I personally hope the membership shoots down the offer and forces the AMPTP to make a better offer. It’s not like the AMPTP is going to stand firm on the crap offer if the membership votes it down. These corporations need to generate income and a stalemate is not helping them short-term. I’m sure they’d rather better their offer and make slightly less money and have that income back, than sit and watch their pipelines slowly dry up.
let’s end the contract out for a vote and let the membership
decide.
Like lemmings off a cliff.
As most actors prove when they have to get up onstage and give a speech (Sally Hawkins anyone?), they’re incapable of thinking for themselves. All they know is how to take direction and reads words off the page. Sad.
It’s not the “questionable tactics” by the AMPTP,and industry CEO’s, etc., etc. that are making the 75% hard to achieve…it’s SAG. There isn’t a union member in any union that supports the AMPTP. SAGS actions are the reason people inside and outside your union don’t support you. Every day it’s a new “drama” release, and the fucking infighting has worn people out. Crew people understand most of what your fighting for, and don’t disagree, it’s just the way it’s been handled, so childish. The list of bad moves is so long, really…sit down, think back,and start making that list.
One of the reasons the AMPTP may be so unmovable regarding new media is…doesn’t the DGA,and WGA have a favored nation clause, so if SAG gets a better deal, the AMPTP has to also give them this upgrade.
I wish I had a magic wand for you, all I can think of is maybe sign the contract WITHOUT new media in it, and take it up again in 2 years, then you haven’t locked yourselves in,and you won’t suffer the fate that the contract for DVDs brought you.
You need one captain to guide your ship, not a ship of fools.
I still do not get this. Why the fuck is SAG in a pissing contest with itself? (Again)
Get some blood-thirsty, shyster lawyers to go and tear into the throats of the AMPTP.
Get a contract that’s better than the current bullshit and then have a goddamn fist fight on Pay-Per-View amongst yourselves.
But only after you get your shit together and get this taken care of.
I swear, is it a west coast thing? Having moved to LA a few years back now, I only every see the whiniest people put in positions in which the don’t get anything done.
Well, get it the fuck done and get it done now.
What does this all mean? I’m exhausted.
Ok, based upon these two statements, U4S does not want membership to vote on the existing AMPTP final offer contract. Why is that?
What do they think they’ll get from the AMPTP that SAG members can support?
Either they live in a bubble, or letting membership vote was NEVER part of the plan. It’s a vendetta to overturn other board members. The contract is the casualty.
So if my math is right, Allen has the support of 30 members of the 52 member Hollywood board and the support of 1 member of the New York board. A precarious hold on power.
Seriously? Was it suggested that SAG members who oppose a strike authorization vote are really just part of a conspiracy to merge SAG with AFTRA?
I was wondering if you were going to pay any attention to what was happening at SAG.
But who’s holding the conch?
SAG is doomed. These dueling statements are giving the producers a good laugh — they don’t have to do a thing! And honestly, both “factions” of SAG are at fault here. The snark factor is too high on both sides for any progress to be made.
I’m surprised, that anyone is surprised, that the U4S crowd doesn’t want the membership to vote. Has everyone forgotten that the is the same bunch that was pushing so hard for qualified voting? How ridiculous! Did you actually believe them when they said that they were going to take that out of their platform? I suppose their new position must be- You voted us in, no need to vote again.
Folks…just be glad y’all still have AFTRA membership. You’re gonna need it.
And Ace, time to stop being so freakin tribal about it all. SAG is not a soccer team. No one in our union, not MF, not UFS, NO ONE is coming out of this looking good.
The fact is that to turn this particular negotiation into the game changer negotiation, even before the economic downturn, even before all of our missteps with SAG, even before the implosion in our own politics, was profoundly stupid. For the reason why see the above comment by btlteamster.
It was never going to work with one guild trying to do all the heavy lifting, unless that guild was the first one to negotiate. Which we were not. You can piss and stomp and moan all you want but if you try to attack uphill on a rainy day when the troops are tired you are likely to get mown down. Best to choose a better time and place of attack.
But that would take true leadership, the kind that doesn’t hinge all their political aspirations on one negotiation, the kind that knows how to acknowledge the hard facts to their membership, the kind that knows how to avoid a dumb battle to win a smart war.