A Message from Interim National Executive Director David WhiteDear Screen Actors Guild member,
As I enter my first full day today as your new Interim National Executive Director, I have reflected on a Los Angeles Examiner story from 1937 that once hung on the wall of my Screen Actors Guild office when I served as General Counsel.
The article chronicled the moment when the studios had finally recognized the Guild as the labor representative for actors in the motion picture industry. A grainy photograph captured members celebrating the news together, the joy in their faces richly evident. That moment, and the incredible work that it took Guild members to reach that moment, have served as the foundation for 75 years of history that has followed.
In my previous tenure at the Guild, I worked alongside several elected National Boards, two presidents (current President Rosenberg and former President Melissa Gilbert) and three National Executive Directors. My intention now, as Interim National Executive Director, will be to work with your current National Board to navigate through a period that is brimming with both challenges and opportunities – from completing our TV/Theatrical negotiations; to preparing for and securing a new Commercials contract as well as several other smaller but critically important labor agreements; to repairing relations with our sister unions; and addressing a polarized political system that is perceived by too many of our members as being close to broken. As we confront these efforts together, my overarching goal is this: to help restore your confidence that this is a union where strong and wise decisions are made despite political differences.
The greatest challenge facing this union is to find a way for democratic leadership to flourish – for disagreement and debate to build into unity and power. The Guild’s diversity of opinion should, and must, serve as a source of strength and solidarity. I believe in the Guild’s capacity for this. And that is why today I offer two messages to each and every member: First, I will be at the office each day to work with your talented staff and your National Board to achieve objectives that advance your interests as actors; and, second, it is time to turn the page on the most destructive aspects of the Guild’s internal politics.
In this swiftly changing environment, we will not be successful if we do not work together. This effort will take an entire union – all members, from background actors, to stunt performers, to voice over actors; those working in film television, commercials, industrials and video games; dancers and singers; middle-class actors, to high-profile ones, to struggling artists working each day to break through for their first chance. We must work together. Because if not, the well-known words that a previous leader offered to a once-divided collection of citizens will matter to us now: united we stand; divided we fall.
During this extraordinary period for both our union and country, I am again reminded of the achievement of the Guild’s founders as recounted in that 1937 Los Angeles Examiner story. Their achievement came as a result of a supreme effort by a group of committed performers willing to set aside their differences in pursuit of that shared purpose. The result: they built an organization whose membership card today remains the ultimate benchmark for professional performers. The triumph of the Guild’s founders cannot be overstated – nor can the sacrifice, wisdom and political maturity that was required to achieve it.
I enter this interim role with the grand history of the Screen Actors Guild rooted firmly in my mind. I did not seek this position, but I am honored to act as its temporary custodian. You have my pledge that I will direct all my energies to steadying this historic organization and ensuring its success. I thank the Guild’s National Board for the confidence and trust they have placed in me on your behalf. And I look forward to working together, in solidarity.
David White
Interim National Executive Director
Screen Actors Guild
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.
As I enter my first full day today as your new Interim National Executive Director, I have reflected on a Los Angeles Examiner story from 1937 that once hung on the wall of my Screen Actors Guild office when I served as General Counsel.

“We will not be successful if we do not work together.”
AHAHAHAHAHAHA! What a jerk.
Translation: “We will not be successful if you do not do what we say.” Please – “work together”? Is that what U4S, NY, and RBD has done to the SAG leadership?
Yes, I’m all warm and fuzzy from the images of SAG in the past (who fought for the rights we now have, I might add). And I’m all for bettering the guild. But I will vote with a clear head on whatever is placed before me, not kowtow to fear mongering and pressure from runaway factions with a different agenda than supporting the SAG membership and our future.
Luck to you, David White. You have some high expectations to overcome. Bring on a new/improved contract. Please. Otherwise…. epic FAIL.
Very nice letter. This organization could definitely use some serious steadying if they have any chance of being taken seriously again.
To those of you who think that this one contract could stand for the end of residuals, you clearly do not understand how these issues progress over time. Yes I know that you got stuck with the DVD deal but I would say that you were never willing to put it all on the line for that issue.
Clearly, every union in this fight has the expectation that the new media issue is still very much alive and will be addressed going forward. SAG lost this issue when WGA went on strike and then settled. If you are smart and stick together you will get what you need in less than 3 years. Or you can keep in-fighting and self destruct.
Nope. Most likely, SAG is dead. The only chance we had for a good contract was with strong leaders who were ready to go the distance at a time of unprecedented naked greed on the part of corporations all around the world, including those in the entertainment industry. Even the Membership First crowd didn’t take it far enough. We should have had a strike authrorization on July 1, and went out if necessary. With a determined membership, and plenty of cash in reserves, any work stoppage would no doubt have been short.
Now, as I see it, the only chance we struggling actors have is to take swift and decisive action to demand that we have a say — to stage a sit-down — or whatever it takes to demand this board step down. WE want to decide our fate and it should not be left up to these cowards and cohorts who force their own interests upon us while they sit and drink champagne in their trailers.
WE CANNOT UNITE BEHIND THIS BOARD BECAUSE THIS BOARD DOES NOT HAVE OUR INTERESTS AT HEART. IT IS PERFECTLY OBVIOUS BY THEIR CONCERTED AND SUCCESSFUL CAMPAIGN TO DESTROY ANY CHANCE WE HAD OF GETTING A BETTER CONTRACT IN THE FIRST PLACE.
And since this David White was put in place by them, I trust him about as much as I trust any Bush appointee — that is, I trust him to lie and try and make it all look good until it’s too late.
Ned, you’re screwed. You’re dead meat swinging on a tree. Coming to power the way you did means nothing but failure. Too many people hate you for what has happened and will oppose you out of spite. That’s what happens when people start a civil war in during a contract negotiation. All you need to do is read just one of millions of history books to understand.
But good luck. This whole thing seems to be going well.
Although many will likely disagree, a lawyer might be just want SAG needs to negotiate through these waters.
Regarding “My intention now… completing our TV/Theatrical negotiations; to preparing for and securing a new Commercials contract as well as several other smaller but critically important labor agreements; to repairing relations with our sister unions; and addressing a polarized political system that is perceived by too many of our members as being close to broken.”, that’s awfully ambitious.
I’d still recommend sending the “final” amptp offer to the members for a vote to get some clarity asap and provide some unifying effect. Good luck.
Does this mean that there might be weekend work?
“The greatest challenge facing this union is to find a way for democratic leadership to flourish”
When has democratic leadership flourished? When refering to politics, there is no such thing as a “leader”.
SAG is a fucking joke!
Translation: You WILL like what we give and be happy with it because we TOLD you to…
The greatest challenge facing this union is to find a way for democratic leadership to flourish – for disagreement and debate to build into unity and power.
Says the appointee of the faction that blocked a vote of the membership.
I hope that all SAG members will take David’s message to heart. It is time to unify. It is also time to be realistic. The former leadership claimed to be fighting for residuals in the broadband space. Nothing released to date has indicated this to be the case. Coverage for existing tv programs creating internet “webisodes” is already conceded. The porior leadership has stated that they also want jurisdiction over not only internet programs with budgets in excess of $15,000 per minute or $300,000 for a series (the other union deals), but also prorams under those thresholds. I am aware of a recent SAG covered made for internet project – guess what the rate was – it was minimum wage. It is not now, nor will it ever be, time to draw a line in the sand over such “small potatoes.”
The fight should be about payment for reruns on the internet, but that is not on the table and has not been for quite some time now. That is where working members are truly losing out on a day to day basis now. Network prime-time reruns have virtually disappeared – all shows are posted on the network websites for people to watch on demand after they premiere. Reality shows have filled much of the void once filled by reruns. THIS is the true economic issue facing the working membership. The guilds should all formulate a game-plan to address this issue in the next round of negotiations. 3 prior guilds were not able to achieve headway on it this time, and the WGA actually went on strike for 100 days. SAG will be no different. If the studios give, then their credibility at the negotiating table with the guilds that went before will be wrecked and making deals early will no longer be possible.
It is time to make the best deal possible in light of current econimic realities, and the realities of pattern bargaining. The true fight will take place in 3 years, and the guilds should all start preparing now.
Making a payment equivalent to a network rerun residual, and having the right to stream the episode on demand on the network website for a specified time period in exchange for that residual payment is what the guilds should be seeking. That would truly benefit the members.
Seeking jurisdiction over programs with budgets of twelve dollars is a waste of everyone’s time, effort and dedication. It would be much better to focus all of that commitment on a goal that would make a real and meaningful difference to the working members of the guilds.
It is at that point that the unions would not only be supported by their members, but honestly, and tryly valued.
This guy is a bagman for the AMPTP. He will be selling us down the river ASAP. The board members that put him in are going to have to answer for this. It makes me sick to see my own people sell me out. LET ME VOTE ON THE CONTRACT!!! The CONTRACT is the main issue. Everything else is extraneous. It is very suspicious to me that certain board members are scared to have the contract sent out to the membership.
It is the most honest thing you can do for your membership–And that is all that Doug Allen wanted to do. What a waste of time and money.
Strange coincidence,
I was just flipping through some old Examiner microfiche copy from the late 1930′s, myself.
What a coincidence! I had no idea that others enjoyed my same hobby. I wish I could pull down half a mil for it.
Sue
I did not vote for this man. Doug Allen had my full support in his endeavor to get actors a fair deal. I will make a point, as I am certain will others, of voting the coup members/appeasers out of the offices they have abused by taking this despicable action which I have no doubt goes against the wishes of a majority of SAG membership.
How dare he sound so reasonable!!!
Woe to the membership. Woe to the membership.
He didn’t mention if he would fight for the best deal or is a schill for the producers
Blah, Blah , Blahh…
Come on get to it already.Tale some action. Do anything , quit B.S’n
I opened a friend’s e-mail first, then, the one from David White.
My friend’s e-mail said “he’s a bagman, sent by the AMPTP,” which made me think “you’re an errand boy, sent by grocery clerks” from Apocalypse.
Much like Obama is finding out already about Republicans, the Frankenstein coalition that pulled this off: UFS/NY/RBD/USAN/ “the stars” – will only respond to force.
Obama, who got elected on lofty rhetoric, but, I trust – I hope – understands the harsh reality of the sub-specie named “Republican,” is already going into executive override to deal with people with a different view of the world. That view tends to raise the earth’s temperature, causes us to invade countries based on lies, licks the balls of the rich while preaching lip-service to the middle-class and poor, subverts the Constitution, makes the definition of torture subject to debate – and, as Obama is going to have to realize, and probably has already, needs to be dealt with by a strong hand.
Such is the case here.
UFS believes leapfrogging this contract in favor of merger, which they somehow, tragically, think is more important, is the way to go. This is misguided, seriously flawed thinking.
NY and RBD, as always, refuse to bow to facts and reason: “proportionality should not determine power,” as in “Hi – I’m Todd Hissong, President of the Chicago branch of the Screen Actors Guild, and I have absolutely no credits in TV/Theatrical, or much elsewhere for that matter, but I want to publicly state I think Doug Allen should be fired.” They reject all things Hollywood as deeply suspicious, and wish to be treated as equals, rather than subject to a system that treats them as what they are: not equal. Not by any reasonable measure due to the fact that 75% of production is out of L.A. and 65% of income comes from there as well. Yesterday was sort of their wet dream come true, and today, we’re looking at a Screen Actors Guild being run out of NY and the RBD. Those are the vast majority of where the votes to oust Doug Allen came from.
USAN: Merger driven. Always has been. Operates from the deeply odd conclusion that SAG, merged with AFTRA, would be a good thing, a better thing. A three silo’d organization subject to the rule of on overseeing umbrella board, and called, “AIMA.” Why would Screen Actors want to be in a union with broadcasters and recording artists? Why would screen actors want to be subject, in ANY way, to the whims of those wholly respected, but nonetheless, totally separate, disciplines? Why would the Screen Actors Guild wish to be subsumed into a vastly more complicated bureaucracy, unsure as to it’s true functioning, it’s effect on our ability to conduct our own business, our ability to strike, the effects of mixing, in any way, our pension and health programs? Well, UFS will tell you it will give us “leverage.” This is the God they bow down to: “leverage.” Now, I’m all for leverage, but does anyone seriously think, in 2011 or 2014, that the AMPTP, faced with a merged union called “AIMA,” will, in ANY way, be cowed, or intimidated, into give-backs on the deal we’re on the verge of accepting, that will devastate the middle-class actor, and destroy SAG, after 75 glorious years, if UFS gets it’s way? (that’s a rhetorical question).
Then, there’s “the stars.” Tom Hanks, I’m told, at an early meeting, way before the economic collapse, said, and I quote, “I don’t care if you get paper or plastic on the set – just take the director’s deal.”
Now, beyond the stupifying arrogance of such a statement, does anyone have any doubt as to Tom’s motivation NOT being driven primarily by the needs of the middle-class actor? Maybe he was misquoted. Maybe.
The mealy-mouthed rhetoric of “We cannot, in good conscience, support a strike in these economic times…blah, blah, blah” of “the stars” is one of two things:
Completely disingenuous, as in “all right – enough of this you little people – we have movies to act in, produce and direct, and we have run out of patience with your little ‘contract problems.’ We live above such concerns, with agents who make deals on our behalf that transcend whether or not you little people get paid residuals in new media or have clip consent, or all the other protections you’re making such an ungodly fuss about!” Or, they honestly believe the “economic crisis” means they should exert their significant influence to deprive middle-class actors of a deal that allows them to have a shot at making a decent living, because they have collectively come to the conclusion that, “it’s not a good time.” I didn’t realize standing up so as not to be stripped of your ability to make a living was subject to “a good time.” The second possibility indicates a rather pronounced dull-headedness, perhaps the result of years of having your ass kissed and operating in rarefied air, where the nuts and bolts needs of those below you are a curiosity, at best.
In any case, we are now subject to the whim of a coalition out of NY and the RDB, that will determine the future of the union. Barring some back-channel agreement that gives UFS a major breakthrough in the contract, because the AMPTP decided it was worth the hit to have a more compliant SAG to deal with, UFS will return with a deal that looks exactly like the one Doug Allen would have returned with before he sent out the contract for an up or down vote. Logic dictates that some new faces will not sway the AMPTP at all. Why would they? Why? Will they give us a bunch of goodies because Mr. White is asking for them, surrounded by UFS? If the answer is yes, then I have to ask the question: why? What has changed, except the faces?
More predictably, they will return with the same contract Doug Allen would have gotten, which minus the suggested substantial improvement, may very well be voted down, and thrown back in UFS’s teeth. What then? Well, a Strike Authorization vote, which begs the question: why have we allowed this to happen, when we would have announced the results of a Strike Authorization vote 5 days ago, under Doug Allen?
There are two philosophies in the Screen Actors Guild: one is: “be willing to fight for your rights.” The other is “O. K. folks – let’s break it up and move along – nothing to be seen here, let’s get back to business.”
For now, the second philosophy has prevailed. We’ll see how long that lasts.
Why wasn’t this “we must all join together” advice part of the program when Membership First was pushing their agenda? Why didn’t Unite for Strength want to “work together?” Funny how attitudes change when you’re the guy on top.
This whole united we stand sentiment would have
come in really handy during the past 10 months.
Now that U4S-NY has flexed the muscle
provided by their whopping 52 percent mandate,
and installed this guy whose partner used to work
for the AMPTP, this guy is asking for unity.
Small-time bullshit.
“We’ve got to work together” is U4S-NY speak
for, “Do everything our way and don’t ask questions.”
The first two letters, by Krispykreme and Ace, say it all. The new guy offers an olive branch and they take a piss on it. Well done guys. Divided you fail.
I know this is not entirely appropriate, the time or the place in the midst of this very serious subject, but when I saw Angus MacFadyen so bravely sign his name, I tittered like a school girl.
I am a shameless fan and love your work! You are one of my favorite actors of all time. Thanks for your wonderful performances.
the posts above say it all. we, our guild, this whole thing, has become a nauseating joke. to think i used to be so proud of us.
insults, infighting, blacklisting…
are we over?
Taiwan Tim, are you saying White’s partner worked for the AMPTP? McGuire? Or someone else? Please explain in detail.
@ anonymous:
U4S and NY are not interested in “working together”. Have you not been paying attention these last months? They’ve done everything they could to ride in on their very slim majority and swing their broadswords. You don’t make such an aggressive move (or moves, rather) and then do the “stop all of this madness – we need to all get along!” dance. That’s ludicrous. And it’s not the way to address the SAG membership which has just watched our board get overrun by a hostile takeover – legal or not.
Having said that, like everyone else, I want an improved contract to vote yes on. And even though I may not like it, the “alternates” have been seated and I won’t make an effort to thwart their efforts – as long as they produce results, which is their claimed reasoning for this coup d’etat. So I’m all for giving this new guy a fair, fighting chance. But…
No improved contract offer from the AMPTP, and it gets voted down by the membership? There had better be a strike authorization ballot in my mailbox the very next week.
Even though it doesn’t seem like it right now, the membership of this guild can and shall run it, not the TV stars and lawyers.