According to an email making the Hollywood rounds, Quincy Jones has started a petition to ask President-Elect Obama to appoint a Secretary of the Arts. “While many other countries have had Ministers of Art or Culture for centuries, The United States has never created such a position,” the email reads. “We in the arts need this and the country needs the arts — now more than ever. Please take a moment to sign this important petition and then pass it on to your friends and colleagues.” The petition is located at: www.petitiononline.com/esnyc/petition.html.
Should U.S. Have Minister Of The Arts?
By NIKKI FINKE | Saturday January 10, 2009 @ 1:45pm PSTTags: Art
This article was printed from http://www.deadline.com/2009/01/should-us-have-minister-of-the-arts/
COMMENTS (50)
-
SUBSCRIBE TO DEADLINE NEWS
-
Marketplace
-
Two Weeks of Posts Comments 1 Paula Abdul Won’t Return To ‘X Factor’ In 273 2 RECORD-BREAKING WEEKEND! 4 Films Open $20+M: ‘The 190 3 Why Actors Hate Agents At Pilot Season… 161 4 ‘Chronicle’ Tackles ‘Woman In Black’ For 121 5 SAG-AFTRA: Exclusive Post-Merger Details 120 ‘New Girl’ Music Video
News/Opinion Poll
Loading ...By The Numbers
Title Studio Gross 1 Chronicle FOX $22.0M 2 The Woman In Black CBS $20.9M 3 The Grey OPRD $9.3M 4 Big Miracle UNI $7.8M 5 Underworld: Awake... SNY $5.5M 6 One For The Money LGF $5.2M 7 Red Tails FOX $4.7M 8 The Descendants FSL $4.6M 9 Man On A Ledge SMT $4.4M 10 Extremely Loud & WB $3.8M 11 Contraband UNI $3.4M 12 The Artist TWC $2.6M 13 Beauty And The Beast DIS $2.6M 14 Hugo PAR $2.3M 15 The Iron Lady TWC $1.9M 16 Mission: Impossible - PAR $1.7M 17 Joyful Noise WB $1.5M 18 Haywire REL $1.2M 19 Alvin And The FOX $1.0M 20 Sherlock Holmes: A WB $1.0M SOURCE: RENTRAKBox Office Poll
Loading ...Archives
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006

- Whitney Houston Interview: Talks 'Sparkle,' Aaliyah's Death And More In One Of Her Final Interviews
- BAFTA Awards 2012 Red Carpet: Michelle Williams, Viola Davis Meryl Streep And More (PHOTOS)
- BAFTA Rising Star Award: Hayley Atwell On Lack Of Female Nominees
- 'The Vow' Wins Box Office: Beats Out 'Safe House' And 'Star Wars' With $41.7 Million
- Whitney Houston Dies: Remembering Her Finest Onscreen Moment In 'The Bodyguard'


- Artist, Meryl Streep Win Big at BAFTA Awards
- Berlinale Dispatch: The Taviani Brothers — Who? — Return with a Great Shakespeare-in-Prison Movie
- Berlinale Dispatch: Greetings from the Baked Potato of Film Festivals, 62nd Edition!
- Summit and Lionsgate Hoping for Sixth Twilight Movie, Of Course
- REVIEW: Star Wars: Ep. I - The Phantom Menace Adds Stunning Third Dimension of Meh



We have that already it’s called the FCC & MPAA.
All this country is about is censoring not celebrating the arts.
Ah. So that’s why we the people of the United States did ordain and establish (the) Constitution for the United States of America. Not in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, but to give the state a say in culture.
I’ll support the arts with my entertainment dollars, not my tax dollars, thank you very much.
I think if anyone needs a Minister Of The Arts it would the Hollywood Studios. Get back to some of that good old fashion story telling with real people and real characters.
Quincy Jones is among the greatest and most influential living American artists. That is beyond question. What is up for question is his objectivity regarding the need for an official Ministry of the Arts. An official Federal department of the Arts. The very concept is silly and of course it will never happen.
hopefully this position will further the tradition of great vision and artistry that Quincy brought us with “Star Camp” and the first three seasons of MadTV.
Um, let’s see. We have no Ministry of the Arts, and somehow this country manages to turn out more filmed and electronic entertainment than the rest of the world combined.
I guess we need a new government bureaucracy to put a damper on all this.
Clearly you’ve never lived in a country that actually does censor the arts.
And, I say if they want to promote the arts in this country, put the money into arts programs in schools. Not in appointing a useless vanity position like Minister of the Arts.
What a lame idea. If Obama falls for this, as I’m sure he will, all it will mean is another level of bureaucrats telling Americans what to do and how to do it. Even worse, it will end up costing hard-working taxpayers millions but will show nothing.
But this is the least of what we are in for, I fear.
Well, considering the inauguration’s in a week and they hardly have anyone signed up to perform, I think what they really need is a competent secretary.
I agree with Jen. A Secretary of the Arts is a terrible idea.
No matter who was appointed to such a position, do we really want to subject the freedom of expression to one person’s ideology? I’m thinking not so much.
The history of the NEA is frought with censorship of government funded art. Of course, the government can say exactly how the money is spent, as soon as we hand over our tax dollars to let them. That’s how it goes. I’d rather keep that money and spend it on shows I like, like the burlesque show I’m seeing tomorrow. I’m doubtful burlesque qualifies as “real” art. But I think it should – and therein lies the kind of debates that would go on once we give up control of funding for the arts.
It would be the first step towards placing a value on the arts and maybe, treating them as they ought to be. Sign the petition!
Would an Arts Czar be able to prevent crappy TV from polluting our airwaves? If so, bring him/her on! Pack your shit and go Jimmy Kimmel, there’s a new sheriff in town!
Is he insane? Do you really want the government to have any more control than it already does?
Here is a little trick to decide if you are giving the government too much power.
If you are on the right. Would you want Hillary or Bill Cliinton to have this power.
If you are on the left. Would you want Bush or Reagan to have had this power?
Keep the government out.
I agree with Jen.
It would be a grand idea if America actually practiced “live and let live,” the idea on which the country was founded.
Instead (by and large) what will happen is that it’ll be turned into another arena for the so-called culture wars, and generate enough Supreme Court cases to fill a history book.
Our culturally rich nation needs a secretary of the Arts & Culture BADLY. This is LONGGGG overdue. Hurrah Quincy Jones!
Anything creative is the first thing to get the chop in schools, both private and public. Heaven forbid the local high school lose their water polo team. They just recently announced TV networks no longer have to support local public programming, which is about the only “arts” programming left on television, paid or otherwise.
There’s no point in having a government position for something that has no government support. You may as well appoint a Secretary of Common Sense.
I’m a Canadian and I’ve seen government arts funding at work and I can say that a Ministry of Arts is a double edged sword.
While the idea of public arts funding is nice, there are problems. Government financed arts programs create elite cliques who dominate the funding bodies, and funnel the funding to their friends and pet projects.
This greatly narrows who succeeds in the art scene from those with the talent, originality, and drive to win an audience to those who are connected to the ruling political party regardless of quality or appeal.
Then there’s the questions over the “censorship” issue. Should the state support art that no one else will support for fear of being accused of censorship?
Is it even censorship to not pay for something you don’t want, or is it editing as Tom Stoppard once asked? Because those who don’t get the funding will be screaming censorship at the top of their lungs.
It’s a lot trickier issue than you think.
When you can turn on an FM radio station at 10:00 in the morning and hear people carrying on graphic conversations about what it’s like to have sex with uncircumcised men or about being sexually attracted to animals, the notion that “all this country is about is censoring” strikes me as incredibly wide of the mark.
The very fact that you can criticize your government without fear of reprisal is a nearly unique circumstance in the long history of the human race. Count your blessings.
Oh god, there you go again.
If you gotta, then for Christ’s sake get David Geffen. He’s not doing anything now.
WhatEVER you do, DON’T GET OVIT or EISNER.
Sheeze, Nikki, it’s all about the lesser of evils, and besides, we don’t need no bloody, wonking, “czar.”
We have the 6 assholes who run the studios . . . isn’t that damage enough??? Imagine Peter (Turkey-King) Chernin as the FILM CZAR?? Who wouldn’t want to throw-up at the thought?
Now let’s get back back to talking about something REAL, like saving the US economy and getting jobs for the several million poor souls out there…or dealing with SAG West VS SAG East, or the life-or-death situation of WATCHMEN.
Now more than ever, we need the arts?
Is he out of his mind?
Now more than ever we need an economy, jobs, an infrastructure, credit, a stable housing market, and a state and federal government that isn’t heading to bankruptcy.
Art… shssshhhh…. what an idiot.
Perhaps Mr. Jones might familiarize himself w/ the National Endowment for the Arts ( nea.gov ) from which he can apply for a grant here ( nea.gov/Grants/apply ), or the National Endowment for the Humanities ( neh.gov ), or even the public/private partnership that is the Kennedy Center ( http://www.kennedy-center.org/ ).
The government should have as little to do with the arts as possible. I know most artists tend to be liberal and that philosophy likes to have government involved. But listen to your inner libertarian. Once you have the government involved, you have the government having influence. And they can be hard task-master. Want to do something controversial or unpopular? Shouldn’t expect that on the taxpayer’s dime. We live in a wonderful country. You can make your own way. Get support that way.
And then the war over what is art and what isn’t art will follow and still nothing will be accomplished.
I supposed you could call the US Poet Laureate the equivalent.
What a stupendously stupid idea!
Just think what would such a department push for if it were a Republican administration?
Everything would be blander than “7th Heaven”
Those are the people that insist the government would screw up the healthcare system in this country, even though the G currently runs the two biggest health systems around. [The VA & the military medical systems]
And what would the Democrats do?
The Multicultural Channels, all 993 of them!