The reason, according to today’s unexpected announcement (made while I was gone for the afternoon), is because the MPTF’s acute care hospital and long term care nursing home are losing $10 million a year. ”This shortfall is expected to widen significantly in coming years. The problem is that the vast majority of hospital and LTC patients are covered by government insurance programs whose reimbursement rates have not kept pace with fast-rising operating costs. MPTF has been making up the shortfall by dipping into its investment reserves. Based on current projections, continuing to subsidize the hospital and LTC facility would likely exhaust available reserves within five years.” About 100 retirees currently live in the MPTF home in Woodland Hills with what I know to be a waiting list. (Everyone I talk to always says there are not enough MPTF health care facilities, not too many!) Yet the MPTF’s press release claims that the closures come because of “declining demand” and that MPTF’s acute-care hospital “for the past few years has rarely been called upon to care for more than ten patients at any one time”. It says these closure decisions are the “result of more than three years of study and analysis by MPTF staff and outside experts”.
So much for the Motion Picture & Television Fund’s promise of “unwavering commitment” to the entertainment industry, and vice versa. This is a huge story with major ramifications for everyone who considered the Motion Picture And Television Fund facilities as their safety net in times of sickness and old age. What else might be closed next? I find it hard to believe that, with all the enormous wealth in the Hollywood, the community couldn’t look after its own better than this. “MPTF is initiating these changes because it’s the right thing to do, but the fact is that we have no choice,” Jeffrey Katzenberg, chairman of the MPTF Foundation Board, said in the statement. “Although we are in good shape today, the acute-care hospital and long-term care facility are generating operating deficits that could bankrupt MPTF in a very few years.” C’mon, there are fundraisers all the time, including that big-ticket Saturday “Night Before” the Oscars party hosted by Katzenberg himself. For crissakes, the old Motion Picture Relief Fund was founded back in 1921 by Hollywood luminaries Mary Pickford, Charlie Chaplin, Douglas Fairbanks and D.W. Griffith to help people in the entertainment industry who fell on hard times. How can this be happening now? I am really sick about this, just sick.
As a result of the planned phase-outs, the 100 patients currently residing in the long-term care facility on MPTF’s Wasserman campus in Woodland Hills will be “relocated over the course of 2009 to selected nursing homes in and around Los Angeles. Every patient will be evaluated individually and matched to the most appropriate facility in the area for their particular needs and family situation. The first transfers will not begin for at least 60 days, unless a patient specifically requests to be moved sooner.” MPTF’s acute-care hospital, begun in the 1940s, will continue to operate until late 2009. Thereafter, acute-care patients will receive their care at hospitals near MPTF’s Woodland Hills campus. The statement said the phase-out of the hospital and LTC unit will not affect the approximately 185 residents of MPTF’s independent- and assisted-living facilities (including the Country House, the Fran & Ray Stark Villas, and the Frances Goldwyn Lodge). MPTF’s six area health centers, which serve some 60,000 industry workers and their families, will be similarly unaffected. The Fund also intends to continue operating its Harry’s Haven memory care facility.
Dr. David Tillman, MPTF’s president and chief executive, said the impending closure “reflects some sobering economic realities that are affecting healthcare institutions nationwide.” To try to limit the problem of phasing out its hospital and nursing home operations, MPTF said today it will expand its community-based efforts. These efforts include the creation of “teams” to deliver services to retirees at their homes or care facilities. “Our emphasis on community-based care reflects the growing desire of today’s active seniors to live as independently as possible for as long as possible,” Tillman said. Nice try, guys, to put the best face on a bad situation. Here is the announcement which shamefully tries to sugar-coat things:
MOTION PICTURE & TELEVISION FUND TO PUT NEW EMPHASIS ON COMMUNITY-BASED CARE FOR SENIORS
Declining Demand and Challenging Economic Outlook Force Decision To Phase Out Acute-Care Hospital and Long-Term Care Unit
WOODLAND HILLS, CA – January 14, 2009 – The Motion Picture & Television Fund (MPTF), the entertainment industry’s premier health and social services charity, announced today a major realignment of resources under which the Fund’s acute-care hospital and long-term care (LTC) facility will be phased out in favor of community-based programs aimed at assisting the growing number of seniors who prefer to “age in place”—that is, live safely and independently in their own homes for as long as possible.
As part of this realignment, MPTF will be expanding its existing community-based efforts by establishing a network of Community Care Teams that will bring a variety of medical and social services to entertainment industry retirees—whether they live in their own homes, in retirement communities, or in long-term care facilities. At the same time, MPTF will be making plans to modernize and improve its independent- and assisted-living residential facilities.
Driven by the changing needs of the population MPTF serves — as well as an increasingly dire economic outlook — the decision to concentrate on community-based care is the result of more than three years of study and analysis by MPTF staff and outside experts.
“The world is changing and MPTF has been changing with it,” said Frank G. Mancuso, chairman of the MPTF Corporate Board. “For nearly 90 years, we have embodied Hollywood’s unique commitment to taking care of its own. Focusing on a community-based approach will allow us to continue honoring this commitment for another 90 years.”
“Our new emphasis on community-based care reflects the growing desire of today’s active seniors to live as independently as possible for as long as possible,” said David Tillman, M.D., president and CEO of MPTF. “It also reflects some sobering economic realities that are affecting healthcare institutions nationwide. With costs skyrocketing and government reimbursement declining, operating our own acute-care hospital and long-term care facility is draining our resources at an alarming rate. The good news is that by emphasizing a community-based approach to senior care, MPTF will not only be able to stay on a solid financial footing, it will also be able to assist many more retirees than we do now—thousands rather than hundreds.”
“MPTF is initiating these changes because it’s the right thing to do, but the fact is that we have no choice,” added Jeffrey Katzenberg, chairman of the MPTF Foundation Board. “Although we are in good shape today, the acute-care hospital and long-term care facility are generating operating deficits that could bankrupt MPTF in a very few years. The entertainment community depends on MPTF for a wide range of social and medical services—everything from healthcare to emergency financial assistance to childcare and family counseling—and if MPTF doesn’t do something now, pretty soon it won’t be able to do anything.”
“These changes will safeguard MPTF’s ability to continue meeting our community’s medical and social service needs for decades to come,” said Casey Wasserman, chairman of the Wasserman Foundation, one of MPTF’s biggest benefactors. “MPTF’s willingness to confront these challenging issues head on—and its ability to come up with creative solutions—makes it more deserving than ever of our support.” Wasserman emphasized that this view is shared by his grandmother, current MPTF Board Trustee Edie Wasserman, who along with her late husband Lew Wasserman has long been one of the organization’s most passionate and dedicated supporters.
MPTF’s new emphasis on community-based care will build on existing efforts such as its Elder Connection program and Center for Aging, which provide social, financial, and healthcare services for industry seniors who want to remain in their own homes. The centerpiece will be a new network of Community Care Teams, consisting of MPTF doctors, nurses, and social workers who will reach out to Fund-eligible seniors in Southern California, whether they are in their own homes, in retirement communities, or in outside nursing homes, to ensure they are getting the support they need.
As a result of the planned phase-outs, approximately 100 patients currently residing in the long-term care facility on MPTF’s Wasserman campus in Woodland Hills will be relocated over the course of 2009 to selected nursing homes in and around Los Angeles. Every patient will be evaluated individually and matched to the most appropriate facility in the area for their particular needs and family situation. The first transfers will not begin for at least 60 days, unless a patient specifically requests to be moved sooner.
“Closing our long-term care facility does not alter MPTF’s historical commitment to industry veterans and their families,” Dr. Tillman said. “We’ll still be there for our people to make sure they get the care they need and deserve. We will work closely with all our current patients and their families to ensure a safe and successful transition for everyone. Once they are relocated, our Community Care Teams will visit them regularly. We will offer the same service to all Fund-eligible patients who might need long-term care in the future.”
MPTF’s acute-care hospital, which for the past few years has rarely been called upon to care for more than ten patients at any one time, will continue to operate until late 2009. Thereafter, acute-care patients will receive their care at hospitals near MPTF’s Woodland Hills campus.
The phase-out of the hospital and LTC unit will not affect the approximately 185 residents of MPTF’s independent- and assisted-living facilities (including the Country House, the Fran & Ray Stark Villas, and the Frances Goldwyn Lodge). MPTF’s six area health centers, which serve some 60,000 industry workers and their families, will be similarly unaffected. The Fund also intends to continue operating its Harry’s Haven memory care facility.
As a result of the hospital and LTC facility phase-outs, some 290 jobs will be eliminated over the course of the year. This represents roughly a third of all MPTF’s hourly workers and a third of its managerial staff. MPTF will provide out-placement counseling and host job fairs in an effort to help all the displaced workers find new employment.
The hospital and long-term care facility currently generate an operating deficit of $10 million a year. This shortfall is expected to widen significantly in coming years. The problem is that the vast majority of hospital and LTC patients are covered by government insurance programs whose reimbursement rates have not kept pace with fast-rising operating costs.
MPTF has been making up the shortfall by dipping into its investment reserves. Based on current projections, continuing to subsidize the hospital and LTC facility would likely exhaust available reserves within five years.
The non-profit Motion Picture & Television Fund, headquartered in Woodland Hills, was founded in 1921 to provide relief for those in the film industry who had fallen on hard times. Today, 88 years later, MPTF is a major service provider supporting the health and well being of the entertainment community. Healthcare, childcare, retirement living and social/charitable services are offered with compassion and respect for the dignity of the whole person. Care is offered through six outpatient health centers, charitable financial assistance and community outreach programs, a full-scale retirement community. and a children’s day care center.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.







And people say that Hollywood has no soul…..
I am one of the over 300 employees who will be losing their job. All of us who work there are like a family and treat our patients as a part of that family.Besides kicking people out of their home,many people use the hospital versus other local hospitals because of nursing care they receive from us!This is a very sad day.Please voice protests to people that count.At least let them know how devastating this is for the people who were counting on MPTV.
I am sorry to hear that you will loose your job. you all need to fight to keep this place open. all these biggies that make 20 million a picture, please give me a break. hollywood is going to have a bad rep if something isnt done. all the big money and they cant even take care of there own, thats sad and pathetic. all the big wig stars and huge homes and luxury cars, etc….but they cant even take care of there own and make sure that the place stays open and high quality care, how sad……that just goes to show you that hollywood only cares about the money that goes into there pockets…
Fess up — how many of us have ever personally donated to the MPTF? I can raise my hand (and no, I didn’t attend a fundraiser to do so).
Maybe instead of “flooding” MPTF with emails demanding that “someone” do “something,” what if every one of us donates $100 to keep the facility afloat? I’ve read that there are 200K of us here in LA. Do the math — we could cover the shortfall. If others are able, and want, to give more, blessings/karma to them. But why is it only “their” responsibility, never ours?
To answer a couple of posters, it’s not unimaginable for MPTF to be losing $10M per year: In 2003 we paid $92K/year for longterm care. IF your pension is $2K/month (25 years @2K hours per), and IF your social security is also $2K/month, we’re looking at MPTF having a $7M/year deficit for 160 patients. That $3M difference is ever so suspicious, or maybe: health care costs have increased since 2003, it’s a great facility, their patients’ pensions and social security don’t average $4K/month.
So I’m just saying, don’t assume this closure is directly related to Katzenberg’s investments or the 400 hours issue. Maybe it really is about dollars and cents, level of care, and how much each of us is willing to contribute (aside from words) for a colleague’s care …
Who are the “We” in “We Take Care Of Our Own?”
I’ve heard the SAG Foundation isn’t even sure it can continue helping struggling performers. The need for help is far outstripping contributions. Look into it Nikki… I hope you find out my info is wrong.
For a Board staffed with industry “titans” obsessed with “image” who spend hundreds of millions every year to promote and advertise themselves and this industry, it is incomprehensible that they would spring this on everyone in so callous a manner. Where is the leadership? What did 3 years of “study” address? Did they consider structural changes in the way they operate short of tossing out 100 lost souls? Could they not have decided to phase out the operation by not accepting new patients but caring for those who are at the Fund until their end comes thereby avoiding a “perpetual” 10 million annual “loss”.? (That, of course, begs the issue of “caring for our own”. ) What about a “special appeal” to the industry at large to save these hundred folks? What about examining other areas of the Fund’s operations. Was there one scintilla of humanity factored into what appears to be a callous business decision that any freshman business school major could have made? Don’t let this happen!!!
This is absolutely outrageous! Most people in Hollywood DO NOT make it big. That hospital is their safety net. The end of a line for little people who give it all so the “fat cats” can make the big bucks.
This is so wrong on so many levels. Now this is something SAG MUST do something about. I would even hope they would shut down the town over this one.
I suspect there is MORE at play here. As soon as they shut down the hospital they will probably sell the acreage for a wonderful price, so these “philanthropists” no longer have to help out the “fund.”
I know what you’re up to Katzenberg and friends. Gawd, you people are so transparent. You’re going to sell it. Save the fund. Put the people into someone else’s facility.
Yeah, right move if you don’t give a damn.
I can only hope this is a tactic to get the community outraged enough to rally in support of the hospital. A big Fund Raiser Is a great idea. It could be televised and bring together our greatest talents. A major campaign could also help pull our community together.
In the early days of the MPTF it was the norm to automatically donate a small percentage of your weekly pay check to the fund. It was those small amounts from grips, editors, prop makers, etc that came in on a regular basis that funded the hospital etc. The practice was all but gone by the mid 1970′s. The leadership of the MPTF dropped the ball and failed to reach out to the new generation of film school educated directors, writers,and support personal. I can only hope and pray your passionate writing will motivate people. I also don’t think name calling and attacks on people who have been very generous in the past is helpful.
My mother is a resident in this fantastic facility and I know she, along with the other residents will be devastated. BUT, please everyone this is a difficult decision for those who run the home. Be kind. It is because of the government not paying their bills on time. Don’t throw these hard working, wonderful people under the bus. Find a way to help.
dude, there is absolutely no reason why they have to shut down a facility because of funding. I dont see nursing homes in my town in florida being shut down due to funds. jeffrey katzenbery needs to be thrown under a bus. with all the big wig money that comes into that town, donations cant help? these stars makes 20 million a pic and cant give some for the place? sorry, no sympathy. our govet is not good, but hollywood SHOULD take care of there own and they arent and its really really sad. they should be imbarrased by this, I know I would be. thnik about it
The MPTF is one of the finest and most dependable organizations we have in Los Angeles, without question. When I heard this, my heart sank, but I was not willing to cast blame on anything but the economy. This hits close to home for it is our community, and we have always felt that our sense of “community” in the entertainment industry is more intimate than many other businesses. True enough. But just as other businesses rise and fall with the vagaries of the economy, so does ours. Our views of ourselves can sometimes be quite insular. Both a blessing and a curse. A blessing because we treasure a sense of belonging; a curse, because forget we live in the larger world.
I firmly believe that help will surface within the industry, but that help is subject to the sea change in our economy which does not play favorites. Like dread diseases, it is mindless and it doesn’t discriminate. Everyone gets hit. Sometimes it takes a car crash to draw spectators to the scene. This is a car crash.
I have a problem with the postings I see conveniently blaming the intentions and motivations of “names” in the business. In fact, I have a problem with “blame.” It’s sophomoric and an easy out for not looking at complexity. Well, we are now involved in complexity with a capital “-plex-”
It’s right to be troubled and alarmed that such a thing could happen in an industry so dedicated to taking care of one’s own, but it’s pointless and self-serving to make uninformed charges.
My hope is that our fellow actors, producers, our union members of every stripe will be charged with the challenge to step forward in personal ways. After all, we are finally, FINALLY, with this new administration, entering a time when “service” and “caring” become honorable traits; praiseworthy and laudable, not something relegated to the Boy Scouts. I feel it’s possible that these principles will become meaningful in tangible ways. After all, we are all finally, in a really truly SAME boat.
Let’s just see what happens. C
I worked on a documentary at the home 10 or more years ago. One of the residents we met was the woman that got half a grapefruit shoved in her face by James Cagney. The Country Home itself is the nicest such facility I’ve ever seen, but unless it’s expanded there’ll be no room for the baby boomers.
There’s a couple of things missing in the press release. One is: how much assets did the fund lose in the panic, and is that the cause for all this? Our health fund lost 20%, but how they got off that light is beyond me. Also, they seemed to dance around the subject of whether they would pull the financial plug on existing patients who are evicted.
Other doctors and other hospitals take Medicare. What’s the fund’s problem with it? And if the U.S. can’t scrape up enough dough to fund Medicare, how could they possibly find the funds to give health care to all 304 million Americans? Maybe Obama should get Raul on the horn and order up a couple thousand Cuban doctors
And now that we see the direction things are taking we can only wonder what service of the fund will be cut next.
I’m sorry for the 290 layoffs. With people losing their health insurance and rising costs, they’re likely to have a hard time finding a similar job.
As a member of Local 700, I’d be willing to throw in $10/check to help support something like this. I’m just surprised it all came down to this so quickly– why wasn’t this brought up earlier when you could really DO something about this ahead of time? Instead, it feels like a fait accompli– and as such, smells fishy.
How sad is this? Millions spent on getting people elected to office but nothing can be spared for such a worthy cause as this? Banks and the auto industry are getting a bailout–why not here? Hollywood does not honor their own at all.
Having volunteered at the motion picture hospital throughout high school only to later be in the film business myself, this news is very, very sad. Is nothing sacred anymore in Hollywood?
Has the cult of efficiency in America really come to the point where we’re basically sending our elderly out on the modern equivalent of ice floes to die?
This is the first I’m hearing of this.
There are some unsung Hollywood legends in the Motion Picture Hospital who deserve better. Frankly, many of the patients will simply wind up in vastly downgraded facilities due to this decision.
I am surprised by the magnitude of the shortfall.
The only upside is the supposed promise of redistributing resources to community care – because even as comparatively great the MPTF facility is, its still a nursing home, and you don’t want to wind up there versus some sort of workable at home solution – if possible.
Frankly, and this is from someone who worked with the patients, those who are going to be most affected by this move will be those too far gone to completely understand what is happening – which is sad because its likely particularly dramatic on a late stage Alzheimer’s patients who don’t do well with change.
One reason given was a cut in state funding, but why the rush to close? There is strong support for including an increase in the federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP) in any upcoming economic stimulus package. Raising the FMAP would increase Medicaid funding to CA, which is threatening to cut Medi-Cal to make up for budget shortfalls.
Another reason was rising costs even though costs are falling around us daily, so why not renegotiate contracts, or look for alternative vendors?
Removing the most at-risk residents from their MPTF home and eliminating the long term program altogether seem like a last resort after all else fails. Where was the major fund raising campaign? Where was the cry for help? Nowhere.
Instead of attempting a viable solution, there is an abrupt disruption of lives, many more lives than the 100 stated. Why?
Let’s act now to stop this misdeed in its tracks and re-pledge to the commitment of taking care of our own.
Sad, but true..
I wish most ‘groups’ really ran their own retirement. India has group homes, for the infirmed/elderly…
My great-grandfather, silent film pioneer, Stanner E.V. Taylor and his wife, actress, Marion Leonard were among the first residents of the MPCH in 1941. Stanner wrote and Marion starred in the first film to be shot in Hollywood, D.W. Griffith’s “In Old California”.
They worked in NY and LA with D.W. Griffith, Mary Pickford and Lilian Gish and other early pioneers, forming their own production company and enjoying relative success. But like so many others they did not survive the transition to talkies and fell on hard times. The MPCH was a life-line to them and they spent the remainder of their lives there until 1948 and 1956 respectively.
It has always been a special place for me. This is very sad.
Rumor has it that it’s really all about the property’s valuable real estate potential! so sad…I have good memories visiting folks there…so lovely, with nice grounds…the only complaint I ever heard was the noise from motorcycles on Sundays.
Hollywood has never been a community that takes care of its own – it has always been a group of people who on a little luck and too much money make a career of taking care of #1. Look to the writers strike – how many writers who may be had some success 5, 10, 20 yrs ago and have been out of work too long, and never got a call or tossed a bone from a successful friend after they worked their butts off ‘on the line’? How many below the liners live in continuous fear that they will be thrown out on their ear because the “talent” decides to strike? How many struggling I-know-the-face actors either the ones on the upswing or the ones on the downturn ever get a helping hand by someone who got luckier?
Stars will throw millions at Obama, at their plastic surgeons, at their publicists, at their wedding planners for marriages that last a year or two but they ignore the down and out right under their noses.
Really makes me hope Mickey Rourke wins the Oscar – what it means to hit the skids in Hollywood needs a posterboy.
As a volunteer at the MPTF facility, I’m devastated. I spend time with people that processed the film, lit the stages, applied the pancake, played in the band. But that was then. Now, in old age, their commodities are dignity and time. The MPTF has been a godsend in providing comfort, respect, and attentive medical care.
I am gladdened by the sense of alarm that has been raised, but please don’t misdirect it at Messrs. Katzenberg, Spielberg, et al. They have taken a visible lead in supporting the MPTF. But they are not at fault for the ballooning cost of health care vis-à-vis a finite endowment. As we sometimes say on set, “all it takes is money”. We must seek greater contributions from our guilds, studios, vendors, distributors, exhibitors. If you are employed by this industry, there is a place for you (and your loved ones) at the MPTF….I mean there WAS a place for you. I’m an AD and I’ll be getting in touch with the DGA today. Who will you call?
please spare me, dont make excuses for hollywwod. they need to do something. I have lost all respect for hollywood if they dont save the home. rising health cost? well, I live in central florida and I never heard of any homes closing down due to the lack of money and hollywood has money. they are selfish and dont want to take care of there own.
Alright, so what do we do? Who can reverse this? How?
If anyone believes Jeffery “I never heard of Bernie Madoff” Katzenberg’s weak excuse for these closings, then they’re insane! I, along with thousands of others, have been voluntarily contributing automatically through our paychecks to this fund for many-many years…since 1960 myself. Who the hell put this little fox in our hen house! Immediately file for a complete and thorough audit of the books (both sets) and investigate the investment directions of the Chairman and the Board immediately and let the chips fall where they may!
This doesn’t look right. There’s no talk of closing some programs to keep others running. Just “it’s closing”, all of it. I’m disappointed and disturbed. This facility was one of the things that made me proud to be a member of the film community. All the people who are wealthy enough to pay for their own elder care are successful thanks to the work of the people who need this nursing home and services now or in the future. All those with money, knowledge, connections and resources to help this facility better keep that in mind.
So what are they going to do with the patients already there? Throw them out on the street like the cats and dogs that were given as Christmas gifts now that brat kids have tired of them?
In a perfect world, this whole fiasco would be deducted from SAG’s fees. Of course, that’ll never happen.
Yeah but if you do donate money to this, how are you going to know for sure that they money is going where it should? That’s the problem with this as well as most charities. There is no shortage of people “in charge” who grab the money the moment it comes it so it never gets to where it should. Someone said Jodie Foster just donated a fortune to them. Where’s that money? Someone needs to open the books and see WHERE the money went (and I seriously doubt it went to the patients). This is beyond disgusting. Meanwhile, Obama is spending a whopping $150 million on his porta-potty laden inauguration party in a few days.
What a bunch of Hollywood phonies.
“We take care of our own” what a bunch
of bull crap. That used to be the motto.
Maybe we should have another fund raiser
for Obama for president or prop 8 or
global warming or some such elitess
agenda. I’ll be happy to donate to a
“hollywood sucks” fund raiser.
Maybe we should have another awards show
so we can gawk and plaster our pathetic
pusses up on TV and tell everyone how
beautiful creative and caring we are.
Meanwhile we kick the people who are in
the worst shape and who have put there
all into this business out on the street
after being promised for years that we
had a safety net with the motion picture
hospital. I now hate to mention I’m at all
involved in this life sucking industry.
Great business if you’re one of the elite
at the top.
How shameless! What hypocrites
they need to look in the mirror. I don’t know
how they can live with themselves. I hope
they reap what they sow.