
Until this week, the only official disclosure from corporate raider/shareholder activist Carl Icahn
has been that he’s buying up Lionsgate stock because it’s “undervalued”. But that all changed on Monday. It’s not just that Icahn (not pictured above) purchased still more Lionsgate stock so that he now has 16,540,849 shares, representing approximately 14.28% of the mini-major. It’s that he amended his schedule 13D SEC filing, which is a statement any person owning 5% or more of a publicly traded company must make for certain disclosure reasons, like when their intentions change. Added Icahn:
Item 4. Purpose of Transaction
Item 4 of the Initial 13D is hereby amended to add the following: The Reporting Persons may seek to add nominees designated by the Reporting Persons to the Issuer’s board of directors (the “Board”), which could include expanding the size of the Board and/or removing individuals from the Board. The Reporting persons may take any such action at the Issuer’s next annual meeting of shareholders or at a special meeting which the Reporting Persons may call.
What this means is that Icahn may seek to add his nominees to Lionsgate’s board of directors and/or potentially remove existing members. This is a declaration he intends to change the way that the company is run.
In addition, Icahn purchased about $1,000,000 of Lionsgate debt which is likely trading at a significant discount to par value (100%) because of 1) low interest rates, 2) the sharp decline in the share price, 3) the decrease in cash on the balance sheet, and 4) the assumption that debt will increase with Lionsgate’s purchase of the TV Guide Network and TV Guide Online properties. In fact, Lionsgate repurchased about $6,000,000 of its debt on the market last quarter for 60 cents on the dollar.
“This is significant because I don’t see any reason for Icahn to purchase the debt in LGF other than to really make a move on this company,” one of my sources tells me. “If the company is sold, the debt has a covenant that forces any potential purchase to pay 101 cents for every 100 cents of debt. If he purchased the debt for 60 cents, he can make a quick 41 cents, or 66%, on his purchase. In the alternative, if he takes over the company himself, he can retire the debt he owns for 60 cents on the dollar, making the acquisition that much cheaper.”
- Carl Icahn Ups Stake in Lionsgate To 13%
- Carl Icahn Increases Stake Still More In Lionsgate; What It Means…
- Carl Icahn May Be Amassing Bigger Stake In Lionsgate Than Most People Realize
- Icahn Ups Lionsgate Stake; Stock In Freefall After Lousy Quarter
- Michael Burns Loses 1/2 Lionsgate Stake
- Carl Icahn Takes 9% Stake In Lionsgate
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


That is a horrifying picture with the lion and the hunter. Any other options?
I drew my breath in when I opened onto your page today , Nikki, and saw that you chose That photo – a hunted/killed lion with a grinning gun holder – to illustrate your article.
It struck a chord – and not to get too heavy on you, there are many species of animals that are endangered, many that are killed for
‘sport ‘.
It is a huge issue which really does define our humanity.
If we kill we should be fully aware of what goes into all aspects of that act, unflinching : that may be extremely difficult when one views raw footage of ‘hunts’; trapping; the animal farms – food, fur, puppy mills – and the slaughterhouses.
We need to educate ourselves and become fully, consciously aware of the consequences of our choices – and Then choose. We are responsable – individually, collectively.
There is a quote that I was told once, attributed to Albert Einstein :
” No other thing ensures the survival of the human race on Planet Earth
more than the natural progression to a vegetarian diet.”
I myself am not fully there – yet. But increasing my awareness in the harsh realities of some of my choices, unfiltered, has changed me.
So when I saw the photo you chose to illustrate Lionsgate, my reaction
was one of discomfort .
Anyone know how he wants the company run? Am I crazy or is Lionsgate one of the few sound companies in town? Hello, Tyler Perry. Hello, Saw. Hello, Weeds. Hello, Mad Men. Hello, cheap horror movies. Hello, profit.
What am I missing?
Icahn has two possible courses of action.
He could split up the company, selling off assets for a quick buck. But with the market the way it is and investors wary of getting involved with Hollywood it might be all that great a deal.
Or…
He could put his own people in charge and restructure the company as a viable media company following his tenets of shareholder responsibility…etc…
That too holds some more up front risk than option, but it also holds the potential for greater reward. Especially if he makes Lionsgate the place for film-finance investors to work with.
WTF, did he kill that lion in the top photo?
That’s not cool.
Okay, I just want to know who shot the lion? Is that Icahn in chubbier days or someone else, because I would love to have the opportunity to spit in their face someday.
Oh gawd, Nikki, I LOVE that photo of the hunter with the glee in his expression! How true!
I wish the cat would have eaten him.
Glad someone thinks it’s time to invest in an entertainment group stock.
Yes, it’s a disturbing, horrible photo…IT’S MEANT TO BE! The idea is that Icahn is a coldblooded hunter in the business world. You’re not supposed to admire the picture! Sheesh!
What a horrible photo of the lion! Jeez…have some fucking taste, Fink!
Lions kill other animals for food, people shoot animals for sport. i agree the photo is shocking. but i can’t even watch animal planet when a lion is chasing a poor water buffalo or zebra…i guess what goes around comes around.
It’s not Icahn in the photo with the lion. Sheesh.
It’s Henry Kravis. (j/k)
Lions hunt for food and survival. It’s not a comeuppance to get shot by a hunter, it’s fucking bullshit.
Shock journalism is not journalism, for us who are animal activists we don’t appreciate using horrific images like the one you used to compare entertainment business to hunting defenseless animals.
Please, next time, a warning. I came here to get Hollywood news, not to see a dead lion.
That hunter makes me sick, oh sure big man shooting a lion from 100 yards or more away. Look at the huge scope on his rifle, makes me sick.
In reply to “youdouche”, I’m vegan, I don’t eat any animals or wear animal products. How do you justify the daily inhumane slaughter of chickens, sheep and cows for human consumption, not to mention the environmental impact it causes. I find the picture extremely shocking but also hypocritical of those who can’t look at that picture but eat meat. Take a stroll to your nearest animal slaughter facility and see how they kill innocent animals, instead of conveniently avoiding the killing process by buying meat wrapped in plastic at your local grocery store.