
Ostensibly, it’s in honor of Vanity Fair editor Graydon Carter. (Even though Barry’s IAC is wasting money backing Tina Brown’s sagging website.) So Hollywood was wondering if Barry Diller’s annual luncheon sur l’herbe at his Beverly Hills mansion on the Saturday afternoon before the Oscars was back on this year. I can tell you it is, after a one-year hiatus because of the writers strike, and the invitations are going out now. Sure, it’s the ultimate mogul meet’n'greet. But Barry’s luncheon sur l’herbe is also where has-been celebs find refuge. Because the really hot stars will be at Film Independent’s Spirit Awards.






the pic on the right looks just like Jon Lovitz. Uncanny.
Here are some Diller quotes Barry might want to repeat at this little luncheon:
Hollywood: “Margins used to be very good in the movie business. They’re now, what, 4, 5 percent in a decent year, so where’s the joy in that? Is there really a joy in ‘Superman 17? or “Iron Man 2??”
Movie studio executives: “‘Mogul’ is yesterday. It just doesn’t apply. You use the word ‘mogul’ and what you do is conjure up the fantasy, the memory of when there were actual movie moguls who made their decisions, believed in what they did, were outsized personalities. There’s no outsized personalities in the movie business anymore.”
“The idea of a company that’s earning money, not losing money, that’s not, let’s say ‘industrially endangered,’ to have just cutbacks so they can earn another $12 million or $20 million or $40 million in a year where no one’s counting is really a horrible act when you think about it on every level. First of all, it’s certainly not necessary. It’s doing it at the worst time. It’s throwing people out to a larger, what is inevitably a larger unemployment heap for frankly no good reason.”
“It’s not that you don’t want to earn as much money as you can — it is your obligation, of course — but companies have obligations beyond that and they certainly have obligations beyond that at certain times, in the times in which they operate. And they also certainly ought to know that meeting and beating expectations is probably yesterday’s game and it will be increasingly so, which would be by the way very healthy for companies. Running a company that meets and beats expectations, and that runs their company accordingly, are companies that I would question why anyone would invest in.”
“It’s incredibly, shockingly stupid if you’re going, when you think about it. On that count alone I wouldn’t give them any money. And not because of any reason other than why would I give money to someone so dumb to go to Washington to ask for money and fly in a Gulfstream. You’d say, ‘You’re not qualified. Unless you leave, I’m not giving you money.’”
And I’m still waiting for my invitation. I’ll bring the potato salad.