Under the newly negotiated terms contained in the bipartisan plan to close the state’s $42 billion revenue shortfall, film companies would get tax breaks totaling $100 million annually to keep their productions in California even though funding for schools, colleges, and public transportation would be cut back. As you know, everyone in Hollywood from Iron Man director John Favreau to studio heads who donated heavily to his reelection campaign have been personally lobbying Arnold Schwarzenegger to keep his promise to the entertainment biz and find financial incentives. But for a long time, the state legislature has opposed showbiz tax breaks, and The Governator has backed down each time. The proposed California measure differs from previous tax credits in that it does not address above the line personnel but doesn’t go into effect until 2011. Let’s see if it passes.
Votes in the Assembly and state Senate are planned as soon as Friday. It is unclear whether the required 2/3s of legislators will support the proposal. One problem is that the new budget blueprint, negotiated in secret between Schwarzenegger and legislative leaders, also contains other budget-busting tax breaks for corporations which Republicans fought for and won. These would deprive the state coffers of $690 million annually. There’s an argument raging over whether this creates jobs or not. As a result, it’s uncertain how legislators will view the tax breaks aimed specifically at the entertainment business.
Lobbying for California tax breaks heated up after the ABC hit show Ugly Betty last spring became the first TV series to announce it was leaving Los Angeles after New York passed new 30% tax breaks (and NYC an extra 5%) to lure showbiz productions and 20,000 jobs. And who got the blame? Schwarzenegger, because he has done less than zero to stop runaway production or enact incentives to lure TV shows and films back to California and even Los Angeles. Besides New York, other states like Louisiana and Michigan (where a big full-frills production studio is being built) are offering state tax breaks. No wonder California’s proposal is called the Ugly Betty Production Credit.
But now New York State just announced it has run out of money for its tax credit program for showbiz. That could impact the California legislature’s decision to finally match such programs. Maybe the lawmakers won’t feel the heat as much. As one New York producer just emailed me to say, “It doesn’t matter if California passes the tax break legislation. Because it won’t last. New York went through a 5-year allocation totalling almost half a billion dollars in only 10 months. How long do you think $100 million will last in LA? It won’t save or create jobs. It’s just another present for Big Media, who will get the money first with their existing shows.”
- Arnold Will Ask For Hollywood Tax Breaks
- ‘Iron Man’ Director Lobbies Guvernator To Try Yet Again For Hollywood Tax Breaks
- Unemployed ‘Ugly Betty’ Crew Blame Schwarzenegger For Show’s NY Move
- Petition To NY: Fund Showbiz Tax Breaks
- NY Out Of $$$ For TV/Film Tax Breaks
- Michigan To Open Full Frills Movie Studio
- First Texas, Then… The Real Price Of Film Production Incentives In Some States
- Africa As The New Canada For Filmmaking






Nice try, won’t pass. Too much tax increase for everyone.
Won’t pass..which sucks out loud.
The city needs to make it easier for crews to shoot and obtain permits, needs to do anything to be more production friendly and keep production here.
I like how you singled out the “budget-busting tax breaks for corporations which Republicans fought for and won”, but failed to mention the other tax hikes that we, the average citizens of California will have to pay for: an increase in our sales tax, a 12 cents per gallon gasoline tax, a SURCHARGE on our state income tax, an increase on our vehicle license fees…and so on. All this when we are fighting to pay our mortgages and keep our jobs. What a crappy state we live in.
Couldn’t Agree MORE!! Mis-managed california funds over the last 20 years have led to this demise. The poor have Metro Link and Buses and the rich have limousines. The WORKERS have funded ENOUGH over the last 20 years and received only higher taxes, gas fees, UNaffordable Medical and sloppy excuses. WHY is it ALWAYS the bourden of the working class to subsidize rich and poor?? California is TOO EXPENSIVE…..love the weather, but can’t afford it anymore. As many others, I will be leaving in the next 2 months….but gee, do our elected officals care???
California always like to be first. We used to be the third most heavily taxed state in the country and if this tax bill passes we’ll move into second place. I’m sure we’ll be in first place within a few years. Rich people are leaving Califoria in droves, which means that us little people will have to pick up the slack.
Everyone is against tax breaks for the rich unless the rich happen to be hollywood studios. Sure they employ a lot of people, just like those rich people you want taxed even more. How many people here are employed by poor people?
Give the studios their tax breaks, and give them to regular taxpayers as well. People spend their own money better than governments do.
I’m gainfully employed in the entertainment industry, although 2009 looks a little bumpy. But still, the state needs to look after it’s infrastructure before issuing entertainment industry tax breaks, I’m sorry. And I don’t know who started the urban myth that it’s difficult to shoot or to be permitted in LA but for anyone that actually works in this business they know that’s total BS. NYC may be a little cheaper but not for long… Yes LA & the State need to do what it they can to keep production here, but they also have to attempt to keep everything else above water as well – like education, police & fire protection, etc.
The bottom line is that the studios and independents will shoot where it is CHEAPER. They are building studios in New Mexico and Michigan to accommodate the massive amounts of work that has migrated to those states, lured by tax incentives. Louisiana profits from a great deal of production for the same reason. Those states are only offering tax incentives because they still make a great deal of money that they would not otherwise take in. Ditto for California, yes the tax break would mean a cut in income from existing projects, which should be offset by the reduction of runaway production. More productions paying at the reduced rate and generating an enormous of ancillary tax income for the state. There are other cost savings to consider, such the reduction in unemployment costs,which an increasing number of production employees are forced to turn to as work in town gets slower and slower. Our steel and lumber suppliers along with other vendors were forced to lay off personnel during the writers strike and to adjust to lower levels of local production.
Unfortunately our local media tend to focus on the economic impact to celebrity pet manicurists, caviar sales etc. It is not a handout to big business, it is a lifeline to thousands of middle class production personnel along with more thousands of non-industry working people and small business owners.
It seems likely that the peculiar resentment much of Northern California seems to harbor towards us will probably doom these efforts. It would help if the industry didn’t make such an effort to glamorize itself as decadent and obscenely wealthy. To quote my unemployment case worker in Sacramento “Well Hollywood people don’t want families anyway, people like me who work our eight hours everyday don’t have much sympathy for the Hollywood crowd” She was some what stunned when I explained that we typically work 12-14 hours a day, or even 12-14 hours a night for several months. That we aren’t all out partying with Paris Hilton between multi million dollar paychecks.
It used to be that you just worried about being good enough to get the work that was available. Now there’s just not enough to go around.
RPB- It’s not an urban myth- it’s a fact.
Also, you think production is going to like spending more money using active LAPD, instead of the retired guys? Nothing against active LAPD, but the cost will probably double, the active guys will then, not be dedicated to the production and those guys will be tired from all the overtime…who pays for that?
The cost will not double unionguy. It’s not ideal but you’re going to be facing the same thing in NYC. And everyone talks up these studios in New Mexico, Massachusetts or wherever but, as you know, it’s going to be like working on location. These areas do not and will never have the huge logistical support you have in LA – from caterers, grip house, walkie rentals, costume shops, delivery services, etc, etc. So they make 3-4 films a year in these places, LA is still going to be the home of the TV and film business until California falls into the Pacific.
RPB-
Fair enough, but how do you see the cost of
active police working after doing a “police”
shift, then going to a production location
making overtime, costing the same as retired?
Also, if production climbs to above the rate
we are at now, there is no way active police
could cover production. But this might be
a topic for another time.
Now that CA voters are witnessing the results of the $42B deficit they voted to create….YES!…you all voted to repeal the car tax. Don’t deny it! And DON’T give me the excuse that you didn’t know what you were voting for.
You all enjoyed that extra $200 each year but now you’re moaning about having to shell out a little extra to get rid of the Golem you created? Gimme a break!
That car tax brought in almost $5B each year in revenues. The year it passed we immediately saw a $5B deficit. The next year, a $10B deficit and so on and so on until we now have a $22B deficit that is projected to grow to $42B by the end of 2010.
Next time….watch what you ask for.
taxes4dummies: The problem is not taxes, it’s spending. Reinstating the car tax would cover less than 20% of the projected deficit. The real issue is that California government spending has been increasing at twice the rate of economic growth. That’s a formula for disaster that requires contantly increasing taxes or massive borrowing to keep up with government expenditures.
The California ecnomy will end up in a permanent recession unless government spending is brough under control.