EXCLUSIVE: I'm told that Peter Gabriel just pulled out of performing at the Academy Awards show. In a letter to the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts And Sciences, the co-writer and performer of Wall-E's "Down To Earth" says he doesn't think the nominated songs, and their writers and performers, are getting enough respect during this year's Oscars telecast. That's because the show's producers, Larry Mark and Bill Condon, have reduced the song segment to a medley of the three songs nominated for "achievement in music written for motion pictures (Original Song)" -- "Down to Earth” from WALL-E (Walt Disney), with music by Gabriel and Thomas Newman and lyric by Gabriel; “Jai Ho” from Slumdog Millionaire (Fox Searchlight) with music by A.R. Rahman nd lyric by Gulzar; and “O Saya” from Slumdog Millionaire (Fox Searchlight) with music and lyric by A.R. Rahman and Maya Arulpragasam. I'm told the producers have slotted 90 seconds in the medley for each song sung by its original performer. But Gabriel said in his letter that he was only being offered 65 seconds for his song. "I don't feel that is sufficient time to do the song justice, and I have decided to withdraw from performing," Gabriel informed AMPAS. "I fully respect and look forward to the producers' right to revamp the show. Even though song writers are small players in the filmmmaking process, they are just as committed and work just as hard as the rest of the team, and I regret that this new version of the ceremony is being created in part at their expense." I'm told that the medley is the brainchild of the producers in their attempt to get the Oscar show's running time down to 3 hours -- which, frankly, would be a miracle given that it usually runs more than 4 hours. No word yet on whom the producers will choose to sing in place of Gabriel.
UPDATE: Here is the text of Peter Gabriel's letter:
"I was delighted when "Down to Earth" was nominated for an Oscar. I was also pleased to have been asked to perform the song in the Oscar ceremony. However, in recent discussions with the Producers, it became clear that despite there being only three nominees, only 60-65 seconds was being offered, and that was also in a medley of the three songs. I don't feel that is sufficient time to do the song justice, and have decided to withdraw from performing.
I fully respect and look forward to the Producers' right to revamp the show. Even though song writers are small players in the film making process, they are just as committed and work just as hard as the rest of the team and I regret that this new version of the ceremony is being created, in part, at their expense."
I still very much look forward to attending the ceremony."
Amen Peter!
As if Peter Gabriel weren’t already cool enough (his music, the Witness project, his support for Amnesty International), he once again does the right thing, gracefully.
Sucks that he won’t be singing there, but Hugh Jackman should have plenty of singing and dancing! Can’t wait for 4 hours of that!
There’s not enough respect for animated films, period. Films like “Waltz with Bashir” and “Persepolis” could have been easily nominated for Best Aninated Feature, despite being in foreign languages. Doing that would have increase mores respect and competition for the category. But no, the Academy board won’t do that.
Hence, how can anyone take that category seriously when “BOLT” and “KUNG FU PANDA” are nominated? Seriously.
and the Bruce Springsteen song from The Wrestler should have gotten a nod, too, but nope.
The Oscars has become a JOKE. Good for Gabriel for refusing to perform.
The producers were gifted the biggest selling film composer in history, one of the hottest rappers alive, and a respected veteran with a large fan base, and they want to stuff them into a 270 second montage? Insanity.
They’re messing with the songs now? As in, one of the few parts of the telecast worth watching?
Simple solution for the Oscars: make a rule that in order to be nominated, a film must have been released WIDE by the end of the year. This year the nominees were announced a day before Frost/Nixon, Milk & The Reader opened wide. Maybe people would tune in if they’d actually seen some of the movies nominated.
Way to go Peter! I can’t believe the producers would try such a rude nonsensical ploy to get the show run time down. This year the songs are great and I was really looking forward to seeing them performed. This Oscar cast has disaster written all over it.
I agree with “College Student” that the songs were one of the more interesting oscar segments to watch.
Watch, they’ll get Phil Collins.
Dammit! WTF are you thinking Bill and Larry? Down to Earth is one of the best songs from a movie in years, and the Slumdog songs have a lot of show potential. Cutting three songs from the show into a silly medley is not at all going to cut the show time down. Get your heads out of your asses.
Quick! Get Phil Collins on the phone! And they wonder why the Oscar® ceremony has become such a joke.
Bill Condon and Larry Mark are “Music Guys”—perhaps it’s ABC-TV executives who are telling them to cut this year’s music because the ABC executives feel that the music nominations this year will bring down ratings ? But- hey- the second that Hugh Jackman bolts out into song and dance is the second that I turn off the broadcast and is also the second that I refuse to purchase a ticket to his new Wolverine movie.
Here are some suggestions for the bozos to get higher ratings for the Oscars.
1. Of the currently televised Oscar categories, here are the ones that need to be televised.
2. Of the current categories from sections 1-5 in the televised list, I would break it down to three divisions: Best Dramatic Picture, Best Comedtic Picture, Best Action Picture. As it now stands, they are slighting too many movies. As of now, Heath Ledger deserves his Oscar for his performance in The Dark Knight, but Dark Knight deserves Best Picture in the Action category though Iron Man may have something to say about that. And lets not forget Robert Downey Jr. for his performance in Iron Man. Yes you will not please everyone, but the Oscars need reinvention and fast.
3. Move the ceremony from February to May while the list of elegible films would include everything that premiered in theaters from March 1st of the elegible year to February 28 or 29 of the next year though more films would be elegible this year (2010 Oscars) due to the date change. The new date would be for the first Sunday of May and this would help to clear a busy February which has so many special events that the new Sweeps months could likely be mid October to mid November, January, and May.
Part of the reason why the Oscars could have scored lower last year is because FOX’s NASCAR coverage was delayed into primetime and past it. A Rain delay with a promise of a race to come was enough to keep viewers away from the Oscars. This year, FOX will likely keep viewers away from the Oscars by running an actual race. To make matters worse, the WWE has scheduled its “No Way Out” Pay Per View for the same time as the Oscars. I am pretty much guessing that Wrestling Fans will either order the PPV or follow it over the internet. They wouldn’t care less what happens to Mickey Rourke at the ceremony. They care more about his appearance at WrestleMania 25.
4. The Ceremony needs a comic host, but not even that will help the Oscars. I am maybe guessing that this years producers went after Jay Leno for hosting, but I am guessing that the WGA rebuffed their efforts. With that said, I would have given David Letterman every single incentive, and even beg Dave, on the Late Show itself, to host this year’s Oscars. Plan C would have been for Rosie O’Donnell to host. Even an unconventional host such as Oprah would have been better than Hugh Jackman.
5. As for any category that I didn’t mention that happens to be in the main telecast, that should be moved to the technical ceremony.
You’re exaggerating, it does not run over 4 hours. Some years it does approach four – the show itself, don’t include the :30 minute red carpet show before – but the awards usually runs 3.5 hrs, give or take. Granted, that’s still too long. But cut them some slack, they can’t please everyone, and everyone’s got a different solution to make the show better.
I had such high hopes for the new producers’ approach, but this stupid decision of theirs really hurts the show.
I absolutely support Peter and really hope other performers will walk away from this travesty too.
It’s easy to bag on Phil Collins, but I think I remember back in 1985 that he wasn’t even allowed to sing “Against All Odds” on the broadcast. Congrats to Peter Gabriel for taking a stand and to the producers for providing an obvious toilet break for viewers with this ill-fated medley.
Wow, that’s ridiculous. I completely agree with Pete and can’t believe they’re cutting it down to just 65-90 seconds. I was only 10 in 1998, but I can still remember Celine Dion singing “My Heart Will Go On” (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEyB8YSfo9g) and Robin Williams singing “Blame Canada” in 2000 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gc0JveFySB4).
Of the currently televised Oscar categories, here are the ones that need to be televised.
Sniff. The Oscars are not the TMZ Awards, and if you wanna limit the awards to the marquee names, that’s what you’re getting.
Signed- Sound Designer and his DP Girlfriend.
MEMO : To Regional Corporate Manager
Dear Mr. Lincoln :
Huge lifetime fans of Springsteen here. Way back to the end of our “historic” campaign at least if not even WEEKS before.
But the ongoing complaints about “The Wrestler” song “One Trick Pony?”
Very effective at the movie’s “Sopranos”-like closing blank screen…
but thematically substitute rock star as show biz profession for wrestler…and you get Paul Simon’s “One Trick Pony” from the movie soundtrack of the same name.
Could it be the Boss is getting a little lazy Abe?
His Grammy?
“Girls in Their Summer Clothes?”
Nice song…but the original was Irwin Shaw’s short story “Girls in Their Summer Dresses.”
The song’s Blessing Avenue was Fifth Avenue in the story.
He’s always had literary influence and homage (which I’ve always liked – rock n’ roll is always about that which came before almost by definition) but these “homage(s)” seem(s) teetering on the brink of glaring.
Make sure that Bruce re-stocks those shelves. Makes them pretty. We got a Doorbuster scheduled for Presidents’ Day and we wanna get some people trampled to get at unbelievably low prices of American made durable goods that they don’t really need.
Now let’s sell this stimulus with our only recent EXCLUSIVE print interview designed to send an EXCLUSIVE message to “our kind” about its myriad of possible applications.
Thanks for the campaign appearances. You really know how to draw people together in ways that we will never be able to do. Not even close.
Sincerely,
Barack H. and Michele Obama
c.c. F.D.R.
J.F.K.
Jackie O.
Lincoln
b.c.c. Gwen Ifill
Oprah Winfrey
Andrew Leon Talley, Vogue
Black Enterprise
David Axelrod
90 seconds? 65 seconds? 10 seconds? Who cares? Until today I was not aware anybody even paid attention to the songs. And for the record, they all suck
can anyone even hum a line from this song? I think we will live.
do you all really care? when was the last time some one above the line played nice with you. Peter should be given a atta boy pat on the back for not bowing down to the Oscar Gods, Hats off to you!!
Non-Union Wal Mart Shift Supervisor,
Please go back to Drudge where you belong.
Peter Gabriel remains the same – performance , oscar or not – he is A LEGEND !!!
You hear a movie song and you remember exactly what you were feeling when you watched the movie. Songs are indeed a very important part – albeit small – aspect of the movie process. Their power to generate emotions and feelings are sometimes more powerful than the acting.
To disrespect the songs – and songwriters – are an insult. To only have three songs nominated instead of the usual five is also an insult. Good for Peter Gabriel!
I agree on points already made especially by Jessy S. – only televise certain aspects of prizes; the Grammy people know what they’re doing when they do. Also, nobody really cares about opening numbers. Just get the damn award show started.
OK, that does it; I’m producing the show next year. I’ll get this thing down to three hours.
This is tragic! It’s bad enough that we won’t get to listen to (the usual) FIVE nominated songs, but now, it’s only going to be a short medley of the three nominated songs. Sigh. I might not watch now, as the 20-25 minute chunk of song performances were my fave part of the Oscars! Gloria Estefan/NSync’s “Music of the Heart” was my all-time favorite musical performance, BTW!
I can tell you what parts Bill and Larry should omit from the telecast:
1. Sid Ganis’s windbag of a speech. Does anyone really care about what he has to say?
2. the In Memorium tribute. A complete downer and always way way way too long.
3. introducing the CPA’s. Who cares?
Oh yeah, let’s us not forget to mention to not have the unfunniest man in show biz, Bruce Vilanch, be the head writer. His writing drags the show since it’s NEVER FUNNY!!!!
Over the last 25 years, the Awards have topped four hours precisely three times. I don’t think anyone would define that as “usually.”
The biggest mistake the Oscars made was moving it to a Sunday night (when people have other interesting things to watch), and then to February (giving people fewer time to see the movies).
But this is just silly. Some people may not like hearing the Best Song nominations, and since this is the category with the poorest track record in terms of nominees – just ask the brothers Gibb – that’s understandable.
But it’s an accepted, integral part of the show. But then again, I thought showing clips from the Best Picture nominees was also integral. Shows what I know.
There shouldn’t be any singing performances (and not just because 99.9% of songs nominated for an Oscar these days would put an ADHD kid to sleep). It’s the Oscars. Not the fucking Grammys. Get rid of the singing and watch the show’s running time get shortened considerably. And that’s a good thing. Ditch all the montages save for the obituraries too.
Peter Gabriel is a total class act.
If only there were more of him in show biz.
In recent years the musical performances have been the only entertaining part of the show, like last year’s Once performance. Way to cut your own nuts off Condon.
Point of order for Jessy S:
Slumdog did not qualify for the Best Foreign Language Film category as it is not an Indian production (produced by a Brit), its screenplay was not written by an Indian writer (written by a Brit), it was not directed by an Indian filmmaker (directed by a Brit) and the majority of the film is not in India’s official language (2/3 of the film is in English, which is India’s official subsidiary language).
Way to go Peter. . .you haven’t sold out yet. . .why start now! Great song for a great movie. . .you deserve to win. . .again after winning a Grammy for the same! Good luck Peter Gabriel!
I find this debate absurd. Year after year people complain about how long the ceremony is. The ceremony is not long. What makes it long is the huge amount of commercial breaks and how long they are. Simple as that. Why never, ever anybody points out at the obvious. Cutting down seconds from songs or speeches doesn’t do much if one solid hour of the broadcast or more is devoted to commercials.
Is it too late? Please re-approach Peter and beg him to perform the entire song! Think of the production value! WALL-E robot onstage or on top of his piano eyes lit up, digital screen backdrop with some of the endearing WALL-E movie clips. It would be so beautiful! Even the Slumdog Millionaire songs could be sang in terrific Bollywood dance numbers, with the kids from the movie! Don’t cut one of the best parts of the show! Viewers need to have their spirits uplifted during these performances! A short medley is so wrong. Whatever happens Peter deserves every bit of the Oscar trophy.
there is probably more to it than what is being reported. Most likely the Slumdog Millionaire songs, which will probably win anyway, are getting a prominent showcase in the medley and his song is being tacked onto it like an afterthought. No one has ever heard of this Wall-E song anyway. Peter Gabriel should probably get over himself and talk to Springsteen and Eastwood about Oscar song slights.
Bonus points for the Oscar people: “Down to Earth” won a Grammy last weekend.
So, let’s get this right. They’re HIDING fashion from the red-carpet which is why we all tune in early. They’re CUTTING the song medley like annoying DJs on commercial radio stations, denying us the one true form of entertainment. And they’re CRAMMING all this into three hours. Brevity isn’t always the answer. There is change for the better where Barack is concerned but change for change’s sake where these half-wits are concerned. I’m tuning in just to watch the shambles unfold…..
BOO to Condon and Mark. What an inane idea! A salute to Peter Gabriel for standing up to them!
Good for Peter! Good to see him holding onto artistic diginity there — apparently the producers of the Oscars have none.
“No one has ever heard of this Wall-E song anyway.”
Well, a good number of people have seen WALL-E, either on the big screen or on DVD, so they must have heard (of) it, as it was the song at the start of the end credits. That is, if they stuck around for the end credits.
I just want Peter Gabriel to win this Oscar !
So many of his songs already appeared in films in the past (City of Angels, Natural Born Killers, Say Anything and more) – this guy has always been a VISUAL man with all his amazing performances and clips.
I am glad that he has won even 2 awards at the Grammies for Wall.e – also for best “instrumental”.
If it is an “insult” to the songwriters/performers not to allow them to sign the entire song, could it not be argued that it is an equal insult to a film’s producers, director, and actors not to show the entire film, rather than a short clip?
The Oscar producers do not seem to like British acts like Peter Gabriel (remember Phil Collins years back with Against all Odds). So we need some of those new pop-corn rockers to perform their junk-food music, that is currently riding high in the charts – that is actually what this Oscar-show deserves !
“No one has ever heard of this Wall-E song anyway.”
WALL-E had the best ending credit sequence in theaters this year, and you don’t think anyone’s heard it? Grossing over $500 million, and no one’s heard it? It’s the best movie of the year! If not for the glass ceiling of the “Best Animated” category, WALL-E would be in the top 5! The Reader?! What a joke!
“I would break it down to three divisions: Best Dramatic Picture, Best Comedtic Picture, Best Action Picture.”
And create ANOTHER glass ceiling? More categories are the last thing we need. Voters who can’t get past animation, genre, and subject matter biases are another. The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, Best Picture? Ha! That’s almost as ridiculous as The Reader. But it gets the most noms because it’s Brad Pitt and Cate Blanchet and special effects.
The five song performances are the most entertaining part of the show! I can’t believe how much the songwriters got screwed over this year; Bruce Springsteen missed his nomination, and now they won’t even give Gabriel his full 5 minutes? Cut the speeches! Have them post press releases! I want music, not thanks for whoever did Kate Winslet’s makeup in Revolutionary Road. They’ve gone past shooting themselves in the foot and just went straight for the kill. This is insulting.
Who do they think they are, these Oscar-producers ?
The music was always the only highlight in this show. My rock-hero Bruce even got no nomination and now this – I was looking forward to see at least a great performance by Peter Gabriel, who is also another big favourite musician of mine – and then only 65 seconds to “honour” this man ?
Dear Mr. Peter Gabriel ! I want You to kick their asses, go get the Oscar ! My little daughter loves your Walle-song !
Down to Earth was maybe my favorite song of 2008 – I was listening to it a couple of hours ago, it’s on my own personal heavy rotation.
A better solution than a medley would be to show a clip from the movie with the song playing, similar in length to any other award. That may also encourage voters to nominate songs that are in the actual movie as opposed to over the end credits.
That being said, the credits for Wall-E were great and continued the story.
Cutting the red carpet is by far the bigger mistake and they will regret that decision as soon as the ratings come in.
Many factors contribute to the decline in the Oscar ratings: a move from March to February, more viewing options with the breakthrough of cable and satellite TV, and a shift in coverage making “fashion” almost as important as the awards themselves.
But the biggest change is in the way the general public views movies, and pop-culture, in today’s world. Most people now think that the year’s most popular films should be the ones nominated. Sadly, art has little to do with popularity, although sometimes they do mix. The Academy Awards is based on honoring quality in filmmaking, not popularity with audiences.
Also, the media attention on “stars” has greatly increased on a daily basis, so the public is already saturated with Hollywood. We do not need the Oscars to give us a glimpse at how people are looking, or who they are dating. The allure of seeing “stars” as themselves is totally gone from the awards now.
So despite what ABC is trying to do, the Oscars will never be the ratings powerhouse it once was when there was only a handful of TV stations, and the public had a higher curiosity for seeing “stars” parade on TV (which “stars” didn’t do very frequently, much less guest-star or do TV shows!)
The telecast should honor film. Period. It should look at the best of the year, and on occasion, reflect the role of film in society. The presenter pairings should also pay tribute to past honored (or favorite) films> Like, how about pairing Robert Redford with Barbra Streisand and introduce them as stars from “The Way We Were,” a very beloved classic. Or bring together the stars of Star Wars or Ghandi or Silence of the Lambs as paired presenters? Also, don’t forget about the older stars. I hate just seeing today’s overexposed crowd. And for God’s sake, make sure the presenter of the final award is a surprise heavyweight!
In addition to some of the suggestions above, like cutting Ganis’s ramblings, they should definitely save time and irritation and boredom by cutting the Jean Hersholt Humanitarian Award this year, because it should never have been given to Jerry Lewis in the first place.
The work Lewis is being honored for is an ongoing source of pain and anger to the people he is supposedly helping. It’s rubbing salt in the wound to call Lewis a humanitarian for portraying people with disabilities as pitiable, life-long children and charity cases.
When members of the disability rights community — including many people who used to be “Jerry’s kids” on the telethons — protested his pity-based tactics, Lewis said (during a 2001 television interview): “Pity? You don’t want to be pitied because you’re a cripple in a wheelchair? Stay in your house!” Great humanitarian, this guy.