BREAKING STORY (Keep refreshing for updates): It just happened:
NEW YORK, March 11 — Carl C. Icahn released the following statement today: “We have recently been engaged in discussions with Lions Gate regarding the possibility of having a number of our designees added to Lions Gate’s board of directors. Those discussions have been terminated because agreement could not be reached concerning certain aspects of the standstill agreement that Lions Gate demanded as a condition to installing those board members.”
And here’s Lionsgate’s response:
Santa Monica, CA, and Vancouver, BC, March 11, 2009 — Lions Gate Entertainment Corp confirmed today that it has ended discussions with Carl Icahn about potentially adding his designees to the Lionsgate Board of Directors.
Lionsgate Co-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Jon Feltheimer and Vice Chairman Michael Burns said, “Lionsgate has a strong track record of successful growth over the past nine years and is committed to building value for its shareholders. We are always open to hearing the ideas of our shareholders and exploring ways to incorporate them. Over the past three weeks, our Board of Directors has been in discussions with Mr. Icahn to consider how we could accommodate some of his requests, including the possible appointment of his designees to the Board of Directors. However, the Board ultimately concluded that it could not meet his requests and continue to serve the best interests of all of our shareholders, which is our number one priority.”
Oy, now things get really nasty. But I’ve been warning you about this. Lionsgate had “demanded” a standstill agreement as the corporate raider/shareholder activist kept buying stock in the open market, as if Jon Feltheimer et al was in any position to demand anything, after Carl Icahn had insisted on several seats on the board. So all that talk by Feltheimer et al about this being an amicable investment by Icahn was total bullshit. But I’ve been warning you about this, too.
The breakdown in negotiations occurred after Lionsgate reported late Monday a net loss of $93.4 million, or 81 cents a share, from a net income of $7.3 million, or 6 cents a share, in the same quarter last year. The mini-major blamed the quarterly loss to the underperformance of its feature films. Not only does Icahn own almost 15% of Lionsgate, but his ex-investment officer Mark Rachesky now has about 20% of the company. Icahn has been seeking at least 3, board seats but Lionsgate wanted to make it conditional on a standstill agreement. As if the studio had a choice with Icahn and Rachesky combined having almost 35% and that figure rising to 50% with the addition of Steinberg Asset Management’s shares. In a board election you only need more actual votes, not 51% of all outstanding shares.
If Icahn wanted to, he could likely wipe out the whole board. And why not? Because in the past few weeks, the aggressive level of acquisition of shares by both Icahn and Rachesky has got to make Felt and Burns understand that the little control they have over their company has been slipping away by the second. Now Lionsgate management is running scared and no longer interested in collaborating and placating the barbarians at the gate. But Jon Feltheimer and Michael Burns have no one to blame but their own failures (not even Joe Drake).
So now the only question left is: What does Carl want? To force a sale or breakup of the company, as some have speculated? But if Icahn really believes Lionsgate is undervalued, as he has said over and over for years, and now put his money where his mouth has been, he may believe in the value of content. He’s also smart enough to know that when you can amass a huge stake like this in a company during a shutdown of the Mergers & Acquisitions markets, you don’t go selling it right away for a small premium. You improve the operations of the company by cutting costs, and then you wait for a recovery, and then you seek a sale.
- Lionsgate And Icahn Talking Board Seats
- Icahn & Rachesky Add To Lionsgate Stakes
- Lionsgate Getting Eaten Alive By Hunters
- Another Update On Icahn vs Lionsgate
- Icahn Interested In MGM, Too?
- Carl Icahn Notifies SEC That He May Add Or Remove Lionsgate Board Members
- Carl Icahn Ups Stake in Lionsgate To 13%
- Carl Icahn Increases Stake Still More In Lionsgate; What It Means…
- Carl Icahn May Be Amassing Bigger Stake In Lionsgate Than Most People Realize
- Icahn Ups Lionsgate Stake; Stock In Freefall After Lousy Quarter
- Michael Burns Loses 1/2 Lionsgate Stake
- Carl Icahn Takes 9% Stake In Lionsgate






“Oy, now things get really nasty.”
It’s Lionsgate, Nikki. When finished they’ll do a horror franchise out of this story.
Well, I guess the management figured they’d be shown the door if Icahn got control, and now they’re going to fight tooth and claw to hold on.
I’m not sure how they can win if Icahn and his allies keep buying up the company bit by bit. Also, any management/shareholder conflict would most likely only create the uncertainty that drives stock prices down, and making it easier to be bought up.
I’d just like to see, just once, a story where Hollywood management and shareholders get along and everyone walks away happy. But that’s probably not gonna happen.
And the blood bath begins… I, personally am rooting for Icahn. There are some clear problems internally with LGF, and possible dismantling of the board as well as upper management and replacing them with competent people will make this place the success it should be. I have some names for ya’, Nikki on who needs to get the boot and fix this disaster.
Just another soon-to-be Hollywood mogul who just sees the biz part and wants to control it for the big salary for himself. I’d really be surprised if he were any different than the other moguls. Actions speak louder than words.
Go get them Carl. Incompetence does not deserve to hang on to power or be rewarded — then again, this is Hollywood which is exactly what is meant to happen.
Blue Horseshoe loves Lionsgate….
Thierry like we don’t get enough ‘torture porn’ in both Lionsgates films and in real life with the ineptitude of the vast majority of execs running studios & networks, especially when you’re talking about making deals with entertainment labor unions?!?!
I’m for some substantial changes in the leadership of most of these media conglomerates, but I don’t put a lot of faith in Icahn choosing the right people to run Lionsgate.
Whatever happened to media companies being run by people who both like and know something about the product they turn out instead of profit seeking rentiers?
“Incompetence does not deserve to hang on to power or be rewarded.”
Couldn’t have said it better.
Take ‘em down, Carl.
You netnerds amaze me. There are MUCH larger forces at play here.
Icahn will take over lionsgate and merge it with Weinstein in a mega IPO in 2010. 3rd quarter.
I agree that we’re not seeing the full scope of what’s transpiring here.
THE GATE OF THE LION’S BEEN CRASHED.
BY AN ICHAN WITH BOATLOADS OF CASH.
THE STOCK HAS NO UPTICK
AND CARL’S NOT TO BE FUCKED WITH.
HEY FELT, IS THAT A ROCKET IN YOUR ASS?