EXCLUSIVE: Lionsgate’s Jon Feltheimer and Michael Burns were having a celebratory St Patrick’s Day dinner at the Chateau Marmont with Relativity Media’s Ryan Kavanaugh on March 17th. “The guys are on their second bottle of expensive wine and getting along like a house on fire,” my source who spotted them emailed me.
For some time, I’d been tracking Relativity Media shopping a major film financing package described as a “mega first-look deal” to four studios: Universal, Paramount, Sony, and Lionsgate. Kavanaugh’s goal was to leverage all four studios against one another. But first Paramount found it “economically unattractive”. Universal (from whom Relativity recently bought Rogue Pictures and has an ongoing relationship with Kavanaugh’s company) said no. Sony was on the verge of saying yes earlier this month but then pulled out of the talks abruptly. (I heard from several insiders that it was an internal decision because Screen Gems’ Clint Culpepper “got word of it and freaked out about losing as many as one and possibly two slots in this deal that included as many as five guaranteed slots a year.”) That messed up Kavanaugh’s plan to leverage the big studio and the mini-major against one another. But in the end, Lionsgate took the deal. Only it hasn’t been announced yet.
Now I know why. Because the bastards running Lionsgate want to get their 8% staff cuts out of the way first.
Talk about having no shame: I can’t believe that Jon Feltheimer and Michael Burns could even contemplate another round of layoffs, this time axing another 45 jobs today from their 550-person payroll. And let’s not forget that on October 8th, Feltheimer signed a new contract giving him a base salary of $1.2 million while the company is losing money, plus over 900,000 stock options (at $5 per share today, that’s $4.5 mil) while he’s cutting secretaries and clerical and support staff. As a staffer emailed me, “The management has alway operated understaffed to maintain their bottom line and please the shareholders. More like please themselves and fill their own pockets! Start talking to the general staff and they’ll tell you they need more people. The employees are overworked and underpaid. The layoffs in the last few months are what’s called taking advantage of the country’s economic downturn and jumping on board for the same ride.”
Now, you watch: the Relativity deal will be announced within days (or maybe, because I’ve outed them all, within weeks.)
This is the sort of “We got ours, You’ll never get yours” behavior that makes Hollywood so sickening right now. The economic crisis is being blamed for all sorts of cutbacks that don’t have to be made. Trust me, even the studio moguls are saying this privately. Especially when the box office is running hot and Lionsgate is primarily a movie play. I find it interesting that the Los Angeles Times and the trades keep treating Lionsgate management as the “victim” in this battle with corporate raider/shareholder activist Carl Icahn. Seems to me the real victims are Lionsgate’s loyal staffers being betrayed by the mini-major’s management.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


No doubt this will turn out to be some stratagem to fend off Icahn’s takeover bid. That seems to be main thrust of everything they’re doing lately.
Did Carl Icahn okay this deal?
As I grow in this industry, I find myself with more and more friends to worry about… hoping the best for everyone in these rough times…
I’ve been hearing whispers about these new 8% layoffs since end of December/early January. I heard this time it would be taking out some of theatrical marketing. Wonder who got the ax?
Lionsgate has been bloated with people who are paid to the same job as 3 others (used to work there, I know from what I speak)
They are also VERY top heavy, everyone is a boss and the people who should know what’s going on don’t and are the first to be blamed.
Let’s hope, though we know differently, part of the 8% are the execs who think belittling, firing and hiring 2 when they’ve already got 1 assistant are the first to go.
Lionsgate used to be such a different place pre-Joe Drake.
There are still a lot of nice people there, particularly in development and production. Some are good at their jobs and some aren’t. But overall, people like working there, even the ones stuffed in uncomfortable cubicles.
What I never understood was having two different development departments, one run by Alli, the other by Paseornek. I can only think of one person in either of those two departments that doesn’t really serve a purpose, but I wonder if they are getting rid of some of the redundancy.
this is all about Icahn and losing the pride financing deal. they need the dough
What if Lionsgate is simply overstaffed? What if one of the reasons the execs get the big bucks is streamlinging operations so that staff can be trimmed? Listen, as someone who worked my way up in this industry starting off as an assistant, I have tons of sympathy for secretaries and assistants who get boned while execs get huge salaries with perks and bonuses, BUT I also know from firsthand experience that there’s a whole lotta Facebook status updating during work hours…
What is amazing is Kavanaugh’s ability to continue to get these deals done in this environment – especially considering he’s got two DUI’s and risks going to jail. It’s truly amazing what he has been able to accomplish as well, considering his investors are getting the short end of the stick consistently. Whatever photos he has of the guys at Elliott, or whatever money laundering scheme this is all a front for has to be exposed eventually. It just doesn’t make business sense on any level.
The 8% cut is to get Icahn to back off, as if to demonstrate Lionsgate is an efficiently run shop. But the reality is that Icahn will get control of the debt, fire most if not everyone, scalp their library and the TV guide channel, and pocket the difference.
Thank you for playing.
Icahn will get control of the debt, fire most if not everyone, scalp the LGF library and TV Guide Channel, and pocket the proceeds.
Icahn craps bigger than Kavanaugh.
Who was laid off? Names? They have some good people there, hope the good ones are okay.
If they were smart they’d get rid of Beggs. He’s got terrible instincts – he went behind everyone’s backs trying to replace Matt Weiner in the middle of his contract negotiations for season three of Mad Men – as if another writer could come in and helm that show, a credit grabber – not one of LG’s shows have been developed in house, and he can’t be trusted.
where the hell does Kavanaugh keep getting all this money
why the layoffs?
because feltheimer is a d-bag, that’s why.
Lionsgate is the most under-staffed co I’ve ever worked for,…to the point that it’s a joke. I don’t even know how they can function with these additional layoffs. I’m lucky I’ve moved on, but was disheartened to learn of a former co-worker who was laid off yesterday. I could’ve told the senior execs 2yrs ago that the company was imploding (..if they ever bothered to speak [or glance] at the ‘little’ people). If Carl (aka, my new bff) gets control, he should sell off the library and just close the doors on that operationally-challenged mess.
it’s all bullshit. the deal he was offering Sony, Uni, Paramount etc was NOT the deal LGF accepted. They won’t get any money up front
Feltheimer is one of the downright meanest people in this town. And that’s saying something.
Were any of the LG development execs axed?
It’s true. They are incredibly understaffed. LGF keeps making acquisitions and expecting the little staff they already have to do the work. I remember at the 2007 annual meeting right after they purchased Mandate, Feltheimer basically told us that meant more work and longer hours for the staff. He didn’t intend on hiring more staff. One worker asked does that mean we get paid more? He basically laughed that question off. I don’t see how more layoffs is going to help this company. How about firing some of the execs who basically have led LGF on the downward spiral that it has been heading in.
If you look bad through Nikki’s excellent columns on this (and I did) you will see the wheels came off this vub after a young man named John Hagoman left LGF. He was the marketing guy behind Saw and the Tyler Perry films and all the rest.
In this market, marketing is key and the loss of Hagoman was unfortunate and detrimental.
Felt, I love ya but you blew it, brother.
Ryan still seems to be under the illusion that things
go better with alcohol.
Not too long ago I interviewed for a job @ LGF in Santa Monica and couldn’t believe the positions immense responsibility vs. lack of pay factor. It was so out of whack, and everyone seemed depressed in their cubes and I ran away.
Then I recently was involved in a film acquired by LGF and their lack of attention to the project was noticeable. Everyone clearly had too many projects on their plates and I think it hurt the prospects for the film.
On the other hand some of the people were outstanding to deal with and will surely get lured away by the other studios. But they are definitely short handed for a studio.
Beggs? Who? Thought he was a PA?
here is the bottom line on lionsgate: the company was unheard of when michael burns and felt arrived. there are layoffs at lg like any other studio and all businesses generally. we’re in a deep recession, remember? the facts: 500 people gainfully employed at the company; the last 3 theatrical movies exceeded expectations; they have revenue of over 1.5 billion and stock is still up 5x since their arrival. the tv department went from zero to 300m with big hits including ‘weeds’ and ‘mad men’. they wrote off $91m from a bad streak which is billions less than most media companies wrote off this year. burns is a savvy financial architect, a natural born leader and is widely respected at the company. i don’t get the relentless critiques of lg–burns and felt have been wildly successful. the financial data clearly demonstrates this.