Ellen Stutzman, WGAW Research Director, wrote this for the WGA website.
It has been a year since the strike was settled, the contract ratified and writers returned to work, and in that time the world of New Media has continued to spin forward. Hulu’s rapid ascent into the top ranks of online video sites has demonstrated the Internet audiences’ appetite for television and film content, creators like Joss Whedon and Seth MacFarlane have found success with original New Media content and more than 1.4 million unique viewers streamed episodes of Lost on ABC.com in December 2008. Now, the cable companies may be throwing their hat into the online video distribution ring and Hulu has pulled its content from other sites and services, demonstrating the growing importance of online video and struggle for control over where you turn for content. The growth of the online video market highlights the need for a service that presents content in a way that allows viewers to easily find what they want, and you better believe that the media conglomerates and the cable operators want to be who consumers turn to for this decision.
A January 17 article in The New York Times presented a free software download called Boxee, a service that combines multiple online video sources into an easy to use interface, which can be connected to your TV. (Insert article link.) Boxee searches sites like YouTube, Comedy Central, Hulu and CNN to provide consumers with video content they are interested in watching. It’s an attempt to create a network of online video site options through one interface, which seems like an ideal development given the multitude of sites and video options that consumers must navigate. However, in late February Hulu announced that it would no longer allow Boxee to search its site for content. Apparently this was done at the request of Hulu’s content providers (think Fox and NBC). Hulu has also pulled its content from the CBS-owned site, TV.com.
In February, the Wall Street Journal reported on discussions between cable providers and TV networks over online video access to cable content. Cable providers, like Comcast and Time Warner, would like to offer cable subscribers online access to cable TV content. This is an attempt to maintain current cable customers and establish control over access to online video. While the cable networks are coming late to the online video party, their dominance of the TV market and ability to deliver Internet content through an already built-in base of set-top boxes may give them an advantage in the pursuit of the Internet-TV connection.
Hulu is aiming to establish itself as an online brand, one that consumers turn to for television and film content. It doesn’t want consumers thinking that a service like Boxee will deliver the content. But Hulu’s viability as the ultimate source of online content is limited for a few reasons; it tends to emphasize NBC and Fox programs over other content, it buries original new media content on its site and its backing by two traditional media conglomerates will hamper its ability to truly develop into an online distributor that is agnostic to the content it delivers. The entrance of the cable companies is an interesting development. They have a vested interest in maintaining their current revenue stream of cable subscribers, which is motivating them to enter the online distribution business. All these moves represent the growing struggle for dominance in online distribution.
WGA Sets Record Straight On Its Strike: “We Achieved Most Important Objectives”
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


Neat! Much like the recent WGA “victory”, this all hedges on the belief that the internet will remain the same and a select few will control it. If anything, the internet has proven the opposite to be true. Maybe you kids should check out the current Pirate Bay trial to understand where this is all heading. I’ll give you a hint: Hulu doesn’t mean shit. It’s like talking about best stage coach.
My God, how pathetic and boxed in. This post is a glaring example of why the strike was a massive failure and how shockingly out of date and sad the WGA is. The studios and unions don’t even yet know they are completely irrelevant. Jurisdiction doesn’t mean shit anymore, kids.
Congrats on highlighting the devastating failure of “Boxee.” Amazing that you would think “Boxee” means anything. How limited. How small. You are, truly, the way our guild thinks.
Death awaits. It’s just around the corner. It won’t take too long. Simplistic thinkers like yourself should go along with the false narrative. Yes, jurisdiction matters. As does fighting over who will present the final mutterings from the beast.
My God. How fucking lame you all are.
FAIL.
I’m working on a solid configuration, but here’s something to consider:
In the LA area, you can receive nearly 2 dozen High Def broadcast channels by plugging in simple rabbit ears. In many cases, the broadcast received will be of better quality than what you might get on some HD cable channels because of less compression.
So there’s all your local channels in HD.
Buy a PS3, and you can stream Hulu through it to your TV. There’s MORE channels (though not HD) and shows. YOu can get rid of your DVR at this point.
Add a XBox 360 with Live Gold, and you can HD netflix streaming to your TV.
So with enough HARDWARE, you can add hi speed cable modem and rabbit ears RIGHT NOW> and only pay for the Internet service, and annual Live Gold Memebrship. You’ll have more entertainment to shake a stick at for less than $40/month if you drop your cable service completely and just get the internet.
Welceom to New Media. Set yourself up now and save all the $$ you can before they destroy this model.
Interesting, isn’t it, that all of these major players on one hand are scrambling for their piece of this giant pie of online content distribution, while brazenly insisting to SAG that there’s no money in the market.
They apparently are also insisting that even if there were money in the market, someday, that artisans shouldn’t see residuals in any appreciable amount.
This, while they’re running ads for their new distribution pipeline during the Superbowl.
The hypocrisy and prima-facia greed are really beyond the pale.
Dave Anthony –
In your apparent rush to be the first to post such deliciously clever comments as “My God, how pathetic” and “My God. How fucking lame you all are,” you seem to have missed a few things.
First, as Marjorie David noted in her piece on this blog, and as Ellen Stutzman noted in the first paragraph of hers, everyone is quite aware that the internet will _not_ remain the same. And many writers are working very hard to ensure that the Conglomerates’ fight against net neutrality will not succeed, so that the Congloms will not be able to monopolize access to the internet and keep things the same.
Second, the WGA and other unions will be valuable as long as high-quality content is valuable, and that will be forever. Whatever one thinks of our latest contract, it did open the door to coverage of new media content, and people like Joss Whedon and Seth McFarlane have since banged that door open and hit the Conglomerates in the nose with it. Ow.
The struggle to protect the interests of writers in all media continues, and it won’t always be successful. But that struggle will certainly produce bigger gains than giving up and wishing “FAIL” upon one’s colleagues.
Q: How is the struggle to maintain a monopoly over content distribution like the struggle to maintain a monopoly over content creation?
A: Both are unwinnable.
It’s been a year since the strike ended and I haven’t seen dime one from new media residuals. Has anyone else been paid?
BH -
Um, Tivo service costs around $20/month, which is one way to access Netflix online. I don’t know what XBox360 with Live Gold costs, but I can’t imagine Microsoft is giving that away at the moment. Netflix – whether it’s through your XBox or your Tivo – is at least another $10. And how much does the broadband cost?
So yeah, as of this moment with some hardware investment and a little patience, you can save some dough if you’re willing do without HD for some of that content, but it’s a pain-in-the-butt solution. The average consumer has been well-trained to settle their lard-laden American posterior into the Barcalounger, pick up their one single universal remote and get whatever they want within a couple of clicks.
Except for their beer. They have to yell at the kids to bring them that.
Still, I appreciate your re-emphasizing the importance to creative professionals of receiving residuals from New Media.
Mark Anthony above is right.
Technology is going to do to TV and film what it did to music.
When you add that to the declining quality you get digital Armageddon, a total destruction of the value of product because of free access.
The US is considering Internet 2.0 which will of course be controlled by the government and is non hackable.
Let the shooting begin.
Dave Anthony,
I have a sinking feeling you’re right but I have two questions:
1. Even if you are right, why shouldn’t the WGA have fought for their fair share of whatever cash is still collectable? Why should congloms get the last crumbs?
2. Why the shit-eating grin? Why do you so look forward to a time when nobody can ever hope to make a living in the movie/TV business? Do you just have a problem with anybody making money for creating ‘content’? Do you believe that you will personally benefit the destruction of this industry? Do you think you’ll continue to see even watchable movies or TV shows (or new media entertainment, whatever that looks like) of any quality at all if there’s no business model to create it? Again, why so happy?
mheister – you miss the forest for the trees. Do I believe residuals for your union are important? Of course I do, but in the model I wrote up where do you see residuals coming from? And of how much? You can call it “pain in the ass” but it IS in fact a prototype of what’s to come: broadcast is gone, replaced by “availability dates” embedded into some type of advert wrapper.
And seeing as I was unawares of the Tivo angle, you’ve actually lowered the cost of the hardware setup because that’s less than an Xbox. The XBox membership I speak of is $50/year with a $375 piece of equipment. You do trade away the entertainment value of the 360 library of games, however…
And this setup isn’t for the people yelling at their kids for their beer. It’s for their kids, the next cash market, who don’t mind a few extra mouse clicks to get where they’re going. If you want to dismiss that market and not discuss just WHAT New Media will look like, then I’d like to respectfully submit you’re part of the problem. We need to wrap our heads around this, and not cut off discussions to what you feel is the topic at hand.
Now – can the Tivo record broadcast HD signals picked up through rabbit ears?
Congrats on highlighting the devastating failure of “Boxee.” Amazing that you would think “Boxee” means anything. How limited. How small.
In the long run you may have a point. But, for now, you do not. Boxee was croaked by NBC and Fox, and they are hardly the only ones whacking away at this.
TV Everywhere — As Long As You Pay for It
“Time Warner’s Bewkes Plots Industry Initiative to Eradicate Free Content”