This is unbelievable. Though I suppose it was just a matter of time before the Hollywood moguls figured out a way to get their hands on some of that U.S. goverment bailout money, albeit indirectly. But why in the world are American taxpayers helping foot the bill to promote a big-budget 3-D DreamWorks Animation movie? Well, it appears the reason is because the president of the Jeffrey Katzenberg-led Hollywood animation studio just happens to be Bank of America’s former Vice Chairman and CFO.
It took respected media analyst Rich Greenfield of Pali Research to uncover this staggering scheme (registration required). He found out that Bank of America was helping families to see Monsters vs Aliens in 3-D rather than 2-D at no additional cost when it starts playing in theaters on Friday, March 27th. (The promotion is here.) And at the same time helping out the box office grosses of Katzenberg’s DreamWorks Animation, a publicly traded company.
“Why Bank of America?,” Greenfield asks in a report posted this morning. “We have not seen any formal announcement about the Bank of America/[DWA] promotion beyond an increasing number of consumers discussing the promotion link on Twitter. However, we find it odd that a bank that just received $45 bn [billion] in government aid is paying for consumers across the US to see a movie in 3-D vs. 2-D at no extra cost. We also wonder whether the presence of DWA’s President, Lew Coleman, helped DWA convince Bank of America to enter into the promotion, as Coleman is a former Vice Chairman and CFO of Bank of America.”
Greenfield found a .pdf for next weekend’s Bank of America offer which says it is limited to its customers (credit card, banking, etc). But he also discovered that the online system allows anybody to participate as long as they have an e-mail address. Consumers can receive up to 4 certificates per e-mail address to upgrade from 2-D to 3-D via the online registration form. However, Imax and AMC theaters are excluded from the promo.
“If MvA [Monsters vs Aliens] skews heavily toward 3D tickets due to Bank of America subsidizing the incremental 3-D cost (only valid on opening weekend), we believe the odds are increasing that MvA will outperform our opening weekend box office expectation of $55 mm [million].” Greenfield predicts.
This week, Pali Research calculated that Dreamworks Animation is getting an average 3-D upcharge of $3.18 for Monsters vs. Aliens as opposed to the cost of an average 2-D ticket. ”While the 3-D premium was less than DWA management expected, we believe the real driver of the effective premium will be driven by the percentage of attendees who pay to see the movie in 3-D vs. 2-D (as we presume the 2,000 3D screens will be in greater demand than the 5,000+ 2-D screens),” Greenfield writes. “We are increasingly confident that there will be a significantly higher percentage of MvA attendees at 3-D screens, as Bank of America has apparently agreed to fund the incremental cost of a 3-D ticket.”
According to Greenfield, the reward certificate provides a $2-$5 value, but he couldn’t find a premium above $4.
What’s incredible here is that DreamWorks Animation has been spending a fortune to market Monsters vs Aliens. The campaign included a widely seen 3-D tie-in with NBC during the Super Bowl broadcast on that network. I was told that DWA footed $9 million of the cost of that spot what with the cost of the NBC ad, the 3-D glasses, the technology, etc. I wrote back in January that it was a colossal waste of money. Because the movie looked like a mess.
But now it’ll be U.S. taxpayers who’ll give thumbs up or thumbs down to this deal.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.


So Katzenberg’s nasty little secret is out. As everyone knows Katzenberg has been the only person lobbying theatres to upgrade their equipment to 3D. And now thanks to this partnership with Bank of America, Katzenberg can falsely created demand for 3D where there really is none. The average consumer doesn’t know the difference or even care about 2D vs. 3D. Yet theatre owners don’t have or want to spend the money to upgrade as it’s expensive to upgrade their theatres to 3D. So Katzenberg has found a way to get large amounts of consumers to see his 3D movie and he’s going to turn around the numbers and throw it into the faces of the theatre owners and into the faces of the industry to make it look like we all want and care about 3D. And he’s doing this with our tax money and is getting away with it because of all of the support he’s given to Obama. And to think that Jeffrey went on CNBC and said that his philanthropy was affected by being a Madoff victim. What a joke. In the public’s interest the Security and Exchange Commission, FTC, and other scrutinizing agencies should look into this Bank of America promotion
Oh Jesus Nikki, you really have to stop with your Katzenberg hatefest.
Advertising is part of business and always has been.
Unless I”m mistaken horribly…
wasn’t the money to Bank of America to offset the bad loans they received control of upon buying failing banks as a favor to the government?
That money isn’t a ‘bailout’ it’s just a little bribe to get them to pick up banks nobody else wanted.
Thanks for the info… I finally got some govt cheese and the family will have nice time at the movies!!!
The truth is a little more complicated than you present here, Nikki.
BoA did not way the TARP funds. They went on record saying they didn’t want them. The government brokered BoA taking over some failed institutions and BoA had funds and capital for the assumption, but the government, first under Bush and then under Geithner/Obama, literally FORCED BoA to take the TARP funds and apportion them to handle the merger.
The government responded by telling BoA that the HAD to take the TARP funds or else there would not just be bank-specific legislation passed, there would be direct Congressional oversight and summons into the daily operations in BoA to “make sure they are solid”. In effect, there would have been a trial of BoA in Congress, even though there was no allegation of any wrongdoing or insolvency.
They promised that with TARP funds, at least them BoA’s merger operation would be the only part of the bank operations accountable to the Treasury. Of coourse, after the money is transferred, the government THEN reserved the right to change the terms of the loan funds and regulation process, and another provision so that Congress gets to change the contract at will, after the fact, until 6 months AFTER the TARP funds are repaid.
This was not a case of BoA almost failing and taking the funds just to stay alive.
I still think it is stupid for BoA in this day and age to have anything to do with Media Production or associated marketing – it seems there are a lot more important segments of the economy to tend to.
But the story, as presented, isn’t really the whole story.
When Drudgebots attack. Lovely.
If money is so tight that an extra $3 for 3D makes a difference, maybe people should not be going to the movies at all.
Sounds like creative marketing to me. Government dollars are meant to stimulate: create value for BofA customers and encourage people to go to the movies. I don’t see an issue.
B of A is the bank that refused to give up the needed money to pay employees back wages in a plant that shut down in Chicago a few months ago … B of A epitomizes everything that is wrong with the banking industry …. they are standing in the way of my refinancing my home based on a $13.46 oversite some 2 years ago … burn this bank to the ground and jail its board of directors …
Those trying to make an excuse for this are really sad.
The money is not to STIMULATE a business that would NEVER have GOTTEN money, it is to help the BANKING industry.
This does NOT help lending and extending.
So, while we’re out here trying to feed our children, keep a roof over their heads:
Obama protects the bonuses,
he’s off to be on the Leno show,
Pelosi demands planes that WE pay for like she’s a queen,
Peolosi won’t stop THEMSELVES from taking an automatic 4900 raise from OUR money. . . .
won’t give US a tax break. . . .
Obama brags that giving us 13.00 a week is sooooooooo generous. . .
While we’re going hungry out here. . . . .and losing our homes, our jobs. . . .
Keep it up democrats. Keep it up.
Neal,
Capping salaries is an unamerican as you can get. Can you imagine saying to immagrants coming to our country after they pass lady liberty, “Come to America land of the free, but if you make more than X amount of money we will take it away from you, because you dont deserve that amount.” Please. If you want to live in that world go to Russia or China.
(Power currupts and absolute power currupts absolutely.
Hey Business… Man
The bail out money was intended to solve the CREDIT CRISIS, not for banks to promote themselves. Is it easier for people to get small loans? No. Then BofA should have loaned this money out.
As for you bitching that people shouldn’t be telling BofA how to run its business, because we don’t know how to run a bank. Guess what, buddy, neither does BofA… That’s why the fucking bank needed to be bailed out!
And before you dismiss me as an ignorant hollywood liberal…. I grew up a Reagan republican and now am independent because the GOP no longer stands for what the Gipper did.
The DreamWorks gang strikes again! Universal, Paramout, Reliance and now Taxpayer! Life is easier spending other people’s money.
I would have thought Bernie Madoff taught them some humility.
“Sounds to me as though this IS stimulus…. promoting a movie to get people to spend money to go see it. sounds like the economy at work to me.”
Damned right, and when “stimulus” cash is handed out to people to break as many windows as they can just think of all those glazers who get “stimulated”
Economy = Freedom.
When someone takes your cash to give to someone else that used to be called theft; now it’s “stimulas” and Americans “educated” by government unions are now too stupid to understand the difference.
It would be one thing if participating theatres gave out “upgrade” passes to B Of A at no cost to the latter to in turn give them out to customers.
Especially in contests, businesses furnishing prizes often give them out to the contest organizers at no charge in exchange for “promotional consideration”.
But if B Of A paid for the ticket upgrades, then something’s wrong.
Needs to be on a bumpersticker:
I sold my offspring into debt slavery to Bank Of America for $45 billion and all I got was a lousy coupon for a 3D movie
or
We’re out spending our kids’s (and grandkids’s and greatgrandkids’s) inheritance on 3D movies
Thank to all the politicians past & present and the lobbyists who bought them off.
No one would be upset if the government had not given the money away in the first place. Everyone should be upset with our government!
I love how whenever Drudge links to a site, all the right wingers come out of the woodwork and immediately blame everything on people voting for Obama. Get a life
Or, Judge, perhaps when Drudge links to a site, you finally get to see what a real cross-section of the USA looks like. Try refuting facts with facts and not BS, for a change! We are here to present INTELLIGENT arguments.
This fits in perfectly with the temper of the times. Bread and circuses, indeed.
The point of the bailout is for that money to be used for the business to restructure itself to bring itself out of a troubled state. I think there should be some stipulations on how that money is used, essentially to restructure the business to make it solvent and viable again, not to pay out bonuses like in the case of AIG.
As for the issue at hand in this article if you read carefully it says “It took respected media analyst Rich Greenfield of Pali Research to uncover this staggering scheme (registration required). He found out that Bank of America was helping families to see Monsters vs Aliens in 3-D rather than 2-D at no additional cost when it starts playing in theaters on Friday, March 27th.” No additional cost. In other words they are being upgraded from 2d to 3d at no cost. This would be a stimulus because it is encouraging people to spend money to see the movie by waving a free upgrade in front of their noses. Yes there were inside connections to this deal, but nothing illegal happened here. Articles like this are a witch hunt and are contributing to this mob mentality that is asking us to listen to our emotions rather than the rule of law and logic. If we are going to get out of this there must be calm, there must be order, bad businesses should be held accountable, but so should the members of Congress that are making this worse by encouraging this overloading of emotion over logic on both sides of the aisle.
The large Bank of America branch in Times Square in New York City has a big billboard for the movie above the branch which advertises the deal.
I agree with Kim and Poe. Consumer spending IS consumer spending whether it’s at movie theaters or elsewhere. And B, consumer spending is not trickle down economics you brain-washed fool.
And for all of you bitching about the bail-out, then tell me – what would you do to stimulate the economy? Please enlighten us with your wisdom.
Thanks! Since I’m not a customer of B and A, I will definitely NOT take my kids to see and pay full price. I was going to take them but now I won’t since all B of A customers will get vouchers to see it. I’ll wait til it’s out and in Redboxes to rent for $1 to see it.
The bailout is a joke. All of the companies receiving money is spending it on whatever they want and there is nothing we can do about it. They just passed a bill stating that anyone receiving over 5 billion dollars can not give out bonuses, well if they received any money they should not give out bonuses. Until us AMERICAN’s do something it will not end. I am personally going to contribute to the mess we are all paying for by not paying the mortgage. I am paying for so many others on top of mine and I am tired of doing it. If more people do it than maybe they will stop spending our money.
Whether this is stimulus or not, doesn’t this argue against ever having the government bail out any company for any reason? And does this not also argue against passing large “stimulus” bills that no one had the opportunity to read based on the argument: “If we don’t do this right now, we’re all going to die so, shut up and vote!”?