Geez. It took the Los Angeles Times four reporters to say absolutely nothing new today about the William Morris-Endeavor merger story. Not even one fresh development. This, despite the fact that the paper is more than 5 weeks late printing a word about the deal, and more than two weeks behind The New York Times. Patrick Goldstein’s brief LAT blog post doesn’t count: it was timed to the NYT story, and acknowledged I broke the news back on February 17th, yet still managed to say less than nothing. Both trades have weighed in superficially. But the most clueless blogging was by error-prone Sharon Waxman who wrote that talks between the two agencies weren’t even happening.
Who’s Clued In …And Just Clueless
By NIKKI FINKE | Friday March 27, 2009 @ 5:52am PDTTags: LA Times, NY Times
This article was printed from http://www.deadline.com/2009/03/whos-clued-in-and-just-clueless/
COMMENTS (7)
-
SUBSCRIBE TO DEADLINE NEWS
-
Marketplace
-
Two Weeks of Posts Comments 1 Paula Abdul Won’t Return To ‘X Factor’ In 273 2 RECORD-BREAKING WEEKEND! 4 Films Open $20+M: ‘The 176 3 Why Actors Hate Agents At Pilot Season… 161 4 ‘Chronicle’ Tackles ‘Woman In Black’ For 121 5 SAG-AFTRA: Exclusive Post-Merger Details 120 ‘New Girl’ Music Video
News/Opinion Poll
Loading ...By The Numbers
Title Studio Gross 1 Chronicle FOX $22.0M 2 The Woman In Black CBS $20.9M 3 The Grey OPRD $9.3M 4 Big Miracle UNI $7.8M 5 Underworld: Awake... SNY $5.5M 6 One For The Money LGF $5.2M 7 Red Tails FOX $4.7M 8 The Descendants FSL $4.6M 9 Man On A Ledge SMT $4.4M 10 Extremely Loud & WB $3.8M 11 Contraband UNI $3.4M 12 The Artist TWC $2.6M 13 Beauty And The Beast DIS $2.6M 14 Hugo PAR $2.3M 15 The Iron Lady TWC $1.9M 16 Mission: Impossible - PAR $1.7M 17 Joyful Noise WB $1.5M 18 Haywire REL $1.2M 19 Alvin And The FOX $1.0M 20 Sherlock Holmes: A WB $1.0M SOURCE: RENTRAKBox Office Poll
Loading ...Archives
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006





At the LA Times wonder why they suck. They couldn’t get a scoop if they worked for Ben & Jerrys. The best part of the paper was Miz Brenoff and Hot Property, and they let her go!
You guys have got to stop calling each other out. It’s just boring already. He said. She said. TOLDJA. The truth is Nikki gets most of the scoops. How she gets them IS HER BUSINESS. And it is a business. Going on for years. She is connected. Does she “shake executives down”? COME ON! But she is/you are very opinionated. Sometimes commenting on movies you haven’t seen but have only heard about. As a filmmaker it’s frustrating to get those barbs when you haven’t even seen the film, but overall I’d rather read Nikki Finke than anyone else. On an accuracy level she’s amazing. Had the merger story first, Chernin first, HBO Callender out first, Carolyn Strauss out first – give her some credit. And stop all these blogs on blogs.
I couldn’t help but laugh when the reporter from the LAT went on kcrw’s the business to claim that they consistently break entertainment stories.
Here’s the thing…
I’m ok with this website reporting actual facts and information…
But when you and your readers use this site to get personal and anonymously try and destroy people’s careers and livelihoods – I think its a bit diabolical…
Other than being a lifelong WMA client, I don’t really have a dog in this fight – either way – I’ll still pay my 10 percent…
I’m just saying Nikki – you need to rise above career assassination…
Like WMA and the trades, the LAT is clueless.
And I couldn’t help but laugh when I saw the “Quick Takes” in today’s Calendar section and all the briefs were missing their headers…priceless.
@ Dan and Andy
I was thinking somewhat along those lines myself. Nikki – you know you exceed competence at your job. Isn’t it enough to just focus on what you do well, instead of spending such a sizable bulk of your time slamming competitors? Even if they start it, just let it roll off you like water off a duck. Be above their pettiness, focus on the work, and let them sink into the mire of all that unnecessary drama.