
SUNDAY AM UPDATE: Warner Bros’ superhero doomsday thriller with no stars and lots of violence opened to a $25.1 million Friday and $19M Saturday for a blockbuster $55.6M weekend with Sunday’s estimate of $11.5M. But that’s lower than the $60sM which the studio was hoping for Watchmen.
Exit polling showed that 65% of the audience was male, and of those 65% over the age of 25. But moviegoers didn’t necessarily like the movie as shown by a Cinemascore of only “B”. However, pumping up Friday’s total was the $4.5M from 1,600 Thursday midnight and Friday 12:01 AM shows including all 124 sold-out Imax screenings. (IMAX even added about 20 more 3 AM shows to accomodate the big demand.) And Watchmen has the highest location count for an R-rated opening — 3,611 theaters — more than even the record-setting 3,603 venues for the studio’s The Matrix Reloaded. This marks the most anticipated superhero movie debut since last summer’s The Dark Knight. Only it’s not a sequel or remake but a long-awaited big screen retelling of a widely admired and highly creative graphic novel by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons.
Yet big questions remain: Is the complex story too murky? Is the rampant violence too noxious? Most importantly, will the pic have legs?
Overseas, Paramount is distributing it day and date in 45 major territories for $28M in grosses there. Japan and 14 markets are left to open. (Warner Bros was targeted in a lawsuit by 20th Century Fox to gets its legal piece of Watchmen‘s proceeds, while Paramount owns 25% and has international distribution.) As for North American box office, I can report that every Hollywood studio was in agreement that the ambitious pic from 300 director Zack Snyder would have an enormous weekend opening. The expected range was high $50sM into the $60sM despite a long running time of two hours, 43 minutes. But now even $60M is impossible. So 300 will remain the highest March opener of all time at $70.9M.
One reason Watchmen did well was the lack of competition. Last week’s #1, Disney’s Jonas Brothers: The 3-D Concert Experience, sank -78% to make only $850K on Friday and $1.2M on Saturday for just a $2.7M weekend and paltry $16.7M cume (which is either a curse or a blessing depending on your POV.) It’s still the 2nd highest grossing concert film of all time. “It played exactly like a concert film with a one-week only engagement,” a Disney exec tells me. “The Miley concert, coming off of a sold-out tour and unaffordable concert ticket prices, certainly set the table with unrealistic expectations.” But this has to be disappointing given all the JB hype.
Here’s the TOP 10 this weekend. (analysis continues below.)
1. Watchmen (Warner Bros) OPENER [3,611 theaters] $55.6M Wkd
2. Madea Goes to Jail (Lionsgate) Week 3 [2,151] $8.8M Wkd, Cume $76.5M
3. Taken (20th Century Fox) Week 6 [3,016] $7.4M Wkd, Cume $118M
4. Slumdog Millionaire (Fox SL) Week 17 [2,890] $6.9M Wkd, Cume $125.4M
5. Paul Blart: Mall Cop (Sony) Week 8 [2,558] $4.2M Wkd, Cume $133.6M
6. He’s Just Not That Into You (NL/WB) Week 5 [2,445] $4M Wkd, Cume $84.6M
7. Coraline 3-D (Focus Features) Week 5 [1,959] $3.3M Wkd, Cume $65.6M
8. Confessions of a Shopaholic (Disney) Week 4 [2,290] $3.1M Wkd, Cume $38.3M
9. Jonas Brothers: 3D (Disney) Week 2 [1,276] $2.7M Wkd, (-78%) Cume $16.7M
10. Fired Up! (Sony) Week 3 [1,798] $2.6M Wkd, Cume $13.3M
Of course the comic book fanboys are turning out for their long awaited graphic novel to come to the big screen. But what about everyone else? Turns out that Watchmen is tracking most heavily with older males — which makes sense since the movie is set in an alternate 1985 America (although Nixon has been played down in the pic). Awareness, interest and first choice is being led by over age 25 males followed by under 25 guys. On one tracking service, younger males have lower awareness but higher interest from those that are aware. Here’s what’s also interesting: there’s high awareness and positive interest from the Latino segment as well as African Americans which is translating into strong first choice numbers in both of those ethnic segments. What does it all mean? “I think that the movie is obviously poised to have an incredible opening,” a top Warner Bros exec told me confidently.
The studio is even optimistic about attracting moviegoers from outside Watchmen‘s sweet spot of males ages 17-to-34. I’m told it’s solid across all demos, and even doing well with females. That may be due to Warner Bros’ $50 million marketing budget for the movie — about average for a tentpole these days. The studio invested in a very aggressive campaign that spent big in the outdoor market and on TV advertising. But what’s amusing is that rival marketing gurus say they’re surprised and impressed by the campaign that’s also left them confused what the movie is about or even who the good guys or bad guys are and why. As one of them admired: “The campaign was about planting a big flag in the ground as if to say, ‘We are an event. And if you don’t understand that, then you’re not cool enough to get it’. ”
That was indeed the challenge for Sue Kroll and her marketing crew, which is why they created a lot of value-added content to flesh out the very graphic characters. Surprisingly, they chose low-rated NBC to air the most cross promotional spots with the pic’s characters — showcasing Dr. Manhattan during a National Treasure movie, and Rorschach or The Comedian during Heroes. Overall, there was a very robust TV campaign running on all the networks and cable tv. Time was purchased on Lost, CSI, Law and Order, Criminal Minds, WWF Smackdown, NFC/AFC Playoffs, 24, The Mentalist, Fringe, The Office, 30 Rock, all the late night shows on every network, and on and on. Watchmen has also been everywhere online — MySpace, Yahoo, Facebook, YouTube, IGN, Moviefone, NBC, For Your Imagination, Flizster, Hitifx, and Fandango.
Strangely, the Warner Bros team resisted the obvious tagline for Watchmen that “someone is killing off superheroes”. (As close as the marketing came was “We want our superheroes”.) Because the difficulty was staying true to the graphic novel as a social and cultural phenomenon but not oversimplifying or overselling it. That meant doing something movie marketers rarely do: accepting that Watchmen is an acquired taste based on a restrictive idea and written as an inaccessible story and then made into a movie that isn’t for everyone. This may be a fine strategy to open the pic. But what about the following weekend when Watchmen‘s negatives are watercooler talk? “I hate to think that, after 2 fucking years of marketing, we’re a one weekend movie,” a Warner Bros exec confessed to me.
But that’s exactly what Hollywood is anticipating. The real disagreement in Hollywood this weekend is not just whether the pic is weird but wonderful, but also whether Watchmen will have legs. As one rival marketing guru quipped, “Probably not. But if you open to $70+M you can get to $150M on your knees.” As another agrred: “They will get a lot of initial interest because it’s an event movie in March — and then the bottom falls out. Whether Warner Bros can broaden the campaign to sustain interest in Watchmen is what movie analysts will be watching after this Sunday.






90 mil at least…..nothing is rivaling it, and it has a whole lot more buzz than 300
50Mil-ish, less than 20 week 2.
I’m guessing that Watchmen will pull a Jonas Brothers and seriously underperform relative to the crazy estimates out there. That being said, there is no competition this weekend so it will get business for that reason alone. Nobody outside the comic geek/graphic novel crowd ever heard of it before and even they are split on it. Watch the second weekend and see if it has any real support or just curiosity and the fanboys.
Let’s break some records! Let’s beat 300, the Matrix Reloaded and Passion of the Christ!
could do? please, WILL DO
Remember that the film is nearly 3 hours long; that’s going to limit its gross. $50 million.
I’m predicting 80mil. I work at the Arclight and our shows are selling like nuts. We even just added a fifth midnight showing at 12:45. This movie’s gonna be huge.
40-45 for the weekend. 20-25 week 2.
Isn’t it possible the increase in online sales in comparison with 300 is more likely a result of the fact that consumers are more comfortable with online sales now than they were 2 years ago? I’d like to see a comparison of its actual numbers, not percentages, with more recent comic book releases…
I’m really intrigued to see what comes next in the overall culture of dark age superheroes, and now that seminal entries like Watchmen and Dark Knight are hitting the biggest of the mainstream decades after much that they’ve inspired has, where it will all go from here. There’s a here.
Don’t underestimate the length of this film deterring box office gold. I think $70 million is too high because there will be less showings. Also, this wont be a tent poll movie like “Iron Man” and “The Dark Knight,” but a fanboy flick with typical movie fans attending. And a big second weekend drop is expected.
I agree with “Anonymous — March 5, 2009 @ 8:04 pm” for the most part.
The range for the “Watchmen” weekend estimate has been $50-70 million this week. $60 million is the nice over/under number.
“Watchmen” is opening in 3,611 theaters this weekend. A $10k average per theater for the weekend is a very respectable performance for any film. “The Dark Knight” did $12k PER DAY on its opening weekend for a $36k average.
A $70 million estimate is saying that “Watchmen” will do almost $19.5k per theater for the weekend. That is more than “Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix” did two years ago with a $18k average. That movie had a running time that was 1/2 hour shorter, was rated PG-13, and had significantly more recognition than “Watchmen.” A $70 million estimate would almost be the same performance as “The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King” did on its opening weekend six years ago ($19.6k average and a 1/2 hour longer running time than “Watchmen”).
I’m thinking “Watchmen” does $39.7-45.1 million. That is a $11-12.5k average per theater for the weekend.
HOWEVER, I should note that my estimate for “Twilight” was ridiculously low.
I’m guessing $50 to $65 mil with at least a 70% drop in weekend two. To my mind, the opening weekend gross isn’t nearly as interesting as the legs it does or doesn’t have in the following weeks. I think the drop will be BIG.
And so here we are in the age of film as “product” and all we can do is jabber about “how much will it make?” salivating over the number like a pack of money whores.
It’s over Johnny, it’s over.
“Nobody outside the comic geek/graphic novel crowd ever heard of it before and even they are split on it.- Joe Melnick ”
Just because you are too dumb to have heard of it doesn’t mean it isn’t outside that niche crowd. Watchmen is huge, bigger than just the comic crowd thanks the the book market and the fact it has been for nearly 2 decades now “the greatest comic ever”. Wake up son.
I hope it does 90m, then the newspapers can write another article about our recession proof industry where: DVD is dying (see sony layoffs), the ad market is shit. But hey, the box office is great and we’re all getting rich. Seriously, when is someone at a major paper going to write that story instead of the feel good crap. Nikki???????????????
I don’t believe ‘Watchmen’ is going to have legs for two simple reasons. At the screening I attended, I saw about half a dozen women walk out (with dates in tow) during the (attempted) rape scene, and peals of laughter during the (non-coercive) sex scenes.
And despite the agressive fanboy marketing, the feedback I’ve been hearing (you know, the stuff that drives the kind of word of mouth no marketing budget can buy) has been tepid.
@CineFileX
I case you had not noticed: this is not a site about movie quality. No star-ratings, thumbs up or down, stuff like that.
This site is about money. Who is still in the business and can make money, who lost money yet again, who is hired, who is fired.
Movie quality is usually only lamented
See Paul Blart.
With the theatre counts and screen numbers, I have to revised my estimation.
I give it north 50M opening weekend just cause of it overtly-long screen time. That said, it’s the 2nd week BO performance that will tell how well is the pic being rcvd by the masses.
I really want this pic to do well but having read some of the reviews from my trusted (and of same taste reviewers), seems like its all hype and lacking of substance that will make this pic one to remember for all the wrong reasons.
Here’s hoping I am wrong!
“I’m thinking “Watchmen” does $39.7-45.1 million. That is a $11-12.5k average per theater for the weekend.
HOWEVER, I should note that my estimate for “Twilight” was ridiculously low.”
Aaaaand your estimate for Watchmen is ridiculously low. It’s pretty clear you have no idea about trends among youth. There is no doubt this does 60m. None. In all likelihood, it’ll do closer to 70.
It probably will have a fairly large drop if nothing else due to the fact that it has some competition next weekend. I think if it does 70m, it’ll get close to 200m in the end though. Probably finish up around 185.
As someone who is female, 18-24, and hasn’t read the graphic novel, I can say with relative confidence that this film will have a great run at least through the second weekend. The rich cinematography is overwhelming the first go-round, and Snyder’s been smart enough to layer the film for multiple viewings.
Reading the graphic novel twice before I saw the movie last night I can definitely say that on a first time viewing it was a mixed bag. It should’ve been longer. There was too many little detals missing from the graphic novel that would’ve made the movie much more multi-dimensional. But I know that after the movie was over I thought to myself ‘wow what a refreshing change of pace of the usual bullshit that plagues the multiplexes on a weekly basis.’ Its not perfect, I don’t think any movie really is(maybe the Godfather pts.I-II)but it’s different and it has an identity of its own, its not asking you for acceptance. All the performances I thought were really well done. I don’t know why critics are harping on Matthew Goode and Malin Ackerman, they did a pretty damn good job making those characters come to life — especially Jackie Earl Haley and surprisingly Patrick Wilson whom I normally don’t like all that much, they were the standouts. Gotta see it again to get a more balanced opinion.
I would like to suggest that the concept of film as product is a fluid one. For that all important first week, yes, it is product and reduced to numbers, but if it is to survive the business of weeks to come it must be more. It must resonate as a story and a visual art if the seats are to continue to be filled.
There is no battle between art and business, they’ve become fluid companions.
“The studio is even optimistic about attracting moviegoers from outside Watchmen’s sweet spot of males ages 17-to-34. I’m told it’s solid across all demos, and even doing well with females. That may be due to Warner Bros’ $50 million marketing budget for the movie –”
- Really? I have yet to find a woman who knows of it (past any imagery), much less expressed interest in seeing it. This is an R rated dude film. If your being told that from WB I call BS. WBBS.
FWIW – I’m a semi-reformed fanboy who read this issue for issue as it came out in the 80′s, and have my IMAX ticket for tomorrow. And I do have a date this evening – I did say semi-reformed.
Running time as a factor in box office may be somewhat overrated. Watchmen runs 161 minutes. Dark Knight was effectively the same length (in terms of available showtimes), 152 minutes.
The highest grossing film of all time, Titanic, runs 194 minutes. The highest grossing film of all time in real (adjusted) dollars, Gone With The Wind, tips the scales at a whopping 226 minutes.
The Sound of Music, 174 minutes. The Godfather, 175. To cite a few examples.