
SUNDAY AM UPDATE: Warner Bros’ superhero doomsday thriller with no stars and lots of violence opened to a $25.1 million Friday and $19M Saturday for a blockbuster $55.6M weekend with Sunday’s estimate of $11.5M. But that’s lower than the $60sM which the studio was hoping for Watchmen.
Exit polling showed that 65% of the audience was male, and of those 65% over the age of 25. But moviegoers didn’t necessarily like the movie as shown by a Cinemascore of only “B”. However, pumping up Friday’s total was the $4.5M from 1,600 Thursday midnight and Friday 12:01 AM shows including all 124 sold-out Imax screenings. (IMAX even added about 20 more 3 AM shows to accomodate the big demand.) And Watchmen has the highest location count for an R-rated opening — 3,611 theaters — more than even the record-setting 3,603 venues for the studio’s The Matrix Reloaded. This marks the most anticipated superhero movie debut since last summer’s The Dark Knight. Only it’s not a sequel or remake but a long-awaited big screen retelling of a widely admired and highly creative graphic novel by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons.
Yet big questions remain: Is the complex story too murky? Is the rampant violence too noxious? Most importantly, will the pic have legs?
Overseas, Paramount is distributing it day and date in 45 major territories for $28M in grosses there. Japan and 14 markets are left to open. (Warner Bros was targeted in a lawsuit by 20th Century Fox to gets its legal piece of Watchmen‘s proceeds, while Paramount owns 25% and has international distribution.) As for North American box office, I can report that every Hollywood studio was in agreement that the ambitious pic from 300 director Zack Snyder would have an enormous weekend opening. The expected range was high $50sM into the $60sM despite a long running time of two hours, 43 minutes. But now even $60M is impossible. So 300 will remain the highest March opener of all time at $70.9M.
One reason Watchmen did well was the lack of competition. Last week’s #1, Disney’s Jonas Brothers: The 3-D Concert Experience, sank -78% to make only $850K on Friday and $1.2M on Saturday for just a $2.7M weekend and paltry $16.7M cume (which is either a curse or a blessing depending on your POV.) It’s still the 2nd highest grossing concert film of all time. “It played exactly like a concert film with a one-week only engagement,” a Disney exec tells me. “The Miley concert, coming off of a sold-out tour and unaffordable concert ticket prices, certainly set the table with unrealistic expectations.” But this has to be disappointing given all the JB hype.
Here’s the TOP 10 this weekend. (analysis continues below.)
1. Watchmen (Warner Bros) OPENER [3,611 theaters] $55.6M Wkd
2. Madea Goes to Jail (Lionsgate) Week 3 [2,151] $8.8M Wkd, Cume $76.5M
3. Taken (20th Century Fox) Week 6 [3,016] $7.4M Wkd, Cume $118M
4. Slumdog Millionaire (Fox SL) Week 17 [2,890] $6.9M Wkd, Cume $125.4M
5. Paul Blart: Mall Cop (Sony) Week 8 [2,558] $4.2M Wkd, Cume $133.6M
6. He’s Just Not That Into You (NL/WB) Week 5 [2,445] $4M Wkd, Cume $84.6M
7. Coraline 3-D (Focus Features) Week 5 [1,959] $3.3M Wkd, Cume $65.6M
8. Confessions of a Shopaholic (Disney) Week 4 [2,290] $3.1M Wkd, Cume $38.3M
9. Jonas Brothers: 3D (Disney) Week 2 [1,276] $2.7M Wkd, (-78%) Cume $16.7M
10. Fired Up! (Sony) Week 3 [1,798] $2.6M Wkd, Cume $13.3M
Of course the comic book fanboys are turning out for their long awaited graphic novel to come to the big screen. But what about everyone else? Turns out that Watchmen is tracking most heavily with older males — which makes sense since the movie is set in an alternate 1985 America (although Nixon has been played down in the pic). Awareness, interest and first choice is being led by over age 25 males followed by under 25 guys. On one tracking service, younger males have lower awareness but higher interest from those that are aware. Here’s what’s also interesting: there’s high awareness and positive interest from the Latino segment as well as African Americans which is translating into strong first choice numbers in both of those ethnic segments. What does it all mean? “I think that the movie is obviously poised to have an incredible opening,” a top Warner Bros exec told me confidently.
The studio is even optimistic about attracting moviegoers from outside Watchmen‘s sweet spot of males ages 17-to-34. I’m told it’s solid across all demos, and even doing well with females. That may be due to Warner Bros’ $50 million marketing budget for the movie — about average for a tentpole these days. The studio invested in a very aggressive campaign that spent big in the outdoor market and on TV advertising. But what’s amusing is that rival marketing gurus say they’re surprised and impressed by the campaign that’s also left them confused what the movie is about or even who the good guys or bad guys are and why. As one of them admired: “The campaign was about planting a big flag in the ground as if to say, ‘We are an event. And if you don’t understand that, then you’re not cool enough to get it’. ”
That was indeed the challenge for Sue Kroll and her marketing crew, which is why they created a lot of value-added content to flesh out the very graphic characters. Surprisingly, they chose low-rated NBC to air the most cross promotional spots with the pic’s characters — showcasing Dr. Manhattan during a National Treasure movie, and Rorschach or The Comedian during Heroes. Overall, there was a very robust TV campaign running on all the networks and cable tv. Time was purchased on Lost, CSI, Law and Order, Criminal Minds, WWF Smackdown, NFC/AFC Playoffs, 24, The Mentalist, Fringe, The Office, 30 Rock, all the late night shows on every network, and on and on. Watchmen has also been everywhere online — MySpace, Yahoo, Facebook, YouTube, IGN, Moviefone, NBC, For Your Imagination, Flizster, Hitifx, and Fandango.
Strangely, the Warner Bros team resisted the obvious tagline for Watchmen that “someone is killing off superheroes”. (As close as the marketing came was “We want our superheroes”.) Because the difficulty was staying true to the graphic novel as a social and cultural phenomenon but not oversimplifying or overselling it. That meant doing something movie marketers rarely do: accepting that Watchmen is an acquired taste based on a restrictive idea and written as an inaccessible story and then made into a movie that isn’t for everyone. This may be a fine strategy to open the pic. But what about the following weekend when Watchmen‘s negatives are watercooler talk? “I hate to think that, after 2 fucking years of marketing, we’re a one weekend movie,” a Warner Bros exec confessed to me.
But that’s exactly what Hollywood is anticipating. The real disagreement in Hollywood this weekend is not just whether the pic is weird but wonderful, but also whether Watchmen will have legs. As one rival marketing guru quipped, “Probably not. But if you open to $70+M you can get to $150M on your knees.” As another agrred: “They will get a lot of initial interest because it’s an event movie in March — and then the bottom falls out. Whether Warner Bros can broaden the campaign to sustain interest in Watchmen is what movie analysts will be watching after this Sunday.
Editor-in-Chief Nikki Finke - tip her here.







Predicted warm weather this weekend in Northeast (after a long cold spell) will help.
50mm P+A seems low. Probably more like 65mm +.
These guys have to do 200m world-wide to make even a little bit of money.
Not sure what the business model is there.
‘Watchmen’ will probably have legs because of older white men, similar to ‘Gran Turino’ and ‘Taken’. Word-of-Mouth will be strong because older men are drawn to masculin male figures in films with intellegent dialogue and strong action. It is possible that they will be turned off by the high gore, but I think older white men will carry this movie.
It won’t do as well as “300″ for a number of reasons:
1. Its longer than 300 by almost an hour
2. The story is much more complicated
3. No male supermodels in loin cloths.
The length of the film issue is self-explaintory. The complexity of the story will deter second viewings. The lack of Gerard Butler and crew running around half-naked will hurt its chances with the ladies (Billy Crudup-voiced naked CG superhero not withstanding).
Harold – Harry Potter 5 and LOTR3 both opened on Wednesdays so their Fri-Sun openings were smaller than they should have been. Had they opened on a Friday, they would have had $100M+ opening weekends.
Also the 3,611 theater count includes the 124 Imax runs. The Friday gross (including Thu midnight) will be a huge portion of the 3-day, maybe 40-45%. Could be mid-60s for the weekend.
It’s going to be huge, both this weekend and next. The buzz is everywhere. I’m a 61 year old male and, having heard about the movie months ago, I bought and read the novel. One of the most fun reading experiences I’ve had in years. Yeah, the plot is so-so but the telling of the story is incredible. And although I am bound to be somewhat dissapointed – since the telling of the story isn’t likely to translate well to the screen – I’m curious as hell and will see it by next weekend.
I just wish the marketing hadn’t tried to cram Zach Snyder’s “visionary” status down our throats. The real visionaries of his films are the vfx animators. I don’t see how visually transcribing famous graphic novel source material from Frank Miller and Alan Moore makes somebody a visionary. Dawn of the Dead ’04 was pedestrian in these terms.
“Remember that the film is nearly 3 hours long; that’s going to limit its gross.”
Those days are long over.
who fucking cares how much money this movie makes? do any of you run studios? is it a fun movie or not, that’s the most important question to be asking
I’m going into hibernation until November, when movies for grown-ups are released.
The big opening numbers are interesting, but is that the rabid fan base response only? Will the theaters be empty over the weekend as a result? If not, prepare for more comic book movies as Hollywood appears to be gearing up for more production. I’ve even heard web comics like Pyramids of Mars are getting a second look
not bad for a p.o.s. movie
then again, when has warner bros or fox really made anything of quality lately?
well, it does matter how much money it makes for several reasons. after all the courtroom/rights issues, several studios are attached and one studio in particular put up most of the budget and as much as i hate comic book films, the industry is in such a state that if this film doesn’t do good, it could mean even more layoffs.
I myself, will not be seeing it, I agree, I’d like to see movies actually made for adults – female adults. After Dark Knight and Iron Man I do not need to see another frikin explosion on the big screen ever again!
@actionman
Unfortunately no, it’s not fun, it’s laborious and if you haven’t read the book, makes no sense.
Eh.Not a fanboy. Zach makes racist trash. And can somebody PLEASE buy him a light bulb for christ sakes?
Jon: Please do go into hibernation. We can enjoy interesting pieces of pop art, while you wait for Stephen Daldry to make a another shallow piece of Oscar Bait. You’re such a cliche it’s not even funny.
WB better enjoy the opening week numbers because based on the responses on the “Yahoo movies board” this movie is getting more F’s than any movie I have seen in a long time. Says one movie goer…” People in the theatre were stunned at how bad this “blockbuster” movie was. There were dozens of groups standing around complaining. I felt so sorry for the poor saps who came in costume. The general consensus was that the highlight of the evening were the previews of Star Trek, Wolverine and Terminator. It was all downhill after that.” But then again People seem to relish the thought of spending million on preceived mediocre films.
“Aaaaand your estimate for Watchmen is ridiculously low. It’s pretty clear you have no idea about trends among youth.”
The estimate? Possibly.
Youth? They’re the weakest component of interest for “Watchmen.” EVERY survey shows men over 25 having the most awareness and interest. The youth are generally passing on this. However, those who are aware have strong interest. It’s just not a lot of them.
If “Watchmen” does $30 million or more today (including the midnights), it might do $65 million on a likely declining basis (i.e., 30F-20Sa-15Su).
“Watchmen” did $4.6 million at its 1,595 midnight performance locations. “The Dark Knight” did $18.5 million at 3,040 midnight performance locations. “The Dark Knight” midnight grosses represented 11.6% of a weekend that would total $155.3 million.
$4.6 million is 11.6% of $39.41 million. My estimate for Watchmen this weekend is $39.7-45.1 million.
If anything, I’m currently overestimating “Watchmen.”
Was at the Arclight Hollywood screening this morning at 10:35. A couple of people in the less-than-quarter-filled theater cheered when the usher introduced the film, but then everybody just kind of filed out at the end. Heard one guy talking about the blue cock and “how sexy the sex scene was.”
Pretty low-key, but it IS “Watchmen.” Not really expecting the post-”I AM Iron Man” cheering section.
My opinion? Zack Snyder proves that, in fact, he just wasn’t good enough to direct “Watchmen.” Some really, really great moments, but not a great film.
I think they should track by grouping people into “fat people” and “not fat people” rather than ethnicity.
I don’t give a rats ass what it makes or doesn’t make this weekend. It still SUCKED and I wanted that 2 hours and 40 minutes back! It’s a pathetic attempt at a good movie. The only good thing is I got to see it for free.
“Those days are long over”? Really? Have time machines and worm holes been installed in movie theaters? Because the last time I checked, there are only so many hours in the day, which is going to limit the number of showing you can run and ultimately effect the number of tickets you can sell.
Hoberman’s review of ‘Watchmen’ in The Village Voice sums up Zack Snyder perfectly: ‘visionary director’ = ‘competent hack’. I actually quite enjoyed his remake of ‘Dawn of the Dead’, but I’d no interest in either ’300′ or this film.
Just got home from seeing this film. It was what it was glad to see it. I have only one side comment because I’m a little shocked THAT PARENTS ARE BRINGING 5, 6, 7 year olds to this film. WHAT IN THE WORLD ARE THEY THINKING. It just pissed me off.
Saw it.
They blew it.
It sucks.