SUNDAY PM/MONDAY AM: It’s another big win for a family film after a dry spell filled with too many sci-fi movies. Twentieth Century Fox’s Night at the Museum 2: Battle Of The Smithsonian not only was the clear No. 1 at the North American box office this weekend, but also Ben Stiller’s biggest live-action opener ever. After opening to $15.3 million Friday, NATM2 received the family bump (+36%) for $20.6 million Saturday and $18.3 million Sunday to easily win the 3-day weekend with $53.5M. The pic finished the 4-day holiday with $70M, an impressive haul with so many half price kiddie tickets. Once again, Fox put together a massive global release: 4,095 theaters in North America, plus 8,100 runs in 93 territories internationally. IMAX showings generated $4.1M (8% of weekend) on 160 screens.
Museum 2 is the first all-audience comedy since Race To Witch Mountain way back in March, and Mall Cop: Paul Blart back in January. So the market was receptive to a pic that parents knew was safe for offspring. This reteaming of Ben Stiller and Owen Wilson and Robin Williams with director Shawn Levy, had to live up to the first in the franchise, which in 2007 opened at Christmastime and went on to earn $250.8M and worldwide $575M.
Museum 2 is likely to have summer legs, whereas Warner Bros’ Terminator: Salvation is already weak-kneed. The McG-directed 4th in the franchise starring Batman‘s Christian Bale is running out of steam after making $14.8 million in domestic grosses both Friday and Saturday and $12.7M Sunday for a 3-day weekend of just $43M from 3,530 venues. That’s much lower even than Watchmen‘s non-holiday opening. T4 finished with an underperforming $53.8M for the 4-day holiday, and $67.2M for the 5-day cume (including $3M from its Wednesday midnight showings and $13.5M from Thursday). Even though my box office gurus were confident Museum 2 would wind up #1, T4 “is pretty disappointing as most pundits thought it was going to win the weekend, as did most if not all of the tracking services,” a rival studio exec notes. Under and over age 25 males turned out, but the buzz turned rancid among fanboys who overwhelmingly didn’t like the pic. (Top critics didn’t either: there were only 33% positive reviews at Rotten Tomatoes). Warner Bros expected more, especially because T4 benefitted from worldwide awareness from that Christian Bale audio.
Sony is handling T4 internationally and releasing it in Asia next week but not until June for major overseas markets so as not to compete with its Angels & Demons. Domestically, that pic made $5.9M Friday and $8.3M Saturday and $7.7M Sunday, and will close in on $300M worldwide as soon as Tuesday ($286M now). It was battling for No. 3 with Paramount’s Star Trek and it was a close call: $21.8M vs $22.7M for the 3-day weekend, and $27.7M vs $29.4M for the 4-day holiday. Ron Howards’ pic has a $87.8M domestic cume while JJ Abrams’ reboot (which made $5.8M Friday and $8.7M Saturday and $8.5M Sunday) has a $191M North American cume starting its 3rd week. Rounding out the Top 5, Paramount’s spoof Dance Flick from the next generation of Wayans opened with a tepid $10.7M from 2,450 dates for the 3-day weekend, and $13.1M for the 4-day holiday.
FRIDAY 1PM: Latest estimates are that Warner Bros’ Terminator Salvation is tracking closer to Fast & Furious “but it’s going to take 5 days to get what they did in 3,” one rival studio exec notes. T4 opened with $13.5M Thursday including Wednesday’s $3M midnight shows and now looks to make $70M-$80M for the 5 days including Memorial Weekend vs Fast & Furious which did $70M in 3 days. Hollywood analysts are still insisting that Night At The Museum2: Battle Of The Smithsonian has the potential to open #1 with $80M for the 4-day holiday. But 20th Century Fox keeps insisting it’ll make $60M at most even if it does big business once the kids get out at noon today.
FRIDAY AM: Warner Bros’ Terminator Salvation chalked up domestic grosses of $13.3M from its Thursday opening, including $3M in midnight showings. The 4-day weekend estimates are now leveling out at perhaps $60M+ for this actioner and for 20th Century Fox’s Night At The Museum: Battle Of The Smithsonian.
THURSDAY 2:30PM: 20th Century Fox is saying they expect Night At The Museum: Battle Of The Smithsonian and Warner Bros’ Terminator: Salvation to be about neck-and-neck with $55M-$60M for the 4-day holiday. The studio even thinks Museum 2 could come in 2nd behind Terminator 4. But rival studios and my own box office gurus think Museum 2 will be #1 with $85M by the end of the long weekend. We’ll see…
THURSDAY NOON: Get ready for a mammoth Memorial Day weekend at the domestic and foreign box office. But you knew that already. By Monday night, 20th Century Fox’s sequel Night At The Museum: Battle Of The Smithsonian should round up the family sample to end No. 1 with an estimated $85 million for the 4-day holiday.
Warner Bros’ Terminator: Salvation already brought in $3 million from its midnight showings and should end Sunday with an estimated $60M for the 4-day holiday and a $75 cume for the 5-day. It looks big with males under and over age 25 but “I wish them luck with female moviegoers,” snarks a rival studio exec. “There hasn’t been anything shown that should convince a female to go see the movie.” There’s also a lot of fanboy chatter since Harry Knowles’ review eviscerated T4 on his Ain’t It Cool News. The combo of Bale and director McG is new so hard to compare their pic with the franchise starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. But 1984′s T1 did $38.3M domestic and $78M worldwide, 1991′s T2 did $204.8M/$519M, and 2003′s T3 did $150.3M/$433M.
Studios expect Sony’s Angels & Demons after one week, and Paramount’s Star Trek reboot after two weeks, to be neck-and-neck for the weekend. Expect an estimated $25M apiece for the 4-day holiday. And, rounding out the Top 5 will be the Damien Wayans-directed spoof Dance Flick which features a genuinely funny trailer . Playing in 2,450 dates, it could finish the 4-day holiday with $15M.






Man did T4 blow a fart in the wind. The movie just sucked. Yeah it was shot well and some of the special fx were cool, but…that’s about it.
I have to admit, Dance Flick is VERY funny. The Wayans do have a knack for the spoofing genre
No way Night at the Museum does $85M this weekend, even for 4-day, sounds like rivals spinning ridiculous estimates. It’s not tracking anywhere near that and if you use the first one as a comp, it will probably play a long time, but only open in the 50s, 60s for a great weekend. These estimates are out of hand. I work at an agency, and I can’t figure how anyone is coming up with these.
I have a feeling Terminator might be the first notable flop of the summer. There’s a great deal of competition for casual moviegoers and fanboys are strongly divided.
Star Trek passed Wolverine this week and T4 will not catch it. LEGS. Baby. Legs.
A Terminator movie without James Cameron is soulless. A Terminator movie without Arnold Schwarzenegger is pointless.
There isn’t enough first choice interest to keep this film going after this weekend.
The boxoffice trackers I have read have T4 at 87m for 5 day weekend and “Museum” at 66m for 4 days. Yahoo movie board has T4 with a B+ rating from 400 plus posters thus far which is pretty good. Frankly I pay little attention to film critics when it comes to the ACTION film Genre. It always amazes me how one critic can say the film is fantastic while another will say the same film is crap. Its as if they were viewing two completely different film. Actually Film Critics themselves SUCK and get a F grade from me.
Terminator is tracking for a $90 to $100 million weekend! I would be shocked if it did $60 million. Museum isn’t tracking well at all by contrast. Terminator is a review-proof type of film if ever there was one. Despite the bad publicity it has recieved, there seems to be a STRONG desire to see it based on all the attention it is getting. People just want to see what the fuss was all about. BY THE WAY, Terminator is also destroying MUSEUM at fandango and movietickets.com.
I think someone might very much regret making estimates like that if it came from FOX.
jdls08,
Film critics don’t suck. You obviously know nothing about critically analyzing a film or what make a good film vs. a bad one. Don’t let your ignorance rub off on everyone else. Of course critics have differences; welcome to the real world. The per-screen taking of a film, with some exceptions, shows that critically acclaimed films make more per-screen than to critically panned ones. It’s not a coincidence; some films are just plain bad while others are excellent. So you enjoy your brainless entertainment. Some of us actually appreciate film as something more than a way to waste time and money.
my friends worked on terminator so i want it to do well.
OH, Dan, Get a grip. For all your claims of expertise on the subject matter you missed the point of my comments.
You might love film critics and base your film going decisions on their opinions but as a whole Film critics have biases and other influences they use or come into play when they review films and as such you get one that thinks one is a masterpiece and another think it is crap and as such these critics don’t affect my decision as to what I see and or what I like. To cut to the chase, you might think you are so fricking sophisticated as to think because a critic didn’t like a film and rated the film a C and I did and rated the film a B the critic is smarter than I am and therefore I enjoy braindead entertainment and DAN here is where your ignorance surface. Hell, many film critics had meandering jobs in the news room until the editor needed a nerd to handle the job and where chosen to fill the post. Hell, if I had my way I probably round up a whole lot of them and throw them in a landfill where they belong. But then again I suppose everyone needs a job.
Dan, just because something is an action movie does not mean it is “brainless entertainment”, the only people who use that phrase are pompous film buff wannabes who want to feel important or special. Newsflash buddy, movies are meant to be enjoyed, however that happens.
My IQ is 135 and I liked T4. Is it better than James Cameron’s films? No. But it is better than the third one IMO. But I guess you would call Terminator 1 and 2 “brainless entertainment” just because there are explosions in them…and you call the other guy ignorant.
jdls09,
I’m sorry for coming off as a jerk and pretentious; I will try to be more polite. My point was that critics understand a film better than you or me (I’m not a critic) and are qualified to judge it on its own merits as a film. I am open-minded and don’t let them make up my mind for me, but when it comes down to it, they are almost always right. And no, that’s not how most critics come to get their jobs, at least not the ones I read and respect.
TheaterFan,
Please point out where I said all action movies were brainless entertainment. I love action movies. Sooo…
I also like some movies that are critically panned; I never said it was bad to like a move critics don’t, just they the critics are usually right. I also like cheeseburgers from Burger King. They aren’t the pinnacle of gourmet cooking – quite the opposite – but they can still be enjoyed for what they are. So sorry for the offense to both of you. I hope you better understand my position and I will try to not be so arrogant next time around…
I just saw T4, liked it better than Wolverine and Star Trek. Critics gave it bad reviews, but the word of mouth has been positive and hopefully save the movie.
Comment by jdls08 — May 21, 2009 @ 2:32 pm
Amen to that!
I have always thought movie critics are a bunch of stupid ppl who thinks they are better than the movie goers by making known their reviews to the masses. Sure, everyone is entitled to their own opinion but keep it to yourself.
That is why I have never bothered to visit RottenTomatoes cause its so stupid to read other ppl’s comment about a movie. Heck! My gran thinks so too and she called Ebert a prick! She can’t believed there are still ppl out who reads critics column.
I guess with Rupert Murdoch intending to charge a fee for online newspaper, we can finally say goodbye to the damn critics cause no one wants to pay to read some silly comments and having to pay for it
Btw, jdls09, got me ready my spade to dig the hole for the critics..lol
I don’t care what critics will say. Remember Woody Allen and his comments on them?
It’s Terminator me and all my friends will go just because it’s TERMINATOR!
Not sure about the legs through. I think Tramsformers will be top grossing movie of 2009…
The New York Times and the New York Daily News gave Terminator very good reviews.
This female moviegoer will see anything with that hunk Christian Bale in it. Don’t you think he has millions of female fans just like myself?
But to all those who saw T4 and liked it, I have to ask what was it that you actually liked, content wise? Seriously?
You can blow up all the buildings in the world, but without character development it all just renders itself meaningless. Mind you this is not a poorly made film in the least, the production values are enourmous, but in the end it just leaves you empty.
There’s nothing in it that you haven’t seen before. And for a production with a cost of 200 million that’s pretty lame. Terminator is done for me now. I have the 3 prior movies and that’s enough for me. If they want to ressurrect thing in 20 years with a fresh concept then great, but if they ramp up production for a sequel to be released in a couple of years then count me out. Sorry McG.
The kids movie is going to win, every suburban parent is going to be shushing their kids through that movie all weekend. Terminator has been getting pretty bad reviews :http://www.newsy.com/videos/terminator_s_mixed_reviews_meanings but it is Terminator everyone who has watched the other movies is going to turn out for this one. Don’t count out the ladies either, Christian Bale is tasty and so is that Worthington guy.
There’s a difference between film criticism and film reviews. 90% of the “reviewers” are doing just that, viewing something and giving their opinion.
In either case, its kind of inane to base your decision to view something based on someone else’s opinion – unless you find someone who’s likes and dislikes are similar enough to yours. Or alternatively, someone who writes well enough that despite giving a positive or negative review gives you enough information to let you know if you’ll like it.
That sad…the reviews are crushing T4. Undeservedly so…not that it’s good – it’s just not THAT bad. Completely souless, but compentently assembled.
B Hennessay
uhm, “Star Trek” is still $75M behind the world-wide “Wolverine” take.
“But to all those who saw T4 and liked it, I have to ask what was it that you actually liked, content wise? Seriously?”
Because it was entertaining, looked great, and delivered the goods as a SUMMER ACTION MOVIE. Sure it was silly, sure Bale was cashing the check — who cares? It’s not Shakespeare, it’s a two-hour ride and I fully enjoyed the hell out of it. And ILM’s rendering of ’84 Arnold was terrific at the end.
It wasn’t faultless, obviously, but some of these “awful” reviews are, IMO, reviewing the fact that McG’s name is on it and not the film itself. I wonder if some other filmmaker had their name on this picture if it would still be getting the mixed reviews it has been.
One thing I know, is that it’s not nearly as bad as Harry Knowles claims it is — in fact he’s lost all credibility with his pissing all over this movie as far as I’m concerned. Not that he had much of it before, either, but that site is firmly in bed with certain filmmakers and studios, I have no doubt now about that.
Remember when Summer movies were Good?
Oh how a wee lass longs for those days.
Props to the Star Trek folk for doing it right… shame on Fox for aborting out another bad X-Men movie
Considering Harry Knowles rarely sees a movie he doesn’t like (nor refuses an all-expenses-paid trip to the set), the fact that his review kills this movie with fire is telling and does not bode well. It won’t dissuade fan boys, but his sentiments will carry through the broader critic sphere and influence those casual fans who are trying to decide whether they want to see T4 or NATM2.
The fault lies squarely with “McG” (I wish I cared enough to know what his real name is, because I feel like an ass just writing that stupid moniker). As an aside, take a moment to listen to him speak. He knows that we know he doesn’t know what he’s doing, so he peppers his speech with nonsensical pseudo-auteur lingo and near malapropisms. He even avoids contractions, as if we’ll think he’s smart because he employs “does not” instead of “don’t”. Its fascinating.
I’ve have more faith in critics if any of the MUSEUM reviews were written by anyone who could recognise that Hank Azaria is doing a Boris Karloff impression (right down to the make-up job). Some of them seem to think he’s impersonating Jeremy Irons! Seen any movies made BEFORE 1975, guys?