A class action lawsuit was filed today in Los Angeles County Superior Court against ICM, the talent agency’s EVP Jack Gilardi, and an outside personal manager named John Rockwell described as a “Hollywood hustler and close friend of Gilardi”. It alleges sexual battery, fraud, and a conspiracy under the Racketeer Influenced And Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act to “hip-pocket” actresses for sexual exploitation. TMZ first reported on the lawsuit, and I have now had a chance to read it. ICM gave this statement to me: the “allegations are outrageous and completely false. ICM denies any and all wrongdoing and will vigorously defend this action.”
Claire Robinson, a former Miss British Columbia 2004 and 23-year-old Canadian fashion model, is the plaintiff representing the class of other “similarly situated” women. These are defined as “all female actresses who were falsely promised representation by ICM through a ‘hip-pocket’ arrangement and who were sexually battered or sexually harassed by a co-conspirator.” The practice of hip-pocketing is described by the lawsuit as occuring “when an experienced, well-established senior agent extends the promise of representation to an actress without credit or experience” but never actually takes the “hip-pocketed” actress through the formal procedures of firm representation and then sexually exploits the woman. ICM sources tell me that Robinson is not listed in their records as a client.
Though the class action claims to “chronicle how young actresses wind up on the ‘casting couch’ to be sexually exploited through a criminal conspiracy of powerful men in the entertainment industry,” the complaint targets only one agent at ICM, the 79-year-old Gilardi. Robinson claims that, two years ago, she visited his office where he verbally agreed to be her agent and have ICM represent her. She alleges that on May 20, 2007, the 79-year-old Gilardi “made sexual advances” towards her in an ICM limousine while they were on their way to an awards show.
The rest of the complaint talks about the sexual advances and sexual battery, including a rape, that Robinson allegedly endured in 2007 and 2008 from John Rockwell, 74, who she says is Gilardi’s ”professional and personal friend”. Rockwell is not employed by ICM but she describes him as her personal manager and she claims he arranged for Gilardi to rep her. There is no mention that she ever reported the year-old rape to local authorities. But the complaint says Robinson suffered a nervous breakdown because of her alleged “hip-pocketing” and has been receiving psychiatric treatment.
The lawsuit makes no allegations of sexual battery by Gilardi or ICM. It does allege ”a criminal enterprise (RICO) involving a scheme to sexually exploit young actress [sic]. The scheme involves ICM, one of the top talent agencies in the world, and one of its legendary agents, Gilardi.” Robinson claims there were certain words exchanged between Rockwell and Gilardi — “the phrase ‘found a star’ was code to Gilardi that Rockwell had found a new victim for their scheme of sexual exploitation” – that show they were “co-conspirators”.
The complaint also claims that Robinson “has since learned that this scheme has ensnared other girls who were ’hip-pocketed’ at ICM”, maybe as many as “hundreds”, without providing any details.






Let the self-defensive women bashing commence.
We all know 95% of what the woman claims is probably true…
Absolute BS enough said…Jack is straight up guy and anyone that knows him well knows this is nothing more then a bitter wannabe
“Grumpy Old Men III”
i have known jack for 25 years and i dont believe a word of this charge.
I don’t know if one should laugh or cry. Cry at innocence exploited, or laugh at the idea of a modern 23 year old woman being swapped around by a 79 year old and a 74 year old pair of devious rump riders with a promise of a future in the industry. 23 is a bit old to be led down that garden path isn’t it? Maybe I ‘m the one who is naive.
When an 80 year old agent at one of the top 5 wants to ‘hip pocket’ you and you’ve never even stepped foot on a set in your life, that shouldn’t raise any red flags, right??? Please. What world does this person live in…? Not saying it’s right but c’mon. It’s not like this is a new phenomenon.
Good luck with this one. Why not outlaw flirting? Why not outlaw being told you’re talented and never having that talent come to fruition? So she was hit on in 2007 and then rapped, and then someone committed sexual battery on her? After the first finger goes in your butt, maybe you shouldn’t take any more meetings with ICM. And if that does happen, call the cops then! Don’t wait. It might appear calculated.
absurd. this one won’t hold up in court.
of course it’s not her fault she’s not booking things. it’s never the actress’ fault they don’t book.
I am absolutely disgusted at some of these comments – the tone of it being fine is just..disgusting. This woman could be your daughter, your sister, your wife…someone you know, anyone.
It disturbs me, as a young female just starting out in this industry, how this is being taken.
Regardless of however it seems, RAPE is not right. Sexual assault is NOT right.
Christ….wow. I hope this attitude isn’t as prevalent…hell, I even feel like joining Women in Film now.
Horrible.
I have never posted before in my life but follow this site as I am a former LA suit. Jack is a really, really good person. I remember when I was at AFM years ago and Jack was with JCVD at a party I was with my elderly mother who adores JCVD. She had a one of those box cameras and Jack asked JCVD to please be patient with my mother’s camera and JCVD must have fumbled with it for three or four shots at Jack’s coaching. So look, it sounds to me like Jack had this friend who was a jackass and that’s it. This kind of stuff happens all the time out there but not by me when I was there and not by anyone I knew, like Jack.
Nice backup plan, fail miserably in trying to make it big, so just sue to get rich! Gotta love it. Did she hire Gloria Allred?
Ridiculous lawsuit that just by the phrasing not only appears baseless, but completely devoid of an understanding of Hollywood practices.
Suggesting hip pocketing occurs in situations as quid pro quo for sex is absolutely ridiculous…
Does this lawsuit realize how often males are hip pocketed?
Actors and actresses are hip pocketed, particularly at ICM, for a variety of very legitimate reasons:
1) They don’t get involved in the covering process. If a client is “officially” represented by the talent department, all the different covering agents are expected to know who that person is and get them auditions. Meanwhile, hip pockets are the sole responsibility of the agents who “pocket” them, hence, covering agents aren’t burdened with the task of getting these extra auditions.
2) You often hip pocket new actors during a trial period in which you get feedback from casting agents to determine if they’re as good as you think, before going through the more formal process of officially adding them to your list and the agencies list.
3) Hip pocketing often occurs as means of currying favor with managers – where an agent will agree to represent a client, but knows that they could never get the rest of the talent department to agree to lift a finger for the client or add him or her to the official client list (for submissions to breakdowns, covering assignments, etc.)
4) Star clients friends / children are often “hip pocketed.” Same with the progeny of network executives and studio chiefs. I won’t name names, but this is a common.
5) Sometimes lit agents dabbling in talent / an assistant / a coordinator will hip pocket an actor to get their feet wet, usually because they really believe in them. (I personally hip pocketed a 10 year old kid as an assistant at ICM, because I wanted the money from having the next big kid star and did so off the clock – not for any “RICO sexual exploitation reason!” Absolutely absurd)
All of this hip pocketing revolves around legitimate business reasons – and none of it involved some sort of criminal conspiracy that is being implied.
Jack Gilardi is an extremely upstanding older gentleman who has been nothing but great to his clients throughout his many years. Everything I know about his personal life suggests to me that this is a baseless accusation against him. He is a very respectful gentleman who treats women well.
To label hip pocketing a client that a manager asks you to as a coordinated conspiracy to sexually exploit is ridiculous. Jack would probably agree to hip pocket any actor whom a long time friend asked him to co-rep – so this accusation of him knowingly trying to exploit a girl who sounds unstable at best is complete fantasy.
It clearly seems they are only including ICM and Gilardi as a defendants because they perceive ICM as having the deep pockets.
Hey WowWah -
My mother, sister or friend would probably be aware of the sexual danger that prevails for most women and men in this business. If you are truly that naive or idealistic in 2009, I’d suggest googling Women in Film ASAP and putting them on voice-activated speed dial.
Just my opinion…
I’m late to this conversation but hip-pocketing isn’t a euphemism for anything sexual. It just means that the agent can’t/won’t take a client on officially, so they agree to unofficially represent them until they prove/don’t prove that they deserve to get repped for real. I have no idea what’s true or isn’t true here, but to straighten out the terminology …
I don’t care about he said she said lawsuits but:
“All of this hip pocketing revolves around legitimate business reasons – and none of it involved some sort of criminal conspiracy that is being implied.”
That’s a nice internal rationalization and true to practice but a real load of shit legally.
As bonded agents of the state Talent Agents at an “ICM” actually have a FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBLITY to their clients. By hip pocketing the talent the legal responsiblity client is thought to be voided but it’s not. And the hip pocketing is done at the potential expense of the agency’s license from the state by not operating under the legal parameters of representation.
Just another reason for the state Attorney General to investigate the current system of agency industry practices. Especially after the merger of WMA/E is concluded.
Huh? What? Nah!
Jack was my 1st agent in the late ’80′s when I was 22 & had absolutely no idea what I was doing. I’m a girl, a former model & he and his assistant George (Climbus?) were nothing but kind & courteous, getting me the best meetings including 1 w/ Michael Piller @ Star Trek: The Next Generation that changed my life.
If there’s any truth to these allegations I would be completely stunned.
this is someone who is clearly looking for their 15 minutes of fame. Jack is a legend and a true class act. Jack deserves better than this, and Nikki, as someone who usually tells it like it is, i’m surprised you wouldn’t call this out.
Unfortunately, seems like this story has legs — Merit? Who the hell knows. I do know that girls (and boys alike) should follow the two golden rules in Hollywood. Never screw for work, and if someone touches you without your cooperation, bite, kick and scream until they knock it off! I know, I’ve been there, and it’s painful. Especially the biting!
She’s kidding, right? This is the most ridiculous thing I think I’ve ever read… C’mon, really? Gilardi? not in a million years. Sounds like a shunned “escort” to me… I’m just sayin’…
Reelbusy…
None of the practices traditionally considered ‘hip pocketing’ necessarily violate fiduciary responsibility to clients under laws and statutes governing agencies.
Tell me exactly how hip pocketing violates the legal parameters of an agency’s state license? (besides in cases where non-agents, i.e. assistants, within an agency hip pocket talent – in which case most would offer up the defense that they were merely managing a “friend” and aren’t acting as an agent)
A huge portion of Hollywood, and all business for that matter, operates under verbal and handshake agreements until money is actually on the table.
Similarly, most agents don’t regard hip pockets as outside the legal protection they are bound to uphold as licensed agents of the state of CA. They are generally afforded all the same legal protections but not the same formal standing within an agency – including the processing representation agreements, inclusion on official client rosters, being submitted by covering agents, etc.
This is merely a verbal, informal arrangement entered into for the expediency of both parties.
Should the government ever get involved in re-policing the industry, managers will be the real target.
It sounds like the above poster is trying to cover her tracks. If the old devil finally goes down then she’s worried about her exposure – if there’s anything untrue about these allegations I would be completely stunned.
I know the old devil better than all of you.
You people should be ashamed. The basic response has been “what did she expect, it’s Hollywood.” Grow up. Pathetic.